Some brand new gameplay screenshots of Crysis 2 (without interface) and some awesome comparison shots between Killzone 2 and Crysis 2.
as they are both unreleased games but have both been shown to the public? wouldnt that be abit more fair, than comparing crysis 2 to a game thats 1year and 8 months old?
Admit it Crysis 2 looks better than KZ 3
Well, Crysis 2 may have more realistic graphics, but KZ3's (and 2's) art direction is what makes them so beautiful. ;)
uh, what? i would give you that KZ2 and 3 look very good. but art direction? really? pretty sure about 50% of the games this generation use the "no color as art" art direction. hell, look at just about every unreal engine 3 game.
Killzone is not I any way pretty. Impressive, yes, but pretty, no.
Why didnt the site state it was pc against ps3? Tryin to pass off pc footage as console footage WHAT IS THE POINT? sites like this should be ashamed of themselves
why did they choose those two kz2 screens, theres no scenery like in the crysis ones just explosions. Theres not even much to compare it to. Its not really a comparison when the things in the pictures are so different. what they couldn't find a kz2 screen with the guy aiming at a few enemies?
Yeah, it looks so much better than Killzone 3 that they had to use Killzone 2 to make Crysis 2 look comparable. (rolls eyes) Besides, I get to play both; you get to hate me for it. :D :P
Crysis 2 hands down.
@Shikoro so you admit it that crysis 2 have more realistic graphics?
I would be disappointed if Crysis 2 on a quality gaming Pc didnt look better than Killzone (insert number here) on a four year old console. Ditto any game on a four year old console TBH.....should be bleeding obvious.
"Crysis 2 looks better than KZ 3" On consoles? No. (No AA, ugly bloom effects, etc) On PC? Duh.
Sorry guys, but when i read some of these ridiculous fan boy comments it pretty much discredited this whole reply chain (Sorry to the few mature commenter). RIDICULOUS, N4PS3G proven once again.
I think the fact that everyone tries to outdo PS3 graphics is a solid testament to how incredible the PS3 tech really is. PS3 sets the benchmark for this gen's graphics...not PC...not Crytek... If you ask me, that's way more than I expected when I bought a PS3 at launch.
unreleased vs unreleased....GAH! both will look amazing, both will be playable on PS3, SO WHO CARES! (unless they don't have a PS3...) this article is
crysis 2 and killzone 3 cant be compared because they both have totally different approaches to the art style. crysis 2 goes for an ultra realistic look where as killzone 3 goes for a more artistic but more atmospheric art style, which one you prefer is entierly down to which graphics style you prefer. Me personaly im just going to play them both and not bitch about it
@above "crysis 2 goes for an ultra realistic look where as killzone 3 goes for a more artistic" agreed " which one you prefer is entierly down to which graphics style you prefer" Me personaly im just going to play with the ultra realistic look.^
lets see what they caught...
Ah man.. I hate this german site. -.- Nice screens though.. *thumbs up*
Why do people always compare these two games? Shouldnt it be like Halo vs Killzone
There shouldn't be any comparisons since they always draw hate from people... :(
Calm down bro
I think Pokemon_Dawn9 is just a 12 or 13yr old kid because his comment is pure immature.
These german comparison websites are so damn annoying.
Another retarded comparison by a foreign website. Why do they even bother?
And that HAS to be the console Crysis 2 cuz it doesnt look better than the first.
lol crysis/warhead/crysis 2 all have 128bit HDR on the PC version at least, how the hell does KZ2 have more realistic lighting, and look at KZ2 textures or colour palette...*vomits*
no. In KZ2, I would see a neon blueish purple light ray and turn 180 degrees around and it would bend so that I would still see it when I've obviously turned away from the light source. Realistic, I think not. In Crysis, however, this phenomenon didn't occur and it looked much more like in real life[the rays were noticeable but not too extreme] because in real life light rays don't look like blueish purple spears coming in to lay siege on your eyes.
Exgamer, the FP for HDR with these consoles is comical at best. The 9700PRO in early 2000 could render higher floating point precesion for High Dynamic Redndering for light effects. When the PS3 or Xbox360 can render 128bit HDR, then you can say its lighting effects are better.
Both look good and I'll be buying both
I think I recognize these screens as being from the pc trailer. So we are going to compare pc screenshots with PS3 console screens nowadays? If so, then I am even more impressed with KZ2 than I already am. And we are not even talking about KZ3. And please show me some from the PS3 build; I don't believe I have seen a single one.
FFversus13 and MGS:R gonna be miles better than both kz3 and crysis !
*yawn* Über Scheisse. Wake me up when someone posts an HD Crysis vs. Crysis 2 PC comparison. That's the only comparison I care to see. I wanna see how much it improved from the original.
Why they doesn't compare the CRAPPY Console Version of Crysis 2? Uh??? Idiots.
graphically and technically halo is well up there with any other console game to date
. http://www.youtube.com/watc... http://www.youtube.com/watc... looks good on console... xbox to the lower right
Oh great. Another "versus screenshots" article again. It's pathetic how people can't just enjoy their games without always having to compare it with other games.
killzone aint the only technical marvel game on a console http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...
