1010°

Killzone 3 versus RAGE: HD Screenshot comparison

GB writes: "Undoubtedly two of the most anticipated first person shooter games this generation, Killzone 2 and RAGE are both visual master pieces on the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360. Guerilla’s managing director, Hermen Hulst, has stated Killzone 3 will use close to 100% of the PS3′s power. That’s what every developer says when they are working on a PlayStation 3 exclusive title, with each sequel actually bettering what the previous did.
RAGE, well we have got this to say."

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
4990d ago Replies(39)
xboxlj4990d ago

I think that Rage will be an amazing experience. So far everything about it looks incredible.

Killustrious4989d ago

Only N4G users think KZ2 is any good?

Uhhh. 95 Review scores averaging a 91 say otherwise.

http://www.metacritic.com/g...

And KZ3 has much better graphics. Rage runs at a higher FPS but KZ3 has about 2934089347 times more action on screen at once. And the textures in Rage are fairly ugly, sorry.

IHateYouFanboys4989d ago

Forza 3 rated higher than Killzone 2, yet PS3 fanboys still say its no good.

TheGamer4989d ago

Rage looks amazing.......on the 360.

As for the PS3 it still doesn't beat UC1 or KZ2 so forget comparing it to KZ3!!!!

But it is probably the best or maybe the same as GEOW1&2.

gamerzBEreal174990d ago

why does it matter whos the best? there both beautiful games and um ps3 gamers can play both can't they? lol but not being a fanboy both games look great and there still in alpha! can't wait to see what they will look like a year from now

Killustrious4989d ago

PS3 fanboys say it's no good because we have Gran Turismo 5. Forza 3 is literally nowhere near the level of GT5, sorry. If Forza 3 is rated higher than KZ2, then GT5 is gonna have like a 99 on metacritic.

specialguest4990d ago

I'm more interested in playing Rage, but Killzone 3 looks more chaotic and action-packed.

The Lazy One4989d ago

That's because they didn't use any action shots from rage. They used mostly indoor shots with relatively little going on. Almost every Killzone 3 shot has an explosion in it. We know for certain that rage has action packed gameplay, because it's been in the gameplay demos. They just chose shots that don't play to the engine's advantages.

Hanif-8764990d ago

Judging from the screenshots Rage looks better. However, the developers for Rage stated that its running on PC with an Xbox360 controller.

8-bit4989d ago

Funny how PS3 games are compared to PC games while the only xbox comparisons we see are multiplats with bad PS3 ports.

frostypants4989d ago (Edited 4989d ago )

I agree, the Rage pics look crisper. But as you say, it's because these are shots of Rage running on a top-of-the-line PC. There is no chance in hell Rage will look like this on the 360, or even the average person's PC.

All that said, I like the environments in Killzone 3 better, but that's just because I find the whole post-apocalyptic Mad Max thing waaaaaaay played out.

Cock4Gamers4989d ago

You are only half right. The Devs said that its running on PC with the graphics settings set in a way that it is similar to what the 360 would look like.

nnotdead4989d ago

from the screenshots, the character and gun models look better on KZ3. after that i think it flips between each pic. some make Rage look better, and yet i think KZ3 looks better. either way both games look good, and i can't wait to argue which one plays better. lol

frostypants4989d ago

@Cock4Gamers, I'll believe it when I see it.

Socrates4989d ago

You act like we haven't already seen Rage running on the 360.

We have.

Rage on Xbox 360 http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Killzone 3 http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Rage looks better to me. And it is running at twice the framerate as Killzone 3.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4989d ago
FACTUAL evidence4990d ago

It does not look better than KZ3, but Carmack did a GREAT job. That is sweet graphics on Rage. Sony should really hire this guy for one of their exclusives someday.

frostypants4989d ago

Carmack is an engine guy, not a visual artist.

cyber_crysis4989d ago

Killzone only looks good two feet in front of the player. The players gun and arms are highly detailed, everything beyond that looks average. Its like watching someone else watch an IMAX movie, KZ2/3 graphics are over rated.

knowledge4lfe4989d ago

is the poor little baby upset?? i got some tissues for you. here

Scotland-The-Brave4989d ago

you just annoyed because killzone 2 dethroned crysis?

