600°
Submitted by DSco4 1713d ago | screenshot

PS3 vs. 360 - Army of Two comparison shows differences

Army of Two: The 40th day offers nice visuals - but how well has the game been ported to the different consoles? Check out this screenshot comparison between the PS3 and the 360 version of Army of Two: The 40th day. The PS3 version clearly lacks anti-aliasing.

The uncompressed screenshots have been taken on a professional grabbing system in 720p. The PS3 was set to "Full RGB" and "Superwhite" settings for better comparison purposes. (Army of Two: The 40th Day, PS3, Xbox 360)

« 1 2 3 »
Pennywise  +   1713d ago
Honestly, I looked at the pics. Which one is better? They both look bad.

This comparison is like two people comparing who has made the best looking crap floating in the bowl.
morganfell  +   1713d ago
They both look like crap but the 360 version looks like blurry crap.
commodore64  +   1713d ago
Wait.. Surely it can't be?
Pennywise and Morganfell BOTH in first with timely damage control?

*looks at jaggy ps3 shadows*
Yep, figures.
mikeslemonade  +   1713d ago
Haha Army of Poo
Pennywise  +   1713d ago
You're right commodore, my stalker...

I didn't dislike AoT because of the clunky controls and bad graphics... I just cant stand jaggies. I hate to break it to you, but the PS3 version looks better overall.

But - Damage control must continue...This game is junk just like your taste and attempted attacks on peoples opinions.
morganfell  +   1713d ago
No need to do damage control when the PS3 has produced the best looking console titles ever. It is not the console playing graphical catchup.

Just because a multiplatform developer is to afraid to exploit the graphical prowess of the console that has proven itself the visual leader is no sort of bragging rights for the console that trails in rendering ability.
Cueil  +   1713d ago
I'm sorry my fiend
but the crappy bottom version is the PS3 version
NateCole  +   1713d ago
x360 version looks dull and blurry. PS3 version looks more defined and vibriant. Visually is a big downgrade for PS3 fans that played U2 or KZ2. That is the truth.
Nikuma  +   1713d ago
Both are pretty meh...
PS3 version has shadows that look more jaggy, and the 360 version looks a bit more blurry overall.
bjornbear  +   1713d ago
are you people on crack?
the top image is washed out and blurry

the bottom is bright colourful and clean o.O...

But in motion is when you can tell, not from photos -_-
BlackTar187  +   1713d ago
Top One looks worse to me
which one is which?
#1.10 (Edited 1713d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
Bigpappy  +   1713d ago
I don't see the big deal
They both look good enough to play. The 360 version is a bit better looking but not by much. PS3 users are hating on games for no good reason. I guess you guys will only play 2 or 3 exclusives a year. Most multi plat's are going to look better on the 360. Just get over it and stop argruing about it every time a comparison gets approved. The slight difference don't make the game less enjoyable. Fanboys just look for something to fight about. Most of you were not ever going to get the game anyway so why even care which looks better. Just move on.
SilentNegotiator  +   1713d ago
Pfft, blind fanboys are always praising blur filters as added AA.
mal_tez92  +   1713d ago
What year is this game from?
Because I saw better graphics than this in 2006
cgoodno  +   1713d ago
XBox 360 looks a bit more faded due to poor gamma settings.

PS3 has some jagged shadows that look more like issues with the screen capturing software they used.

So... I guess it's up to fanboys to decide the winner with pointless internet rambling!
DelbertGrady  +   1713d ago
Whatever happened to Lens of truth and Eurogamers comparisons? Not a huge fan of it but at least they did it on a more professional level(measuring framerates, screen tear, resolutions etc.) than these crappy german sites.
#1.15 (Edited 1713d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
rezenu  +   1713d ago
But you know the fanpeople around here. There still has to be a stupid argument over which one is better.

Overall, the game looks ugly, imo.
#1.16 (Edited 1713d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
darthv72  +   1713d ago
sure signs of denial
when fans of a console smear a multiplatform game because it doesnt surpass the other console, basically stating they didnt want it in the first place.