I had to choose to disagree with you. While I agree that Killzone 2 is not the only graphical marvel, I don't agree that Halo: Reach is another. When I think graphical marvel on consoles, I think KZ2, GT5, U2, GOW3, etc. Soon, I'm sure (or at least I hope) I'll add Rage to that list (and maybe Elder Scrolls 5). But until then, the PS3 holds all the graphical marvels in my book.
Those shots weren't taken at the same resolution or some was lost in the killzone shots because i own both games and killzone doesn't look as good as if it was on my tv in my living room. I think crysis 2 might have it beat regardless but personally i like to actually be involved in the action and not run around a giant island shooting down trees. Maybe thats why they drastically changed the scenery, because they finally realized that people actually want action and not feel like a gardner!
just shows you the high regard of KZ.... I dont see Crysis being compared to other games I am playing Reach or MW
just gotta lol at the KZ haters... how frigging transparent can you be... and for the DAs please linky me to the compare of Reach or WW with Crysis.. go try and find one
it's disillusional PS3 fanboys that make these retarded comparisons, it's not even close or ever will be get over it.
Suck it or delete your account.
The last guardian says hello. And UC3 while it hasn't yet been shown, ND says it will look better than UC2 which is still a graphical benchmark a year later.
Graphical benchmark ? for who ? For me crysis 2 was, is and will be the no 1 graphical benchmark and after that Kingdoms. UC3 - "ND says it will look better than UC2" - and my Chinese friend says that he don't eat cats and dogs also he claims to has ps4 and that he has used 100% power of ps3.
these screens for crysis aren't from the console version of the game. Its so funny how you trolls act like your 360's can match ps3 exclusives in the graphical dept, but its okay, deep down inside you know the truth. I dont wanna sit here and argue with kids, but I will say that crysis 2 on the pc looks pretty, but Im not gonna spend 300 bucks on one graphics card just to run this on high settings when I can buy 5 ps3 games like Twisted metal, infamous 2, Killzone 3, motorstorm apocalypse, Dead Space 2 with move support. BTW, I could get crysis 2 on my ps3, but why would I wanna play an average shooter with good graphics? I only play fun games.
then no killzone purchase for you huh cause that game defines generic
Remember Kids Cryengine 3 Crysis 2 is Real time all the time
So how many disc will the 360 version of Crysis 2 be? I know it won't fit on one DVD.
Sorry to burst you bubble but Crysis was only 1 Dual Layer DVD Crysis Warhead was 2 DL DVD but this was done for convenience for people that only wanted online
SIGH installing vs. not installing you do know that Crysis 1, once installed and uncompressed, added up to about 14gb of game data? or more than 2 xbox 360 usable DVD9s? (6.5gb each of usable space)
They must have to compress the hell out of their data to get it all on one disc.
Sorry your wrong I don't believe you have Crysis My Crysis Installing on my 500GB HDD is 6.54GB Plus I would be shocked if they use almost 3GB out of 9GB for security on 360 discs Crysis Warhead on the other hand requires 2 installation becuase of the way they did it the single and multiplayer. Crysis Warhead 6.24GB Crysis Wars 5.36GB @ Holeran No compression at all, most PS3 games could fit on 7GB discs and even some exclusives done touch 10GB, all you got to do is look at the PS3 torrent sites
With my dual graphics cards killzone 2 gets blown away big time by crysis its not even close. The textures a mile away in the distance is better than anything that killzone 2 can make. Yet alone in a open world like crysis. It doesnt have the crazy physics crysis has either when you shoot a tree or blow up a building it falls apart in countless pieces.
In these shots Crysis 2 looks much better but they appear to be PC shots. The real comparison will be when we actually see the PS3 version.
I hear that the PC version of Crysis 2 is visually great and runs pretty well but the console versions (Xbox 3600 and PS3) are a mess. To compare a PC product running the latest PC hardware to a console version of a different game is a pretty lame grab at click-throughs.
Most people have been happy with where the 360 campaign is at in terms of graphics/performance, but apparently the mp is running poorly
So my understanding is, that there comparing The best PC FPS game to a very limited CONSOLE FPS game tsk tsk...... There goes to show if the PS3 had about 1 or 2 gigs of RAM it would of been able to be just as, if not more capable of surpassing a high end PC both Graphically, and In game Physically.........
Don't kid yourself If you want better Graphics and Physics on PS3 you need to get rid of that Cell B.E and RSX
I can't tell the difference between crysis 1 and 2. I'm sure if I study them more carefully I'd be able too, though I have to say I'm not too impressed ,you'd think that the newest iteration from a supposed talented developer would look marginally better..hmm....
What is there to improve?
killzone 3 looks so much different than killzone 2 lol
Don't you all think it would make more sense to compare killzone 3 to crysis 2 but when their both finished & released in 2011?Also why is anybody coparing killzone 2 a finished & released 2009 game to crysis 2 a unreleased & unfinished 2011 game in the first place?
people are dumb thats why, i'll be owning both so i'm not losing sleep over this. just hope the console version of crysis 2 holds up.
crysis 2 will own...
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.