Cock4Gamers4989d ago

you freaking KIDDING me? D-Did you just say KZ2 dethroned Crysis? I am appalled that this recession has caused budget cuts in the mental health sector. Thats the only way I see you being free at home to post such a comment.

squelchy154989d ago

I like the way scotland the brave got agrees for saying KZ2 looks better than Crysis. And Cock4gamers got a disagree for stating the damn obvious!

Belasco4989d ago (Edited 4989d ago )

Thank you. I have still not finished KZ2 because I got bored with it and the graphics didnt really impress me.

Scotland-The-Brave4989d ago (Edited 4989d ago )

What i meant to say was killzone 2 destoys crysis 2 on consoles

Socrates4989d ago

Uhh hell no it doesn't.

Killzone 3 http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Rage (Xbox 360) http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Killzone 3 vs Crysis 2 vs Rage http://www.youtube.com/watc...

If you think Killzone 3 "destroys" Crysis 2 or Rage on consoles you are blind.

Scotland-The-Brave4989d ago (Edited 4989d ago )

Obviuosly killzone will be better than crysis on ps3. Killzone is built from the ground up and optimized for ps3 archictecrure. There is no multiplatform game that will operate/look better than killzone for ps3, and everyone knows that ps3 exclusives look a lot better than xbox exclusives. But We will see when the games are actually out. Its just the same as when xbox fanboys said that alan wake, splinter cell,and halo reach will have better graphics than uncharted or killzone and look how that turned out. If a game built specifically for xbox cant look as good as a ps exclusive, how the hell will a multiplat?
EDIT: The textures in the crysis (xbox) vid look shit compared to killzone.
You are blind and stupid :)

iPlayGamez4989d ago

lmao he keep saying killzone 2 looks better than crysis because he thinks crysis is a xbox game. this just show how blind fanboys like scotland is he sees the best looking game ever created accidently think it is a xbox game and goes into denial. and if he was referring to crysis 2 then it has all been PC gameplay that have been shown at e3 (i dont know about any vids after e3)

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4989d ago
Highlife4989d ago

Killzone 3 and Rage look amazing.
The thing that I want to see is if rage can capture what killzone 2 did as far as what was going on onscreen, the atmosphere, and sound. If it can we have 2 great games.

side note- I know games are mostly gameplay and visuals but the surround sound on Killzone 2 was amazing.

frostypants4989d ago

Yeah, the part of Killzone 2 when you're approaching on those lander things works as an awesome home theater system demo.

jack_burt0n4989d ago

@Highlife totally agree the immersion is incredible not equalled on any platform I have Sli rig too no way it competes whatsoever.

Wow have you seen rage running the animation is worthless, its an open world of sand dunes LOL ppl look at rez and dont see evrything else.

You ppl need to play killzone 2 it really is stunning.

Death24944989d ago

It all comes down to art style. Rage should have better textures because they're hand drawn textures. Killzone3 looks just more believable and realistic to me. Fortunately, I'm a ps3 owner so i will be able to buy both. Especially since they are on opposite ends of 2011. If you're a 360 owner i would definitely recommend buying Rage.

OH FYI for those who don't know. Killzone3 will run at 60fps 2d and 30fps 3d. I will be playing this shooter with my pre-ordered PS Move.

SOAD4989d ago

Killzone 3 will NOT be running at 60fps in 2D. Disregard Death's second to last sentence.

IHateYouFanboys4989d ago (Edited 4989d ago )

how did SOAD get so many disagrees for stating a fact that even the developers of Killzone 3 have confirmed?

Killzone 3 in 2D is 30fps maximum. FACT. END OF STORY.

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

"Eurogamer: Are you allowed to talk about any technical details?

