Try our new beta! Click here
Submitted by Tinted Eyes 2165d ago | screenshot

Gamespot - PS3 vs Xbox 360 Graphics Comparison

Gamespot says: We're now getting onto our fifth installment of this feature, and with every passing year the differences between the consoles continue to melt away. When we first started this feature, the differences between some versions of games were astounding. Fight Night Round 3 looked drastically better on the Xbox 360 with its improved lighting and shadowing effects. The following year, the graphics on both platforms got considerably more even--Oblivion even looked better on the PlayStation 3. Every subsequent comparison pretty much ended the same, with the Xbox 360 getting the benefit of slightly higher-resolution textures and other marginal improvements that wouldn't be noticed unless the images were put side by side. We'll see if the trend holds true with some of the best games from this year. (PS3, Xbox 360)

« 1 2 »
Flanders   2167d ago | Spam
NotSoSilentBob  +   2167d ago
It is sad that GameSpot has to do these kind of things to get hits. I can guarantee that if they got the XCM/controller converter for each system and then did a comparison no one YES NO ONE would be able to tell the differences. Games stopped verses Games in motion are 2 different things.

And as it has been stated before, who cares about Multiplats? Yes I know 360 fans only care about it. Let exclusives and I mean FULL EXCLUSIVES not console exclusives speak for the system.

I find it funny how so long ago 360 fans were saying how their system was so much more powerful then ps3 yet now many media outlets are claiming they are the same when it is well known that the ps3 in theory has more power, but it takes more to get it out for everyone to see.
#2 (Edited 2167d ago ) | Agree(22) | Disagree(11) | Report | Reply
kaveti6616  +   2167d ago
Graphics are not really a reflection of the power of the hardware. At least, not anymore. The 360 has been lauded for being easy to develop for. The PS3 has been lauded by its first party developers for being great to work with. So who cares, really? Let the 360 have the slightly better multiplatform games. I'm down with that. The PS3 gets really great-looking exclusives, but more importantly, PS3 exclusives can get more content on one disc. That's really a plus because a developer always wants to fit their game onto one disc, and with the PS3, they don't have too worry too much about size. The 360 hardware has the advantages of being so easy to develop for that the developers can churn out great looking games for less cost.

Look at Gears of War 2. That only cost Epic 12 million dollars to produce. Graphically, the game looks excellent. The single player campaign is also very fun. I love the level where they get swallowed up by the giant worm. The only thing that sucks is the multiplayer, and that has to do with Epic's retarded decisions in that aspect.

So, in conclusion, both consoles have their advantages. PS3 has its pros and cons, and 360 has its pros and cons. No one should really care, but they'll still talk sh!t anyway.
thorstein  +   2167d ago
The ONLY way to do a screenshot comparison is
to simply put them both on the same TV at the same time. Use picture in picture and take a pic of the screen that way. Simple, easy, and no BS. (of course, this will only lead to photoshop edits).
Sunny_D  +   2167d ago
They both seem exactly the same in a lot of these pics. I never realized how good AC2 looked.
Saaking  +   2167d ago
Isn't this unfair for the 360? It has no chance of winning. Oh, they use MULTIPLATS instead o using exclusives. That's just cheap.
#2.4 (Edited 2167d ago ) | Agree(37) | Disagree(12) | Report | Reply
-Alpha  +   2167d ago
Gamespot has been doing multiplatform comparisons for a long time.

It makes no sense to compare exclusives because there is little to complain. You are making a criticism away from the context of the comparison. The point is to compare multiplatforms, so telling them to compare exclusives is irrelevant and nonsense.

It would be hard to compare exclusives because PC would win each and every time too ;)
Saaking  +   2167d ago
Yes, PC would destroy consoles and it probably always will; however, if you compare exclusives (which take full advantage of each system) you can get a better idea of what a console is capable therefore comparing them is a better idea.

Compare GeOW2 to UC2 (both TPS) and you'll see which console can do more. Or compare GT5 to Forza 3. Or KZ2 and Halo. See my point? Multiplats run better on the 360 becuase it's easier to program for, therefore there's no point in comparing. Especially when PS3 exclusives looks miles better than these multiplats.
kaveti6616  +   2165d ago
@ Saaking
I wouldn't say that Gears of War 2 is an accurate reflection of the Xbox 360's hardware power, for one reason

Gears 2 runs on the Unreal Engine 3, which is NOT a custom engine for the 360. It's not built from the ground up to take full advantage of the 360 hardware. Uncharted 2 is built from a custom engine that uses 100 percent of the SPUs and does so efficiently, according to ND.