If you dont have anything nice to type then why type anything at all? Oh wait...this is n4g...nevermind.

*looks at screens* come to think of it...you guys are right. both look like crap.

carry on!
#1.17 (Edited 1713d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
Tanny92225  +   1713d ago
Tough call!
Ps3 version is more vibrant and clear, but suffers from horrible aliasing.
360 version is blurrier and its colors seem more washed out, but it has slightly higher res textures and better (but still bad) aliasing.

At first glance, the ps3 version looks better, but I will have to give it to the 360 version which has slightly less aliasing.
TheDeadMetalhead  +   1713d ago
Weird...
The 360 version looks like it has the brightness setting too high, and I don't see any jaggies on the PS3 version. @_@
ikkokucrisis  +   1713d ago
Ugh, why compare screenshots of such an ugly game?
Why not compare UC2 on the PS3 with the 360 ver...
oh whoops it's not multiplat! haha
SuperStrokey1123  +   1713d ago
The top looks far worse, not that either looks expecially good but the top is worse by far.
SixZeroFour  +   1713d ago
360 (top)

-the textures are more detailed
-the shadows are more smooth

ps3 (bottom)

-the colors are more vibrant
mastiffchild  +   1713d ago
Another day another crppy, pointless comparison piece posted on N4G. makes me kind of sad to be alive!!

Jaggy shadows on the PS3 and a little blur on the 360 version? Who cares? Yet again it's not nearly enough to merit changing your choice from whichever console you would have chosen to play it on anyway. A few jaagies and/or a little blur is not going to override controller preference or playing where your mates are, is it? No,. no it's not. the game is NOT a great looker on either console and the main draw is the co-op which, after a fashion, works OK in the demo and is better than last time out.

No need for either set of zealots to crow over such small beans as it's hardly the best looking console game ever made, now is it? re we meant to assume it's as good as it could possibly have been on both platforms? No again. It's as good and as equal as they could make it with what they had with parity, yet again, being their main concern so it sells on both consoles. There are no points to be scored here-unless we're deluded enough to say this game looks better than Gears2 AND Killzone2-and we aren't that far gone are we?

Seriously, why argue over this kind of thing? the differences are tiny and it doesn't push the PS3 OR the 360 very hard AND all it wants is to look as similar as possible. Jebus!

Wake me up when there's a comparison of a multiplat game that challenges the looks of the best games on either system will you? Or when there's, y'know, some proper, game breaking issues with one or the other but not for the next however many multis that, like this, show us nothing to less than nothing about our machinery.
Government Cheese  +   1713d ago
360 version looks faded and PS3 has jaggy shadows. If you disagree then you are blind.
vhero  +   1712d ago
Do we have to compare every non exclusive game??? OMG!!!
MNicholas  +   1712d ago
Terrible
This far into the life-cycle their PS3 graphics should be at least at the level of the original Uncharted game which maxed out the RSX but didn't use the Cell much.

Despite relying on just the PS3's GPU, the original Uncharted game was found, by Digital Foundry, to easily outperform every single multi-console title.

Realistically speaking, we can't expect anything to rival Uncharted 2 but surely, after all these years, we should be seeing more multi-console games match the visual quality of the original Uncharted.
#1.26 (Edited 1712d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Sangria  +   1713d ago
Vivid colors and aliasing on PS3, pale colors and blurry image on Xbox 360. Interesting way to avoid "superior versions" and making community agree on "both look inferior".
Typical-Guy  +   1713d ago
Who cares! this game sucks T-REX's balls.
bacon13  +   1713d ago
Wow, a game must be really bad for it to suck extinct animal testicles. 40th Day loses with time travel fallaccio!
xbox3flopteen  +   1713d ago
lol
warp-suck lol.

an´way, did the t-rex had ball, how d fck do you kno that huh¿? on topic.

