Approvals 12/3 ▼
Cyrus365 (5) - 5072d ago Cancel
Mandaspt (3) - 5072d ago Cancel
movements (2) - 5072d ago Cancel
CoffeewithChess (2) - 5072d ago Cancel
260°

What's Missing from Red Dead Redemption?

GTMAM writes - "Red Dead Redemption is easily a strong contender for Game of the Year. There is really nothing wrong with it, other than the bugged multiplayer, to speak of. But there are a few things I noticed that I would have liked to be different in the game."

Read Full Story >>
gamestechmoviesandmore.wordpress.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
SiteBot5072d ago
Sir_Falcon5072d ago

When you complete the game you should be able to drive cars over the vast landscape. Its perfect terrain for offroading with gta4s physics.

Dsnyder5072d ago

John hates cars. He said they were too slow and unreliable. So it would be out of character for him to drive one.

WildArmed5072d ago

To be able to kill children..

oh wait.. -.-

Bigpappy5072d ago

Have you done it? and why did you? Oh, i'm sorry, it wasn't you who shot the kid, it was John. I got it now.

JoySticksFTW5072d ago (Edited 5072d ago )

I haven't played RDR yet, and maybe that idea would kill the emotion of the game, but Jackie along for the ride whupping arse would be pretty cool

Maybe next game they could do it. And do co-op with the 2nd player able to use Jackie Chan's move set.

Dumb idea? Who knows, but I'd sure as heck play that!

:)

EDIT: I might get shot watching whatever crazy antics Jackie would come up with next, especially if he drank alcohol and blew fire. Aww yeah!

BannedForNineYears5072d ago

It's missing swimming.......>_>

Fred-G-Sanford5072d ago

I had high hopes for this game, but it ended up boring me to tears.

The GTA series bored me in much the same way, so I guess I'm just not a fan of Rockstar's games.

In fact, I would even go so far as to say that I hate their games. It all just feels so lame and boring, almost the same feeling I get when I go back and play a bad PS1 game.

It's cool that so many people like their games, but I am definitely not one of them.

Sm0k3y_Bac0n5072d ago (Edited 5072d ago )

Yeah everyone likes different things, but I think if you've ever enjoyed a sandbox game or third person shooter you should try RDR. SP wise, its in my top 5 favourite games.

I had a similar experience with Gran Turismo. I can play it for one hour max before needing to play Burnout.

GodsHand5071d ago

Missing the 'Swing of Death'. I would love to see some horses fly.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5071d ago
kneon5072d ago

bug and glitches missing? You must not have played it long enough. There is no shortage of bugs and glitches, what's missing is patches :)

gameslowdown5072d ago

sorry mate but your just pointing out the obvious, I could have told you that.

PrimordialSoupBase5072d ago (Edited 5072d ago )

Here is what should be obvious to people if they actually took a minute to consider what they're playing:

1. The game is incredibly easy, rarely offering an interesting challenge
2. Its economy and ecosystem exist for no reason or applicable purpose
3. Its fame and honour systems exist for no reason or applicable purpose
4. No lasso in multiplayer
5. You can't set up bait within settlements or towns (read: pointless limitations in an 'open world')
6. Though improved over GTA IV, the fail states within the linear missions can be plain retarded (I bump a race spectator, have to restart at a checkpoint)

Stalker shares many of Red Dead's systems and concepts and executes them impeccably. Rockstar once again has produced an average game with fantastic style and character -- unfortunately, the latter now takes precedence for 'gamers'

Sm0k3y_Bac0n5072d ago

I see the reasoning behind your points, but I disagree with some of them.

The game is incredibly easy with auto aim. But if you use expert aim it makes it much more challenging. You could say Bioshock unchallenging on easy, but Survivor without Vita chambers is quite a bit harder. Instead of difficulty levels you have different targetting systems.

I'm glad theres no lasso in MP. It'd just mean noobs would spend 3 hours being dragged around on the back of a horse. It'd ruin free roam.

Why would you need a more complex economy than that of gaining money to buy weapons/properties/horses? I don't see what else could be done with money other than buying things.

Fame/honour is there to give you some recognition of the effects of your actions.

If you want to read into a game that much, then fair enough. I take games as entertainment and RDR entertained me greatly.

vickers5005072d ago (Edited 5072d ago )

1. Take off auto aim, noob.
2. Just like Smokey Bacon said, what else why would you need a more complex economy system? This isn't WoW, so go back to playing that if you like economy/trade based games so much. I think it's cool that it's even there in the first place, since it adds a bit of freshness to the game.
3. Fame and honor exist for no purpose? You suck at trolling. It's obvious you haven't played the game. Fame and honor make people react to you differently, it gives you certain perks such as discounts, the law will turn a blind eye to you, and a couple of other things I haven't yet discovered.
4. True, that does suck.
5. What other actual good game lets you set up bait to lure in animals to hunt at all? Not very many. They don't want you setting up bait in town because it would be retarted. You're just too lazy to get on your horse and ride out of town for a couple of seconds. This isn't a game like mw2 where everything is done for you and you don't have to barely move.
6. Are you f*cking serious? You must be joking right? You're calling the game linear? If you think this game is linear, then I don't know what game you wouldn't consider linear. You probably delude yourself into thinking games like Uncharted 2, Alan Wake, or Halo aren't linear. For your number 6 reason, that is the very proof that you haven't played this game, or at least haven't spent more than 5 minutes with it.

