NowGamer looks into whether the future tech in Ghost Recon: Future Soldier has any scientific foothold...
It's multiplatform right? Okay.. Not that realistic then.
Did you even read the article? Its quite interesting. Heres some future weapons. http://www.youtube.com/watc... Wonder if they will have this in GHFS.
I like the game but the first part of the E3 gameplay seemed very unrealistic to me... the guys were clearly visible yet they were not seen by the enemies.
The weapons and systems often shown in games like this never make it out of Aberdeen or Natick. Look how long games have been pushing things like the dead M8 program. Besides, Ubisoft has ignored the part of the game that should be emphasized...and it isn't the technology: "Despite the importance of the technology, at the heart is still the warrior; enormously skilled, highly trained, and unwilling to lose. It is the soldier that drives the technology rather than the other way around." http://www.shadowspear.com/... There have been posts from him on a few forums where he broke off his relationship with Red Storm because they failed to properly portray the soldiers and made it all about technology.
Don`t know, need to see some gameplay.
Now they say its going to fall into March?! Well, Gears is releasing in March, isn't it? If Ghost Recon Released in December, it would be great.
From what I saw at E3 the game looked great but the AI looked retarded. There was a point in the demo where one of the guys gets a bullet in his head and the guy just holds up the corpse in the chair. The AI just looks at the dead guy in a chair and walks away. There is NO WAY you would not notice a giant bullet hole in a guys head and blood pouring from it. Not to realistic if you ask me. That's just the AI though. Everything else looked great.
screw you fanboy
Ghost Recon seems stale to me. The production values have always been higher on the Rainbow Six series for some reason.
so it knifes him and you watch casual id say
what is wrong with you people? you should be asking how fun is ghost recon! Realism is not a factor in fun, if it is, it is a minor one
http://www.youtube.com/watc... Every 2011 graphics is already last gen!!!
The graphics look like crap but the camera shaking is pretty real.
agreed...in motion it looked amazing, but when he slowed down, the textures on the arms and truck, and the weapon model werent THAT great, still good tho
dude really? does textures look last gen...
I'd say it's very realistic. Everything in the game is already being worked on so I don't see how any of it could be fake.
When the US Army debuts opticamoflauge cloaks that can turn the wearer invisible, I'll Enlist! The drone seems like it might be possible, I think I saw something similar on Future Weapons.
As a person who served 6 years in the US Military I can confirm that you watch too much TV.
you sir obviously have no idea what you are talking about
Umm.. cloaking devices. The news reports about them describe them as being goofy camera-->screen tech that looks like a giant monkey suit and doesn't really work too well, unless the person is totally stationary and a looong way away. Some tech just never goes anywhere, you know. It doesn't *all* pan out better and workable in the end.
This is the one and only Ghost Recon I've ever been the slightest bit interested in.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.