Submitted by BIoodmask 1774d ago | opinion piece

Why Halo Reach Is the Most Disappointing Game of the Year

It's hard for one to feel a sense of overwhelming emotional tragedy when, even during the admittedly effective ending, everything is as scenic as a tropical island tour. The island just happens to be a bit foggy sometimes.

Worst of all, Halo: Reach doesn't have any memorable moments outside of its lead into Halo: CE, and your final moments (as a nameless, numbered nobody). (Halo: Reach, Xbox 360)

« 1 2 3 »
MrMccormo  +   1774d ago
Okay, I don't think Reach deserves all the hype nor the high scores (my opinion)?

But most disappointing game of the year? I doubt that.
Moonboots  +   1774d ago
I only disagreed because I feel it's worthy of the praise it has received. It's a good game and at first glance at the title I don't agree with that statement at all.

Haters gonna hate.
Cevapi88  +   1774d ago
its less about hate and more about getting hits....sites like these dont have an affiliation to a console or a certain brand....they come up with these titles to get people to click and read...easy money if people get pissed off...that's their whole business plan, i can just imagine a meeting in which they go "hmmmm, what title can we come up with to piss off gamers this time, OHHH I KNOW, lets rag on a game that is a 4 million first week seller"
Natsu X FairyTail   1774d ago | Personal attack | show
StanLee  +   1774d ago | Well said
It's funny; the writer claims to be a fan of Halo and to have waited for the game for 9 years but claims to be disappointed. The game is pure fan service, start to finish. No memorable moments?! SMH. I'm sure we'll see more articles like this in the coming weeks.
Redrum059  +   1774d ago
Wow, ppl are realy out to destroy this game. Why though???
DasBunker   1774d ago | Off topic | show
Windex  +   1774d ago
There are two sides to this....
there are haters who tries to bring it down and who tries to talk about overhype.

and there are xbox fanboys who try to exaggerate into best game ever....

it's got 92 on metacritic and 8 reviews were from site with "xbox" in their name.

i think it is a great game, but the ads, marketing and fanboys made it bigger than what it is.
OSU_Gamer  +   1774d ago
@Natsu X FairyTail

"The Influx of lames Rushing to this articles is huge. "

Thats odd...because you are already here.


Have you played it??? How do you know that it was made bigger than it actually is. People on this site tend to make it smaller than what it is. Did you ever think about that?

"it's got 92 on metacritic and 8 reviews were from site with "xbox" in their name. "

So no PS3 game gets any reviews from sittes/magazines with Playstation in the title. GTFO

Not to mention that just because a website consistse purely of xbox related content doesn't mean theat they are automatically fanboys that give the game higher scores than it deserves.
#1.1.7 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(18) | Disagree(18) | Report
Sez  +   1774d ago
@ windex
The same can be said about both factions. There's also sonyfanboys that will always over exaggerate a game or exclusive like it the second coming. I can name a few but that's not the point. I do agree that there are haters on both sides. But your clearly trying to make your arguement one-sided.

Edit: oh and I'm sure if you check many of ps3 exclusives/multiplat game score on metacritic/gameranking you will also see a lot of ps site reviewing the games and giving it high scores.
#1.1.8 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(15) | Disagree(9) | Report
psman012   1774d ago | Off topic | show
Sony360   1774d ago | Trolling | show
inveni0  +   1774d ago
bitmob.com: "You know why Halo: Reach is the most disappointing game of the year? Because we want hits!"

That being said, I could actually understand being so totally hyped for what is, arguably, the final of the best your system has to offer. If it's not a 15 on a scale of 10, then you're naturally going to feel a little sad that it's over, and that it's not a 15. I liken it to how I felt after The Matrix: Revolutions.

