In this screenshot check Videogameszone compared the PS3 to the Xbox 360 version of Enslaved. Which one looks better? Hint: Click on "See full size" to view the images in original size.
honestly, ps3 version was very rich colors, textures and everything. these are the people who developed heavenly sword i think they learned how limited the other console was.
do you need glasses the game looks identical neither version have an edge.
Yup both look identical, i can't even spot the differences.
or you can just ignore it and feel wiser.
The 360 version has slightly sharper graphics...
It's a multiplat...so I don't give a fuck.
What has sharper graphics?? They're both pretty much identical! Everything else is up to how the game looks on your monitor/TV screen. http://www.videogameszone.d... _____ http://www.videogameszone.d...
The only thing those screens prove is that this is nowhere near the level of Uncharted 2 that the devs had previously implied. It's not bad looking, though, and both consoles look the exact same. So, good for them! No one's getting a crap port this time. I wish that all devs would be so kind.
When the Xbox has a clear upper hand you always say they're identical. =)
I hope you're not responding to me. I have a clear history of complaining about the PS3 ports of games. It's my biggest problem with the industry. In fact, I've decided to start boycotting any devs that don't give BOTH versions the same attention. It's why I'll not be playing anything from Square Enix in the future, and Rockstar is next in the list of boycotted devs.
@1.1.9 lol the boycott list expands? if you keep that up you wont be playing any games except for exclusives until the next set of consoles arrive.
You say that like it's a bad thing.
Yeah I guess PS3 owners will be stuck with second to none AAA titles... boo... hoo.. How did Arkham Asylum & FF go by the way? I think its easy to see that some console owners that have a choice, choose. No need to jump at underwhelming games just because theres nothing else to play. Chalk this up to yet another multiplatform that fails to live up to the hype about visuals. Stop comparing nonsense to PS3 exclusives, and this wont happen. Set the bar to Gears of War 3 or something, then you will hit it out of the park every time.
Sooooooo, you only play exclusives? o.O That must suck..
They look pretty much identical, but the aliasing is quite bad on both, and the colours are better in some of the 360 shots and sometimes in the PS3 shots.
360 has some lighting effects and the ps3 doesnt another thing is that the ps3 screens could have been used with the color range on limited also gifs since i was bored http://i52.tinypic.com/ztj1... http://i52.tinypic.com/2eyd...
@ the person whop mentioned motioned blur... I one pic the PS3 has the motion blur (Nariko wannabe running down the hall) where the 360 doesn't. In another pic the 360 version has motion blur (Male main character jumping near a sphere in the foreground) and the PS3 doesn't. The graphics look equally sharp and colorful. Nice job Ninja Theory. Too bad no one on either game is really going to buy this game. A Heavenly Sword 2 would have been much better.
Or do the screenshots look like they were taken with a camera on a TV?
We will have to wait for a demo or the actual release of the game to make a real comparison. You would think that with their experience with the PS3 that the 2 games would be equal at the least...UNLESS they are upset about not making Heavenly sword 2...lol. Here's the first 15 minutes of game play. There are some really talented people over at Ninja Theory...The gameplay is incredible!!! http://www.youtube.com/watc... BTW...this is the 360 build...Hmmmmm...Ninja Theory made an EXCLUSIVE Xbox 1 game called Kung-fu Chaos ( 2003 ) back in the day.
Anyone else think the game play looks stiff and rigid? I'm a bit disappointed.
" Anyone else think the game play looks stiff and rigid? I'm a bit disappointed." No, but I think the inFamous 2 gameplay looks pretty stiff and rigid. :)
@Palaeomerus The first Infamous was open world and the second one will be, this is linear. What's your point? You think that this is on level with Infamous 2? lol. http://www.youtube.com/watc... Open your eyes! That is rigid? LMAO!
outrageous, palolomerurus and other fanboyz are in full force here (no stupid ps3 hack article to play today :))
@outragous You try to compare an again linear game played/shown on the PC to Infamous 2. Infamous 2 has got people scared. Again Infamous is open world. I didn't bring infamous up Palaeoerus did, I was just replying. PlayStation 3 owners get to play all 3 lucky for them!
Ignore outrageous weak trolling efforts. He is just another in a long list of trolls on N4G that need to be shown the door permanently. You don't even have to view his post. Just read the title and know what generic response to expect from him as soon as you see his name. So predictable it's boring.
They stated the game for the original xbox but it was never released!
wait you say this is 360 build like it matters but the video isnt even in hd infact the irony is that its at 360p
I can't tell a difference in the two versions. But maybe that is because the pictures are taken off of a computer monitor?
the pics are too small and the quality is too low.
'Heavenly Sword' on the PLAYSTATION®3 which is 2/3? years old looks better
So what, a game is alot more than pixel and a quick look at the sales chart HS was sadly a flop, but i liked the game enough to buy it and i probably would buy enslaved to but i am not sure which version i will pick
Silly little droid, you need to get some glasses. Enslaved looks a lot better than Heavenly Sword. Which is only natural since it is from the same developer 3 years later.
