See this comparison between the PS3 version and the Xbox 360 version of SEGAs Vanquish. Hint: Click on "Full-size image" to view the images in their original size. Which version do you prefer?
the only difference its that the ps3 version is v-synced so no screen tear at all but the 360 version isn't so it has slightly more responsive controls and higher average framerate
Really, -0.5 fps less on PS3 make it less responsive. DF is really amazing.
ps3 is triple buffered = no screen tear, but slightly more input lag 360 is double buffered = some screen tear, but slightly more responsive, and higher fps and no the fps difference was more than .5
the 360 version is a jittering mess of screentearing, digital foundry are talking crap watch the gametrailers review the 360 footage flickers and tears all over the place. The PS3 version is vastly superior vsync and triple buffer is crucial on a game like this.
I played Vanquish and it was a pretty quick. I'll wait for Lens of Truth to confirm the "unresponsiveness".
@Gago From ps360frame youtube demo analysis: - http://www.youtube.com/ps36... - http://www.youtube.com/ps36... XBox360 : 29.108 fps / 11.611% tearing PS3: 28.614 fps / 0.000 tearing 29.108 - 28.614 = 0.494 fps See?
@above dude http://www.eurogamer.net/ar... at 00:14 360- 30 fps ps3- 18 fps DF: "The key difference seems to be that the Xbox 360 goes for a conventional capped 30FPS, double-buffer approach (losing v-sync when dropping under the target frame-rate in order to maintain fluidity) whereas the PS3 game employs triple-buffering, effectively ensuring that there is not a single torn frame any time during the gameplay experience. The Xbox 360 version feels a touch more responsive, but whether this is down to the double-buffering or a slightly higher average frame-rate is something we'll need to take a look at in more depth with the final review code when it appears. It's also worth pointing that while the tear-graphs in the video suggest that the tearing is a problem on 360, the neutral colour schemes combined with minimal lateral motion make it far less noticeable than you would imagine."
Lol, they're still exactly the same. Live with it.
all that means jack crap. I am not going to sit 3 inches from my screen to see when and where a frame dips or tears. The game is another testament to good developers being able to make a game as identical as possible. It is a fun game on BOTH platforms. One sided whiners just get over it.
I'm the biggest PS3Fan-bitch(babe take your pick...lol) on this site and im with the 360 on this one, or maybe its the triggers...because in the PS3 version they changed the shoot/dash buttons so it throws me off...lol
Played both on my television, didn't read the article.
I thought the PS3 looked better too when I played it.
they look the same 2 me congrats sega
Since I don't have this superior vision that fanboys seem to possess, they both look the same to me.
STOP WITH THE GOOGLE TRANSLATE! If it's just comparison shots, link to the original article!!
Who cares. Just play games.
both versions look great so really I don't see any need to say anything other than nice job to the developer. 2nd, Why do we allow this "google translate" non-sense to get approved?
i see the 360 one more clean.
lens of truth and digital foundry said both version were identical
Maybe but in the photos of the article that we are talking about 360 ones looks better for me.
Yeah... that's call fanboy-vision.
shingino When you don't have arguments to discuss something you just put names and start to act like child...or wait maybe you are a child.
I played both, virtually no difference. Whoever says there is a difference is simply delusional or a liar.
Yea I agree bro, I've played both as well and I couldn't tell a difference from either version. This nitpicking is pointless. I don't how much longer this can go on for seeing how DF got called out by one of the guys from Lucasarts for their face off Star Wars: FU 2. But I guess if they have guys like Gago who pay attention to crap like fps and screen tear they have nothing to worry about.
I do like the DF comparisons. But remember the motion blur crap they came out with about 360 being better, when infact it's the other way around and told by the actual devs. This game is pretty close on both systems, but yes slightly higher fps on 360, no screentear on PS3.
the lighting and anti aliasing on the 360 loook half a generation ahead of the ps3 version tbh. I thought we all learnt 2 years ago that the 360 cant be beat when it comes to cross-platform comparisons?
Superior 360 FFXIII confirmed, right?
thats the only game you can name? i can name you like 20 that looks better in 360.
I bet I can name 20 the bots claim look superior when they infact can only pick the difference with their analysing machines, not thier eyes. You guys crow over the tinies difference in a shadow or texture while totally ignoring PS3 exclusive rape all multiplats.
funny thing is, there is nothing to compare to since it is exclusive. anyone can say anything. How do you compare them? They did a good job for both version so who cares. Seriously, do you guys buy console to play game or for bragging rights?
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.