Medal of Honor PS3 vs Xbox 360 - watch the following videos in HD:
Xbox 360 version
Pretty Obvious who the big winner here is. Xbox 360 version looks much better than the PS3. Wasnt PS3 lead platform?
"Xbox 360 version looks much better than the PS3." You posted that comment the minute this video went up so there is no way you watched both.
Ya you can notice some major jaggies on the ps3 version, but thats to be expected Im getting this for my ps3 anyways since its just been collecting dust lately
Jaggies? You seeing things troll.
Exclusive content > Jaggies
360 looks kinda blurry...
I think it's pretty obvious who the Real Winner here is. I mean which version has it's Limited Edition Bundled with Medal of Honor: Frontlines HD which has it's own Platinum trophy? Hey, More bang for your $60.
Both versions have horrendous screen tearing. I watched them both at the same time and every time there was screen tearing my eyes noticed immediately. Graphics wise they are both pretty equal, the 360 version looks a little darker but that's about it. I don't expect a multiplat to have major differences. Anyways this game looks boring as hell, I lost all faith in MoH after Frontline on PS2, Airbourne was crap and very glitchy. Maybe this game will be different.. I'll probably just buy this for the BattleField 3 beta and play a little of the SP..
EA never that were trying to make a superior PS3 version, they just made it lead dev console, to ensure that the PS3 wouldn't receive a shoddy port, well done EA.
Here we go (again)...
here we go again.again.
I think I'll wait for DF or LoT analysis...Well not like I'll buy the game, but still curios nonetheless.
so should everyone
meh...both looks the same to me...PS3 is just darker imo... im gonna get on PC n e way...no prob for me
PS3 version has more subtle lighting which makes it look more real.
pixels 250, 379 and 489 are missing from the 360 version. That's unacceptable./s
They should just get it over with and rename this article 'TROLLBAIT'
Or create a new comparison section, that you easily can avoid.
Like you can't read that out of the title, can you?
Good idea for a site tbh. Do some comparisons, submit to n4g, ???, profit!
360 ftw . to those who disagree: it's a fact. Don't get angry with me. At least prove me wrong. Ooops you can't. I enjoy my ps3 but multiplats games run better on the xbox
we're talking about a multiplat. I own a ps3 so your attempt at causing some fanboy rage is a waste of time sucka. edit: still no replies proving me wrong lol. N4g: ps3 fanboy land. I'm waiting to be proven wrong about 360 running multiplats better than ps3. Come on ps3 fanboys where are you? This is your chance
I don't really disagree with you. I think it's been proven on a lot of games that the 360 versions are generally of a slightly better standard. More often then not, it's a negligible difference that most people wouldn't care about at all. It's usually down to 360 being the lead platform What my point is, that doesn't prove any hardware capabilities. It proves how much effort, or lack of, a developer puts into the port. There are games out there which are great on both consoles because the developer works hard to port it well What's important is the exclusive games. They push the advantages of the said console and show what it can do. The fact that exclusive games on ps3 walk all over exclusive games on 360, shows that the hardware of the ps3 is more capable then 360 to push out technically more advanced games. So when a multiplatform game is worse on ps3 then 360 (mostly a petty difference) it's obviously not down to incapable hardware, but lazy devs
"It's usually down to 360 being the lead platform " *cough* bull. EA use ps3 as lead, then port to 360 because it's the more flexible console. It can do anything the ps3 can and more hence why they code on the lowest-common-denominator then port it across. ps3 holds back the 360 and has been for some time now :)
lol 360 is easier to program for. That's all If ps3 is holding 360 back then show me a game that looks as good as uncharted 2 Show me a racing game on 360 that has 1080p @ 60fps like GT5 does. If I recall, the cars in GT5 have double the polygons forza 3 cars have, plus GT5 has 16 cars on track racing while forza can only handle 8 ps3 is holding 360 back is it? *sniff sniff* *sniff sniff* what's that? ....oh it's the distinctive smell of BS
lol Ever since the PS3 has become the lead platform for many developers, MP games have been looking better on both consoles. The only thing the PS3 is holding back is the 360's first place position my delusional little fanboy. =P
edhe, hm, yeah, the PS3 is holding back the 360, like a game as Castlevania. 2 disks there, one here. Yet PS3 performs better and the game pushes some serious boundaries, not just on the PS3. Must be the PS3's fault it doesn't fit onto one DVD9, I guess. Or FFIX, but that was just a bad port, right? Anyhow, I see no difference in that comparison between MoH 360 and PS3. Both look pretty fantastic, IMO.
