490°
Submitted by sub85 1382d ago | screenshot

Medal of Honor PS3 vs Xbox 360 vs PC HD Screenshot Comparison

In this comparision they checked the graphical differences between the PS3, Xbox 360 and PC version of Medal of Honor. Hint: Click on "full-size image" to view the screenshots in their original size. (Medal of Honor, PC, PS3, Xbox 360)

buying1999   1382d ago | Spam
enkeixpress  +   1382d ago
... Wait for Digital Foundry's & Lens of Truth's articles :)
#2 (Edited 1382d ago ) | Agree(16) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
RageAgainstTheMShine  +   1381d ago
DF? Digital foundry is another site on Microsoft's payroll XD
Dlacy13g  +   1382d ago
But, but .....
I have to say...I like the screen comparisons when there is a glowingly large issue. But really.... I look at the 3 and I am not OMG wowed by any one over the others.
Fishy Fingers  +   1382d ago
What did they do to the PC screens, Set it at 720 and put on minimal AA? Hardly fair, why not show it at it's best.

Consoles look pretty damn close to me, slight colour difference, but nothing you'd know about while playing.
Chaos Striker  +   1382d ago
Apparently Eurogamer's face-off gallery shows the same minimal AA. It could be possible that the developers did not enable AA in the PC version, but I am not quite sure. Here is a link to the Eurogamer face-off if you are curious:

http://www.eurogamer.net/ga...
Fishy Fingers  +   1382d ago
I played the beta, the options were very much the same as any other PC game. AA and filtering upto 16X etc. The game had practically no jaggies for me, thats not whats shown here.

It looks like they're using low-medium settings (texture, shader etc) at 1280x720 and maybe 2xAA.

Thats like showing one console version at standard def or something.
#4.1.1 (Edited 1382d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(0) | Report
CobraKai  +   1382d ago
Thanks. That was a MUCH better comparison.
bviperz  +   1381d ago
Mines is set to 2560x1600, med settings (for smoother movement during intense firefights) and 2x AA and it looks awesome. Oh, and those are the setting in MP.
Zinc  +   1382d ago
My opinion, so whatever:

PC looks the best, hands down. You can tell obvious differences in color saturation, lighting, shadows, textures and smoothness.

Interestingly enough, the PS3 version actually looks better to me than the Xbox version, which is unusual for a multi platform title.

EDIT: To any disagree. Actually look at the images. There are subtle and not so subtle differences between the Xbox and PS3. Look at the second picture with the shadow being cast by the man against the truck, the PS3 shadows appear to be better. The PS3 texturing appears more alike to the PC texturing, which is better than the Xbox version. The Xbox version has more jaggedness to it than the PS3 version. The color saturation on the PS3 is more akin to the PC, than the Xbox version.

I call it like I see it.

Hopefully, people can look at things objectively.
#5 (Edited 1382d ago ) | Agree(11) | Disagree(11) | Report | Reply
moparful99  +   1382d ago
Ps3 is better at streaming textures but the blur affect from the AA is the only negative I see anymore.. People scream screen tear this, and frame rate that but honestly 99% of the people that play these games can't see nor tell the difference.. Anything over 20fps is indistinguishable to the human eye so that whole point is moot...
GoldPS3  +   1382d ago
1st PC
2nd PS3
3rd 360
acky1  +   1382d ago
I think the contrast of the 360 looks better making it ever so slightly more appealing to the eye. Just my opinion.

Doesn't look fantastic on any platform it must be said.
niceguywii60  +   1382d ago
Are you guys out of your minds? The PS3 version has weak contrast and sharpness and inferior lighting compared to the PC/360.
#6.2 (Edited 1382d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(14) | Report | Reply
pedrof93  +   1382d ago
Did you u saw the bad shadows on 360 ? Or the less sharpen graphics ? 360 is inferior than PS3(the super white should be off to have better contrast). PC wins but the graphics still look bad.

360{PS3{PC
#6.2.1 (Edited 1382d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(3) | Report
TheIneffableBob  +   1382d ago
I have to agree.
PC > PS3 > 360

360 version has slightly sharper textures sometimes than the PS3, but the lighting and shadows in the PS3 version are better. PC version has the best everything, including colors. PS3 is a little washed out with the colors, but it's close to the PC version; the 360 version's colors are a bit over-exaggerated.
XtremeHDGamer  +   1382d ago
PC>>PS3>XBOX360
xg-ei8ht  +   1382d ago
PC/PS3/360

Same as.

Rage PC/PS3/360
Crysis 2 PC/PS3/360
Blacktric  +   1382d ago
So you played both Rage and Crysis 2 side by side or you are just another sad troll?
#8.1 (Edited 1382d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
zeksta  +   1382d ago
My Comparison:
Starting from Picture 2 through to Picture 5.(Sorry, Pic 1 won't load :/)

Picture 2: Not sure how many of you guy's took observation, but the shaders are at least on a medium for PS3, while Xbox is on Low and PC is on High. (Look at the man's hand shadow to see what i mean) you can also see also of Pixelation and Distorted Textures on the 360.

