Top
260°
9.3

NowGamer: Red Dead Redemption PS3 Review

It’s a sad state of affairs when, with a blank page and a head full of Wild West memoirs, you’re suddenly affronted by the notion that nothing you can write can do justice to that which you’re attempting to describe. Not because we ourselves lack the prosaic cock and balls to meet the graphical poetry of Red Dead Redemption head on with like-for-like lyrical smugness. More that, while Red Dead carries it off effortlessly, we, mere humble game hacks, come off sounding like we’re trying too hard.

Read Full Story >>
ps3.nowgamer.com
The story is too old to be commented.
Indy-Pendent2747d ago

Never would have expected that!.....haha!.....The wait is painful.

II Necroplasm II2747d ago

I'm about to take some sleeping pills, so the next thing I know, I'm playing this game.

knight6262747d ago

Great game so far cant stop playing it i just need to unlock all 13 costumes and have fun with the wild west everyone will love this game

kvg882747d ago

But seriously, are we going to argue 1/10th of a mark?

The games awesome, can't wait to get it!

Strange_Evil2747d ago

"The PS3 version has to remain the same as that on graphically inferior hardware (360). Put that right out of your mind, though. Because even though the 360 version is perhaps more impressive for having overcome greater limitations, the two are identical, and you can rest assured, that even by the higher graphical standards of a PS3 owner, this game is still going to melt your face off."

Well, so both the versions seem equal and none have said either is lacking... So good news for all.

xdye0172747d ago

What's weird is the ps3 review takes advantage in the graphics and sound while the 360 review in gameplay and longetivity. Its like the reviewer is talking about 2 completely different games :S. I thought they both have the same content.....

kvg882747d ago

That's really weird - is it even the same reviewer? Because gameplay wise, it should obviously be the same, if not tipped in favour of the PS3 because of exclusive content.

holdmedownma20082747d ago

It's two different reviewers bro.

Elimin82747d ago

He's saying that while the PS3 version takes advantage in the graphics and sound department the 360 does not but still thrives in gameplay and longevity. Meaning They are equal except the PS3 does Graphics and sound better. be it fully or slightly better...

My 2Cents...

MGRogue20172747d ago (Edited 2747d ago )

"The PS3 version has to remain the same as that on graphically inferior hardware (360). Put that right out of your mind, though. Because even though the 360 version is perhaps more impressive for having overcome greater limitations, the two are identical, and you can rest assured, that even by the higher graphical standards of a PS3 owner, this game is still going to melt your face off."

Ah man.. I think the PS3 version is going to win in the graphics department.. Partly because most PS3 games tend to have vSync enabled & in that one PS3 gameplay video of the game I saw.. The framerate looked really smooth, Like 40fps smooth. :)

PS3 version for me! :D

kvg882747d ago

that's not what the score implies. They gave 360 version 9.4.

holdmedownma20082747d ago

It's two different reviewers bro.

AKS2747d ago

That part of the review wasn't necessary and badly damages the credibility of the review and even the entire website.

holdmedownma20082747d ago

You're right bro, but if that's the case IGN should be on its last leg.

AKS2747d ago

I've already made a comment about ign in another thread.

Show all comments (19)