Steven Ter Heide: Absolutely. It's 720p, like Killzone 2.
.....
We're aiming for 30fps, both for 3D and standard. 3D is obviously a little bit of an overhead, because you have to render twice."

marinelife94989d ago

Killzone has better textures, better lighting, and higher polygon counts.

Seeing them in motion is where Killzone really separates itself. The animations in Killzone just like in Uncharted really makes it look superb.

popup4989d ago

I think that this proves how little screenshots alone work in providing a total picture of graphics and engine prowess.

Leave both actually running side by side instead and then see what happens. Rage would look the same as the still but KZ would come alive! X,Y and Z would be awash with non-repetative analogue goodness including realistic dust, wind, smoke and cloth etc, making the scene come to life. One is a moving photo, the other a live scene.

Or you could squint and say one is a neatly rendered Starship Enterprise and the other is a dirty Millenium Falcon.

I still really like the look of Rage (outside especially) but feel this article sucks.

frankymv4989d ago

Killzone 3 is better than rage

bnaked4989d ago

We need a video comparsion! Rage would have no chance..

hazeblaze4989d ago

I agree. Rage has a more lush color palate... Killzone 3 looks more technically impressive however. Especially the detail of the models and guns. The art styles are so different though that it's kind of hard to compare...

Immortal3214989d ago

in all those screen shot comparisons you can see for your own eyes all the mayhem going in the background as well in your face.

rage looks good, no doubt but all I saw was good graphics, there were no sense of mayhem or apocalyptic environment.

lazysey4989d ago (Edited 4989d ago )

Haters gonna hate!

Consoldtobots4989d ago

soda popinsky's obsession with PS3 fans > christian fundamentalists

RememberThe3574989d ago

While all you guys are arguing about Rage, Killzone 3, and Crysis, I will have played all of them.

Socrates4989d ago

You know what's great about being a multi-console owner? I will have played Killzone 3 and the best looking console versions of Rage and Crysis 2.

RememberThe3574989d ago

But is was pointless to bring up the 360 since the system isn't is question here. If they would have mentioned Reach or Gears then I would have mentioned the 360 but this is about two game that both appear on the PS3 but one doesn't appear on the 360.

And how are you to know that the best looking version of Rage and Crysis 2 are going to be best looking on 360?

fuckoffodion4989d ago (Edited 4989d ago )

"will have played Killzone 3 and the best looking console versions of Rage and Crysis 2. "
How do you know that? Oh that's right, you're dumb fanboy. I should have known.

avengers19784989d ago

KZ3 will be a better game. RAGE will sell more copies(because it's multiplat)

Nerox34989d ago

@Active
God of war 3 is king at the moment.....UC2 is yesterday and it IS cartoonlike to be honest ^^

Nihilism4989d ago

Rage runs at 60 frames, by rights it should look half as good as KZ3...but it looks very very close. + it is an open world, massive draw distances etc.

Rage is a technical and graphical marvel. No other game can boats custom textures on ALL objects and landscapes. KZ3 is just another shooter, rage is on another level altogether for the reasons above.

JRisburning4989d ago

Go share that on the forums....oh wait....

chazjamie4988d ago

you speak the truth. not sure why people disagree with you. the engine (rage) highlight is textures; custom textures is something amazing and i am sure not many people have the time and patience to draw each little detail.

kz, looks like it should. realistic and dull, but i think i will have more fun and probably appreciate rage more.

wsoutlaw874989d ago

the colors in rage in the first 2 seem deeper and clearer however the screens of kz3 were in the snow level that try to have that white out appearance. In the end I think kz3 looks more realistic. well have to wait and see which looks better in motion, that will be the difference.

hennessey864989d ago

i love the the close up graphics of killzone 3 ie the the gun it looks stunning but i do like the varied look of rages backgrounds there is alot in them which im assuming is down to the megatextures but id have to give it the overall best looking game to killzone 3 it will be the reason ill b buying a 3d tv