yes in the forth picture you can notice the difference here, but even if the ps3 one did look more bad than the xbox, this game still stay being a crAp.
mastiffchild  +   1713d ago
I think he means Marc Bolan's bands testes actually-though that to, in some cases, and definitely Marc's, would still take some time travel. though it would still, possibly, be as much fun as this game if it's no better, in the end, than the first one!
i_am_interested  +   1713d ago
thats gotta be the ps3 version on the bottom

some companies still havent learned their lessons with the unreal engine on it

that foliage in the first shot on the ps3 version just gave me eye cancer
#4 (Edited 1713d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(8) | Report | Reply
Cueil  +   1713d ago
eye cancer
you should call your attorny right now... I'm guessing you can get 2 to 3 million... :p
table  +   1713d ago
lol... if people can genuinly argue a meaningful difference here then they deserve to be castrated.
PirateThom  +   1713d ago
http://www.cynamite.de/imgs...

Blurry or jaggie.

Pick your poison.
JOLLY1  +   1713d ago
I think you meant blurry or blurry and jaggy
Kushan  +   1713d ago
And remember, if you're "pro" one of those consoles and can't fathom it being in any way inferior, it'll be "better AA" or "sharper" instead.
PirateThom  +   1713d ago
No, definitely blurry or jaggy.

If anything the PS3 version is too sharp.
Morbid Bulldozer  +   1713d ago
PS3 looks sharper, but also has jaggies all over the place and worse textures.
nogolis  +   1713d ago
I think we all need to sit back and look objectively at these comparisons from now on. We all know, Uncharted 2, Killzone 2 and a host of other Ps3 exclusives look head and shoulders above anything on the xbox 360. We know the power is there in the Ps3. That's not a question anymore. What we need to start questioning is not why the ps3 version of a multi platform game looks better on the xbox 360 but why the developers of "Said" multi platform game aren't talented enough to get the same end results out of their games as we see in these beautiful Ps3 exclusive games.

That's the real heart of the matter. Not these shoddy ports by clearly inferior developers.
Chucky2003  +   1713d ago
PS3 is sharper
moneybuyseverything  +   1713d ago
I will wait for Eurogamer and lense of truth.
Superwhite isn't for games its for Blu-ray MOVIES

What do you guys think?
#9 (Edited 1713d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(14) | Report | Reply
Foliage  +   1713d ago
I think you enjoy Lens of Truth because they are a bunch of xbox fanboys, and you don't like this one because they are not.
#9.1 (Edited 1713d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(7) | Report | Reply
moneybuyseverything  +   1713d ago
Nope. It's because the mentioned sites in my first comment don't doctor their comparisons and have not been caught saying the 360 version is the PS3 version when it really was not, like this site has done in the past. This site has been caught red handed tagging the wrong console to pics on purpose.
#9.2 (Edited 1713d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(16) | Report | Reply
TheBand1t  +   1713d ago
I think you need to get a new hobby, Why Dis. :/ Awful convenient as soon as We Won gets 1 bubble and vanishes, some new troll appears that types exactly the same way and says the old BS.
moneybuyseverything  +   1713d ago
^^^Are you talking to me?
I don't know what you're talking about.

So far Cris688-Maddens raiders-TheBand1t all magically come out of the woodwork saying the same thing like I know what you're talking about. All with the same sort of underline anger and shady style.
TheBand1t  +   1713d ago
Not my fault you're as subtle as a sack of falling bricks.
moneybuyseverything  +   1713d ago
I have no idea what you are talking about
But what I do understand is you have the same style as Maddens raiders. I feel a sort of revenge factor in you comment it must be because I pissed you off when you where using you Maddens Raiders account. You talk to me Like I know you.

So I guess you have nothing to say about the topic? Didn't think so. This is the same behavior you use with your other accounts you have used so far to attack me.