THAT being said, an article that was genuine with such a bold statement should be written as more of an homage to the game than a list of complaints.
Spydiggity  +   1774d ago
did any of you bother to read this article before accusing him of being desperate for hits or being a sony fanboy?

the guy clearly loves the halo franchise and is obviously quite familiar with the story, so even if he likes sony, it has NOTHING to do with it. second, the article is rather well written and the points he makes are spot on. i felt EXACTLY the same way while playing it.

i mean, come on, here we have a company (Bungie) who KNOWS this game is going to make a billion dollars and yet they gave us nothing new, nothing impressive, or amazing. they just gave us another budget title banking on the name. don't get me wrong, reach has rejuvenated my love for the halo multiplayer, and is better than ever (i play it at least 2 hours every night); but the single player is exactly what this guy said...boring. i wouldn't say you shouldn't buy this game, cuz the multiplayer carries a TON of weight, but if you're the type of person that only plays a game for the campaign, reach is a swing and a miss.

i do agree,however, that the title probably should have been different.
Spydiggity  +   1774d ago
double post, i'm sorry.

EDIT: Let me just add this. what is the purpose of a website if not to get hits? that's why you make a website! it's a childish, immature, petty accusation that is absolutely pointless to make. The author is still entitled to his opinion.
#1.1.13 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(7) | Report
Windex  +   1773d ago
LOl @ OSU_gamer
yes i have xbox as wel..

lol. i love the fanboy rage though.

i just counted review sites with PS3 on it. 4 out 100 sites has PS in the site name

Halo reach 8 out of 60 review sites with xbox in the site name

again i love ur fanboy rage
#1.1.14 (Edited 1773d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(7) | Report
Dee_91  +   1773d ago
yea its dispointing
that its the last one
Sony360   1773d ago | Trolling | show
SaberEdge  +   1773d ago
When I see an obvious flamebait title like this I simply don't read the article.

It's not that people aren't entitled to their own opinions on Halo Reach or any other game, it's the fact that they make their titles sound like a factual statement which is a slap in the face to all those of use that really enjoy the game and think it is actually one of the best games of the year.
Garrus_Vakarian  +   1773d ago
I'm a long time Halo fan and I found the story disappointing. As anyone who's read the books would know, Halo: Reach retcons at least 2 books worth of canon. It's very disappointing that they made these retcons, and the product of the retcons doesn't even justify the retcons.

I'm glad 343 has complete control over the Halo series. Hopefully they'll have better consistency than Bungie did.

NOTE: Overall Halo: Reach is a fantastic game, though like I said, I'm disappointed in it's story. It's told in a good way. The retcons make it less enjoyable for me.
suckerpunch  +   1773d ago
haters gonna hate. all of the sudden everyone claims to prefer treyarch to infinity ward, clearly IW kicks trey in the groin when it comes to good quality games. trey's games never reached AAA status b4, until black ops actually do that then..............everyone is complaining there's no dedicated server for PC........blame who? blame themselves for not purchasing the game for PC, PC gamers pirate the damn game, the sales of modern warfare 1 is like tiny tiny portion of the total sales, i know customers always right but all the PC weiners do not give IW enough incentives to support them more. Halo reach is disappointing........blah blah blah, ask that idiot one thing.....which console game actually packed theatre mode, forge, firefight, crazy multiplayer offerings, crazy customization, campaign, campaign co-op, great graphics(i said great not some of the best ok), cool soundtracks, tight FPS gameplay..............into one game ? developers have limited time and fund for each game,do your damn maths, being able to implement so many shit in one game with these limitations is mighty impressive, bungie is phenomenal and as phenomenal as they are, they are not god! of all the shitty developers out there making A games and worse you don't bash you bash halo reach and bungie, tell me how are you suppose to promote quality and value for money in this industry ? my way is to criticise top developers hoping for further improvements from them and give them credits and praise for their wonderful achievements and contributions but not entirely dismissing them for little flaws. so......the safest way in this industry is to make AA games right because people will call you a great game, underhyped, underrated, unappreciated.......right ? everyone will be like ohhhhhhhh... poor game, i will buy you. all the constant hating and bashing halo franchise received has slowly diminished its popularity and acceptance, halo games are rated lower and lower even in metacritics, what many developers failed is to judge the game independently of its predecessor, scored it lower because reach is pretty much been there done that due to past interations, how about for people who never played halo before ? why is halo reach scored lower than halo 3 when its significantly significantly better (even if halo 3 is released in 2007 and reach is 2010), i know, because reviewers are either influenced, exactly like the rest of the haters or have to satisfy haters with their unreasonable blind hatred.