Sevir044989d ago

But ive gotta say. Rage is looking spectacular! i dont know what consessions are being made to get the game running the way it does across both platforms but it's clear that ID has harness the best of the Ps3... that said. KZ3 is a marvel
In it's self. for one. The game's levels are 10 more open and larger than the KZ2's and so much more dynaimic. I remeber fannies saying KZ2 only looked great because it was a corridor shooter and very linear, Well thats all been proven moot after seeing just how large, and "open world" the levels are in KZ3 are. Bigger more robust set pieces and better handling of textures are all present in KZ3. It's Lighting system is still unmatched and the game Runs flawlessly in Both 3d and 2d. which translates to a better game for the 2d side of rendering. the fact that the KZ3 is doing 30fps in each eye means that the engine they use is capable of running fine and robustly as Rages 60fps Id Tech 5. It's clearly evident here that they didn't make any consessions on what was taxing the PS3's engine to make the game look this much betetr over its
previous installment. And lets not for get. graphics is only half of the equation of why a game looks good. the other half is owed solely to Art direction. why know of the different rendering techniques used to fake resolutions and such so for now i'll go and just say that Both games are technical marvels and its great to see that a multiplatform can at this point stand up to a top tier PS3 exclusive, but we do know that Ps3 exclusives always make the biggest improvement withing the last few months of launch. so lets all have this conversation when it launches next year

+ Show (25) more repliesLast reply 4988d ago
Natsu X FairyTail4990d ago

Pretty bad Pictures. Not even in HD

solar4989d ago

lets see...what other unfinished, 2011 games can we compare next?

FrigidDARKNESS4990d ago

Rage wins hands down no contest.

HeroXIV4990d ago

Rage looks like it has better textures but you can see the polygon limitations on the weapons unlike KZ3.

Even if that wasn't an issue I think the fact is we've seen a bit TOO much of this same old snow level, KZ3 explores new ground and new locations so wait until we see some of those locations and prepare to have your mind blown.

HelghastKid4990d ago

dude stop lying, both games look ridiculously detailed. There is no "WAY BETTER" going on between these two games, it will be a close one. But in the end, we need to actually find out which one plays better.

Etseix4990d ago

beauty is in the eye of the beholder :)

rage looks awsome!, but still, KZ is .... really something, :I

HydraxFFx4990d ago (Edited 4990d ago )

What I want to know is if the Rage screenshots are on PC, PS3 or 360.

forcefullpower4990d ago (Edited 4990d ago )

I think picture 3 did it for me. I think that these are from the PC Version.

Hallmark Moment4990d ago

Probably the 360 since it's the only platform the devs have been showing the game on this year. I've never seen PS3 footage of Rage only 360 E3 footage and pics. Rage is unmatched and the media were blown away by Rage and could not believe it was running on a console AKA 360 with 60fps and open world sandbox design

Lyr1c4990d ago (Edited 4990d ago )

It's funny. They actually had the PC, PS3, and 360 versions run simultaneously on display right next to each other, and while the PC version obviously looked best, the PS3 and 360 version looked and played exactly alike. The only difference: The 360's crashed while the PC and PS3's continued running perfectly.

Edit: How does one attain disagrees from speaking truth?

extermin8or4990d ago

actually its been pc with a 360 controller each time

forcefullpower4990d ago (Edited 4990d ago )

So far all the footage i seem to see is either them talking about how great the graphics are and then just show the racing aspects of the game.

Are they going to be showing something in-depth like fallout 3 game play. I just get a feeling its going to be very similar to borderlands with better graphics.

ID Tech is very good but they have always lacked in the last few years of any gameplay. You cant just have sparkly graphics with nothing else.

niceguywii604990d ago (Edited 4989d ago )

http://g4tv.com/videos/4667...

The public has not seen the PS3 version running. Go find the video of it so I can see it. Yes everybody knows the game has been shown behind doors and media claiming things based on that.

