Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Live Action Trailer shows no in game footage but possible features of the title. Cloaking, Land Based Drones, and even more technological advances since G.R.A.W.
Should be Wii too.
Cloaking Looks Bad Ass!
Yes it does. I cant wait to play the beta from SCC.
Theres a beta in SCCC???
Lol! Yep there sure is! http://www.gamestop.com/Cat... Check bonus info on the page.
I wonder if PS3 will get a beta a little later too.
For some reason, this does not interest me whatsoever. The next Rainbow Six please?
Sorry but everything shown is Killzone 2. From cloaking to facemask is way too similar.
as a Killzone fan This good that this guys are been inspired by KILLZONE 2 and not Halo(Power rangers inpired) or MW2. But even in real live action the animation and effects on KILLZONE 2 looks much better quality . I hope the game-play on this game is Good and top quality. like in KILLZONE. GRAW was ok in the single player it was fun .
Never really been big on the GRAW games but they've been reasonably entertaining for me in the past but I hoping gameplay vids match the excitement of that trailer though. ... feels great to see FPSs being inspired/influenced by GGs Killzone2 instead of the regular ol' CoD/Halo clone #3891748385 we've been feed for far too long.
Conker's Bad Fur Day had both cloaking and face masks. Killzone 2 = GRFS = Conker's Bad Fur Day?! OMGBBQ
arent we tired of killing crazy Russians?
there is no russian dev making an FPS killing crazy American yet (as far as I can remember), so...while waiting for that to happen, crazy russian will do for now, I guess.
Looks pretty cool, but I wonder why the soldiers taking down the tanks didn't just cloak before attacking? Clearly you can move and be cloaked at the same time.
Very similar the stance when he walk, cloaked like this character:
Russians and Arabs aren't the "bad guys" lol? If Americans r the bad guys in a game, it would cause the biggest controversy ever.
American's were the bad guys in Modern Warfare 2 and Splinter Cell Double Agent.
This should be Xbox Exclusive.
LOL 576p FTW /S Thats all 360 can do 576p
Shuld be calls noob kid5507
so it cant perform and have the visual dream the developers want. look im not a fanboy, but 360 exclusive just cant match the ps3 excluive in performance and visuals. Just look what happen the metro 2023. hyped up to be goty and better visuals then killzone2, but it flopped.
I would much rather see some in game footage than this crap, this has nothing to do with the game as far as I'm concerned. All this does is increase the price I have to pay for games. That had to be exspensive as hell to make. Spend more time on games, less time one Live Action Trailers.
Gotta admit though that's great advertising.
What a waste of time and money...where's the game play already...This was gonna come out last yr then delayed...They better have some gameplay at E3...Beta on SC Conviction???... MW2 game trailers were awesome...love that game...IMO, Graw 2 best multi player this gen...Incredible maps, weapons, game modes and graphics, on 360 anyway, PS3 version brutal and PSN...well...lets not talk about it...Redstorm handled the multi player stuff...single player pretty bad going back to graw 1...Redstorm should make their own game...The whole cloak thing is dumb...looks like Crysis...I heard all kinds of stories already, captain mitchell goona be bionic man in this one...LMAO...What's going on with Ubisoft....
There hasnt been a Ghost Recon game since the CODMW series. I wonder if it can still be popular.
You're right. Man Ubisoft has some old franchises. Splinter Cell is like 7 years old this one is older than that. Rainbow Six, they need some new IP's
Not sure about popularity, but I'm pretty sure that it will be better. The AW2 gameplay is still, to this day, superior to MW2. The stuff you can do is much more interesting and it's less casual than the CoD series.
I completely agree. After being a casual gamer for the majority of my life, GRAW was the first shooter I bought and it was so amazing and turned me into a shooter junkie lol. This video looks sweet. It gives a little bit of story info and shows off some features they have in store for the game. I want this game now!
that was crazy i cant wait till summer to play the beta :)
Someone up above said that theres a beta in Splinter Cell Conviction.
