IGN: Heavy Rain's an interactive movie, and it's an enthralling experience.
None the less, This game is the truth.. the step in the right direction that the Gaming industry needs. i'm Glad Sony took up HR and Quantic dreams vision, this is what owning a PS3 is all about, giving experiences you simply wont find on any platform. HR=totally purchased. i'm skipping the demo since i dont want anything spoiled for me. And as far as bright spots for Sony, It's only the Begining of 2010, MAG started off the year Quite well i would say.. MAG has been sucessful, maybe not like ME2 but it certainly has garnered quite a positive reaction. and then ofcourse WKC is well not quite what everyone was expecting... This Game comes as Sony's Second and Better block buster of the year, but all of that Changes, after March, this Blokbuster onslaught continues with pehaps the biggest EPIC of the Year... GOW3...
"Graphics 8.5 The characters look great, but some low-res items in the environment make some scenes look a little disjointed." Holy god dude...how nitpicky can you get? This is exactly what I've been talking about with certain games getting a free ride while others get nitpicked to death. Low res items in the background? Perfectly OK for ME2 to have it...9.5 for graphics and the most revolutionary game of all time, but Heavy Rain having low res items? FLOP, there's no excuse for low res items on a PS3 game, deal with it fanboys. Give me a break..
What's the big deal? The reviewer has played the game and gave the graphics an 8.5, why are you complaining? Heavy Rain's focus is on giving an uninterrupted experience, so if textures seem a little off then it's going to affect the game and in a game like Heavy Rain it seems more apparent than other games. Why do you have to assume that there is just a PS3 bias, and how the HELL did it flop?? It's so illogical for people to do that, and they do that a lot, especially with exclusives. People get really sensitive anything something bad is said about an exclusive, as if reviews aren't supposed to point out these objective facts.
Marceles....calm down. The reviewer thought the graphics deserved an 8.5 get over it. Why do you even care, if you want to proclaim they are the best graphics of all time go ahead. They probably are getting "nitpicked" because the dame doesn't have traditional gameplay so the emphasis of what makes the title bad/average/good/great has to lie elsewhere.
@2.1 I find it funny that you're complaining about them being nitpicky, when it's you that's guilty of the same crime. So they gave graphics an 8.5 (Rounds up to a 9 ;)). What about the 9/10 OVERALL rating? I'm sure that means the game is crap, right?
and I was suprised that it wasn't a comment by Bungie. Off to read the review now. It only does AAA exclusives. Guys, you gotta remember that these games are reviewed by different people and different teams. The guys that review 360 exclusives aren't reviewing a PS3 exclusive. So Roper deducting a whole point for a slow start in now way means the game is worse than Mass Effect 2. In fact, why even compare the two?
I think that Heavy Rain got an 8.5 in graphics because it was compared with the best games on PS3 in terms of graphics (Killzone 2 and U2) and Mass Effect was compared with the best game in terms of graphics on the 360.
Meh...that's observing a standard, not nitpicking. Something was mentioned that many games have that problem but hey, let's mention it for Heavy Rain to make the graphics sound worse. But when other games have high-res models zoomed in with wonky animation followed with low res objects and bloom in the background so you won't notice, it's not worth mentioning. I'm singling out one aspect of the review, that's great it got a 9. I'm sure if a game you liked got a 10, but they said the story was mediocre and you disagree you would mention it. I just noticed it, that's it. Yeah it's an opinion, "deal with it", "face it", "live with it", whatever...but come on
Whenever I get a PS3, this will be the first game I buy, hands down. I hope the game does really well. It looks awesome!
Marceles...I get where you're coming from, you want the critiques to be equal. Where we are coming from is that it shouldn't matter. The fact that the review brought it up doesn't change what the game is or how good it is in any way. I mean you got all worked up (and you aren't the only person I see doing this) over something so irrelevant. Maybe the guy that reviewed HR is a graphics Nazi and other reviewers don't pay that much attention. The fact that he pointed out some graphical hiccups isn't going to change your enjoyment of the game is it?
I can kind of see what marceles is saying. For example, Me2 has the exact same emphasis as HR on character polygons to the exclusion of the environment. HR has the entire game mo-capped/hand animated, while Me2 is only mo-capped during in-game CG scenes. Plus I could easily venture to say that HR does carry more texture and graphical assets, even though ME2 has a bigger world full of crates and barrels. So why is HR getting nitpicked for that? Is it intentional bias? Probably not because the reviewers are different, but still console graphics standards need to be measured the same way across consoles. It's these glossed over differences that make so many "strictly" 360 owners think they have the "same" level of graphics on their consoles.
lol trust me..I'm not screaming to the top of my lungs going AHGAHGHAGHHAGHAGH at the computer, I'm totally calm Bea. I'm trying to have a conversation with my fellow gamers about a part of the review that isn't brought up in many games since similar games use the same technique. I know it shouldn't matter lol, but it was brought up in the closing thoughts and I wanted to bring it up. It's not a graphics problem, it's a production technique. It's like saying GTA4 has the best graphics ever, 10.0, but then saying Infamous sucks because the textures aren't as great as Crysis and there's minor pop-in. It's an open world game, you give a little to get a little.
