Red Dead Redemption comparison screens from MazingerDUDE.
I find it interesting that people are reporting that their version of Red Dead Redemption on PlayStation 3 looks nothing like the pictures. I'll find out this Friday, but I have a feeling that I'll be joining them.
Watch the 720p Gameplay video of the PS3 version.. Looks alot like the Xbox 360 version to me.. Maybe even better in some ways
nah i think they messed up. wonder if this was R*'s sub studio who ported this... ehh
I'm with them. Mine looks way better than this. Lol.
I swear to goodness...if i bought this on the ps3 i would be satisfied but pissed.....Gamers, seriously...don't let this slide. As long as you do developers won't give two sh!7s. They'll always say, "Well they're gunna buy it anyways..."
The 360 version is much crisper and clearer. But the weird thing is that I think the PS3 version looks better BECAUSE its blurrier. Looks less jaggy in those shots. I'm still waiting on my 360 version to get shipped, so I have yet to see either version in person.
My PS3 version looks better than the screenshots show.
I am playing on a Sony Bravia through HDMI and this game doesn't look anything like the screens in the comparison. The game looks a lot better than what they are showing here. As for the 360 version, I couldn't tell you because I haven't seen it, but what I can say for sure with the utmost certainty is that these PS3 version screens have either been doctored or taken from a crappy tv with standard hookups....definitely not what I am seeing when I play it.
I bought the PS3 version and I can tell you that the game DOES look like these screenshots. Anyone telling you otherwise is telling an outright lie.
word i bought it for the ps3 aswell, and im a little pissed seeing the 360 looking alot better in terms of overall quality sharpness and image resolution
Hmmm....you won't be able to notice the difference when in motion. IMO, it doesn't really matter. Game is still great.
I know that just because im a PS3 fanboy the 360 fanboys are gonna claim that im just being ignorant but I really don't see that big of difference...
Jesus Christ on a stick. I'm gone for a couple of days (playing Red Dead with every free minute that I've got) and N4G turns into a complete war zone. F*** me! There are several articles covering this crap and it really doesn't matter. I was able to do a side by side comparison. Yes, the 360 version does look better imo. However both versions look and run fine. Just go and play the damn game, people.
All this has proved is that those pointing fingers saying Sony fanboys are whats wrong with N4G are only half right. Bunch a fankids jumping up and down over what? Meanwhile in the real world none of this pathetic BS matters.
ive seen better comparisons. you should look elswhere.
you guys need to seriosley chill out, they both look good.
do u think rats look better in hd?
HAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAAH HAHAHA OMG I laughed so hard I pooped a lil. thankyou for making my work day alot better. :)
I actually like the PS3 version because of the softer image. It looks somewhat more movie-like than the Xbox 360 version, which stands out a little harsher almost PC-like with jaggies. It does make me wonder... if the Xbox 360 version was running at the same SUB-HD resolution they could have easily render the game with 4x AA and give it a butter smooth frame-rate! Higher resolution isn't always the icing on the cake. It should always be about how the game draws you in, in most convincing way it can. Frame drips, screen tearing, aliasing all take away from the overall experience! They pop my bubble and make me often realize I am simply playing a game. The only time I should be aware that I am playing a game is when I switch off my console! I am still picking up the Xbox 360 version here... I gotta have my Achievement points!
lol if they lowered the resolution like thato make the 360 framerate even smoother. Ps3 fanboys would say the resolution is lower because" they catered for the lowest common denominator" - seems like they really did this time..
You are so right! It would probably start a whole shit-storm of attacks and critique! Fanboys love gloating over the misfortune of others. Just getting along is so much easier!
I thought my PS3 copy looks great on my 52" Bravia. But then again my expectations were really low when i put my disk in because of GTA4. Anyway, the textures on this one is a huge upgrade compared how they looked in GTA4. It's not blurry at all. The only thing that was extremely disappointing is how small the map is. I thought it was going to be twice the size of SA but that's not true at all. Maybe they're talking about story and how long it is to finish the main story, but i highly doubt it. Yeah, it looks really great on the PS3... i did find some glitches when traveling really fast around the steeps near the right side of the map where the broken down ship is and the waterfalls. Some of the random travelers are stuck on the road and you only see the body of the person sticking out and the head of the horse from the ground. I dont like the multiplayer since they lied about the hunting challenge in which "waves of animals" attack you and your posse. That's BS i've searched all over and found nothing. If im mistaken, please somebody tell me where it is.
Head west, till you see a small cluster of trees(they look like Oak). they will form a circle. go to the middle of the circle, and "crouch". hold down "X" for about 15 seconds, and you'll hear a the sounds of animals growling, this means the challenge has started. wait for the animals to attack. ;) hope this helps.
i own both systems and i personally prefer ps3 over 360 in general gaming but to say those screen shots look the same would be a lie and you know it, its clear that 360 version looks slightly in some cases much better.
There is no denying that's the case. What I miss, though, is the DF article, which points out what and how R* could have improved the PS3 version to match the 360 - in the same way they wrote a 3 page article doing exactly that with FF-XIII for the 360. Like using BD/HDD streaming, SPU/MLAA, etc. I don't say it's R* fault. That is an relatively old engine (Rage, AFAIK and the same as GTA IV, based on what they knew in 2005). For sure not optimized for the PS3.
I prefer the PS3's more softer look to be honest.. Gives it a overall better look Xbox 360 version looks way too rough around the edges for my liking
Lol x2 i know.. right? the 360's smooth frame-rate, clarity, sharpness, improved shadows and lack of pop in are also not to his liking.
you guys really have no idea what your talking about. Keep reading you super informative internet articles about how superior the 360 version is when I gauruntee that you have no even seen the game run on the PS3. Like I said earlier I have the game for the xbox and my best friend has the game for PS3. We both have the same Toshiba 42" 1080p tv model. There is no discernible difference what so ever. Ive played the game on his PS3 and hes played on my Xbox, They look exactly the same and neither of us can tell the difference. You guys wreak of fanboy ignorance
hahaha... i had to read it twice.. bloody hell u are funny. "I prefer the PS3's more softer look to be honest.. Gives it a overall better look Xbox 360 version looks way too rough around the edges for my liking" hehahahaloool
Hard to believe the difference is this noticeable. Either way, just enjoy the damn game.
It isn't, but this is exactly the response I expected. I can almost guarantee you that if I put up 2 videos of the same version but falsely labeled one as "360 720p" and the other "PS3 subHD," almost everyone would be saying "Wow, there's a HUGE difference! Version __ looks so much better!!!!" I can't deny I do get a bit of a laugh out of all this. People are clawing each others eyes out over marginal differences. When I buy Crysis 2 on PC later this year, THAT WILL BE A SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE over the other versions. These versions of RDR look very, very similar.