The fact that they are both TPS games is not enough to say that you can compare them. And I would also say, as an opinion, Naughty Dog is more competent at leveraging the strengths of the hardware and optimizing their engine code, whereas Epics engine is really just a versatile middleware cash cow that has technical issues.

Sad to say that I don't think Microsoft has any competent first party developers to really make a great engine for the 360. I was hoping on the X engine, but that may have just been a rumor.
deadreckoning666  +   2165d ago
Lol, graphics are good but gameplay is infinetly more important. Look at Modnation Racers and Demon Souls. Graphics are only impressive the first couple of times you play a game then you get used to them, then gameplay is what holds you until the end of it.

I woulda traded a San Andreas sized city for GTA4, even if the graphics had to be downgraded a little.

@Saaking- Why would they compare exclusives? Everyone ALREADY knows that the PS3 is more potential on the graphics front however this comparison is meant to show the difference of multiplatform games. Since multiplatform games make up 80% of the games on the market then it is these games that ultimately decide which system has the better graphics in a sense.
#2.8 (Edited 2165d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(8) | Report | Reply
Raf1k1  +   2165d ago
I don't mind checking out graphics comparisons but this is more of an AC2 graphics comparison between the two consoles.

A proper console vs console comparison would use the games that show what each console is capable of wouldn't it?
itisa  +   2165d ago
Gamespot: We are using Assassins Creed II for Ps3 Vs Xbox360 Graphics Comparison.
In other related news:

Gamespot:"Uncharted 2 won Best Graphic(Technical).
Other mentionable nominees:Assassins Creed II,...,...,..."

Seriously,what does that tells you?
#2.10 (Edited 2165d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Christopher  +   2165d ago
Normally I'd go with the 360 on multiplats, but based on those screenshots I actually prefer the PS3. Normally it's the PS3 that's washed out, but this time it's the 360.

Either way, I've started playing AC2 and I gotta say, very disappointed with the body detail. It's like they put all of the effort into clothing/gear and let the faces look like a 4-year-old game underneath.
BWS1982  +   2165d ago
The multiplats were split
AC2 and MW2 look a bit too bright on PS3 there (to the point that it's probably possible to make them identical by changing the gamma and brightness in settings like that one article did here last month using MW2 video clips, if anyone saw that, they made the 360 and PS3 versions identical by reducing the brightness in game) and 360 had the superior visuals in those...but that's easily fixed by tuning. Same kind of thing with DA:O and Batman AA, they were better on the PS3, darker and more robust, with the PS3 showing richer visuals, but that may or may not be able to be changed in DA:O as I saw some of the textures and even geometry appeared to be different in some of the shots.

I actually like the richer look, whether the 360 or PS3 pumps it out, and would just switch settings to get that look if need be. If I couldn't, oh well, I move on, or maybe get it for PC (or get it there in the first place, like I did with Ghostbusters)
#2.12 (Edited 2165d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Anon1974  +   2165d ago
Funny that people still focus on slight graphical differences.
How about hardware reliability? Has that changed over the last few years? Where's the articles on that? How about online play? Controllers? Overall console value and features?

I still find it irresponsible that sites like this are choosing to focus on the odd, blurred texture from one version of a game to another when there's real issues out there between the consoles that actually drastically affect gameplay or console choice.

You never see an article these days asking "Hey. For the money, which console provides the most features, and which will last you the longest?" Instead we're constantly bombarded with articles saying "This game looks pretty much identical ACCEPT for 2 fps difference that you'll never notice but we did because we hooked each console up to a PC with a measuring program!"
pixelsword  +   2165d ago
No Saboteur?
Ohh... riight; it has 16xAA on the PS3; no need to compare a multiplat that pushes the PS3 for once. lol

You can't say "because they're doing the 'best' games of 2009" because if they have AC2 and RE5 on there, they're not doing the best games of 2009.
PJ  +   2164d ago
Everyone that says multiplatform doesn't matter is wrong. Those multiplatform games may as well be 360 exclusives after reading the comparisons and multiplatform is key to any consoles success.
Flanders  +   2167d ago

