Try our new beta!Click here
Submitted by AhmadVGArabia 1957d ago | opinion piece

Uncharted 2 visuals on Xbox360? Yes, indeed.

Castlevania: Lords of shadow is shaping up to be one of the most visually stunning games of this generation. (Castlevania: Lords of Shadow, PS3, Xbox 360)

Attached Video
« 1 2 3 4 »
DasBunker  +   1957d ago | Well said
With the camera angle 500 feet away you can make anything look like U2 lol...

keep dreaming.. 5 years and counting

its pure flamebait, why couldnt he just say the game looks stunning and leave it at that.. oh thats right U2 is the graphical benchmark on consoles, but still flamebait.
#1 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(142) | Disagree(31) | Report | Reply
immortal84  +   1957d ago
@ DasBunker
"ts pure flamebait, why couldnt he just say the game looks stunning and leave it at that.. oh thats right U2 is the graphical benchmark on consoles, but still flamebait."

It isn't flamebait. The author mentioned that he wrote an article in June and he listed five games (Lords of Shadow is one of them) that do have the potential to match the best visuals seen in many PS3 exclusives. Also Uncharted 2 is the graphical benchmark on consoles so comparing it to Uncharted 2 is rational.
#1.1 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(15) | Disagree(73) | Report | Reply
DasBunker  +   1957d ago
@ immortal
and the point is?.. still flamebait.

@ acky

"People on this site will automatically react negatively to any comparison made with the almighty uncharted 2 and any hint at it being better than it.

Then people might understand that graphics don't make a great game, only add to one. "

so youre OK with the comparisons then you go on about how graphics dont make a great game? and what "hints"? we have eyes too you know and its lame cuz none of the games compared to U2 come close to it.. EVERYTIME. its just for hits.
#1.1.1 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(31) | Disagree(10) | Report
MrMccormo  +   1957d ago
It should be telling that every game coming out keeps getting compared to Uncharted 2 (nearly a year old), God of War III (several months old), and Killzone 2 (over a year and a half old)...

We've all heard this "as good looking as Uncharted 2" hype before. Don't believe it until you see it, and I've definitely not as good looking as U2. it's a beautiful game, but not even close to U2.
acky1  +   1957d ago
Why so many disagrees for immortal's comment....?
Everything he says is true.

People on this site will automatically react negatively to any comparison made with the almighty uncharted 2 and any hint at it being better than it.
I really hope crysis 2 looks better than uncharted 2 to see how people react on here.

Then people might understand that graphics don't make a great game, only add to one.
boodybandit  +   1957d ago
immortal84 " Uncharted 2 is the graphical benchmark on consoles so comparing it to UC 2 is rational"
Rational or not it's definitely not reality.
Uncharted 2 is clearly the better looking game.

How many articles are we going to get like this? The only, at least so far, games that surpass PS3 exclusives are other / newer PS3 exclusives.
#1.1.4 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(37) | Disagree(4) | Report
nycredude  +   1957d ago

The only reason why people react this way is because we have eyes and we look at the screens and videos and we played Uncharted 2. it's freaking clear as day none of these games match up. If it did then I would be impress. At the moment it's just FUD and flamebait trolling for hits.

Uncharted 2 can hang with most pc games IMO, and I play all my pc games on max settings.
MaxXAttaxX  +   1957d ago
Both version of the game look great
even though the PS3 version performs better(according to GameSpot, IGN or whatever)
#1.1.6 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(12) | Disagree(6) | Report
acky1  +   1957d ago

It's always ok to make comparisons with games...especially comparing it to such a good looking game. And of course graphics don't make a great game. Are you trying to argue otherwise?

I've never been obsessed with graphics in my games...thats why games like mario kart looks a hell of a lot better than modnation racers. I like visually pleasing games, don't care about the specs.
SilentNegotiator  +   1957d ago
GOW3 has even better graphics than Uncharted 2, and GOW3 has an even bigger scale than Castlevania.

