Strategy Informer Halo: Reach Review

From "So, this is it then? Bungie's last Halo, the game that brings together ten years worth of work, the game that takes us back to the beginning, and the game that's supposed to be the most definitive title in the series. As someone who's been a fan ever since the first game, this has been a very singular experience. It's not often you witness a definitive event in a franchise that's shaped you as a gamer, and it's even rarer to be in a position to pass judgement. This definitely wasn't the most straight forward reviews I've ever done."

Read Full Story >>
The story is too old to be commented.
CountDracula2716d ago (Edited 2716d ago )

I thought this was game informer for a sec

FAIL too many indie review sites nobody cares about!

T9X692716d ago (Edited 2716d ago )

What do you expect? A big game like Halo Reach comes out, and indie sites review it to get hits. No different than big games like Uncharted 2, and if I remember correctly, on N4G over 300 sites reviewed it.


389 to be exact.

StanLee2716d ago

That's just crazy. 80% of those sites aren't even relevant.

All_4_One2716d ago

Yeah, and Uncharted 2 maintained a 96 Metascore with 105 reviews, which is more than any other game I have ever seen, and it`s not even a year old yet. Unbelievable.

lowcarb2716d ago

Are you implying UC2 is a better game then Reach?

coolbeans2716d ago

I know, so many bankrolled PS sites. amirite?

All_4_One2716d ago

Uh, no. I was implying that Uncharted 2 maintained a fantastic score despite being one of the most heavily reviewed games. I was just adding on to t9x69`s comment. Why get defensive over it?

lowcarb2716d ago

"Why get defensive over it?"

No not defensive at all. Just trying to understand your comment.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2716d ago
2716d ago