lousy website looking for hits.
when a game is as popular as modern warfare or halo, it's is easy to be used as resources to generate hits and fuss.
The Lazy One  +   1773d ago
"and there are xbox fanboys who try to exaggerate into best game ever.... "

Uncharted/2, Killzone 2, God of War, Metal Gear Solid 4. Seriously, go into any article on here and say "Uncharted has good graphics" and you will get disagrees because you didn't say "Uncharted has the best graphics."
LOOK_AT_THIS_I  +   1773d ago
@ windex
Do you not expect an xbox only game to get reviews from xbox related sites????

WTF did you expect a review from nintendo power or something?
I agree most reviews nowadays are heavily edited and tend to leave out important details on games in order to remain neutral/favorable but damn man, your logic on reviews is retarded.
tacosRcool  +   1774d ago
I don't think Halo Reach deserves all the high scores. But you know other people write articles on popular games like Uncharted 2 and stuff
divideby0  +   1774d ago
totally agree with Mr. M.. I have about 15 hrs into the game and its NOT the most disappointing GOTY, but its far from GOTY that is for sure.

game is very good, and for 30 bucks I paid for it, its a steal (at BB)

btw... terrible article..
#1.3 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(18) | Disagree(19) | Report | Reply
wicko  +   1774d ago
Article made sense, but the title did not match the article. Bit of a sensationalist title if you ask me.

I had the exact same disappointment in the campaign. The characters were uninteresting and I just didn't care about them. I'm not a big fan of the Halo universe, but some personal character interaction would have made it much more enjoyable for me. The first Halo did a decent job of that with Cortana and the Chief, even if there wasn't much character development, their interaction was interesting.

But I get why they did it this way, if you like Halo lore, you probably loved this campaign.
SaberEdge  +   1773d ago
The characters were a lot more interesting to me than what you find in most shooters.
120FPS   1774d ago | Trolling | show
morkendo23  +   1774d ago
TITLE of article
Blacktric  +   1774d ago
"Halo 3 has issues, but it still stands out as one of the most exciting single-player games I've played. Launching up and into a Scarab from an ATV? That's awesome. Reach rarely feels like anything more than an exercise in walking up to buttons to trigger the next ho-hum cinematic. Even the slow-paced space battle bored me."

Completely agreed. They tried a more "human" approach with ODST and it was obviously a tryout for shaping up the characters for Reach. But hell it didn't work for me. Sorry, but when you build up a great franchise with memorable characters for 10 years and make the last game you make a prequel, I'm sorry but most of the gamers won't give a sh*t about what's gonna happen to the new characters that you choose to include into that game. We already knew how it's gonna end and a campaign like that makes it more and more unbearable. I even bought the Limited Edition so I could discover some secret things about the game's campaign/storyline, but it made me feel like I bought another MW 2 Hardened Edition.
ABizzel1  +   1774d ago
I had high expectations for Halo Reach, in that it would be the first halo game I'd actually buy, and so far it's been good, but not GOTY good. There a ton of multiplayer stuff, but most of it's recycled from the previous games which is fine.

