130°
Submitted by Espio1 1771d ago | news

Starcraft 2: 'No chance' of LAN support

CVG: Blizzard has ruled out the possibility of it ever introducing LAN support into Starcraft 2 - saying its new 'always online' Battlenet system does a comparable job. (Industry, PC, Starcraft II, Starctaft 2)

Alternative Sources
TotalPS3Fanboy  +   1771d ago
Well, then...
'No chance' of MY support
'No chance' of ME buying
Darkstorn  +   1771d ago
Blizzard should really think about adding LAN. How hard could it be? And it'll appease a lot of fans.
conker121  +   1771d ago
First off I dont get the quotation of 'no chance' since he didnt use those words so trying to be cute with your comment failed. Second, get over it. Most games LAN barely even work or are underused in general. SC2 looks like it will have an endless and amazing amount of content. 90% of people saying they wont buy the game over the LAN issue are simply talking out of their ass.
FantasyStar  +   1771d ago
I'm just preparing for the fallout of SC2 when it drops. I think Blizzard will take EA's spot of "most pirated game ever due to DRM".
#1.3 (Edited 1771d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
badz149  +   1771d ago
@conker
have you ever played Starcraft?? LAN is massively important for that game! I think, you're the one talking out of your ass!
Noctis Aftermath  +   1771d ago
While the loss of LAN does suck, with how easy it is to connect to the internet these days i think alot of you are overreacting, in fact i'd go so far as to say that the majority of you never planned on buying the game and instead planned on pirating it anyway.

Disagree away.
GenoZStriker  +   1771d ago
Hmmmmmmm........
Funny because people in the beta and competitive scene have completely forgotten that SC2 has no LAN, why? BECAUSE THEY DON'T CARE. The game is great and is looking great.
siliticx  +   1771d ago
Too bad Blizz...
Emulated servers are already starting to host on LANs...
Halo3 MLG Pro  +   1771d ago
hackzors!!!
rexus12345  +   1771d ago
Nothing wrong with this
People intending to play multiplayer implies they have Internet connection
if blizz designed battlenet so you can very easily join your friend in a game, then this is perfectly reasonable DRM
FantasyStar  +   1771d ago
You forget about us people that would like to take our rigs up in the mountains where there's no internet with some buddies for Spring Break. So explain how I would be able to play the game I purchased if there's no internet here?

I'm inconvenienced because Blizzard is treating their fanbase like criminals.
XxRoosterxX  +   1771d ago
if you're going up to the mountains and you're bringing a computer, you're missing the point of the of "going to the mountains.
JussBlazn  +   1771d ago
I blame Activision
CARRIERHASARRIVED  +   1771d ago
They want the Battle.net usage at an all-time high after SC2 is released. There will be fees, fees, fees, and ads you must endure. They talked about it rivaling Steam, which be be cool to see.

But, I think they're going to make a lot of decisions their long-time fans won't approve of. After D3's showings, It's safe to say it's the WoW-fan's game in it's current state (not SC related I know, but a negative on them for sure). After hearing about the LAN-dropping, I can't help but think of the PC/MW2 fiasco. Basically, "You play where we tell you to play or you don't play at all."

One of these things just doesn't belong. Can anyone guess?

Activision/Blizzard, Blizzard/Activision, Blizzard, Activision

That doesn't sit well with me, seeing as I first started playing SC (and WC) in a LAN house. You can bet this game will be molested by hackers trying to find a work-around.

The gameplay is tight though, I can attest to that.
I Call 9MM  +   1771d ago
Another crippled PC game. Sigh, you disappoint me on a regular basis Activision. You, Ubisoft and EA. Starcraft was made for LAN, me and my buddies regularly played LAN games often, it was fun. These publishers are killing PC gaming.
ApexHell  +   1771d ago
lol
wait for teknogods to crack lan on it :P they already got it to work offline :P.
hazelamy  +   1771d ago
always on?
have recent events not shown that there's no such thing?
5tgyw3ty34  +   1770d ago
No lan, no buy. Simple as that.
And btw, they better work on the graphics cause the low poly stuff looks a lil sh|tty as of now.
#11 (Edited 1770d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

8 Ways to Go to Hell According to Videogames

9m ago - Outsidexbox: We thought you got to hell by doing bad things such as murder or walking slowly wi... | PC
20°

Joystiq is closing and I'll miss them like hell

9m ago - Polygon: The death of a gaming news website is a terrible thing. It weakens the video game in... | Industry
20°

Dying Light - All Battle Journal Text Collectibles

30m ago - There are 17 Marvin Zucker's Battle Journals in Dying Light. They are one of text collectibles an... | PC
20°

Funk of Titans Video Review - CramG

39m ago - A video review showcasing the side scrolling over the top Funk of Titans game in action on Xbox One. | Xbox One
Ad

Visit CGMagazine: The Culture of Games

Now - CGM is for the mature audience of comics and games that wants more out of their media than just a review score. | Promoted post
30°

Life Is Strange review: an untaxing but enjoyable trip through time | Independent

44m ago - The plot is what will drive you to buy at least one more episode. This introduction does more tha... | PC