The poor liddle Xbot mod is on a rampage again! I know who you are now dimwit...
kaveti6616  +   2165d ago
Flanders, you ignorant slut...
deadreckoning666  +   2165d ago
Seriously Flanders, wow

On N4G if you make any argument in favor of the PS3 then your a PS3 fanboy

If u make an argument against the PS3 then your a 360 fanboy

The logic here is idiotic. Fighting over which system is "better" is dumb enough, but fanboys don't even know how to determine which side other fanboys are on lol.
#3.2 (Edited 2165d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
zeeshan  +   2165d ago
I have the 360 version and it looks great. After seeing the comparision, I think PS3 one looks better. Overall, a great job done by Ubi!
holdmedownma2008  +   2165d ago
I hear you bro, but this really wasn't a comparison. This is more of an personal opinion. I strongly believe the journalist at this site or any for that matter should know better.
thor  +   2165d ago
Wow... they really are looking closely to see differences. If I gave you a random image, I bet you wouldn't be able to say whether or not it's the 360 or PS3 version. The only thing I can see that's different is the contrast which can be adjusted. But judging that the 360 version is superior because if you examine a still image with a microscope you can see that one guy's arm textures are slightly higher resolution? That's pedantry at its most extreme.
commodore64  +   2165d ago
@ thor.

I disagree.
The devil is in the detail, thor.

Most often, it is these details that separate what is 'great' from what is merely 'good'.

For example,
A 'great' University thesis will pay attention to these subtle details.
A 'great' Car will have designers that pay attention to every little detail.
A 'great' videogame will have the same attention to these details as these other examples.

Surely you don't mean to imply that we should stop paying attention to the detail that separates a 'great' multiplat from a 'good' one?
How exactly does that work?
What you are proposing seems to be a double standard which serves to gloss over the observable differences in multiplat games and thereby stagnates the incentive for developers to get the most out of each platform.

In the comparison of screenshots of this article, the 360 shows better texturing, detail etc .. on nearly every screenshot.
This analysis doesn't even consider framerate issues and loading time problems on ps3.

I find it strange to think that ps3 fans seem exceptionally fond of highlighting the superior detail of KZ2 and UC2 at nearly every turn, yet seem EXTREMELY reluctant to acknowledge the superior detail of 360 multiplats.

What's with that?
DelbertGrady  +   2165d ago
Must be fake since teh PS3 isn't winning, right?

Now where are the 'credible' comparisons from those german sites where they can't even capture identical screenshots?
snoopgg  +   2165d ago
and a great console maker
would make the time to pay attention to subtle details of how to make a reliable console to play these minute advantages of multiplats on. I wont buy another 360 for these so called mini advantages of details in multplats just to have it crap out like the other two I had.
Consoldtobots  +   2165d ago
"Fight Night Round 3 looked drastically better on the Xbox 360 with its improved lighting and shadowing effects."

this is the biggest bold faced lie I have read this generation and proof that this article isn't worth reading.
Godmars290  +   2165d ago
Not bothering giving them hits,
Just wondering if they mention weather or not most if not all multiplatform titles are 360 builds that use PC friendly tools.
Dutch Boogie  +   2165d ago
Meh we already know which console has the best graphics. Just looks at the exclusives on both consoles and you'll know the answer. Not to mention the one with the highest rated games. Better luck next time M......
hatchimatchi  +   2165d ago
does this really matter? both games look good on their respective system.
bjornbear  +   2165d ago
my point exactly, i don't understand why this happens.

The differences between SNES and Megadrive games was noticable, they had different colour pallates, different graphics over all.

However, in this case, the differences are SO minimal that these articles / these battles about multi plats are almost forced =/
nefertis   2165d ago | Spam
bjornbear  +   2165d ago
lets use logic =)

Multiplat graphical differences + excluisve graphical differences = absolute graphical superiority

PS3 comes out on top.