Halo Reach deserves a 9/10
bjornbear  +   1774d ago
wow talk about flame bait + hit-seeking

every good games get these articles, just ignore them people!

let the author go play Nier or Kane and Lynche dog days,
n to the b  +   1774d ago
there it is again, "SMH"! what means this please??
hazbaz  +   1773d ago
@ n to the b
SMH = Shake My Head :)
DatNJDom81  +   1773d ago
The single player campaign was mediocre
Im sorry but it just didnt do it for me. But I wouldnt go and say that it was the years biggest disappointment. It had its moments no denying that. but all that praise is just overdone. Multiplayer is good though.
bennyace  +   1773d ago
It's wierd...
That most of the people agreeing with this article haven't or ever will play the game itself.
Scotland-The-Brave  +   1773d ago
and you know this how?
Domer25  +   1773d ago
"most disappointing game of the year"????
WTF is this, seriously epic flamebait.
"most disappointing article of the year" yeah fixed.
vhero  +   1773d ago
I kind of agree but if you get into the hype and get yourself totally physced and expect something extra special you will get so disappointed and probably think its the biggest of the year.
I also kind of agree with windrex it is a great game no doubt but it got rubber-stamped before anybody even saw so much as a screen shot as GOTY in their eyes because it was Halo and it would stay that way no matter how bad it was. I'm not saying it is bad far from it but its not GOTY material just a great 360 exclusive.
Marcus Fenix  +   1774d ago
Why Halo Reach Is the Most Disappointing Game of the Year?
coz bitmob.com wants hits.
awiseman  +   1774d ago
yes this totaly sumthing bitmob known for
trash halo to the ends of this earth cuz they jelous they dont hav 360's lol.
gonzodamus  +   1774d ago
Most websites do. It's how they get money :)
BeaArthur  +   1774d ago
Excellent analysis. Clearly they didn't play Crackdown 2.
pixelsword  +   1774d ago
Ugh, don't remind me.

If ever a game deserved a rental...
Hellsvacancy  +   1774d ago | Well said
I dont understand, y r they lookin 4 hits? maybe the dude or dudet who wrote the article ACTUALLY didnt like the game as much as it was hyped up 2 b, its there opinion

If u luv summin your called a fanboy and if u hate it your called a troll, people neeed 2 wake up becuase there stupid
ukilnme  +   1774d ago
"If u luv summin your called a fanboy and if u hate it your called a troll, people neeed 2 wake up becuase there stupid"

So true. Did you set your alarm or do I need to give you a wake up call? j/k
AKissFromDaddy  +   1774d ago
Well said :-)
drewboy704  +   1774d ago
Because all 4 million people who bought it were disappointed and are only playing it because they're Microsoft infested zombies. I'm joking for those of you that don't know and also I'm sure some were disappointed at parts of reach but really, The only people that say its terrible and disappointing are the flame-bait writers and people that haven't played it.
Scotland-The-Brave  +   1773d ago
or because they bought the game because of the hype, i have done that with plenty of games and they turned out to not live up to the hype. I just tossed them into my cupboard.
dizzleK   1774d ago | Off topic | show
awiseman   1774d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(1)
MR LOOKINGBILL   1774d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(3)
Shackdaddy836  +   1774d ago
I'm kinda getting tired of these halo hate posts....

Reach was good. It was definitely not a disappointment. Just look at all the people playing right now.
Anderson8  +   1773d ago
Reach is a good game, however, just because this guy doesn't think it lived up to the hype doesn't mean he's hating..there's a difference between hating and genuine dislike... ppl need to remember this
Eiffel  +   1774d ago
Desperation, oh how you affect those.
sayonara89  +   1774d ago
bitmob = joke
OSIRUSSS  +   1774d ago
If Reach gives Halo fans what they want,How is it "Most Disappointing"?
omi25p   1774d ago | Personal attack | show
Droid Control  +   1774d ago
Good gameplay
bad story.

