Top
100°
9.0

Joe Danger Review - PlayStation LifeStyle

Despite containing and combining elements from a number of different games, Joe Danger feels completely unique. This game will keep you coming back for more as you attempt to boost your score with insane combos. The combination of customization, speed, and combos fit in perfectly into this fun and innovative downloadable title. Joe Danger just oozes out fun and creativity and puts it into one unmissable experience, so do yourself a favor and pick up one of the best titles on the PlayStation Network.

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
The story is too old to be commented.
doctorstrange3027d ago

When the store is back up, you will not be disappointed

Milky Joe3027d ago

Yup, the game is pure genius!!!

JonnyBigBoss3027d ago

I am getting this the second the PSN Store comes back up. This looks like a masterpiece!

Briefcase Joe3027d ago

Why did you change your scoring system? Why out of 10 now?

AssassinHD3027d ago

A 10 scale is a far more accurate measurement system than a 5 scale.

Awookie3027d ago

What makes you say that, the 1-5 is much better imo
5=amazing
4=great
3=good
2=ok
1=bad

while 1-10 usually ends up going
10=amazing
8+ =great
1-7= bad

AssassinHD3027d ago

I don't think it is fair to label a 7 as bad. On a 1-10 scale 7 is well above average.

I understand your reasoning with your 5 point system, but I would argue that a 2/5 is hardly "ok". An "ok" game is comparable to an "average" game, and 2/5 is below average.

There is no true "average" on a 5 scale system because 2/5 is 40% and 3/5 is 60%.

You may argue that a reviewer could simply score in half-digit increments, but if you score in half-digit increments on a 5 scale system, then you are really using a 10 scale system anyway.

Awookie3027d ago (Edited 3027d ago )

What crazy school do u go to where 50% = average? and who cares if there isn't an exact 50%

from a visual standpoint a 6 in 1-10 is considered a bad game while a 3 out of 5 is considered good (not great) so who gives a crap if there is more numbers when only 6-10 on the 1-10 scale matter.

I mean you hardly ever see them use 1-5 on the 10 pt grade scale so whats the point?

AssassinHD3027d ago

The crazy school that taught me basic math. Technically since review scales start at 1 instead of zero, the average would be 50.5%.

Honestly review scores should be on a 0-9 scale instead of a 1-10 scale, since the decimal (base 10) system begins at 0.

AssassinHD3026d ago

I meant to type 0-10 scale. That would more fluidly translate into a percentage (to 100%) than 1-10. Starting the scale at 1 automatically gives a game a 10% value on a scale of 10 (or 1% on a scale of 100).

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3026d ago
Faztkiller3027d ago

Easier for Metacritic I'm guessing

RankFTW3027d ago (Edited 3027d ago )

I've been playing this all day, totally awesome game guys and well worth the money. Been a right laugh sitting on vent with my buddies and us all trying to beat each others high scores.

sixaxis3027d ago

i agree, been playing it for many hours straight, i cant belive how addictive it is, i even dare to call it as the best PSN game out there. i havent even tried "sandbx" (create a level).

3027d ago
Show all comments (22)