EDIT

LOL I got 3 or 4 disagrees in less than 1 minute and suddenly you get 3 or 4 agrees. No one is in here.
#9.6 (Edited 1713d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
TheBand1t  +   1713d ago
Haha, okay kiddo. The one alt account I had was banned quite a long time ago.
moneybuyseverything  +   1713d ago
Sure.

Nappy time. lol
TheBand1t  +   1713d ago
Yes, I suppose it is your nap time. Good night and sweet dreams.
bjornbear  +   1713d ago
Eurogamer? Lens of truth?
wow...do you play videogames or spend your days on the web?

Those two websites are trash

its like going to The Sun for international politics news, or to MTV to listen to good music.

I LOL at thee.
moneybuyseverything  +   1713d ago
LOL at Maddens Raiders/TheBand1t with his misplaced unprovoked aggression and anger. I was talking to you about nappy time.

I'll wait for EuroGamer and lense of truth for the truth. The game maybe garbage but as 360 and PS3 owner It's nice to know which version to spend money on if I do decide to buy a game.

Glad to see the magical disagrees I was getting and your agrees have stopped once you where called out.
#9.11 (Edited 1713d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
ZombieNinjaPanda  +   1713d ago
"it must be because I pissed you off when you where using you Maddens Raiders account. You talk to me Like I know you."

Confirmed Multi Account.

GTFO PL0X
GiantEnemyCrab  +   1713d ago
Wait. TheBand1t and Maddens Raiders are the same person? That better not be right..Band1t and Maddens are not even close to the same besides both preferring the PS3.

Maddens is a hardcore FB who was boarderline Nasim like at one time.

TheBand1t is a gamer from what I've seen. He doesn't go looking for trouble and trolling 360 news. He is on my PS3 friends list and dude knows his gaming.

Nah, you got that wrong man.
NiiGhTx  +   1713d ago
This whole thing about 360 version of any game looks better is pure BS.

Just change the goddam brightness!!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watc...
GiantEnemyCrab  +   1713d ago
So tired of this "turn the brightness up" every time a PS3 game isn't on par.

The excuse is getting old.. It's like the brightness button is magic or something. lol
#10.1 (Edited 1713d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
mastiffchild  +   1713d ago
Come on fellas-there's nothing there tha woukld tempt me, were I buying the game, to change whichever console I'd want it for. Imn fact i'll go as far as to say if I saw it a quid cheaper on either and didn't have a preference or more mates on one system i'd definitely go with the "bargain".

Honestly, I just don't see either as being very good or either being in any way inferior overall to the other. Little things, little, tiny things and we still argue?
heihoosilver  +   1713d ago
the same argument again.
and why the xbox360 pics are always taken closer than the ps3 pics?
http://www.cynamite.de/imgs...
Waldex_Encore  +   1713d ago
Motherfvcker PS3 looks more vivid and detailed
what's up stupid xbots? where's the damage control?, is obvious that the PS3 looks better, enjoy Bayonetta as the last 3fixme superior port
JasonPC360PS3Wii  +   1713d ago
Poor droids no games in 2010 and still losing these comparisons
Karooo  +   1713d ago
idiot are you serious
no games in 2010, fool sony has 21 first party studios, microsoft should be more worried what they gonna do after 2010 no milkage of halo anymore.
OmarJA-N4G  +   1713d ago
360 has no games. :)
NateCole  +   1713d ago
You need glasses, nah scrap that. You need a brain. How you will understand what i am saying without a brain is not my problem.
Consoldtobots  +   1713d ago
didn't your hear?