Oh well...then i guess the 360 wins =(.../s

Stupid stupid stupid, these multi-plat comparisons never make sense to me =P
deadreckoning666  +   2165d ago
Overall, the 360 wins on multiplats and overall the PS3 wins on exclusives. Multiplatts make up the majority of the market therefore I can use logic as you say to make the argument that the 360 has MORE better looking games than the PS3. Lets be fair here bjornbear. I used BOTH multiplats AND exclusives as you intended. Why should PS3 exclusives put the PS3 over the 360 in regards to graphics when MOST PS3 games are multiplats that look equal to or inferior to their 360 counterparts?
#9.1 (Edited 2165d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
MrJackOfAllTrades   2165d ago | Spam
Apocalypse Shadow  +   2165d ago
D@MN jack that was a good analogy.

tons(no pun intended...well maybe)of fat chicks or a few hot chicks?

megan fox,jessica alba,hayden panettiere,zoe saldana(star trek)and let's say a hot chick pornstar like jeneveve jolie?or....

monique(female comedian),biggest loser chicks,female hot dog champions and female sumo wrestlers?

what should i pick?lol!
bjornbear  +   2165d ago
sorry to let you down buddy, but everything i wrote down to the "/s" was sarcazm, i never intended on making such a comparison because its STUPID.

Gamers shouldn't care about this stuff, not when the differences are so minimal =/

still nice try ;) next time, notsoblockoftextpleasethanxbye

@ jack- great analogy ;) point is, many gamers here are proud of the 100+ fat chicks xD
#9.4 (Edited 2165d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Alvadr  +   2165d ago
I have both versions of AC2 and there is no difference in textures or resolution, the (still) screen shots show this.

The difference is in performance. The PS3 version has a great deal of stuttering and screen tearing and it is bad. Ubi has not done a great job in making use of the different memory structure in the PS hardware.

Im not a 360 fanboy, It is the PS3 version I have played the most and have even got the platinum trophy. I just say what I see.
Krew_92  +   2165d ago
Are they even trying anymore?
Come on in every single description it says, "As usual the 360 has better textures" Like if they don't even try to look at their own screen caps... Modern Warfare 2 looks identical, Dirt 2 looks identical (but they somehow say the 360 has better textures?) Assassin's Creed 2 look identical but the don't even try to acknowledge a fair view!
Screw these comparisons! They are pointless and unwanted, they just make the gaming community look like rabid Fanboys!
dirthurts  +   2165d ago
I disagree to a point.
I kind of like looking at the comparisons. I own both consoles, so I don't really care who wins. But from a technical standpoint they are interesting. That is if you're interested in computer graphics anyway...but I hate that it's fanboy fuel...
holdmedownma2008  +   2165d ago
some media outlets go out of their way to prove that all multi-platforms run better on the 360, but it's just their opinions nothing more.
DelbertGrady  +   2165d ago
And what if they do?
kneon  +   2165d ago
PS 3 looks better to me in most of those
But I think they haven't got the settings right. It appears that in most of the games the XBox is set with too high a brightness level, the colors are all washed out the blacks are definitely not black. Did they think that setting the brightness using in game settings to the same value would produce the same results? I'd be surprised if it did.

I'd like to see a comparison where the brightness is properly calibrated so that both consoles are set as close to the same as possible. As it is I can't say whether I like the PS3 images better because they are better or because the testing methodology was screwed up and in most cases biased towards the PS3 (except MW2, that looked better on the XBox to me)
Apocalypse Shadow  +   2165d ago
the conclusion i get is that
multiplatform games on ps3 are a non issue for many companies now.the difference is so slight now that if you BLINK,you'll miss it.and only because the systems render differently.

i look at it as inexperience in porting someone else's game.EA had that problem porting valve's game to ps3.and sega had a problem porting platinum's game to ps3 with bayonetta.or the dev trying to make a multiplatform engine work for both.instead of separate engines for both.

but EA has gotten way better making games on ps3 after the fiasco of madden.and soon,you may see platinum games making their own games on ps3 or better ports of their games from sega.and third parties are learning the system being that it was so difficult for some before.that means full steam ahead for the next 7 years.

it only adds to sony's momentum when it comes to ps3.bluray won and is a great benefit to ps3,the system is still more reliable,the exclusive games are rocking,no dev houses have closed at sony,more games are coming,online is STILL FREE....and now multiplatform games are a non issue for sony to worry about.

and it will add to accurate motion control,3D movies,3D games and whatever else sony throws out in 2010.