It was boring and predictable, and failed to live up to the highs of the previous games.
iHEARTboobs  +   1774d ago
When something is hyped really high it'll always let some down.
To me Halo has always been about the multiplayer. Campaign from 3 and ODST were blah. I liked the fall of Reach story so I'm hoping for something epic with this game.
theonlylolking  +   1774d ago
Its a great game but if you where over hyped like my friend gets when any FPS is revealed then of course you will get disappointed.
electricshadow  +   1774d ago
I played this for about four hours last night at my friend's house. I had a blast playing it. It's really fun, especially online, but I don't think it's the most disappointing game of the year.
munish23  +   1774d ago
No way is it the most disappointing game of the year. I haven't stopped playing it since I picked the game up. I'm loving every minute of it. I think there are a lot more disappointing games out there than Halo Reach.
antz1104  +   1774d ago
I thought the storyline was pretty good, and each Spartan's death scene were a pretty epic way to go out or I was like "WTF?!" I don't know what the author was expecting; and he sounds pretty arrogant to expect the game to play out the exact way he's wanted it to.

To each his own I guess, you can't please everyone. But the majority of Halo fans thought this was a great sendoff for Bungie from the series, and I agree.
mricecreamman  +   1774d ago
agreed. the game as been always DISAPOINTMENT from the beginning! more like epic fail...only people that does not know true gaming would say halo is the greatest game ever (in reality it isn't)
antz1104   1774d ago | Personal attack | show | Replies(1)
STIKUP ARTIST   1774d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(1)
StarScream4Ever  +   1774d ago
As much as I find Halo Reach disappointing on my playbook, calling it Most Disappointing Game of the Year is just out of reach. The game is good, story is satisfying, characters are a little bland, but overall quality is better than ODST.
Lord Gunchrote  +   1774d ago
Better than ODST/ it damn well better be after the wait. lol.
HOSe   1774d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(1)
Lord Gunchrote  +   1774d ago
Halo is cool...Halo Reach is not any better than 3. Just because someone dislikes a game doesn't make them a fanboy...it makes whomever uses that dumbass term the fanboy.
#20 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(8) | Report | Reply
OSU_Gamer  +   1774d ago
There is a difference between disliking and game and writing an entire article calling that game the most dissapointing game of the year. Especially when it isnt's and a huge majority of gamers agree.

If I said I hated the playstation 3 and I thought it was terrible would you think I was a fanboy? I bet you would.

(Im not saying that though, I love my PS3)
#20.1 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
ukilnme  +   1774d ago
I thought logic was not allowed here on N4G. Bubble to you.
Horny  +   1774d ago
These articles are getting annoying, it's ok to dislike the game but most of the are written in a way that seems as if the wither is almost tryig to convince himself it's horrible. It has hype so they try to hate on it more than they really do
Horny  +   1774d ago
lmao @ my spelling, damn I phone

but anyways to add on Halo is a good game and you will have fun with it even if it doesnt blow you away
Hades1337  +   1774d ago
Absolute nobody websites bashing a Halo game as per usual. To my mind Reach is a better game than Halo 3.
Convas  +   1774d ago | Well said
I see a lot of conflicting opinions here. Some of you are saying "This guy is a total PS3 fanboy because he doesn't like Halo" and others are saying "So because doesn't like the game he's a troll and/or fanboy?"

This guy's number one problem is that he expected too much from the campaign. First of all, there were plenty of "Oh, no they didn't" moments. Like in Winter Contingency, when you first arrive, you see all the cryptic evidence that something horrible has gone down. Or when you got jumped by those Zealots in the Relay Station and they dragged the marine away with them kicking and screaming?

Or Tip of the Spear, how the entire mission goes to hell, they rework their strategy, and when it seems like everything's actually going to turn out right, BAM, Super Carrier shows up. Or in Long Night of Solace. A crazy plan becomes reality, they head to space, they get things going, plans are once again disrupted, a sacrifice is made, and it seems like things are actually going to work out (again) and then BAM!! The Whole Covenant Armada shows up.