I know you think you're "cool" when you're bagging on Rockstar just because they are a big dev, but you're not. But hell, I'll humor you for a bit. What games do you consider to be a non-linear, challenging, fame/honor/rankbased level system that exists for a purpose, and that has a better bait system than Red Dead?

I think you're missing the point of this game. This game is a western, and is designed to be like one. This isn't some stupid gta game where you can run around doing whatever the f*ck you want, no matter how ridiculously idiotic it may be.

Red Dead is a fantastic game, whether you like it or not, and no matter how much you hate Rockstar and think you're cool for doing so, nothing about that will change.

Independent_Charles5071d ago (Edited 5071d ago )

turn that rubbsih auto aim nonsence of for open world or atleat be able to join open world games with it turned off and make the guns deal more damage. 4 shots with the rifles into someone then get 2 shots from a lemat revelover back and im dead <-- stupid and now im just plain bord of it and gone back to gears 2 and alan

PrimordialSoupBase5071d ago (Edited 5071d ago )

The very first thing I did was remove the auto aim and it's still way too damn easy.

I bring up the bait because it's a missed opportunity to make an applicable and hilarious use of the game's AI system (bringing a bear to a gun fight, etc).

The answer to almost every single one of your other rebuttals is simply GSC's Stalker; one of the very few games that can claim to be truly open ended, and it reaps massive dividends because of it.

And no, Red Dead is not a fantastic game. While not quite as retarded as GTA IV's hyperbolic reception, the general opinion will turn slightly as time goes on and the rose coloured glasses begin to fade to reveal the real and serious problems with Rockstar's rigid design.

Sm0k3y_Bac0n5071d ago

To be honest i found Stalker mediocre at best.

Real and serious problems with R*s design? That design is the reason why R* games have become so popular so they must be doing something right.

Everyone has different tastes in games and the reason you dont like RDR is because you dont like the way games like that are designed.

RDR is a fantastic game. Just look at the amount of people saying its one of the best games they've played. You may not think it's as good as 99% of other people, but you are in a very small minority. A few people saying a game isn't fantastic does not make it an average game when thousands of people think its amazing.

poopface15072d ago

The ability to have more than 1 horse.

So my good horse can stay for xtra dangerous missions, because I dont want him to die.

- Ghost of Sparta -5072d ago

If you break a horse in the wild it immediately becomes available to buy from any General Store. You could buy all the horses you want.

bjornbear5072d ago

i killed my kentucky saddler by under estimating a cliff hight.

i survived, but he basically broke his legs and died...then when i whistled for one my normal one came back

strangely, its as fast as the saddler so i basically wasted 750 =(

still, i'd love to know...google here i come

- Ghost of Sparta -5072d ago

Bjorn. If you purchased the Kentucky Saddler and it died somehow, simply open up your satchel and consume the horse again.

aaronisbla5072d ago

you might have to buy the deed from the shop first, if its the one you get from one of bonnie's missions ( pearl white horse ) you need the deed first. $750-1500, depending on your honor and where its bought

poopface15072d ago

And It just died as I was playing a few minuets ago. Weird because I thought it was safe but I guess it died while I burned down the village.

WildArmed5072d ago

As Ghost said, Buy a deed for the horse as soon as u break it.
That way u get a free horse when the current one dies!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5072d ago
socomnick5072d ago

What's missing is Decent rpg elements, a better shooting mechanic and please remove auto toggle aiming from the multiplayer in red dead redemption 2.

Toggle aiming has no place in any multiplayer.

HighDefinition5072d ago

Wow, we agree. The world must be coming to a end.

bjornbear5072d ago

the toggle aiming should be 100% expert no auto-aim all around.

they should bunch up casual servers with normal servers, and isolate expert servers, not the other way around =/

ChefDejon5072d ago

you can level to unlock the hardcore multiplayer modes with no auto aim.

FragMnTagM5072d ago

to unlock the hardcore modes with expert aiming. Is it really that big of a deal?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5072d ago
Show all comments (74)
120°

15 PS3 Games That Would Absolutely Shine as PS5 Remakes

GB: "With this feature, we talk about 15 games on the PS3 that should be remade for the PlayStation 5."

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community7d ago
kenpachi8d ago

You left out The Darkness games bring those back

fan_of_gaming7d ago

The head of Nightdive Studios has posted that The Darkness is on their list of games they want to do, so hopefully something comes from that

Yi-Long7d ago

Little Big Planet 1 and 2 deserve a mention, IMO.