Have you watched them both?? Honestly they do look very similar, ill be getting this game, take off your glasses.
which means not exactly the same. All you did was help my argument rofl. I win
That's one of the main reasons (besides Live) that I refuse to get rid of my 360. I happen to like a lot of multiplats more than exclusives and I want the system which runs them best and that's the 360. I don't have a great PC, so the 360 is a must have. Even if MOH was better on the PS3, there's still tons of other multiplats that perform better on the 360. It's a shame really.
Yep, that is true. For multiplats PC is the best way to go, but if you cant or wont get a PC for gaming then the 360 is the next best way to go. The PS3 makes itself useful by having some nice exclusives.
The majority of multiplats are so close as to make no difference. You know that. There are very few multiplats that look appreciably better on either system, but they exist on both. You know that too. Stop acting like a few less pixels is some game breaking defect. It's funny how this is suddenly the multiplat generation when every other generation has been about exclusives.
You say that in almost every article. It's almost like you are trying to convince yourself. Look, if all you have is a PS3 don't worry about it. Ignore these articles and just enjoy what you have. However, you are flat out wrong about the differences being a matter of a few pixels. That is another meme that I hear a lot of PS3 owners repeat. As if the differences can only be detected by special machines and are almost non-existant to a human observer. None of that could be further from the truth. There are often some very noticeable differences between the different platforms. How many times have we seen one version (usually the 360) run well, without screen tearing and undue amounts of jaggies, while the PS3 version is sub-hd and has tons of screen tearing, slowdown and jaggies? It happens more than you would like to admit. But even when it isn't that severe there are still real reasons why a multi-console owner will choose to pick up one version over another. For instance, if one game lacks anti-aliasing and the other doesn't most people would instinctively choose the one with anti-aliasing as the better looking version. Just something like anti-aliasing can make the difference between a good looking game and a great looking game.
@starchild. I hope he says it in future articles also because it's true. This isn't the 06-07 era. Maybe there was a huge difference then, but now the difference is so minor, you would really have to look for the little screen tears here and there or the few pixels. ( yes that is all it really is) I don't know how long sites like Lens of Truth or Digital Foundry have been around, but if it wasn't for sites like that, no one would really care about the small differences and just play the games like they're supposed to. Sounds like you're the one who is trying to convince himself to me.
"But even when it isn't that severe there are still real reasons why a multi-console owner will choose to pick up one version over another." Uhh, I'm pretty sure the majority of multiconsole owners buy their game on a certain platform simply because of their preference. Maybe they like Live better. Maybe they have more friends on the PSN. Maybe they prefer one controller over the other. The majority doesn't care if one platform has slightly better AA or a slightly higher frame rate over the other. I lost count on how many multiconsole owners all over the internet bought FFXIII on the 360 just because they prefer the controller (lol) and the achievements even though it was graphically inferior to the PS3 version. Also, didn't Bayonetta sell more on the PS3? So yeah, the majority of MP games are too close to even matter. If they require frame rate analysis tools, I don't think anyone would notice any difference.
That is if UE3 is being used, which this game is using for Single Player.
Multi-platform titles are usually always better on the Xbox 360 platform in terms of performance & looks.. But... We will have to wait until Lens of Truth & Digital Foundry get their hands on each version of the game which shouldn't be too long now. :)
Still don't know why people disagree with this after years and years of proof.