Also, let's not forget, we're playing as Spartans, for someone who's read the books, you should already know that they aren't exactly a happy-go-lucky bunch. They're trained soldiers taught to rein in and suppress any type of emotion that may hinder the success of a mission. (Halo fan right? Riiiiight ....) Halo: Reach went from small time skirmishes to outright invasion in the lattter missions, so yes, the ALIEN APOCALYPSE was right in front of your eyes.

I won't say I wasn't a bit disappointed with some parts, I could complain that we didn't get to fight any Scarabs, that Bungie didn't experiment with various Malekgolo forms (Mini Scarabs and Super Ginormous Hunters from Halo Legends), and that they didn't do an Infection Survival/Co-Op mode with actual Flood Zombies (DLC FTW).

But besides that, Halo: Reach was a VERY memorable experience. Of course, everybody is entitled to their opinions, but this guys presents his viewpoints very badly.

"Wait, who the hell is that guy? What does she do again? Where is my squad during gameplay?" That depends. That's clearly outlined in Cutscenes, they get sent different places, they stay back and send you to do the dirty work, it goes on and on. Very lame question. And all the characters are introduced over time. Kat's the tech specialist (You'd have figured that out, especially if you and your friends were so "quiet" during cinematics. Emile's the Bad-ass loner, Jun's the Chatty Sniper, and Jorge is the Kind-hearted Heavy Weapons Support. Carter should be a no brainer right off the bat.

Really, I grow tired of these "Halo" fans complaining about things and not even trying to distinctly back up what they are saying. Playing Halo CE, 2 and/or 3 doesn't make you a fan son.

"Worse, half of 'em suddenly disappear altogether during the cooperative game, so I don't see them, never mind learn about them." This is pretty much one of the most retarted things I've ever heard. You're Co-Op partners take the place of the spartans who would've been playing with you DURING CO-OP.

A fan of the series would've been keen on this (If you'd been following Bungie's weekly Dev Blogs).

Again, everyone's entitled to their own opinion, but this guy is trying to yak on a great game under the guise of "Halo Fan" (Where've we heard that one before?). He uses poorly framed questions and his statements contradict each other. Which is the reason Mitch Dryer's article on Halo: Reach is the Most Disappointing Article of the Year.
#23 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(13) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
antz1104  +   1774d ago
Well thought out and THUROUGH, lol. + bubbles.
VoodooHack  +   1774d ago
Having read the books as well, I was pleased with the story in Halo: Reach. I'm not quite sure what his expectations where going in, but I suspect they may have been inflated enough to set you up for disappointment.

I came across plenty of "Oh, s#?t!" moments like the destruction of the UNSC ship in Tip of the Spear after Noble 6 et al took out the Covenant tower. I found it a great piece of foreshadowing that punctuated the contrast between effort and overall outcome. Or in Long Night of Solace, the epitome of a special op, where a desperate situation spawned a crazy idea that again, foreshadowed the endgame. (@Clizzz, I see that you and I see eye to eye on this point.)

If you're looking for Shakespeare, a video game isn't the place to look. If you're looking for strict adherence to canon set by a book, I thought we'd all learned years ago not to expect it.

The story provided just enough context to frame the action as it was with all the other Halo games or most games for that matter. That's all I expected, and with that in mind, I was pleased to find a story that gave me a little bit more.

I get the sneaking suspicion that the article was born of unrealistic expectations and a bit of hyperbole.
Masta Kaos  +   1774d ago
i still dont get it....why is HELO: Rich so hyped up? The game is avarage in my books.....try'd playing it but got bored, maybe im a Sony fanboi i dnt knw coz i dnt like the game.
Kingdom Come  +   1773d ago
Maybe if you...
Played the game, you would realise why it receives such praise.
bobrea  +   1774d ago
DURRR SOMEONE DIDNT LIKE REACH WAAAAH. Look guys, Reach is fun from what I've played, and I still plan on picking it up once my 360 gets fixed, but the single player is nothing special. I actually found it pretty boring. The multiplayer is as good as ever, but it's just one person's opinion. CALLLLLM DOWN, it doesn't affect you in any way if he/she is disappointed by the game.
Ivan Drago IV  +   1774d ago
masta i agree with you, i own the game and its fun and all but its nothing special. Belive me, if Halo reach was a FPS with a totally different name and a new IP, it would be getting reviews of 7s and 8s. The graphics still look outdated, even the controls feel outdated, its just another Halo. Nothing new.