Picture 3: Now, i'm really not sure what the hell is up with this, PC looks like it's on Low here and the textures look utterly disgusting for the PC, in-fact, PS3 looks better apart from shadows, also again, 360 has major Shadow Distortion and screen tearing as far as i can see (Look at the top of the picture).

Picture 3: Okay.. now the PS3 has screen tearing down the bottom and has anyone looked at the gun, the back of it now looks 2D and massively pixelated, but anyway, same as previous observations.

Picture 4: Now, here is where we can get a good look a the guys face!, As far as i can see the PC's resolution is majorly low, textures low, hell PS3 looks better right now, 360 is slightly more distorted and has alot more Jaggies for some odd reason.

Now.. as you can see from my observations, it's pretty accurate, but these pictures were not taken correctly, and especially the PC version, the only thing on THE PC that looks better is shadows, that's it!

Overall.. Shitty Website.
#9 (Edited 1382d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
siberian-bullet  +   1382d ago
Considering i was made on ps3. It looks the worse for me
pedrof93  +   1382d ago
You were made ?
thabigboss  +   1382d ago
haha didnt know people can be made on a ps3.wow what a machine the ps3 is.
moparful99  +   1382d ago
ps3 it only does cloning.
theonlylolking  +   1382d ago
HAHAHA LOL you have to be joking
SuperStrokey1123  +   1382d ago
Can we just not have links to translated pages anymore?
CobraKai  +   1382d ago
How's the texture pop in, something that UE3 is notorious for? Honestly, I would get the version that has the least pop in. (not counting PC since mine isn't all that)
EazyC  +   1382d ago
It's nice and all looking at screenshots on each platform to see which one looks the best, but past the unnoticeable technicalities there is barely a difference when playing the game. To start arguing about it is very childish.

As a side note, I find it very strange that the PS3 version technically doesn't look as good as the Xbox 360 or PC versions, considering it was developed on PS3. Like I said though, talk about clutching at straws....
xg-ei8ht  +   1382d ago
EazyC

The PS3 version is alot closer to the PC version in most things, shadows and textures, 360 has a dither problem on shadows, it also tears more.

But hey, you can keep thinking the 360 looks better, while most know this will be the same with rage and crysis.
hoops  +   1382d ago
"But hey, you can keep thinking the 360 looks better, while most know this will be the same with rage and crysis."

And the irony is because this site is full of fanboys, if Rage or Crysis looks better on the Xbox360......well you know whats going to happen....
AND GOD FORBID if Crysis 2 or Rage ends up looking better than all other games and the Xbox360 is the better console version...N4g.com WILL IMPLODE LOL
ATi_Elite  +   1381d ago
IMO:

This game has crap graphics and it's obvious it uses the Unreal Engine 3 or a modded version either way the UE sucks.

The fact that all three versions look similar is a result of lazy programming.

The PS3 and 360 versions should have very noticeable differences because of each consoles strengths and weaknesses.

The PC version is just a straight 360 port. no more to be said about that;(

The multi-player looks better as it uses the Frostbite Engine but again no real work was done there either to put out the best product for each platform.

if the game is totally awesome and innovative then fine but right now MOH is a cookie cutter FPS Hybrid-Clone with average graphics.
Rhezin  +   1381d ago
I'm not buying ANY shooters this fall
because they all blow ass. I think I'll wait for K3 and The Duke. Oh and Krayzie, couldn't agree more dude, the UE engine f!cking blows, UNLESS Irrational games utilizes it. They're doing some amazing sh!t with Bioshock: Infinite.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

The Daily Five: Great Video Game Remakes

37m ago - "While gamers will always desire new and innovative game franchises, sometimes we just have to re... | Culture
20°

For Your Amusement: Kim Kardashian: Hollywood

37m ago - Colm Ahern: "Recently, the video gaming public were up in arms over Kim Kardashian’s entry into t... | iPhone
30°

The Walking Dead: Amid the Ruins Review| GamesFiends

37m ago - "Hard to care for a character that you don't know well enough or the in-game cast ignore the pass... | PC
20°

Rise of Incarnates Beta Detailed, Sign-up Launched

37m ago - Hardcore Gamer: Bandai Namco Games has today detailed the upcoming closed beta for Rise of Incarn... | PC
Ad

Looking for a great Pokemon Community?

Now - Look no further. Join us at the BulbaGarden Forums, the best community for everything Pokemon | Promoted post
40°

4 Things You Need to Know About Sherlock Holmes on PS4

37m ago - Olga from Frogware: Fictional detectives rarely go gently into the night; devotees of the long-... | PS4
Related content from friends