Because this is N4G.COM silly
It looks great on both.
way better than MW2 for sure its quite impressive, lets see of BO looks better than this, but it def. looks nice a little cookie cutter...but wtv
They look kind of similar I guess. At the end of the day, even if the 360 version does look better like many here are saying, why does it matter? I don't see how having a multiplat game look better on your system of choice gives you bragging rights when they're completely negated by exclusive titles that graphically and technically, these multiplatform titles can only ever dream to reach. I guess, when you can't brag about quantity of quality you settle for second best....superior multiplats :/
I am not getting pulled into which is better but I agree it shouldn't sway which you buy. Also as for the million comments about 360 has multiplatform games well.. since no 1 360 game can beat the top looking ps3 exclusives I think PS3 has nothing to prove in the fact it doesn't only match the 360 in terms of graphical power it surpasses it so if a game does look better on 1 console compared to the other it's down to the devs alone nothing to do with the consoles (sometimes with good reason like ff13 was developed for ps3 first for 2 years then 360) . Damn fanboys and there tunnel vision makes me sick..
but...but...but the ps3 was the lead platform and it suppose to look better. The 360 version looks superior in every way i guess it is the most powerful console.
LOL! Imagine if world leaders made decisions using your system of logic... epic fail
o_O LOL COMPARISON FAIL. He's right.
Are you retarded sir? 360 plays a multiplatform game better than the ps3 and its the more powerful console? Get your head checked cause the ps3 has exceeding 360 games graphically for years now..
Ghostbusters was lead on the PS3 as well and it still performed better on the 360.
Just shows, you can screw up everything if you don't put enough effort in.
do you enjoy your bubbles FrigidDARKNESS? As with dumb comments like that.. They ain't gonna last long..
Time to make something out of nothing again. Sweet.
Yeah. For some reason, this has been the generation of the multiplat instead of the exclusive like it's always been before. One platform has better exclusives, and the multiplats require side by side, pixel counting comparisons to see the difference. It's funny to me that the people on the other side of the argument gloat about those extra pixels. I won't bother replying to the trolls above with any logic or truth, because they won't get it and I'll just get another warning for doing so. They say this site is controlled by the PS3 crowd. What a laugh.
360 version looks much brighter, higher resolution.
Have a look don't be blind. I screenshotted them both at the exact moment, 360 clearly higher res like most multiplats it's no different.
Could you MAKE them images any smaller to prove your point?
I don't see what your seeing. Look the same aside from a slight difference in lighting and/or gamma.
LOL Too desperate.
After playing the PC beta both consoles look pretty rough. They should of stuck with one engine and developer and focused on getting the best results they could. Not a bad looking game, but both consoles are capable of more.
I think its time 4 the people on the interwebs 2 stop comparing ps3 and 360 games graphics wise since its more than obvious pretty much everything looks better on microsofts console. It should be better to compare wii with ps3 and 360 with PC. PC will obviously win in the later battle but who will win 3rd place between the low budget hardware consoles?
I should just help you on your way to another bubble, just so I can laugh at your comments. I mean, wow. Were you the top of your class at clown college?
I disagree everything 'looks better' on 360. The 360 graphics appears often darker which is then perceived as 'better' when in reality PS3 offers far more realistic and complex lighting effects. It's a question of taste but graphically the 360 doesn't come close to what PS3 can offer.
I like the black levels on 360 better, but PS3 will have superior sound experience.
Cool, 'cos i've got a TV, but not a 7.1 surround system. I'll go for the better looking one then.
The jaggies on the ps3 version cut into my eyes, same reason why I bought Batman on 360. PS3 needs to learn how to use anti aliasing more often. 360 wins as usual.
thats why Batman AA 360 version won the Lens of truth comparison right?? http://www.lensoftruth.com/... ohh wait ps3 won.... seriously your name is enough reason for ppl to ignore your stupid comments.
The tearing on the 360 version is much much worse, if you cannot see that your a nublet. This game will be forgotten quite quickly anywayz. With Black ops coming.
game is meh... not a buy or even a rent here.. dont care what the vids look like