I just dont see the hype for the Halo franchise. Sooo many better games out there that deserve the same amount of hype. I honestly think the only thing keeping Halo on top is nostalgia. People buy it because its Halo. pure and simple
poopface1  +   1774d ago
lol I completly disagree
just because you dont like something doesnt make it average. Reach is far above average.

The polish and content of reach is unmatched. Its not even my favorite FPS, but people ragging on the SP are just grasping at straws.

Reach has the best SP since halo 1, and easily the most content and multiplayer features of any halo GAME, so in my mind its the best halo yet.

The Sp took me 12 Hours to beat on heroic(not sure if that includes all the time from me dying) and was pretty good. I hated the story of halo 2 and 3 so this was great to me. Not to mention you can play it with 4 player co-op. That alone has more value than alot of Campaign only games. Not to mention Firefight, forge and theater can all be played alone if you want.

People judge the SP in REACH more harshly than they do SP only games, simply because they are hoping to piece together some BS complaints about its weakest link.

Unfortunately for them, the weakest link in halo Reach is still stronger than the entire chains of most games.

Noone will like every game, but people can only lie to themselves when they pretend a great game is average because they don't like it.

I buy alot of "great" games, and very few of them keep me playing as long as reach already has. So although I may not like a game, I can still tell the difference between great but not for me, and average.
#27.1 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
spunnups  +   1774d ago
Sorry, I have not played Halo Reach, but even I know it's not even close to most disappointing. IMO, it looks like either Quantum Theory or Mafia 2 will take that crown easily.
Fatal Blow  +   1774d ago
I don't know about u guys but i loved it the only reason i bought a xbox 360 halo reach console was to play this and alan wake i have a ps3 and a wii to true gamers should play all great games
SuperStrokey1123  +   1774d ago
Well if you only want to play great games pass on Alan Wake...
Jack-Pyro  +   1774d ago
AW was great, not perfect, but it was great.
Convas  +   1774d ago
ULTRA SUPER DISAGREE. Fatal Blow, pay no attention to this bloke. If you own a 360 and have the moolah, lay it down on Alan Wake. Chances are you'll have a good experience with it!
SaberEdge  +   1773d ago
Massively disagree. Alan Wake is one of my favorite games this year.
SuperStrokey1123  +   1774d ago
That sure is one flamebait title lol
« 1 2 3 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

New Music Teased for Driveclub; New Free Car Announcement Coming and Private Lobbies Info Shared

7m ago - The season pass for Driveclub may have ended, but Evolution Studios won’t stop supporting the gam... | PS4

Comic Book Games: 8 Games That Bring Superheroes And Villains To Life

1h ago - Gamerant There are no two greater symbols of geek culture than comic books and video games, an... | Culture

'Warhammer: Arcane Magic' - a Digital Boardgame for iOS

Now - Arcane Magic is a turn based strategy game set in the Warhammer universe. Play it now on Ipad and Iphone. | Promoted post

Nom Nom Galaxy Launch Trailer

1h ago - The official Nom Nom Galaxy launch trailer as the game makes its way to Steam after enjoying succ... | PC

Otome Visual Novel ‘Because We’re Here’ Hits Greenlight with a Demo

1h ago - Hardcore Gamer: Are you a bit tired of all the saccharine, high school-based otome visual novels... | PC

Top ten Sequels | GT Countdown

2h ago - Gametrailers: Some sequels are just two good not to mention. We dug up all the first numbered... | PS2