Good call on Motorstorm, a game released 2 gens ago but still looks and feels so good. Motorstorm 2 and Motorstorm RC were gems as well. They followed up the Motorstorm games with the brilliant Driveclub, which still manages to put modern racing games to shame. Imagine closing down a studio as talented as that ... (!) Incredible.

A little 'arcade-gem' back then was The Last Guy, a top down 'follow the leader' snake-like game where you had to find and lead survivors to safety during an alien invasion, on terrible looking 'Google-earth' maps. Graphics were poor, even back then, but would love that same gameplay with modern maps and graphics.

Street Fighter 4, once it finally had a full roster, was quite good, but it was always an ugly game, sadly. Imagine bringing that back while using the current SF6 engine.

fan_of_gaming7d ago

Good suggestions, I'd be in for
LittleBigPlanet
LittleBigPlanet 2
Motorstorm: Pacific Rift
Motorstorm: RC

purple1017d ago

God damn I love motorstorm so much

At the time I had a low-mid range sony 40” tv, The latency to the controller was waaaay too high, would to play a modern version

In saying that later I got a 3d lg tv and playing the 3d motorstorm in my bedroom with the environment crumbling around the track, was something special, specially compared to what others were playing at the time, will always remember that

Skuletor7d ago

Some good choices here and Resistance: Fall of Man is my most wanted PS3 remaster/remake. Not sure about their claim it was Sony's answer to Gears of War though.

CrimsonWing697d ago

I’d rather have sequels than remakes. Look at Dead Space 1 Remake. Would’ve been cooler if we got a new entry and it failed with sales sealing the fate of a sequel rather than just replay the same game and it fail in sales and we never get a new entry.

Remakes are great for things like PS2 and earlier games to really get a crazy new graphical coat, but I think we should ease up on all these remakes and actually do sequels.

fan_of_gaming7d ago

Yeah for sure, sequels would be ideal. But in the current market environment where many big publishers are risk-averse, I'd rather get a remaster or remake that a developer can do on a budget that will be approved, rather than nothing for an IP.

Inverno7d ago

I rather they remaster and port over to PC and current gen all the games permanently stuck on PS360. Those games don't need remakes, they need to be given a chance to live again outside of their confined consoles and then give a few proper sequels. Like Sleeping Dogs, Motor Storm, LA Noir, should get another entry.

fan_of_gaming7d ago

Yeah I'd be fine with remasters of PS3 games too, they don't have to be remakes.

Show all comments (17)
160°

For just $6 you can play the Red Dead Redemption port on Xbox and PS5

Rockstar Games’ shiny new Red Dead Redemption port is now on GTA+, and you can play it while claiming some tasty GTA Online benefits.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community21d ago
Profchaos21d ago

Rockstar still strying to make GTA plus work
Should be $6 for the rdr game on sale not 6 bucks for a months playtime

Exvalos21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

I hear ya, 49.99 or whatever the price on that game is, is a bit stiff seeing as it's just a port.

anast21d ago

Why would anyone rent this game?

jznrpg21d ago

One of my favorite games from PS3 generation. I have the remaster as there was a buy 2 get 1 free deal a while back but the price they are charging for the port is way too high although not surprising at all.

CobraKai20d ago

Still tryna milk a dried up cow

200°

Red Dead Redemption Title Update 1.04 Notes (PS4 / Switch)

Improvements have been made to the stability of the game

Read Full Story >>
support.rockstargames.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community37d ago
OtterX37d ago

I still think this release was a big waste of time. I would have been a day 1 purchaser if they had redone the game w RDR2 graphics. I still own my PS3 copy, so don't see the point in picking this up if it's minimally improved.

CobraKai37d ago

I bought the game cheaper than the remaster on 360. There’s no reason in releasing the game at that price with so little improvements if any.

Profchaos37d ago

It's nice to have it as a handheld game I guess if you travel a lot but yes the ps5 release was a joke

kaos8937d ago

It plays at 60 fps on PS5 and a higher res if you value that.

OtterX37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Yea, PS3 graphics at 60fps and 4k doesn't warrant the price. It was severely disappointing considering they already created so many of the assets north of the San Luis River (New Austin) in RDR2 and could have reused a lot of things, or reworked things bc they are the same area at different times in a fairly close history. It's friggin' Rockstar - you know they have the money and resources to have done it.

jznrpg21d ago

I like that I can play the game on current generation console but it would have been nice if they did more to make it look better.

Profchaos37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

They should have released the game in its current state not the state it launched in. Obvious we all wanted this to be a expansion to rdr 2 given that the original map was already remade in the game lots of people though this was just going to be added in later as paid DLC.

Now the game runs at 4k 60 fps on ps5 and can be brought on sale it's actually worth playing.

At launch the game was priced far to high and was a ps360 era game that couldn't run at 60 fps.

I'm in no way a frame rate snob I defended games like tears of the kingdom in the past for being 30 fps experiences but rdr was a joke at launch