Sorry, no go, flamebait writing vgarabia.
PSFan100  +   1957d ago
"Uncharted 2 visuals on Xbox360? Yes, indeed"

No, indeed. The animation isn't even close to uncharted 2. The character model here is too far away and you can't see a high level of detail on it. The character model doesn't even seem to get affected by water or snow unlike uncharted, Nathan actually gets wet and covered in snow. Look at the environment (bushes) in the video, it doesn't even move (or react) when he runs through it! My opinion is UC2 looks better not to mention GOW3, KZ2 (KZ3). Your opinion is this looks on par (article author) "Uncharted 2 visuals on Xbox360? Yes, indeed", so who's right?
pustulio  +   1957d ago
I seriously was going to say that PS3 fanboys will start bashing this and saying it's impossible and bla bla bla the usual BS But i watched the video and it's not like UC2.

I'm not the biggest PS3 fan but i'm sorry 360 comrades this is not like UC2, it does look good but to be honest it doesn't look like or better than UC2.
sikbeta  +   1957d ago
LAME... comparing a multiplat game on x360 that is probably, the same as the the PS3 version, with an Exclusive PS3 game? Please, that's not make any favor to the x360...
LastDance  +   1957d ago
Ok, im surprised none of you fanboys have actually brought up the REAL argument here.

Castlevania (Like God Of War) has a fixed camera position. Meaning that A LOT of bits can merely be rendering CGI 2D plains as oppose to full 3D like in Uncharted.

That is why this whole argument is null. Without a full rotatable camera, you can't judge what is great graphics and what is a great smokescreen.
MikeGdaGod  +   1957d ago
it does not's settled. no need to argue, we all can go back to playing games

EDIT: good point LastDance
#1.1.13 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report
DaTruth  +   1957d ago
Oh please just give it up already! These guys will never quit!

Stop gazing over at the other side of the fence and just jump over! The grass really is greener and has MLAA now!
#1.1.14 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report
SaberEdge  +   1956d ago
I'll have to see it on my own tv before I decide how it compares to any other game. Besides, does it really matter? It looks gorgeous without a doubt.
jellybalboa  +   1957d ago
woteva fanboys, still trying to be optimistic!!
sikbeta  +   1957d ago
You damn right... 5 years and not a single game that can be compared with the Holy Trinity = UC2 + GOWIII + KZ2 (next one is KZ3D)....
units  +   1957d ago
gow of war and castlevania now have something in common
ELite_Ghost  +   1957d ago
they both look good, just not U2 good...
UnSelf  +   1957d ago
god of war looks better than U2

U2 is just more consistent
ChozenWoan  +   1957d ago
oh.. the submitter was being serious.


Yea, every game not released for the 360 now looks as good as UC2... then it gets released and reality sets in.

number47   1957d ago | Off topic | show
TheBlackSmoke  +   1957d ago
Lol for real, so far this year we've been told on n4g that Splinter cell conviction, Alan wake and Halo:reach will beat Killzone 2 and/or Uncharted 2 in terms of graphics during the build up to their releases and then its literally been crickets and tumbleweed about it after its out. Same shit happens with Multiplats too and the next one to fail the challenge will be Crysis 2.
KiRBY3000  +   1957d ago
you forgot Metro 2033, it was supposed to outdo KZ2 visuals...
Triella  +   1957d ago
I agree with everything said above as great as Castlevania is, it does not compare to these games, fact :
#1.4.4 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report
Sony360  +   1957d ago
Good thing alot of these games matched (and in most cases surpasses) both games when it came to gameplay and multiplayer.
Scotland-The-Brave  +   1957d ago
But thats not what is being discussed here.We are discussing GRAPHICS. Its true though, every high profile game that comes out for 360 is touted as having better graphics than U2 or K2 or GOW3 and they always fall flat.
#1.4.6 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(1) | Report
jellybalboa  +   1956d ago
bubbles up 2 u sir
Aquarius  +   1957d ago
Heavy Rain and GOWIII has already surpassed Uncharted 2 2009's visuals

poor, poor 360 fanboys

first it was
Mass Effect 2
Alan WAIT!

number47  +   1957d ago
best laugh of the day.. well besides...

