510°

Duke Nukem creator: PS3 is a 'mighty fine system'

Nick @ PS3Center writes:

Though we still have no idea what's going to happen with Duke Nukem Forever, Duke's creator George Broussard has recently come out and started answering some questions from the fans. So of course, what was one of the first questions? 360 or PS3.

Read Full Story >>
ps3center.net
Godmars2905132d ago

Chances are it *might* come to the PS5 or Xbox 1420.

tmt3455132d ago

but i had to laugh at the fact that the huge 360 compliment was completely ignored :P

long live ps3!

Government Cheese5132d ago

""I prefer the 360 due to Xbox Live and the unified achievement system," Broussard replied. "I think it's a better end user experience."

He was quick to point out, though, that he is a fan of the PS3 as well, saying "I play the big exclusives on PS3 and it's a mighty find(sic) system.""

xaviertooth5132d ago

@blitz0623

its indeed 1420. xbox is naturally an incomplete system.

AridSpider5132d ago

"I prefer the 360 due to Xbox Live and the unified achievement system," Broussard replied. "I think it's a better end user experience."

'nuff said. Can't fight facts.

El_Colombiano5132d ago

AridSpider,

"I prefer"

"'nuff said. Can't fight facts."

Ummm....google what a fact and fiction are.

Blaze9295132d ago

I think he means the "unified achievement system" part.

Either way, who cares.

raztad5132d ago

@Ard

Oh Xbox Live? hehehe. Keep chatting. I'm back to MAG and GoW3.

KingME5132d ago

The guy makes "ONE" statement about the PS3 being a fine machine an it becomes a news story on N4G. To hell with what the rest of the interview said..."LOOK EVERYONE" he said "The PS3 is a mighty fine machine!"

So stupid, and desparate!

You PS3 guys seem so needy sometimes, most of the time.

Foliage5132d ago (Edited 5132d ago )

KingME your comment displays the most neediness in this whole topic. Wah! the 360 wasn't mentioned... Wah!... go cry some more.

And who cares about this guys opinion? If you didn't notice, his studio was shut down because they haven't been able to make a proper decision in years... there isn't a lot of stock to put in his preference of consoles when he hasn't done anything of relevance outside of working on a PC numerous years ago.

And it's quite obvious which is the better system, seeing as the 360 is 4-5 years behind what the PS3 is showing in their exclusives these days. The 360 is incapable of matching the superior PS3.

Christopher5132d ago (Edited 5132d ago )

Both systems are good, but there's no denying that XBLA makes a lot of why the 360 is good just like PS3's exclusive quality and quantity is why the PS3 is good.

Having said that... who the heck wouldn't guess that the title of the article would be PS3-focused considering it's on a PS3 site? The same exact thing happens on 360-focused sites as well.

When in doubt, proof that it's important to actually read articles and not titles, just like it's important to read reviews and not just look at review scores.

YourCall5132d ago (Edited 5132d ago )

Does this look familiar?

"If you come into a PS3 topic and troll, I will act like a fanboy in return... espcially since you guys leave logic at the door when you hit the "reply" button.

Why xbox fanboys have so much interest in PS3 topics, I might never know, but I have a good idea. Let's just say it involves inferiority, a very little certain appendage, no life, and a lot of jealousy from the xbot."

Try at least maintaining consistency with you own lame bio. This story is pointless and appears to be a hollow PS3 feel good story. The title along is simply ridiculous. You're the one that's actually needy. You have a need to run your mouth whenever someone says something about the PS3. I know I'll get disagrees and your bullshot comments will get agrees because you fanboy support each others like members of AA. My name is foilage and I am a HARDCORE PS3 FANBOY. "Hello Foilage!"

Read your bio again, and put your name everywhere you put Xbox, 360, or xbox. Talking about a douche.

The article is about Broussard and questions he was asking. The funny thing is he was ask 360 or PS3 and he picked the 360 is the one he perfers, then so that he wouldn't get bombarded with hate mail, he said that the PS3 is a mighty fine machine, and just like a desparate attention wh0re, PS3 fans made an article about it and use it comment as the title even. Seriously? That is needy if you ask me and even if you don't.

Dead_Cell5132d ago

"KingME your comment displays the most neediness in this whole topic. Wah! the 360 wasn't mentioned... Wah!... go cry some more."

He's saying that both consoles were mentioned in the article, and therefore there is no logical reason to not mention somebody likes both in the headlines. This headline -has- been spun into a pro-ps3 one.

So you're pretty much full of sh*t.