MS is working on yet ANOTHER Halo............lol
gamer7804  +   1713d ago
Don't trust...
i don't trust this comparison, they have messed with the settings, like the previous guy said i'll wait for the "lens of truth" review.
testerg35  +   1713d ago
The problem is when LOT comes out with a comparison and the 360 version looks better, PS3 fans says LOT doesn't know how to set the settings on the PS3.
Bumpmapping  +   1713d ago
360 starting to show it's age jump and play b3yond.
Nitrowolf2  +   1713d ago
wow
both version looks like crap to me
and i notice to things i didn't like
one was the 360 version is more blurry then the ps3 version
the other i notice the ps3 version has more jags then the 360 version
either way thye look like crap to me, even both lightings are different
Sandman81  +   1713d ago
Some looked better on the 360 while some looked better on the ps3, overall looks average on both
Kushan  +   1713d ago
People are going to, as usual, fight tooth and nail over which version looks better when the reality is that the game itself simply doesn't look like anything special. Nothing worth getting worked up over, but people will none the less.
NateCole  +   1713d ago
It looks slightly better on the PS3 but is far far from U2 level. Has ruined MP games. Playing most MP games is like playing late PS2 games visually.
Cueil  +   1713d ago
eh
perhaps you can't read... but the top non-blurry version is the 360 version... you know the one with AA turned on and high resolution texture on the leaves? yeah that one is the 360 version... that's just the way the cookie crumbles on the URE3... I don't know why people even both using it on multi platforms anymore
NateCole  +   1713d ago
Dude. Are you serious?. Take of the fanboy googles. The PS3 version looks better.
GiantEnemyCrab  +   1713d ago
PS3 Rules!

Xbox 360 Rules!

Droids are awesome!

Bots are awesome!

(just figured if I said that I could get this place to implode)
Cueil  +   1713d ago
wah
other than the PS3's inability to handle higher res textures in the URE3 the only difference is the way the two consoles handle lighting...
Red Eyed Gamer  +   1713d ago
"Some looked better on the 360 while some looked better on the ps3"

Pretty much sums it up. Like I have said before, Will the minor difference's stop you from enjoying the game?
borgome  +   1713d ago
How good was Avatar, man, what a sick moive. Oh wait, what games is this, oy yeah, nobody gives a crap about it.
#21 (Edited 1713d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
OmarJA-N4G  +   1713d ago
PS3 wins poor bots, next. :)
#22 (Edited 1713d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
iistuii  +   1713d ago
As per usual
It's my 360 for multiformats and my PS3 for exclusives due to the lack of AA on PS3 Multi's.Why oh why can't they be bothered to learn how to put in AA on the PS3, as it's more than capable. BLAME the DEV'S.Lazy B@stards.
ZombieNinjaPanda  +   1713d ago
The game looks like sht period.

Who cares about caring two pieces of sht?

Wow look at my english, I meant to say, who cares about comparing two pieces of sht?
#24 (Edited 1713d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
ASSASSYN 36o  +   1713d ago
Agreed. And you could have edited your mistake.
ZombieNinjaPanda  +   1713d ago
@Above

I did, but I'm not one to stealth edit.
ASSASSYN 36o  +   1713d ago
...ok WTF ever. Defeats the purpose of an edit button.
Rocco Siffredi  +   1713d ago
The droids mention once again KillZone2 and Unfarted2.. the only two games out of 500 (yes 500, lol) which look better on their plattform, haha.

Brink, RAGE, BF:BC2 > PS3 exclusives

But keep talking about your so calles "exclusives" which nobody plays:D!

By the way: Assassins Creed 2 on PS3 > UC2 in half that time.. lol

Looks LIKE NO ONE CARES about sonys exclusives.
OmarJA-N4G  +   1713d ago
360 has no games. :)
#25.1 (Edited 1713d ago ) | Agree(12) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
abc1233  +   1713d ago
unfarted 2? what are you? 10?

so what if uncharted 2 and killzone 2 are only 2 games? that doesn't change the fact that they still blow away all the games on 360 to date graphically, and those games you mentioned arent even released yet so its just pure xbox fanboy opinion which isn't worth much these days.