What do you call two wizards playing basketball against eachother?

Wand on Wand...

heyyoooo. Nah this was way more funny.
Rubberlegs  +   1957d ago
Heavy Rain looks garbage compared to Uncharted 2. Heavy Rain has some great looking character models but it so unpolished it terms of the level design. Some levels look good, others just don't mix right at all and look dated.

Uncharted 2 looks so good because of the polish that went into it and some amazing textures. Also all the big set pieces, any game can look good but for an action/shooter game these days they need those type of big set pieces that will set the game apart from others.
#1.5.2 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(6) | Report
Caffo01  +   1957d ago
i think U2 is still the king of console graphics...just my opinion!
Aquarius  +   1957d ago
you can't really compare Heavy Rain and Uncharted 2 because they're both opting for a different feel...

"Heavy Rain has some great looking character models but it so unpolished it terms of the level design"

is that it?
you must have not played Heavy Rain...saying its garbage, 95% of the time I was playing it, didn't feel like I was playing a game because it was so realistic actually TOO REALISTIC (it's not meant to follow the rules of your traditional game, it's about real life )

"but for an action/shooter game these days they need those type of big set pieces that will set the game apart from others."

So what about art? Castlevenia is very very artistic. Trying not to look at videos of Castlevenia because I don't want to spoil it, the art really stands out in that game.

Heavy Rain
GOWIII all offer a different vibe in regards to the graphics but each one is better than the other in terms of graphics.

Next up is GT5.
#1.5.4 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(2) | Report
karl  +   1957d ago
kratos looks extremely real to me...

uncharted 2 details are maybe unbeatable still i think GOW3 looks the best
Sony360  +   1957d ago
Poor, poor ps3 fanboys.

Forgetting about decent gameplay and harping on about graphics.
Organization XII  +   1957d ago
and probably K3 will surpass them all, hahaha while 360 fanboys will wait for halo4??
Scotland-The-Brave  +   1957d ago
Poor Poor xbots, feeling rather jealous are we?
DaTruth  +   1957d ago
he MLAA does a lot for GoW3 and the textures were just wild in that game. But the art direction in Uncharted 2 is stunning. Uncharted 3 will be mind blowing with MLAA.

Heavy Rain looks great but on a technical level it falls short, being that there just isn't much going on there like explosions and whole levels in motion that the other games have!
gameraxis  +   1957d ago
@ sony
yea ok kid, like u2 and gow3 didn't have excellent gameplay to match... i'll go as far to say a high caliber ps3 exclusive usually has better GAMEPLAY and better GRAPHICS than anything on the 360... wait until they fix the stuff in k2 and release k3 then go back and look at reach, and OPEN YOUR EYES, i just bought the 360 slim (second 360) first one broke 3 months after the ps3 came out and i made a decision to get the ps3, always loved the xbox 1 and ps2 now i like both now once again, but the 360 is simply outdated, not to mention the extra 78mb of ram sone released for the devs to use, that puts it over the 360 specs, and the type of ram in the cell is twice as fast as the 360's anyways... again i love both consoles and 360 games can def look great, but the astonishing looking ones are on the ps3... and look it up, there's a video that explains the cell architecture ram thing, so if u have 256mb of ram in the 360 and 256mb of ram in the ps3 (which is now around 330) the cell architecture and new ram pipelines transfer data twice as fast and that's being modest. before the disagrees look for the video
TK421  +   1957d ago
Uh No, and they can keep their wonky animations as well.
TK421  +   1957d ago
They're trying their best to get hits
#1.7 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
TheBlackSmoke  +   1957d ago
Just go and play the train chapter from Uncharted 2 and this article becomes so lol worthy.

