Top
230°

Prince of Persia Xbox 360 vs. PS3 - Screenshot Comparison

Videogameszone compared the graphical differences between the PS3 and Xbox 360 version of the new Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands.

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.de
The story is too old to be commented.
BubbleSystemSuck2651d ago

please... please... Stop whith this "Screen comparison" thing

N4GAddict2650d ago

Yea, the game is fine on both consoles

niceguywii602650d ago

Not even videogamezone can hide the differences this time.

Robert Patrick2650d ago

this game will suck, so this is pointless.

Sm0k3y_Bac0n2650d ago

@Robert.

I really, really hoped it wouldn't suck but it just doesn't seem have the same "je n'ai cest que" as the PoP games from PS2. Ah well. Guess I'll have to wait for Mirrors Edge 2 until i get a decent acrobatic game.

Jack Klugman2650d ago (Edited 2650d ago )

seriously the WORST site for game comparisons right here.. just awful and always trying to beat the real sites that do this like DF and LoT.

anyway, 360 version for the win again even with this poor comparison.

SaberEdge2650d ago

I agree that this is the worse site for comparisons.

BubbleSystemSuck2650d ago (Edited 2650d ago )

hate comparisons...
is only for flame bait....

ZeroX98762651d ago

mmmm, normaly I'm taking for the ps3 sides since the lighting is almost always better, but this title is clearer on the 360. not that you could really see this when your playing (in motion), but when looking at those screenshot, it seems the 360 got better textures. one of the best screenshot to see the difference is the seventh one. the enemies are clearer on 360 than ps3. Well, the ps3 and the 360 can't be better than the other in every title.

Alcon Caper2650d ago

The 360 version does seem to have better textures. And the enemies are less blurry as well.

niceguywii602650d ago

Normally PS3 has better lighting? LOl You mean you like the low contrast faded look of PS3 hardware better.

N4GAddict2650d ago

Looks good on both consoles.

SeanRL2650d ago

No, seriously, they look the exact same. Can we just enjoy the game?

kaveti66162650d ago

Since the game will probably be mediocre, no, I cannot enjoy this game on either one of my consoles.

talltony2650d ago

Why is mediocrity always being compared to mediocrity? Why don't we only compare the best on each console? This multiplat doesn't push the bar in any way shape or form.

dirthurts2650d ago

Some people own both platforms and want to buy the better running version. Simple as that. It's not a my console is bigger than your console thing. Why can't people get that?

dirthurts2650d ago

If you really want to compare hardware...go build a pc.

talltony2650d ago (Edited 2650d ago )

Most Multiplat game differences are not even worth mentioning which why these comparisons are usually pretty stupid except in the case of bayonetta and final fantasy

Milamber2650d ago

@ Dirthurts

Yes, but in this case there is really no difference to report.

dirthurts2650d ago

But not enough to really push one way or the other. As long as the frame rates hold up the two versions are similar enough to where you should just pick your favorite controller.
I don't expect even the PC version to look much better, except for much higher resolution with Ubisofts track record as of late.
But you are correct. Very little difference.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2650d ago
kneon2650d ago

Actually it looks quite good, better than average, and I think better that Red Dead Redemption, the other game I got today. The cut scenes were excellent. A bit too good in fact as it's a bit jarring switching from cut scene to game play.

Show all comments (32)
The story is too old to be commented.