Marceles...believe me I understand. I will be the first to say that reviews aren't consistent but there's not much we can do. The game looks great either way and I'm excited to check it out. For the record GTA 4 definitely does not have the best graphics.
Look, I get what you are saying but saying that they are bias is a grasp at straws. You are using PS3 exclusives, but if you look at the broader picture NO game is ever reviewed in one standard. And do you really think ME2 would have gotten a lower score if the low res was pointed out? You havent played the game yet, so that alone shows that you shouldn't be so quick to judge. There is no "checklist" for games to meet standards. And there were other reasons it got 8.5 too, so let's not dwell solely on "low textures"
I respect Roper's opinion (The reviewer). He doesn't play Xbox at all for those that don't listen to the Beyond podcast.. He is the senior editor of the Playstation team and I trust his opinion over Greg Miller or Ryan Clements.. I think he also pointed out that the voice acting was less than stellar in some spots (which I have seen in the demo) and talks about the game being a little slow to start. I think he is very clear why he gave the game the score that he did, there is no controversy here as far as I can see.
Biases, maybe sometimes... inconsistences, yes, almost always. But nevertheless, a great score for a great game. Awesome AAA quality, demo actually sold me on the game whereas before I was skeptical about the gameplay, etc. HR is one of the best looking games I've played. Gamers should be excited about this kinda stuff, it pushes gaming to new levels.
lol yeah DEFINITELY not the best, just used it to make a point :P
Great Score. Can't wait to pick it up.
Anyone saying that because it's a great score, it doesn't have to be accurate is dead wrong. IGN has had more than enough time to establish a set of standards that they rate games by, and when certain games get a pass in one area while other games don't and subsequently lose points, while it may overall not seem like much to you, it's unfair, and yes it is most certainly biased. It's a matter of the PS3 games consistently being judged more harshly. Maybe you couldn't care less about an extra point or two, but that's besides the point isn't it? Cause what matters to you is irrelevant, what matters is what the game deserves, and if each game is rated based on a different set of standards, there's absolutely no point. This isn't some teen fanboy blog we're talking about here, if one game is being deducted points for one 'issue' yet another game released around the same time is given a pass on the issue it matters, whether you care about it or not. Clearly it matters enough for IGN to take points off and point it out. Not to mention this is a consistent problem with IGN and other sites alike. Just because it's a good score, doesn't mean that's the score it deserves.
So IGN gives MW2 a 10/10 for graphics but this gets a 8.5 kk ign. wateva joo say dood. Anyways, great score. Paid for my Collectors Edition already and cant wait till release.
In before SUCK IT BOTS
flop sealed and confirmed of 2010. cant wait for see the flop in sales too.. ps: ign give the mass effect 2 9.6
Cry more. All I see is the 9 all over your face. ;)
ps3hasonlyflopgames is crying! WAAAHHH! WAAAHHH!
Heavy rain haters OWNED!!!!!!!
OHH CRAP ITS .6 BETTER! Can you go into Mass Effect 2 and tell me what makes it 3/5 better then Heavy Rain? Whats this you can't? Then guess what shut up! They are both great games can't we all just accept that? I swear to god this is why I hate the point system for game ratings it should be the star system.
8.5 for graphics? LOL!
.____........___...____ .____||......||.......____|| ||.........___||.......____|| 'Triple'A'Station 3' ;-P p.s SUCK IT BOT!!! ;-D
Great score but from what i saw in the demo,no way its a 8.5.Ign is becoming to picky.This is a 9.5 in graphics at least
Boom to the power of boom
b-bu-bu-bu-but Alan Wait is superior!11 yeah right, mediocre tpp running with flashlight with 2007 (this is when it supposed to come out lol) graphics is laughable BOOM.
but due to it being a niche title it will probably get less sales than it deserves. Perhaps from now on,people could stop the accusations, in the gamer zone at least, of certain web sites namely - IGN, Eurogamer etc of being biased over consoles - this solid score proves again that there is no hidden agenda. Happy gaming one and all :D EDIT @mint royale - that is why i highlighted the 'gamerzone' in my text - surely the fanboys can leave this zone alone.........2 disagrees for talking sense - that somehow doesn't surpise me LMAO
The hidden agenda for the most part comes from insanely paranoid fanboys who are looking for something to argue over. If they don't agree with something, it is not a talking point, they are just right and the others are wrong and biased. Most sane people realise this.