Naughty Dog didn't get all those awards for nothing, Castlevania really looks good but its not touching one of the most well received games ever made in ANY department.
Brklynty1  +   1957d ago
Uncharted 2 comparison #2335453454....
No xbox game, nor multiplat will best a ps3 exclusive. can we just drop it now?
MorganX  +   1957d ago
eh, have you seen the snow in UC2? It is possible. It may not have been done yet, but of course it can be done. UC2 isn't "that" good. The overall presentation hasn't been matched though. Based on this video, neither Castlevania or Naughty Dog can do snow in HD yet.
gtsentry  +   1957d ago
thats wat killzone 3 is upto
Brklynty1  +   1957d ago
show me snow better than uncharteds dude
trust cant
MorganX  +   1957d ago
UC2 has no snow, and from the looks of it neither does Castlevania. Why would I go looking for snow, when I have UC2 and that Castlevania clip. Finding other snow isn't going to change the fact that snow in both are masses of white pixels and nothing like snow.
bustamove  +   1957d ago
Lol, I laughed when I saw the title.
Jazz4108  +   1957d ago
uncharted and uncharted 2 are the king of the cartoon games.
4pocalyps3  +   1957d ago
hey man
you're forgetting about uncharted 2!
DatNJDom81  +   1957d ago
Wheres the logic in this? Castlevania runs better on PS3 according to many reviews and this game doesnt look as good as UC2. So it looks as good as Uncharted 2 on 360? As Das Bunker said 5 years and counting. As usual PS3 exclusives are still the benchmark on consoles. Funny how 360 fans knock them but are dying to have a 360 game reach that level. Guess they're green with envy.
gamerdude132  +   1957d ago
In which case, God of War 3 looks horrible. Killzone 2 looks horrible. Gears of War 2 looks horrible, Halo Reach looks horrible, Unreal Tournament 3 looks horrible, Splinter Cell Conviction looks horrible, Batman Arkham Asylum looks horrible, Metal Gear Solid 4 looks horrible, Grand Theft Auto IV looks horrible, Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 looks horrible, and inFamous looks horrible.

Man, who even approved this? We're having stupid conversation over whether or not Castlevania looks decent compared to Uncharted 2. Why can't you accept the fact that THE GAME LOOKS FANTASTIC and move on??
ABizzel1  +   1957d ago
The environments yes, everything else no.

It's comparable on one aspect of Uncharted and that's the environment.

The character models are only detailed in cutscenes, and the camera is zoomed so far out it's hard to get a good look at them.

The game looks good, but not U2 quality just yet. That goes to show how much quality went into Uncharted 2, it's nearly a year old and still has little competition outside of other PS3 exclusives for best looking graphics.

IMO there's the Uncharted level which includes games like (Uncharted 2, God of War 3, Killzone 2, Heavy Rain, Flower, Gran Turismo 5, and Crysis PC). Those games represent the best of their genre and platform as far as graphics are concerned. After that then the next tiers come such as FF13, Mass Effect 2, Assassin's Creed, LBP, Forza 3, etc...

And Come 2011 there will be more games entered into that top tier.
#1.14 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
doa766  +   1957d ago
GN gave Uncharted 2 10 in graphics and 9.5 overall
GT gave Uncharted 2 9.8 in graphics and 9.3 overall

IGN gave Lord of Shadows 8.5 in graphics and 7.5 overall
GT gave Lord of Shadows 9.0 in graphics and 7.9 overall

if you think that looks as good as Uncharted 2 you fall in one of the follwing groups:

-xbots in deep denial who still plan to buy Kinect and play with that tiger

-people who never played Uncharted 2 on a HDTV

-people in dire need of glasses


no game on 360 beats Uncharted 1 in terms of graphics, a few match it but none clearly surpasses it

and god of war 3, killzone 2 and uncharted 2 are on completely different level, far from what the 360 can achieve
shoddy  +   1957d ago
any multiplat games with decent graphic is U2 killer.
next they will say Crysis 2 on console then Rage, then until 2012 maybe they will catch up.
FACTUAL evidence  +   1957d ago
if this has
UC2 visuals, then I'm bill gates..........this looks cool, but uc2 is cuttin it.

