The headline says it all: there's new footage of the Halo: Reach Firefight mode courtesy of Halo Waypoint. Keep an eye out for surprises like the return of the bubble shield.
GOTY long live halo
I don't know if I'd go that far since there are many great games coming out this year across all platforms, but I'm interested in this.
Halo Reach and LBP2 are my biggest games for 2010. I am predicting both to be my GOTY. Like nearly every year there never is ever one GOTY. I'm sure Reach will win GOTY on a few sites as well as all the other heavy hitters this year. It's tough to call Reach GOTY with all the other games for sure, but it's a heavy contender. I'm sold on the multiplayer, but I have lots of expectations for Single Player. Bungie is a great team, and FireFight 2.0 looks nice.
Looks realy good, Ill giv it a try wen my cuzin gets it. @alpha-male damn dude, seven bubbles??? Your avatar name realy suits you. How do you do it?
doesn't look much better than H3.
Lol games looking at the same game.
Damn, thats looks marvelous, but GOTY, lets not get ahead of ourselves.
It might be.
It has a lot of features, why wouldn't be GOTY? It can be. I think Mass Effect 2 might win it though.
It has as good as shot as any of them, and better than most. At least that is my impression based on Bungie's track record and everything I have seen of Reach.
i hate when ppl say goty (unless the game actually is)...they should really say "goty contender" until goty is awarded i love halo reach, loved the beta, and LOVED what was shown on campaign and firefight 2.0...i KNOW its a goty contender but i would never say goty until its actually won it
People just love to jump the gun early!
I'm sure when they say GotY they mean GotY for them.
I basically agree with you. However, I think we all know that in a sense it is just a shorthand way of saying "I think such and such will be GOTY". Still, it would be better if people made it clear that it is merely their opinion.
true...i know the majority of the ppl saying (apart from the fanboys) say it cause its what they think will win or their opinion...but i just think it kinda disrespects the other goty contenders when they claim such and such already won goty ESPECIALLY when the year isnt close to being over (only about half way in the year)
Oh man thanks for the laugh. haha
Nice use of your bubble man.
littlebigplanet2 goty 2010
GOTY is going to be hard there are a ton of contenders already and by year's end there will be at least 10 games worthy of competing for the spot. Mass Effect 2 God of War 3 Red Dead Redemption
Long live Halo! And it could be GOTY. I just know it looks amazing and will almost certainly play amazingly well.
killzone 2 might be your fanboys lover but it is only a aids riddin whore compared to halo
Great freakin game cant wait to see it in action.
Reach is looking great.
When I see reach, I can't help but get happy.
I dont think this video does the graphics any justice. The vid quality is terrible
The graphics for Halo Reach was never that good to begin with. What difference would video quality make?
A very big difference. Have you played the Beta or are you trolling? Because Reach doesn't look THAT bad
IGN posted a better quality version if this. In HD! :D http://www.youtube.com/watc... What do you mean they weren't good? Halo: Reach looks amazing! This might be the best looking Halo game yet. :)
This is what I like to see, gameplay videos where the players aren't absolutely terrible at the game.
Now that what i am talking about Bungie !! This just raised my Halo fever big time.. Something i haven't felt since Halo3 was about to come out. This is awesome !! Gameplay and the online makes Halo one of the best console shooter. but .. Am i the only one who was expecting more graphic wise? I mean the game look so much better than Halo3 like WAY BETTER but ... i just watched what Killzone3 is going to be like and i am still playing Killzone2 and those kick some serious ass. Dont flame me for this i am far from a fanboy this is only my opinion.
Memots, I agree that it doesn't have quite the visual pizazz as Killzone 3, but that doesn't mean it is a bad looking game. It really is one of the better looking shooters around. The thing is, Killzone 3 is just exceptional in the graphics department. Only now are we starting to get games like Crysis 2 and Rage on consoles that can go more head to head with Killzone 3 graphically. Halo though is one of the best playing shooter franchises in many people's opinion and I also think Reach does look very, very good graphically.
Actually, Rage is flat out the best looking game I saw at E3. It looks amazing and it blew everybody away. Here is a video so that you can see what I am talking about. http://www.youtube.com/watc... It looks better than any other game out there on consoles at the moment and it also runs at twice the frame-rate as most of them!
FantasyStar, just shut up. You don't have a clue what you are talking about. You are just blinded by your fanaticism. Halo Reach looks fantastic. It is definitely among the best looking shooters on consoles.
is better than it actually is. It does not look that great IMO.
You need to get your eyes checked. You can't watch this http://www.youtube.com/watc... and tell me it doesn't look great. The character models, textures and skies, for example, all look better than those in Killzone 3. Killzone 3 uses massive amounts of blur, bloom effect and other effects to give it a very soft, almost analogue look, but I don't think that automatically makes it look better. It's just a certain look. I think both looks are great.
Are you on crack?
Im hoping the singleplayer will be better than halo 3's. Obviously the matchmaking will be top notch.
....those graphics are f**king brilliant. I always loved the Halo games although Halo 2 got a bit repetitive. However, Halo multiplayer was never my thing.
I dont know if i can get back into halo again...halo 3 kind of killed it for me.
You know how silly that sounds. It's like saying "I don't know if I can get back into Killzone again because Killzone 2 kind of killed it for me". What I mean is that both Halo 3 and Killzone 2 were well received games with great critical reception, so if you didn't like those games then you probably just aren't going to like any games in the series. On the other hand if you did like past Halo games then why would not favoring one game in the series prevent you from enjoying a game that for all you know might have improved on the basic formula in significant ways.
Looks fun like hell...
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.