ScrappyDoo5131d ago

Says the guy who can't get a game done in 13yrs.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 5131d ago
DelbertGrady5132d ago

"I prefer the 360 due to Xbox Live and the unified achievement system," Broussard replied. "I think it's a better end user experience."

Sure is. Unified achievements. Tons more games & content. Proper game invitation system. Unified headset & party support. Can't imagine playing BF BC 2 with a bunch of mic-less morons, running around on the battlefield like headless chickens.

blasian5132d ago

better mic-less than listening to little 12 year old boys saying everything and anything about sex and race.

DelbertGrady5132d ago (Edited 5132d ago )

So that's why you play without headsets? I haven't encountered what you mentioned while playing BF BC 2 on Xbox Live so it must be isolated to PSN.

Most PS3 fanboys on N4G act like 12 year olds/caged animals(open zone is 95% PS3 mongrels) so I guess they/you behave the same on PSN. Wouldn't want to play with them either.

CernaML5132d ago (Edited 5132d ago )

People play Bad Company 2 on Xbox Live? I thought they were still stuck on MW2. Teh Map Packs Teh Map Packs!

Anyway, BC2 on the PSN is tons of fun. Most of the time people have mics, but it's always much better to join a friend's squad.

DigitalHorror815131d ago

Get real. You're going to have that anywhere you go. I was playing Left 4 Dead and MW2 on 360 and the same 12 year olds are on PS3. You're going to have it wherever you go. As for fanboyism, you're a 360 Fanboy as big as they come. "I just prefer the 360."

Yes, and I prefer the PS3. Don't tell me you've NEVER heard of little kids on LIVE, because when I played GEARS, I was often sniped by children on breaks from school; the types of kids that don't know a whole lot about button combos but can still kick your backside like it ain't no thing.

And PS3 IS a "mighty fine system." I didn't know if I'd like it once I got RROD, but once I unboxed it and set it up to my HDTV, I was a believer. You should try it, you'll like it.

TheXgamerLive5131d ago

The second place console get's billing in the title even though it was an actual let down by the games creator in the story, HA HA HA HA HA HA !!!!!!!!

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5131d ago
callahan095132d ago

What does he mean "unified achievement system"? Uh... trophies? Every meaningful PS3 game except for literally about 5 of them has trophies, and every PS3 game coming out from now until forever will have them. Everybody can earn them, compare them, etc. etc., I'm not sure how it doesn't qualify as "unified" or on par with the achievements system.

Pennywise5132d ago

Why waste your breath? The uninformed teenage anti-sony blog campaign must go on!!

creatchee5131d ago

He's saying the *unified* Achievement system because EVERY game released for the 360 must have Achievements built into the game, not just the "meaningful" ones. I believe that the minimum high end of Gamerscore benefit is 250G for Arcade/Indy games and 1000G for retail/full games.

It's different for PS3 because Trophies weren't even in games until firmware 2.40 in 2008. They became required for all releases on PS3 in 2009. But it couldn't be considered a unified system because there are 2-3 years of games that don't have trophies. Some have been updated, but many have not.

Walrus5131d ago

people on here can't seem to tell the difference between "fact" and "opinion". Oh, and, while I prefer trophies, He has a point about the unified achievements. It's irritating to play older games (Soul Calibur 4, for example) and get absolutely no trophies for them.

Statix5131d ago

Why does it matter if some game from 2006 doesn't have trophies? The fact of the matter is, 100% of newly-released games (starting from back in 2008) have trophy support and that's good enough. It's not like I'm f***ing weeping and mounrful that I can't go back and play Resistance 1 all over again just to get all the trophies for it.

creatchee5131d ago

Does it matter or will people be weeping and mournful because some game from 2006 doesn't have Trophy support? No.

Would replays of the same game be enhanced in some way by the addition of Trophies? Of course it would.

But the point of his preference in terms of the two progress systems was that all 360 games have Achievements, where not all PS3 games have Trophies. Hence, the unified Achievement system tag.

And for the record, who in their right mind WOULDN'T want to play MGS4 with Trophies?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5131d ago
The Milkman5132d ago

I believe what he means by "unified" is that all the achievements amount to one full number. So then people are more likely to try for those little silly achievements for fun to get more of a overall reward. No one cares about how many bronze trophies you have because it's like having a handful of pennies you collected. Then again if you like to really only worry about the main achievements then the trophy system is for you. I personally like both depending on the game though.