PS3 fanboys in denial as always. Where are the PS3 videos running this game?

http://gamingbolt.com/wp-co...

http://gamingbolt.com/wp-co...
http://gamingbolt.com/wp-co...

Rage makes KZ3 look like a Launch PS3 game in comparison

raztad4989d ago (Edited 4989d ago )

@niceguy

I dont get how RAGE makes KZ3 look like a launch game. In the shoots you posted the KZ3 weapon make RAGE to look low poly.

How about this (KZ3 MULTIPLAYER)

http://gamingbolt.com/killz...

BTW, RAGE on PS3 was presented in QuakeCon. It was reported to be running at 60fps, stable (didnt crash) and looking as good as the xbox version.

da305kratos4989d ago

and this coming from a guy with one bubble.....interesting /sarcasm

Death24944989d ago

Yeah bro, I'm in Texas and Quakecon was held right here at the Hotel off of I35s. They indeed showed 360,PS3,and PC running simultaneously all at 60fps. Rage is a masterpiece and there should be no doubting that at all. Ps3 gamers win in the end because we can buy both. I will end this year playing the hell out of Halo Reach until Killzone3 arrives next year.

CernaML4989d ago

Quit crying, niceguywii60. Many people have seen RAGE running on the PS3 and have confirmed that it looks just as good as the 360 version. Also, Killzone 3 looks better. :P

hazeblaze4989d ago

That G4 link clears up a lot! Because it sure didn't look as good as the PC clip of the same footage on Gametrailers... and SURE AS HELL doesn't look as good as Killzone 3. I will probably buy the game regardless... but I'm a bit disappointed if that's how it looks on consoles :-(

Scotland-The-Brave4989d ago

read lyr1c's comment, you douche!

Antan4989d ago

For who are new to N4G, Hallmark and Niceguy are the same multi account user, and been around for a number of years. Highly opinionated to the extreme. And 95p/c of his comments involve crying/moaning/finger pointing and over hyping. You get used to him and just along. Really good fun....

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 4989d ago
beardpapa4989d ago

you really expect rage to look better than kz3 when they even demoed it on an iphone running at 60 fps?

i say the game is made to be very robust and scale itself according to the performance and capabilities of the hardware it's running on.

nickjkl4989d ago

mhmm did you see how bad rage looked on the iphone

need for speed looked better that rage did and that was on the old iteration of iphone

Optical_Matrix4990d ago (Edited 4990d ago )

Killzone 3 looks fantastic! Can't wait!

EDIT: Why am I getting disagree's for showing excitement for the sequel of one of my favorite games this gen? N4G never ceases to amaze me. There was no fanboy drivel involved either.

coolbeans4989d ago

You do realize someone could disagree with you about it looking fantastic right? Not everyone likes KZ's art direction, or Halo's, or Crysis', etc. etc.. Hell, I didn't even disagree with you and I can see where ppl are coming from.

Show all comments (298)
230°

20 Years of Guerrilla: The Story of a PlayStation Studio

The Amsterdam-based studio reflects on its humble beginnings, beloved franchises, and growth through the years.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
SullysCigar351d ago

Up there with the top tier in the industry. Love Guerrilla Games - Horizon Burning Shores is simply STUNNING.

1Victor350d ago

Can’t wait for their next franchise

SullysCigar350d ago

Same. They nailed it with Horizon. The trouble is I also want a new Killzone! Can't I just have it all?!

jznrpg350d ago

I’m with you I want Horizon 3 , Killzone and new IPs

badz149350d ago

I have yet to play Burning Shores as I just started Forbidden West (bought at launch, just unwrapped last weekend LOL) and playing on PS5.

man...I still can't believe the graphics especially now I'm playing it on my LG OLED. that graphics and with stable performance backing it up, GG really is the master of their craft!

Vengeance1138350d ago

32.7M sales in the Horizon franchise! With 8.4M coming from Forbidden West alone! Truly a hugely successful game and franchise as a whole. Looking forward to Horizon III

Shane Kim350d ago

That's kind of a huge drop though. It's only been two games.