Russians as enemies is quickly becoming old. To all the developers out there, please use Taliban/Al Qaeda, Chinese Red Army, North Koreans, or even Iranians as your foes!
what about americans?
where did that come from? dumbass
So you suggest, which you think is a 'better' enemy, North Korea and Iran? Really!? Seeing as how NK could not launch an offensive against the US and the US could just bomb it from afar.. which would defeat the purpose of a video game. And Iran? So by saying Iran, and excluding them from your 'Taliban/Al-Qeada foe', you mean the Iranian army? That would be a pointless game, enemy to fight, using conventional warfare... the US is light years ahead of Iran in military capability. And for your 'terrorist foes' there's a million games out using that. And as for China, there are less, but OF:Dragon Rising did it most recently. Basically, they've all been used and reused... most scenarios for 'foes' are not great, and most people don't care when you're playing a game. It's a game!
africans. oh wait no you cant because some people will get offended and trust me it wont be the the blacks or afican people calling out racism. so i wonder who? edit or how being a character other then white, like african american or filipino or japanese or arabain, but something other then british or american. thats why i like character custimazation in games likes masseffect and oblivion, i can be any color.
@voice of reason, Well, I was only giving nationality suggestions since German, Russians, and Japanese (if developers start cranking out WWII Pacific Theatre games, which I see as the next WWII FPS trend) are just soooo plain beaten to death! Sure, we Americans have the technological advantage to take those countries, including Russia, with ease. However, there are many variables that make things complicated, and technology only gives you an edge, and not a simple solution to win a war. Game wise, it doesn't have to be an all-out military offensive and more of a covert operation. As far as "videogame terrorists" goes, and I know there are a lot of games that uses them as "bullet fodders", 98 percent of them are your usual stereotypes...rogue Russians. What I'm trying to say is that developers need to be using current headlines, like actually using Al Qaida/Taliban instead of using plain, boring Middle Eastern groups (like COD4) as enemies. @Aryani, Read the current headlines and get out of N4G once in a while. Though most Iranians are cool, your Iranian government is going to "coo-coo" land and is just plain asking for trouble. And since most people are starting to get sick and tired of "crazy-Russian-nationalis ts-trying-to-take-over", the crazy Iranian nationalists would be good bullet fodders in future games, especially Tom Clancy games. :)
@mac. Perhaps I should've stated, in reference to America, they are vastly superior (not just technologically) at CONVENTIONAL WARFARE than any other nation. Asymmetrical warfare is another story... And, please don't tell me about the "complexities of war", as I assure you, I know this subject well. If you want to debate me about such issues, pm me. And also, in your response to Ayrani, you made things too personal... don't criticize others' governments on a video game site. Not the place for it! On topic, I see your point about shooters getting stale if they rehash the same locations/enemies... but, also keep in mind they're video games... they're not oscar winning movies or politzer winning books lol!
@voice of reason, First, I want to say "thanks" for a well-thought reply. However, I want to say that we have gotten ourselves into a little misunderstanding. Yes, I totally agree with you that America is vastly superior when it comes to conventional warfare. Sorry for the confusion arising from my second post, but my point is that we can still make videogames with plausible plot even on countries like North Korea. When I pointed about "variables" when it comes to conflict, that's where videogames come in. For example, in a theoretical "variable" in a theoretical conflict with North Korea, how do you deal with North Korean infiltrators in South Korea? Or how do you neutralize a North Korean nuclear weapons factory in which taking it out with conventional weapons would be a humanitarian disaster? Or in a theoretical war against China in which a group of Chinese soldiers decide to hide in a civilian city, where collateral damage would be far too great but the need to neutralize them is needed? How you deal with these situations would be the premise of a future videogame and an exciting one to boot since you are forced to complete your military objectives while minimizing needless destruction. So yes, it's not really just a mindless "run-and-gun" adventure. Once again, I TOTALLY AGREE with you that simply making a game based on regular, classical conventional warfare (enemy unit vs enemy unit in a pure battlefield environment) would be plausibly pointless. An example of this would be the storyline of MW2 in which the Russians invaded the United States, completely disregarding the real-world data on both countries' military capabilities. As far as my comment about Aryani and Iran's government, I want to say I apologize as that wasn't my intention. I'll admit that military themed videogames tend to be American-centric, that's why I pointed about those nations in my first post as they are considered to be America's traditional foes, and therefore potential foes for future videogames. The use of Russians as "baddies" in today's videogames are of course more than likely based on the love-hate relationship and tension between post-Cold War Russia and USA. I'll repeat this again, sorry for the misunderstanding and thanks for a great reply post.
