From Gaming Target: "I relived my fondest 64-bit memories thanks to an Activision E3 appointment at which I got the chance to play the enhanced GoldenEye 007 on Wii."
Meh, Complex sucked anyways.
You said it. Temple all the way!
No way, Complex was always king with its "tower" hideouts and closet/vents where you could outwit your friends.
Complex was the best level! I used to have Goldeneye parties at my house with upwards of 30 people and the Complex was the most popular level that people played!
I liked the Temple and all, but for someone to say Complex sucked, you must be crazy!
You won't be getting Temple either since it's not in the film.
complex was good. my fav was the bunkers. singleplayer my favorite was all of them. oh man dont get me started... the facility: i would shoot Oramovf early with the golden gun at the end so me and trevelyan can shoot it out for hours with non stop waves of enemys coming, omg that was so much fun.
Meh. Facility was always my favorite Multiplayer level. Complex was probably like my least-played.
I liked Facility a lot also, especially when you used the Gameshark and you could go ALL the way back lol
Complex was one of the most intricate and well-balanced levels in the game, as well as in Perfect Dark. Brilliantly built and paced.
I wonder what ELSE this game isn't going to include.
Which sucks... Brosnan was definitely a better Bond than fricken Daniel Craig.
NO PIERCE BROSNAN!?!?!?!?!
I like Daniel Craig as much as the next guy, but Goldeneye is Pierce Brosnan's freaking movie. He arguably reinvigorated the Jamed Bond series with Goldeneye. Its a terrible shame they decided to dump him from a game that should be his.
Yeah I just don't understand why they did it at all. Why swap out the Bond, of all things? It's a really nonsensical change.
I thought maybe they were trying to update it to appeal to people who were too young to remember Goldeneye and Pierce Brosnan...but why would they care about a remake anyway? So far, it doesn't look much like the N64 game or the movie - it just looks like Call of Duty wearing a really cheap Goldeneye costume.
by contract now, that's why. Pierce's contract is over, so he can't be released with new licensed products as Bond anymore, that has to go to Daniel Craig. It's all legal/contract-based...
No gonna lie, I saw a video of GoldenEye MP and it looked like shit. Nothing like the original at all, I have a feeling Acitivision is going to ruine such a classic game.
activision are pro's at dead horse humping
I agree, it looks like Call of Duty. WHY did Nintendo go to ACTIVISION!?
cause every dumb ass out there loves call of duty and nintendo wants some of that pie
because Activision owns the liscense to the Bond game franchise. Nintendo couldnt release Goldeneye without their permission and Acti probably wouldnt let them unless they published it so it really was the only option. Im sure MS tried to do the same with Acti to get golden eye on LIVE.
Complex was my favorite level. Pretty much killed my excitement for this one.
Same. A lot of things have kinda irked me about this remake since it was announced, but that really does suck. Creeping around in the vents and popping my unsuspecting friends in the back was classic. Would have preferred a straight port, HD or not, for whatever console. Think there was one already pretty much finished for the 360 before some legal shenanigans derailed it. I remember seeing screenshots for something like that a year or so ago.
Complex, Automatics, License to Kill.
they effed up, they should have put this on the real consoles.
I still play it, my favorite places are Temple (OF COURSE), Facility, Complex and Bunker. Fuc* Caves, you couldn´t see anything!!
this look good but there will never be another experience like back then on the N64, omg the good old times. lol at the golden gun, the one every one wanted to get first haha.
No Pierce Brosnan, no Complex. I knew Activision was the devil
specially when you where in that little room with the square hole in the ground!
I wont even have to buy this game. Piracy ftw!
Wii kills another good game. First Smash bros and now goldeneye? When will the casuals stop?
what the shit does the wii have to do with their choices in what they want and don't want to add in the game?
i have to disagree, brawl+ is awesome...
i definitely enjoyed Melee more than Brawl but i dont blame the wii for that...
Let the milking begin $3.99 Complex DLC map etc,etc.
Because it uses the gay Wii controller.. I mean if it were for sword fighting games like Oblivion for instance then I could see using the Wii mote for it but Golden eye.. why waste a game like this using the Wii... seriously So many memories with this game.. Playing 24/7 with my friend on their old wooden finish TV in their basement.. wow .. temple.. golden gun.. popping outta the vent.. pretending to take a crap and jump out and be all SAPPPRISE BUTTSECKS NUKKAH!!!!!
I love IR but I am happy to inform you that you can use gamecube and classic controller for this game as well. Happy playing.
I watched some Multiplayer of the game from E3 and I'm afraid many fears have been realized.
The wonderful gameplay and design of the first has been comprimised by the addition of modern, overused FPS mechanics. In fact, I would go as far as to say that his is simply Call of Duty gameplay dressed up in nostalgia.
Regenerating health, no weapon pick-ups (that I'm aware of) no body armor, 1 hit melee kills, 3 bullet kills...all of these things just arn't what the origanal Goldeneye was about.
Regen health, 1 hit melee kill? See, I knew Activision was full of shit. This is a goddamn cash-in and I knew it since I saw it at E3. Activision will no longer get money from me for this atrocious rape on my childhood.
And one more thing if Activision thinks I'm going to waste my money on this Call of Duty game dressed up in nostalgia (as Swiftfox welly put it) they can kiss my.... well, you get the picture. 7_7
People would complain if it wasn't modernized. No one will ever be satisfied. Besides, if you really want an old school FPS, just play the original.
wii isn't activision back. Their just being lazy and just porting it with little to no updates. The have the money to push this game to Mario galaxy potential but squander it and let nostalgia be the seller. RE4 was good port so why so that just proves they being lazy. My question is why did Nintendo bother with these clowns when the cold have easily presented conduit 2 instead. WE know it going to be better I will evened be as bold say best fps on wii. I agree w/the people saying why put this on wii like we actually like half backer ports. Give it to the 360 or PS3 cats. The thing that get me is when they cry about their sales. when they didn't advertise and made a half baked port.(as in cod reflex)my final thoughts is just buy the conduit 2 and teach them a lesson if you want a good wii shooter. If you guys disagree w/me just look who improve their game more. the conduit wasn't that good but really who putting in more effort. features missing 12 person wii speak patches (c2 will have it) activision could do theses thing so why aren't they?
sounds awesome, can't wait.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.