For the flame bait comments please be don't be such hypocrites. I see so many false PS3 news used as flame bait all the time. One article that got approved a lot that was completely fake about the ps3 console sales pissed me off the most. It was some normal person that created a free website and posted some fake bulls%^t and it got approved. This is article is all fact and it deserves to be approved. The guy prefers Xbox achievements more so what? Does that mean everyone has to feel the same way now? I swear ps3 fanboys cry the most of the group. I just want to ram that bottle down your throat sometimes.

nycredude5132d ago

You know what is worse or at least just as bad as elite fanboys? Elite anti fanboys who come on here acting like their sh*t don't smell. Dude get off your high horse man.

Like it or not, for better or worse, Fanboys are just gamers who are a bit more passionate about their choice of console(s). Try not to be so condescending, especially just towards once side, as if the other side is any better.

On the actual topic of achievement and trophies, I actually like the trophies better as it separates out the more persistent/skilled/serious trophy gamers as opposed to the ones who just play alot. Achievements is just one big arbitrary number and doesn't do anything to differentiate between the ones who just play alot and the truly skilled.

kaveti66165132d ago

Lol @ nycredude.

Your IQ has dropped so low that you now have the audacity to come on here and defend fanboyism. Maybe your definition of what a fanboy is, is different from my definition. In my mind, a fanboy is an individual who is so infatuated with a certain product that he jealously defends his product from all competitors by bashing all competing products, regardless of what those products bring to the table. And this fanboy does all of this because of the insecurities he has about his purchase of the product. He needs to defend his console in order to maintain his dignity. Ironically, the fanboy loses his dignity the moment he chooses to be a fanboy. Fanboys are illogical, irrational, annoying, loud, and altogether useless pricks of the consumer world. They're not actually gamers. Real gamers appreciate games for what they are. They don't b*tch incessantly about a game or a console that they don't like or is not on their system. Because honestly, it's not just a coincidence that every game on a particular system is "awesome" and every game on the system you don't own is "garbage." It's you. It's not the console, it's not the games. The problem resides with the fanboy. And I would argue that I am more passionate about games than any fanboy on this site.

Pennywise5132d ago

Okay, kaveti6616... Give me a break. Just because I prefer one console over another does not make my opinion useless. I've been gaming from probably before most people were conceived on this site. I've owned almost all consoles since gaming started and dozens of gaming PC's. I have spent an embarrassing amount of my life playing games and I am being led to believe by you that my opinion is worth nothing because I don't like MS or their 360? You are delusional and add nothing to any conversation you take part in... It is okay to put people in check with your comments(I do it a bunch), but that seems to be ALL you do. Quit worrying about who bought which system in order to get a feel for their opinion.

I will always be honest with my opinions... I will let you know if I haven't played something( I usually won't have to because if I haven't played it, I won't comment)...I think NYC had a very valid point and you came here to tell him his IQ dropped and his opinions mean crap because he doesn't lay down and take it like the mindless consumers that you let influence your decisions. Unlike you kaveti6616, I like to take my opinions from gamers with standards.

nycredude5132d ago (Edited 5132d ago )

What does iq have to do with anything here. We are talking about games, and about gaming in a free world. Where does it say in the bible or law or whatever book you adhere to that you can't be a fanboy? Why can't I favor one console over another? At least I own both consoles unlike so many others who come here and pop crap.

Maybe next time you should make more sense before you come and attack someone. You don't have to be a fanboy to be "illogical, irrational, annoying, loud". You are proof of this with your totally obnoxious and condescending comment here. I agree with some of your assessment of the problem with fanboyism, but your hate of it is borderline fanatical.

Fact is this is a free world and people who spend their own money are aloud to criticize all they want, however baseless their criticism may be. I don't always agree, but that is just the way things are. There are certain people here who take it to another, but for the most part all I see are people who prefer one over the other, and I can respect their opinion while disagreeing.

Personally I try to remain neutral, but I do admit that I prefer one console over the other, but it's mainly because of the experience it gives me over anything else, besides the fact that I don't like what I perceive to be nickle and diming by big corporations.

kaveti66165131d ago

I'm delusional? There a few choice words I'd like to say to you right now, but I won't because I'll get banned. But just know, I do indeed think your opinion is worthless. More so because your dislike of a company has translated into a dislike for games that come from said company. Your opinion is worthless because you are blatantly biased. Just think, how can anyone trust what you say about any game, whether it be from Microsoft or from Sony? If somebody asks you what you think of a game that's on the 360, you say it's crap. If somebody asks you what you think of a Sony game, you say it's innovative, and wonderful. How can anyone use you as an unbiased source? You shamelessly kiss Sony's ass, and you hide on this site just because it's overrun with fanboys like yourself who share your biased opinion. You don't enjoy games just for being games. You talk about your Sony games as being "sophisticated and mature" and you bash 360 games as being for little kids. None of what you say should be heeded.