MW: The concept of dealing with a Cold War enemy and today's bad guy at the same time is a great idea. BC: It's comedy shooter Everybody else: ok... Though, who else would be capable of pushing Ghost Recon's futuristic technology to the limit?
I thought GRAW 2 sucked so I'm not interested.
This should be PS3 exclusive
Splinter Cell died after CT & Ghost Recon died after GR2. Both franchises are mediocre.
I hope its more Bad a** than COD6...
this looks awsome, but a trailer is one thing....i full game is another. ill have to wait and see if they can pull it off
so its only a game huh? its only a game when you're killing people from other nationality other than the US. why isnt there a game then where your mission is killing americans? then it wouldnt be a game and would be too sensitive for the masses; hence why we havent seen a game with 9/11 gameplay feature in it and the same reason why six days in falujah got cancelled. im not trying to be anti american or anything but just put yourself in other people's shoes.
They show us and give us what they want. and people in general are stupid but is not that simple they have make us stupid they have a system and know how to control . they make the movies, music, games and control the news. and the most important they create and control the money and can do what they please. and to keep everybody away from this reality they have to create a alternative reality that is were we live .
If I recall correctly, the final couple of missions in MW2 had you killing Americans. In BFBC2 you kill Americans in the Multiplayer if you are on the Russian side.
@roadsidepossum, Don't forget Haze, the Manhunt series, the Grand Theft Auto series, and basically every video game set in America in which you beat up American thugs. I hope that shatters Aryani's myth that only Americans get a "free pass" when it comes to bad guys' nationalities. Also include in every multiplayer game in which you go up against American factions. @Aryani, So, I'm thinking that you never enjoyed a game in which Russians and Germans are the bad guys because they're the most over-used nationalities when it comes to villains.
It's all a matter of context. But please, don't confuse American civilians and American soldiers. If it is American soldiers vs. Iranian soldiers... then odds are gamers won't care which "side" you're on as long as the context is right. By this I mean, if it is fictional conflict... or a nonfictional one in which people (Americans and Iranians) are not still sensitive about. For instance, there have been countless WWII shooters, no? And of all those, do you recall one which reenacts the bombings of Hiroshima or Nagasaki? No. Why? Because it is still a sensitive subject for both sides. But also, don't be confused, America--despite its declining status as the only superpower--is still the largest economic and military power in the world. It makes sense, from a developers standpoint, to make games featuring the world's strongest military. And the cancellation of Six Days to Falujah was because of complaints form those who had fought in the battle, or knew those who did. You say, "put yourself in other people's shoes." Well you should do the same! I mean no disrespect, but not everything is America vs. the world... these are just games!!
this beta better ROCK!!!!! well let you guys know how it goes
well your kinda missing my point. you really cant take games like haze and the gta series seriously, but games that are set and inspired by real life events like real life wars that took place in past/modern times are what are sensative areas and you dont see the americans as the villains or are set on a mission to kill americans. and all this is in the story campain portion im talking about. you cant take multiplayer nationality teams seriously either. and again on your last comment, like i said put your self in others shoes. how would you feel if your were the russian/german playing these games but then again im a very nationalistic person so not everyone will see things the way i do about this topic.
Looks like Ubisoft took a page out of Bungie's ODST trailer. "How to make a kickass live action trailer".
This is sh*t, I want the real ghost recon/thunder island/desert storm :(
This does look fantastic. One of the best trailers i've ever seen for visuals.
Hands down the most bad ass trailer I have ever seen!
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.