Related video
#1.17 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
gameraxis  +   1957d ago
agree with bunker
looks great, but still, people who don't have an eye for what advanced tech u1 and especially u2 used will say ( oh it looks just as good) but its probably missing half the detail, differed rendering ( in k2's case ) and i personally think GOW3 is the new graphics king but that's just me... throw a few green plants, rocks, and some good lighting and people that don't know what to look for go (OMGZ IT LOOKZ JUSTZ LIKEZ UNCHARTEDZ)
#1.18 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Raikiri   1957d ago | Off topic | show | Replies(1)
wat634   1957d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(7)
bananasNmonkeys  +   1957d ago
#4 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(14) | Report | Reply
zetsuei1  +   1957d ago
From what i have seen at HD videos, not a chance in hell.

Besides Uncharted 2 is a 2009 game they needed all that time just to REACH (and not surpass) UC2 in graphics?! Seriously that sounds even more lame than awesome.
Shaman  +   1957d ago
This looks incredible,agreed.Definitely up there with the best,definitely best looking game on 360.

But nothing beats UC2 because UC2 has best production value and polish.
units  +   1957d ago
visually maybe
but technically it goes to reach

Reach is an enormous leap over its predecessors and competitors on 360 and an exciting example of a first-party exclusive that genuinely pushes the console into new technological territory - something we don't see so often on the Microsoft platform.


@Shaman visually and technically are two completely different things
#6.1 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(27) | Report | Reply
Shaman  +   1957d ago
Nope not really.I mean Reach is huge and it looks damn nice(something similar to what Insomniac does with RE on ps3) but it just doesent go for best when it comes to looks.Its technically great,with great per object motion blur,lots of a.i,huge sandbox level etc.but UC2,GOWIII,KZ2 and now Castlevania are all above.

Castlevania is pretty impressive technically also to be fair.Amazing lighting,camera motion blur and per object motion blur,stunning textures,vistas,artstyle...bes t looking multiplat IMO and it looks like its like for like on both consoles...
#6.1.1 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(3) | Report
TheBlackSmoke  +   1957d ago
Yes Reach is a graphical leap over Halo 3, but Halo 3 looked like an uprezzed version of Halo 2 so its not saying much. Reach is what Halo 3 should of looked like 3 years ago and before you say nothing looked as good as Reach in 2007, Uncharted says hi.
UnwanteDreamz  +   1957d ago
Did you even read the four page article you linked? It doesn't support your claims. They really only say it is technically the best shooter on XBOX.
#6.1.3 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(2) | Report
Arnon  +   1956d ago
Dynamic motion blur, the same Anti-Aliasing technique that Crysis 2 uses, increased water shaders, an enormous draw-distance that doesn't hinder any aspects of the game, v-synced, etc.

"With a framebuffer setup ideally suited to living entirely within the GPU's attached eDRAM, Bungie can enjoy optimal processing conditions, allowing it to really go to town. The very first campaign level is an effective showcase for the key revolutions that Bungie has made on a technical level. As Noble Team first touches down, you're treated to the richness of the terrain, and the sheer scale offered by the mammoth draw distance - which Bungie reckons to be four times higher than Halo 3."

I mean... what part of this article did NOT talk about the technical aspects of the game? It honestly sounds like you opened the article, went to page 4 and read the last paragraph.

"Evolutionary in many respects, sure, but where it counts Halo: Reach is the revolution we've been waiting for: a genuinely superb game with a combined feature set that pushes Xbox 360 performance to the bleeding edge."

And even then, it still states that it's one of the most technical titles out there, so I'm not sure how it doesn't support his claims.
UnwanteDreamz  +   1955d ago
Wrong, the author is clearly compairing the game to older Halo titles when it calls it a revolution. The author in fact never compairs the game to anything other then other Halo games. If he were saying that the game was technically better than any other console shooter then why in 4 pages of words he never says it?

You must have read the whole thing, saw one word, and thought you had me. Sir reading comprehension must not be your thing.
Shoko  +   1957d ago
No, sorry.