VersusDMC350d ago

One year after realease HZD sold 7.6 million.

https://www.noobfeed.com/ne...

So not a drop off.

Unless you're saying a HFW should have sold as much now as HZD sold in 5 years?

Vengeance1138350d ago

It's been 3 games, this includes Call of the Mountain. Also no, its a great improvement over HZD.

solideagle350d ago

lol you are comparing:

HZD: 28 February 2017 - May 2023 (6 years+)

HFW: 18 February 2022 - May 2023 (1 year+)

We will see if it surpass original number.

Phoenix76350d ago

@shane, 2 full main games, 2 DLC add ons, 1 VR spin off game, oh and a an official LEGO set.
Not too bad for an ip that's only been on market for 6 years

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 350d ago
REDGUM350d ago

Wow, very impressive. I didn't know the numbers were so high for Forbidden West. Still playing through it myself

thesoftware730350d ago (Edited 350d ago )

Yooo, when I first saw that Killzone 1 footage at E3, my friends my brothers and I were like, Holy shit! When it came out, it didn't look exactly like it, but we sunk so many hours into 1 & 2.

I even liked Killzone: SF, it was a spectacle to look at, and even today it looks good. I hope they make a new one. Can you imagine how that will look, and they can get some modern FPS pointers from Bungie.

blacktiger350d ago

thank you fps lover, I'm with you

talocaca350d ago

Such a wonderful studio. They deserve all their success.

The Decima Engine is absolute 🔥 I'm just mad they have abandoned Killzone.

OzzY-waZZy350d ago (Edited 350d ago )

Kinda wish they move on from Horizon tbh.

potatoseal350d ago

They are probably working on mutiple projects. One of them is Horizon 3, but another is a multiplaer game and probably somehting else.

Imalwaysright350d ago

There were rumours that they were working on a Socom reboot.

Show all comments (47)
300°

Killzone 3 is playable with mouse & keyboard on PC via RPCS3 & KAMI

DSOGaming writes: "While Sony does not plan to release Killzone 3 on the PC, Yahfz shared a video that gives us a glimpse at what such a PC version could look like."

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
1101d ago
bouzebbal1101d ago

Still looks secure 2 gens later... one of my favorite ps3 moments. With 3D and move the game is on another level

MadLad1101d ago

PC almost always ends up the best place to play games, even if it takes a while.

What would you rather play decades down the line? A game at a fixed resolution and frame, considering you have a working disc, and the hardware?
Or run it on an emulator that can update the experience all around, and let you use whatever control input you prefer?

If you insist on the former, it's really only for the sake of nostalgia.

Applejack1101d ago

I disagree. The main draw for consoles has always be the simplicity of just putting the disc in / downloading it and playing without worrying about anything else. The average person just wouldn’t want to deal with emulation even though it’s very important for preservation.

Terry_B1101d ago

Even emulators are super simple to use.

jukins1101d ago

Youre getting flak because people on here thibk of themselves as pc wizards. But honestly most poeple try and go get emulators and romz they end up with malware.. yes theyre "easy" if you know the basics but alot of people dont. That said the fact that its taken nearly 20 years to get a sustantially better experience for ps3 games than on its native system shows the complexity of getting bc to work. Sony, if they have any intention, should just invest in a vastly better psnow experience.

1101d ago
Vegamyster1101d ago

jukins

Most people who emulate don't get malware, you'd have to be going to some weird sites for that to happen, heck years ago people were getting sketchier ad's resulting in malware warning on this site if you didn't have a ad-blocker lol.

SinkingSage1101d ago

Can't get malware if you legally dump your own games, which you should.