The 360 version definately has sharper textures. This is not surprising, its the same for most multiplats. Other than that they both look the same. The guys hair looks like shit in both versions.
its looks terrible. his fingers biceps look even worse. This is not an attractive game.
It doesn't have sharper textures, it appears to me the 360 version is running at a higher resolution.
Any differences that you may see seem to be a matter of camera angle and the amount of motion blur present at the time. In short, they look identical to me. Now people can just enjoy the game on the console of their preference.
I agree completely, it's hard to compare them fairly when the pictures are not all taken at the same exact moment at the same angle.
The developers didn't imply any goddamn thing. They said their game looked as beautiful as Uncharted 1. Not Uncharted 2. And the game does look very beautiful. All your post proves it that you don't know how to read.
I say they look almost Identical to each other, barvo to the devs for accomplishing this.
The Sony Ps3 mascots will claim that looks better and colorful in their console just like the Xbox mascots. THEY BOTH LOOK THE SAME TO ME!!!!!!
@buying1999 yea dude , you might wanna look at that pic again and try playing spot the differences . cause its a totally different frame , just look at the lighting on her face and also her hair is a tad higher in the 360's frame , which means the pic was not taken at the same time . so the ps3 version might as well have motion blur :) and i think the ps3 version has better lighting . the texture looks the same
none of you are giving examples. they look soo close to the same that which ecer one you want to look better in your head will. the only real difference is the blur. you can say its an "affect" intentionaly put in the game but, im not sure because its noticable in screen 15 and hes walking... either way the game doesnt look that great.
Honestly who cares about graphics anymore? I grew up playing shitty nintendo games and now you vaginas are complaining about textures and other bs. Pretty much everything looks good these days and graphical differences between the two consoles are so slim only the hugest nerd could point them out. Just play the damn game if it's fun it wont matter what the hell it looks like. Im so tired of reading all the gayness in here I dont know why I keep coming back haha.
I don't know about you, but that's one ugly game.
just finished seeing all the screens, ps3 is way more cleaner while the other console's blurry you will get the feeling someone's smoking.
Noooo. Look again at image 3, where Monkey is in the background against an explosion on the right and 2 guys falling over in the foreground. Monkey and the metal floor surface have much softer focus (read: blurry) in the PS3 version. You can see it again on the pods in image 7 (ignoring the obvious screen tear on the PS3 version). Don't know what that website were playing at but the PS3 shots look sub-HD to me, too.
Looking at it again it does seem that way, the sub-HD part. Plus its hard to compare when all the shots are taken at different times in the game, even if only different my a few milliseconds.
in some pics ps3 loks beter,in some on x360 ,but its look same to me..
some screens the ps3 looks better, some screens the 360 looks better, some they look the same
did look a bit washed out on the pictures while the ps3 version was more detailed and crisper wont know until the game is released there was some lighting beyond one of the charcters neck which was in 360 version but there was another scene which the ps3 had speical lighting while the 360 version didnt i would wait until the game games out both version look good
I don't think I could tell the difference. Either way good job dev's, now lets check out the gameplay.
Differences favor one version or the other depending on the scene, overall neither is better than the other. Looks decent enough on both consoles, but I think the graphics in this game have been overhyped.
Looks similar to me. and I wont be getting this game. Maybe half the price.
I dont think it looks as good as heavenly sword especially in motion. http://www.gamershell.com/s... anyhow the only thing you need to worry about is screentearing this game has the worst i have seen in ages.
Heavenly Sword gameplay does look better...a very underrated game!
^ yep... HS was a great game.... the use of motion was spot on..directly arrows to specific body parts and seeing diff. resulting actions....great characters were great, graphics were top notch and gameplay, once you got the battle system down was awsum stupid gamers were so lame, complaining about a lack of jump button....cant make this stuff up
Um...the screens need to be clearer for a distinct comparison. I don't care for this game anyway.
colours stand out a little bit more on the ps3 but you really have to look at the images. Glad the creators found a way to keep quality the same on both consoles. Shows they are dedicated to bring the best quality no matter what system.
Look identical to me. :|
Unfortunately that isn't good enough for some people.
If you want actual system comparisons go to lensoftruth.com . Not low res screen shots that look no different.
I'm sorry, but lensoftruth are not reliable. Some of them are PS3 fanboys and they sometimes slant things in the PS3's favor. They don't use objective measurements as much as they should.
Pretty much the same to me, so either way your getting a good looking game. Heavenly Sword with an uncharted complex.
basically .. just hope it doesn't tear all over the place but early reports indicate it does.
Both look the same.
You people argue about the dumbest things. Who fucking cares which one looks better. Obtain lives omg....
These are the worst articles on this site. They add absolutely no value or insight on a game. All they do is promote fanboyism.
The PS3 version seems to have slightly better colours. Look at the skin and you can see its darker and less colour rich in the 360 version. That's the only difference I see. Performance wise, well thats anyones guess at the moment.
wow, unless you do fullscreen the 360 version looks bad, but in full screen they both look the same, with minor differences.... definitely in my radar for a rental.