The author pointed out ONE moment of that video (1:30) where the game looked visually impressive. You shouldn't have to do that. If that game is up there with PS3 standards, it's going to have to look like Uncharted 2 ALL THE TIME. Also, that part used a lot of lighting - lighting looks great, period. There's some lighting in WII games that make them look almost 360 quality, but we know they're truly not up there. It's just the effect the light has on our eyes. Notice the darker, duller parts of that video - they didn't look as impressive did they? Exactly.
AhmadVGArabia  +   1957d ago
@ Shoko
You are wrong. The author wanted you to skip to 1:30 because those visuals looked similar to Uncharted 2 colorful visuals. If you watched the whole video you will see that the game look stunning in almost all areas.
#7.1 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(16) | Report | Reply
Shoko  +   1957d ago
So now we're talking about color? How desperate. "Oh look, the color scheme is similar!"

And did you not see the beginning of the video? The areas that are brown and redish? Doesn't look amazing at all. And by "ONE moment", I meant one area, cause that area continues on for the rest of the video. But you get the point. There's a reason why the author told you to skip to that part. He didn't want you to see how unimpressive the beginning of the video looked.

But like frostypants said below, I agree that it's an amazing-looking game. Best multi-plat I've seen IMO. It's just still not up there with GT5, U2, and GOW III.
#7.1.1 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(11) | Disagree(4) | Report
SaberEdge  +   1956d ago
Yeah, but there are parts of GOW3 that don't look any better than that part either.
frostypants  +   1957d ago
It DOES look visually impressive. Let's be honest. It looks excellent. But any claim that it looks as good as U2 is pure hyperbole. Still, that doesn't mean it doesn't look damn good.
#7.2 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
theonlylolking  +   1957d ago
Very well said I must say. A lot of people see great lighting and think OMG graphics are so awesome. Just like in gears 3 they make lighting dynamic and many people are like holy s*** it looks amazing. It looks great but amazing? I dont think so.
#7.3 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
jack_burt0n  +   1957d ago
looks like alot of people talking that haven't played it, its good and def has a polish you only normally find on ps3 games but its not that good at all.

and you have to remember the 360 has the bad port according to all the reviews so nothing to boast about.
units  +   1957d ago
ill wait for lens of truth or digital foundry before jumping to that conclusion
Woodrow  +   1957d ago
Drugs make people Dumb!!
ChozenWoan  +   1957d ago
So don't do drugs mmmkay!
Rockstar  +   1957d ago

It looks impressive don't get me wrong. But not UC2/GOW3 level detail...

BTW 3:36 and on looks impressive, can't wait.
#10 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
sdtarm  +   1957d ago
Yeah and the water effects are the same if not better than UC2 as well as the detail in the character/s

Christopher  +   1957d ago
Thank you for the laugh. It was much needed.
TheMailman  +   1957d ago
This title must be the LOL of the year...
MaximusPrime  +   1957d ago
hand that crown to MS many comments they made.
Gam3s4lif3  +   1957d ago
Pretty cool
jaosobno  +   1957d ago
Dream on xbox, dream on. Not even close when you wake up.
ChozenWoan  +   1957d ago
speaking of Waking Up
... wasn't Alan Wake supposed to be the UC2 graphics challenger.
Hank Hill  +   1957d ago
Yes it was but when it was released no one bragged about the graphics anymore.
TheBand1t  +   1957d ago
No, it doesn't.

Still a very pretty game to look at though.
KratosGirI  +   1957d ago
Here we go again...
KratosGIRL  +   1957d ago

Yeah I know :(
#17.1 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Blaster_Master  +   1957d ago
LOL! You 360 fans are bragging about those linear levels and then try to compare them to Uncharted 2?! Hahahaha! Wow, as much as you guys envy the beast known as Drake, yall should really think about investing in a machine thats been doing graphics and games better than this since 2007. Hahahaha! Thanks guys I needed that.
theonlylolking  +   1957d ago
Uncharted 2 has a little bit linear levels but bigger draw distances than castlevania.
blahblah  +   1957d ago
as much as i prefer uc1 gameplay wise. getting on the top of the hotel and looking at the city floored me down. abnormal draw distance with most stunning view ever in any game.

second thing that floored me down were physics on the train. damn, i could almost feel the real train shaking and every curve blended so wonderfully into movement.