if Assassins creed 2>uncharted 2 then i guess all those game of year awards uncahrted 2 received were bullshit, dream on XD
Nitrowolf2  +   1713d ago
wtf AC2 looked like sh1t, well it looked good, but i mean to me it wasn't even much of a graphicla upgrade from one
Heavy rain, GOW3, MGS4, they all blow aware all the 360 games in graphics
lh_swe  +   1712d ago
Poor kid doesn't know how blind he really is.
If there only was a way to open his eyes from his brainwashed state.
jimbone  +   1712d ago
Droids answer for everything
Q: What are you doing today?
A: uncharted 2 and killzone 2
Q: What is your name?
A: uncharted 2 and killzone 2
Q: Do you like to swim?
A: uncharted 2 and killzone 2
Q: Who is the President of the U.S.?
A: uncharted 2 and killzone 2, uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2, uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2, uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2, uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2 uncharted 2 and killzone 2

Ok, this interview is over.
#25.5 (Edited 1712d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
lh_swe  +   1712d ago
I make a whole list of great games, would you like that?
And in that list there would be many PS3 exclusives, however when the argument over performace arises (graphics or otherwise) Uncharted 2 and Killzone 2 are the go to guy's so there's your reason for it being mentioned soo much. On a side note *cough* Halo 3 *cough*.
jimbone  +   1710d ago
No lh_swe it because you have nothing else to say. BTW F$%& your opinion.
lh_swe  +   1710d ago
Well it's not solely my opinion and it's a fact.
And in the same respect I can say f*** yours because I at least bother to argue before dismissing someones opinion.
Rocco Siffredi  +   1713d ago
PS3 version looks like a PS2 game.
Inferno  +   1713d ago
I thank God for having a brain.
#26.1 (Edited 1713d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
OmarJA-N4G  +   1713d ago
How does it feel to be a retard?
abc1233  +   1713d ago
another xbox fanboy whose IQ is the same as his shoe size, i'm seeing more and more of these every day.
patronnessy  +   1713d ago
Poor bot,

PS2 games still look better than any 360 game.
lh_swe  +   1712d ago
Rocco the retard is back for some verbal abuse
Btw Rocco what games did you play in 2009, just out of curiosity?
devilmaycry2020  +   1713d ago
More like army of crap
Both look terrible, both have terrible controls, both have choppy frame rate both are pathetic.
there is no excuse for the game to look this terrible. the first one was some what a release title. But this ? it's just a lame attempt of making a game.
BannedForNineYears  +   1713d ago
Haha.
http://www.cynamite.de/_mis...
Look at the PS3 version (The leafs).
Fail EA...Fail.
Er, should I say fail Unreal Engine.
Akagi  +   1713d ago
At least it's an honest comparison.

For some reason, over at LensOfTruth, the PS3 screenshots of games have faded, washed out color, yet the 360 is always vibrant.
ASSASSYN 36o  +   1713d ago
I don't care which version can and can't do what. This game is horrible.
« 1 2 3 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

Digimon All-Star Rumble - Shoutmon Vs. Gabumon Gameplay - TGS 2014

17m ago - Video of Digimon All Star Rumble for PS3 and Xbox 360 at TGS 2014. | Xbox 360
30°

Final Fantasy Type-0 HD TGS: Showfloor Gameplay

18m ago - Running on PS4 but Xbox One is also available on the Showfloor 8 minutes of footage. | PS4
40°

Xbox One Exclusive D4 TGS Hands-On - I Can't Put My Arms Down | GR

19m ago - "This game is entirely controlled via Kinect, which is a double-edged sword. Most actions are per... | Xbox One
20°

Sakurai Shows The Improved Fighter Record In Smash Bros. 3DS

19m ago - Today on Miiverse, director of Super Smash Bros. For Wii U/3DS, Masahiro Sakurai, has detailed th... | Wii U
Ad

Destiny (PS4) Review

Now - Bungie’s next series is here, but how does it stack up? | Promoted post
20°

Murasaki Baby (PS Vita) Review [PSU]

20m ago - "Murasaki Baby is a wondrous artistic and emotional creation that is ultimately let down by the g... | PS Vita
Related content from friends