Treyarch: Black Ops is our deepest, richest multiplayer yet

With multiplayer playing such as important part in the long-term success of both Modern Warfare and Modern Warfare 2, developer Treyarch has told MCV that it has placed more focus on the online aspects of Call of Duty: Black Ops than it ever has before.

“The multiplayer is going to be the deepest, richest multiplayer that Treyarch has ever made,” community manager at Treyarch Josh Olin told MCV.

The story is too old to be commented.
Fierce Musashi2915d ago

This game is going to sell like sex in Vagas, isn't it?

Sm0k3y_Bac0n2914d ago

Unfortunately your probably right.

villevalorox2914d ago

God I hope not, I will not be buying this game, and if I ever do it will be used. I refuse to give Activision any more of my money.

CernaML2914d ago

I wish I could say the same thing... but Blur is just too good. :(

BattleAxe2914d ago

I'm going against the "I'm cool because I'm telling everyone I hate CoD" grain.........Day one purchase for me :)

Redrum0592914d ago

I'm not gonna lie. As much as I know about activision and the cod games with all of their bull sh**. My friends aren't as informed about games as I am so they are like most ppl who think cod are the best games ever. And wich ever game has all my friends playing, I will be buying day 1.

STICKzophrenic2914d ago

I wasn't planning on getting Black Ops immediately, but with Future Soldier delayed into next year, I may get it now sooner than I thought.

I guess it'll be a toss up between this and Medal of Honor.

scar202915d ago


Greywulf2914d ago

Seek story from other FPS's

Sarobi2915d ago

I've never had a problem with any of their games,especially theire call of duty series (Big red 1, Call of duty 3, and World at war) so i really do think they will do good with black ops

IrishAssa2915d ago

The problem most people had with Waw was it was just like Cod 4 set in WW2. People said Treyarc couldn't make sh** becase of that and then Realised IW couldn't do any better with MW2. It was just another 4 but it wasn't as good as 4 because you had people focusing on getting their Killstreaks instead of playing for the team.
I like treyarcs games aswell. I liked the Spiderman games they made back in the day too and loved Cod 3 at the time.

Sarobi2914d ago

The spiderman games from tryarch is what got me into liking them, in my opinion was one of the few well worth movie games,

scar202914d ago


TenSteps2914d ago (Edited 2914d ago )

Read his post again before you caps lock and state something IrishAssassin52 never said.

He said that "The problem most people had with Waw was it was just like Cod 4 set in WW2." Read that part very carefully it means that World at War was basically just like Call of Duty 4 with the exception that World at War was set in WW2.

Sarobi2914d ago

@Sca20, IrishAssassin52 was pointing out how COD4 Played exactly the same in WAW, Not saying it was set during WW2

IrishAssa2914d ago


The spiderman games were very fun. Just swinging around the city was good fun and I agree it's one of the few good Movie games out there.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2914d ago
Michael-Jackson2914d ago (Edited 2914d ago )

I heard that Quantum of Solace sucked, I don't know if Treyarch are great developers because the only decent game they made was World at War but they used Modern Warfare Tech as a base.

mrv3212914d ago (Edited 2914d ago )

A famous artist once said. Painting is not about adding paint to a canvas but knowing when to stop... or something like that.

Stop adding stuff... titles are ok I guess but the kill streaks and perks and all that is fairly annoying. No cheap vehicles like tanks in MW2, A heli like BC2 could be great... imagine it a 3 man helicopter with one pilot and two guns.

Sm0k3y_Bac0n2914d ago

Yep, and IW didn't know why to stop, thats why MW2 was poor. On the other hand, total opposite with WaW MP. I mean, they changed barely anything from COD4 yet the MP was shite.

Karlnag32914d ago

aaaannnnnnnd end scene.

Show all comments (42)
The story is too old to be commented.