dawgsfan1175131d ago

I believe being a fanboy is completely pointless. I have asked a million times and not one fanboy has given me a good reason for defending one system OVER ANOTHER SYSTEM. Thats the key point. Why do you feel the need to state every single thing a PS3 can do better than a 360 or vice versa. I own both and they each have their strengths and weaknesses (360 has better online IMO and PS3 has better graphics). Point is that no matter what someone says about your chosen console it doesn't change the way you use it. So why argue over the internet about the superior console?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5131d ago
Show all comments (88)
170°

Duke Nukem Promo Caught Using AI Images, Publisher Apologises

It took about five seconds for artists (and fans) to notice.

What would otherwise have been a fairly minor announcement, the news that some old Duke Nukem games were coming to an Evercade handheld, has blown up after the rapid discovery that the bundle’s promotion included a bunch of terrible machine-generated imagery.

Amplitude323d ago

Literally who cares. It's a picture of Duke Nukem shooting a gun on a black background to announce a tiny port to a practically unheard of handheld. Why would anybody care that it's AI generated?

Sciurus_vulgaris323d ago

AI generated art often borrows or outright steals from copyrighted images. The the work of freelance artist is also used by AI without the consent of the artist, who are furthermore not given credit.

RiseNShine323d ago

This is a bit confusing, so if an artist painting is inspired by other artists, should their art be removed? All in all, almost all art is inspired/borrowed by previous artists in one way or another, if you use some form of impressionism, should Monet descendants be able to take down your art?. In this case, the character property is from the publisher, and the rest of the art is as generic as it can be, how is this a copyright issue, is dark scenery with red smoke some kind of copyright infringement?

bloop323d ago

@Rise: If you use a music analogy, it's fine to create something in a particular style inspired by something else as long as it's not an exact copy. You most certainly cannot use someone else's recording, add your own recordings on top of it and then call it your own though.

Amplitude322d ago (Edited 322d ago )

The AI is trained on copyrighted images but does not steal them. This has already been ruled in court.

Is it taking away artists jobs? Already has, clearly. There's other artist work out there for now.
Is it taking my job? Yes

It is what it is. It ain't going anywhere and there's a 100% chance that it's gonna be used more and more for game art (and I'm sure literally every career you can think of in the next couple years).

If it gives the Duke Nukem devs (or any other dev for that matter) that much more money to spend on the game instead of ads then I'm all for it.

ps: I've been obsessed with AI for 5 years now and I truly believe this is the beginning of AI replacing the vast majority of jobs and think it's the best thing that could possibly happen to humanity. It's gonna happen quicker than you think. Nobody WANTS to work - even an artist would rather be making their own art to sell rather than being commissioned to do a duke nukem promo shot. We'll figure it out

sadraiden322d ago

@amplitude

no one wants to work, and yet that is all that will happen thanks to AI. AI will take all of the interesting creative jobs away from people that are actually good at them, and those people will have to find tedious jobs to keep the machine running and feed their families. yayyyy......

bloop322d ago

Amplitude: "I for one welcome our AI overlords."

If you think millions of people losing their jobs is going to be the "best thing that could possibly happen to humanity," you need your head checked. Think about it for one second.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 322d ago
CrimsonWing69323d ago

Why do they need to apologize? You can’t use AI generated imagery in advertising now?

gold_drake322d ago

copyright is a very .. complicated thing.

sadraiden322d ago

I'm sure there's an actual human artist that could have used the work.

Essentially, if you're not going to demonstrate to me that your game has soul, then I won't play it.

CrimsonWing69322d ago (Edited 322d ago )

But this isn’t the game, it’s like an advertising/promo. And I’m not sure about copyright because isn’t this an original work? Games sometimes use pieces of other people’s photos for textures, for example bricks or sand.

I’d assume this would fall under something similar for use. I mean, is the image it produced original or did the AI program literally just find someone’s Duke Nukem fan art and post it?

60°

"Hail to the King" - Duke Nukem is coming to Evercade.

Two collections featuring six great games will be available in November 2023. Including Duke Nukem 3D and Introducing: DUKE NUKEM 1+2 REMASTERED - developed by Blaze Entertainment!

80°

2D Sidescrolling Version of Duke Nukem Forever Leaked

Duke Nukem Forever originally began its life as a sidescroller instead of a shooter back in 1996, and that canceled version has just been leaked.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
Rancegamerx481d ago

Very cool, but i don't know how real this is... I'll check it out later to find out.