if you got to pull out a magnifying glass to see the difference,then sony just added another check mark into the POSITIVE COLUMN.
#13 (Edited 2165d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
stonecold1  +   2165d ago
batman burnout
dragon age all say hi its a bit silly trying to compare them since 360 holding ps3 gaming development back tekken 6 and final fantasy 13 for example to try to fit some games to fit on a dvd8 and then theres tekken 6 it looks worse than the other version of tekken 1, 2 , 3, 4, tag tekken 5 all 5 tekken games were good but tekken 6 looks like a ps2 game ps3 exclusive already above the xbox 360 t games today like final fantsy vs 13 isnt coming to the xbox 360 which will show final fantsy 13 that it has nothing to compared to the real next gen final fantasy vs 13 uncharted 2 or even uncharted 1 metal gearsolid4 would not be able to fit on a dvd 8 and look at final fantasy 13 on 360 with multi dvd s ps3 more powerful but developers need to steep up there games instead of half a$$ down graded games
MrJackOfAllTrades   2165d ago | Spam
nogolis  +   2165d ago
Maybe it's just me or my monitor here, but the ps3 version looked to have better contrast and more vivid colors in each version shown. Batman AA more so than any of the other versions, though. How blind and skewed can one site be?

Reguardless the PC cripples both versions in all of the above "multiplatform" games. Which is what really matters here. None of the exclusive games on xbox 360 have ever been tossed up next to an Uncharted, Killzone or Infamous. For good reason, I believe.
pippoppow  +   2165d ago
I find it interesting how the PC is ignored when talking about multiplatform games. Lets compare the PC version to the console version to see the differences as well. There are plenty of PC gamers after all.

I do not think most gamers will go out and buy another console or a PC to play a slightly better version of a game. Will 360 owners buy a PS3 just to play the better version of FF13? Will 360 owners buy a PC to play the better version of Mass Effect 2? Will PS3 gamers buy a 360 to play the better version of Bayonetta or Ghost Busters? Some may but most will not.

Last gen the PS2 multiplatform games were worse than the XBOX. The differences were greater in favor of the XBOX but didn't matter. Just like it doesn't matter now for most gamers.
#16.1 (Edited 2165d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Darkfiber  +   2165d ago
The graphics look the friggin' same, the only difference is the lighting most of the time. One is usually brighter than the other.
Wrathman  +   2165d ago
gawd r we still doin this?

fact. the ps3 is more powerful than the xbox
fact. the ps3 exclusives do look better than any xbox exclusives
fact. the xbox is 99% of the time the lead platform for 3rd party devs
fact. they usually sell better on the xbox

TBH i dont care that a game is better shaded on the xbox

if someone handed me a ps3 and i used to play online for the first time i wouldn't bother with XBL just so happens i got an xbox i prefer it.i got the ps3 2nd.and frankly i find it much duller to go online with.nothin wot so ever to do with games.90% of my library contains 3rd party games.the only reason i still have my ps3 is for blu-ray and internet smut.and i enjoy vidzone and the odd time the bbc iplayer.but not a games console 4 me.and you can learn to love it for everything but that. ps3=media console.

surely you cant hate me for that.i just spent 5 hrs tonite watchin transformers 2 and inglorious basterds on blu-ray.pretty nice movie by tarantino.i recommend it!
chrisulloa  +   2165d ago
PS3 could be more powerful than 360, but the PS3 coding is too complicated for devs to get everything right on it. So most devs max out their games on 360 (Better graphics). The Xbox has better detail and lighting than the 360 in these photos, but it's probably just the gamma.
Aleusia  +   2165d ago
Derp indeed
If that is true then explain why every ps3 exclusive has looked better and performed better than any 360 exclusive.

B..B..But the multiplats
General Jewels  +   2165d ago
Once again Xbox 360 wins another round of graphics, 5 rounds under the belt........With PS3 low quality textures and awful framerate problems, i just wonder sometimes they can pull of one or two great looking games like Uncharted 2 and Killzone 2 and the rest....not so good. Looks like 98% of the games look better on Xbox 360 and run smoother. Oh will PS3 not that powerful i guess.
Aleusia  +   2165d ago
@ General Jackass
Okay dude as an owner of the PS3 version of Assassin's Creed 2 I can tell you that the framerate is fine, the textures are fine, and the game is overall fine..there is nothing wrong with the ps3 version of ACII. You bots can keep your slightly superior multiplats, exclusives are where it matters.
Mr Bot  +   2165d ago
the pictures in some game comparison is reversed
usually ps3 have more brightness, but for some games they made it look like ps3 shows less and darker colors!!!