castelvania looks wonderful, i mean really wonderful. but, compared to uc2 still crap
SaberEdge  +   1956d ago
Nonsense. This is where people go way off the deepend. Saying Castlevania looks like crap compared to Uncharted 2 is pure delusion. It may or may not quite stack up to Uncharted 2, but it is definitely close.
theonlylolking  +   1957d ago
LOL when I saw castlevania I said"wow these graphics are bad but the blur effects are really nice"

Anyone that says castlevania has amazing graphics probably have not played uncharted 2(hd), crysis 1 max settings(hd), killzone 2(hd), GOW3(hd), etc...
jack who   1957d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(5)
Xbro  +   1957d ago
Implying any other game looks better than uncharted 2 that is released.

alex123123  +   1957d ago
at 0.20 that looks like old snakes eye patch :O
StuM   1957d ago | Off topic | show | Replies(4)
masterofpwnage  +   1957d ago
Why can't they compare anything beside uncharted or ps3 exclusive.
Maybe a 360 game.
frostypants  +   1957d ago
Same reason every FPS is compared to Crysis.
theonlylolking  +   1956d ago
Crysis does not look as great as it did years ago.
jacobdevos  +   1957d ago
it really astonishes me
that they didn't include uncharted's silky smooth animation system as 'visuals'. Because this games animations look about as fluid as a bed of rocks.
#25 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
SaberEdge  +   1956d ago
Why do some PS3 fans have to attack anything that isn't a PS3 exclusive? I don't get that.

The animations in fact look extremely good in Castlevania Lords of Shadow. You don't have to be so defensive of PS3 exclusives that you lie about other great games.
Hades1337  +   1957d ago
I couldn't give a shit about graphics if the gameplay doesn't match up.
#26 (Edited 1957d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
You Noob  +   1957d ago
Ehhmmmm... ehrrrrr... mhhhhh...

NO =)
lochdoun  +   1957d ago
GREAT Article!
The power of DirectX.
Skadoosh  +   1957d ago
I own both consoles and love me some Uncharted but I seen games on the 360 that are on par with Uncharted 2. Playing on my 55 Panasonic Plasma, I can clearly see that games like Alan Wake are just as good graphically.
gtsentry  +   1957d ago
nycredude  +   1957d ago
Dude Alan Wake isn't even the same resolution as Uncharted 2. What a fail bro.
Skadoosh  +   1957d ago
what does resolution have anything to do with it? You kids don't understand nothing. MGS4 is an amazing looking game and that's not even 720p.
ExplosionSauce  +   1956d ago
MGS4 is 768p
Christopher  +   1957d ago
Perhaps in your opinion they look as good as one another, Skadoosh, but technically they just don't add up.
UnwanteDreamz  +   1957d ago
Your opinion. Mine is that you are full of it.
JonnyBigBoss  +   1957d ago
Misleading title. Castlevania looks good but not even close to Uncharted 2.
Motorola  +   1957d ago
its a forest, thats the ONLY WAY it looks like uncharted. Uncharted 2 was more than a forest....
« 1 2 3 4 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Kona: Day One Preview | Hey Poor Player

15m ago - Hey Poor Player's Jonathan Trussler writes - "Kona: Day One – Parabole’s first episode of their p... | PC

Why MMOs Should Keep the Trinity

2h ago - Liore presents a compelling argument for keeping the holy trinity in MMOs. | PC

Check PS4 Release Dates for 2016 at

Now - Check our release calendars to see what games are coming out this year. | Promoted post

Review: The Witness (Sony PlayStation 4) | Digitally Downloaded

2h ago - DD: I never thought I’d like a puzzle game this much, and I can’t believe a game that isn't a JR... | PS4

Review: Pokemon Rumble World (Nintendo 3DS) | Digitally Downloaded

2h ago - DD: Alternatively, you skipped past the free-to-play game, which means you are either unaware it... | 3DS

Review: Mini-Games Madness Volume: #1 - Hello World! (Nintendo Wii U) | Digitally Downloaded

2h ago - DD: The best part of Mini-Games Madness Volume #1 is its menu screen, which features psychedelic... | Wii U