Rachel_Alucard1101d ago (Edited 1101d ago )

That's fine if that's the main draw, but it doesn't make it a better experience, just a preference. Having the freedom to do the things you can do on PC is what the appeal of PC is. Buying a game on PC means you never have to worry about the console makers just deciding the next hardware shouldn't support the generation anymore, which means everything you bought is stuck on that hardware instead of moving up with everything else. Nintendo uses this tactic to keep reselling the same games over and over at inflated prices. Sony cut all previous gens off the PS4 and sold it back to people in a poor attempt with PSnow. While the PS5 supports PS4 games, that may not be the case in the next gen after this. No to mention shutting off all the previous stores and updates completely. Even MS stopped making new BC titles at some point, so now there's a big list with 17 pages of titles that are not playable on Xbone and are just trapped on older gen. That's not a problem on PC, the reverse happens where you only have to worry if your hardware can play the newest releases at ultra with no issue.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1101d ago
AzubuFrost1101d ago

Shhh don't say that aloud! You're going to trigger a lot of console infidels here.

Shane Kim1101d ago

I rather play it when it's available then wait 10 years.

MadLad1101d ago

Did you purposely miss the entire point of my post?

Inverno1101d ago

Well that's the beauty of still owning a retro console tho. Those who usually complain about emulation are just being blindly loyal to a company. Emulation is great for many reason, but if I still owned the console then I disagree nothing beats plugging it back in and going down a nostalgia trip

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1101d ago
RevXM1101d ago

The RPCS3 devs are doing great work. And Kami works nicely with it too it seems.
Very neat.

Magatsuhi1101d ago

Been playing mgo on pc with mouse. It's not perfect but I can make it work.

Binarycode1101d ago

2 is the better game.

A Remake would be good. 60fps 2-4k

Omar3li1101d ago

60fps is peasant for FPS games now

1101d ago
Show all comments (22)
80°

Top 10 PS3 Games We Hope Come Back On PS5

While Xbox has committed to backwards compatibility spanning four generations, PlayStation has continued their stance that the feature isn't important. Well, it is! I'm hoping these PlayStation 3 classics that skipped the PS4 entirely show up again on the PS5 for everyone to enjoy.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
Knightofelemia1279d ago

Resistance, Dead Space franchise, Splatterhouse, Lollipop Chainsaw, Brutal Legends, Alice Madness Returns, Enslaved Journey to the West, Mass Effect franchise. Also wouldn't mind seeing a new Wild Arms game remake or HD remaster, the Xenosaga trilogy, a new Parasite Eve, a new Dino Crisis just too many games to list that are forgotten and left in the dark now adays.

Sciurus_vulgaris1279d ago

The PS3 is difficult to emulate. PS3 backwards compatibility on PS5 would require translation from PowerPC to x86. Additionally the PS5 likely would have to mimic the PS3’s GPU and CPU.

ApocalypseShadow1279d ago

**Luster Network
Your privacy choices
We and our partners process personal data such as IP address, unique ID, browsing data. Some partners do not ask for your consent to process your data, instead, they rely on their legitimate business interest.**

This is what pops up on my web browser. So I can't even read the site. So, forget that. They don't need my data.

But let's get something straight. OG Xbox had around 1,001 games. How many are BC on Series X? **39** THIRTY NINE. Come on! That's wack BC. You can't tell me that's a complete list. Talking about commitment. Game preservation. Ridiculous. Covers nothing.

How many games released on Xbox 360? Around 2085. How many are BC?
568. That's it. Around 1,517 are **MISSING** Stop playing. Tired of that nonsense.

Anyway, the only games I really want from PS3 that would be awesome are Motorstorm and MGS4. I'll take BC. I'll take a remaster. I'll take a remake. If not those, then Killzone 2. And in VR, maybe Sports Champions, House of the Dead Overkill and the Time Crisis games.

That's all I need. But we've gone over BC again and again in every possible way. It wasn't that important because Sony sold 115 million consoles without it. That's proof enough with no outcry. And PS5 has damn near all 4,000+ PS4 games BC. It's not PS1,PS2 and PS3. But that's plenty. I'll take more but you get what you get.

Show all comments (6)