its a fact that many games released this year looked better on ps3 than 360, and some games look better on 360 than ps3!!!

what that have to say?? well it depend on what the devs want to achieve!

and one thing for a fact, ps3 exclusives are better than multiplatform games!! ps3 exclusives are the one dominating the GOTY charts everywhere but not the multiplatforms!!!
chrisulloa  +   2165d ago
sunil  +   2165d ago
Guess gamer zone is the new open zone :)
Wrathman  +   2165d ago
just red thru a few posts in there.seems the kids are playing nice for far.

oh hell ill take a dig...the gamerzone is full of ps3 fanboys who have nothing to play coz they are bored with uc2 i was after 15mins.

karan8624  +   2165d ago
@ Above
You only played it for 15 minutes because the wallmart employee told you to get off the display and let the other kids have a turn
DigitalAnalog  +   2165d ago
I think they should change their title to "Multi-plat" comparison because the thought of comparing them both platforms on a graphical standpoint is just........... pathetic. Wait until 2010 before you can put up that title again.

-End statement
Chucky2003  +   2165d ago
LOL,the games look the same on both consoles, in Dragon's Origin the textures of the ground are better in the PS3 version
rezenu  +   2165d ago
Wow, this is garbage. Unless you're comparing exclusives, this is a useless comparison.
Pootangpie  +   2165d ago
LOL at the sony rejects
keep telling yourself it's a corrupt conspiracy done all by M$ ROFL
#23 (Edited 2165d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
PS3Freak  +   2165d ago
The fact that people still do this is just dumb.

How about for a better comparison, you put Uncharted 2 images up against.. i dunno.. anything?
Traveler  +   2164d ago
Yes, but comparing exclusives is even more pointless, because then you are comparing different developers, with different skill levels, different budgets, different development times, and so on.

You can't glean much from a comparison of exclusives because there is no fair baseline from which to compare from. You really just end up comparing the different talents, budgets, game engines and development times, rather than comparing the actual power of the consoles themselves.

Multiplats aren't a perfect way to compare either, but at least they are created by the same developers, with the same talent, same basic development time, etc.
tawak  +   2165d ago
PS3 vs Xbox 360 Comparison a.k.a "FLAMEBAIT"
Aleusia  +   2165d ago
Yep....pretty much, these comparisons are always stupid and always show that both versions basically look the same.

I really dont recall there being multiplat comparisons last generation, kinda shows you the mentality of xbots and the comparisons will be more and more frequent..they are desperate now and will be grasping straws all over the place when multiplats come out.

It is of my opinion that multiplats...pretty much mean d!ck and that exclusives are what determines which system has better graphics and what not. If a port is inferior on the ps3, it's not sonys fault nor is it the fault of the's the dev's responsibility 100% but it won't matter, they are too desperate to care about logic so everytime a multiplat comes out in 2010, expect more of this crap from sites like failtaku, destructard, and joystacks.


I tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth so help me Sony, Nintendo, and my fallen friend Sega.
#25.1 (Edited 2165d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
ImmortalLegend  +   2165d ago
I've noticed on this site that bashing the Xbox 360 seems to be ok, but anything against the PS3 is a crime lol.
holdmedownma2008  +   2165d ago
CobraKai  +   2165d ago
If there is one thing to take away from this, it is that the line between the PS3 ver and 360 ver is blurring unlike the previous GS comparisons where the 360, in most cases, clearly performed better.
hello00001   2165d ago | Spam
horndog  +   2165d ago
The "most powerfull" of the three and it sucks for most games
what a waste. Ps3 exclusives that are worth playing are far to few compared to third party. Even ps3 fans agree that third party games are better than their own exclusives. That's why third party games are the top sellers on the ps3 and the 360 version is always the better on the two. Shame on sony for fooling us with the ps3. Won't happen again.
Lazarus69  +   2165d ago
Aren't third party games better sellers on the 360 aswell,besides halo3?
Bullseye  +   2165d ago
Even if you compare exclusive's
you would then have to compare other elements of the games. Simply saying PS3 has better exclusive's based on graphics is just as lame as this article. 360 has better multiplats - I personally find this to be true, but still, if most of those games are garbage anyway, does it really matter? Gaming, is going the way of football. It's now more often about money and brands,NOT entertainment and gamers.
« 1 2 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Monsters and Mischief: Yo-Kai Watch review

18m ago - Adriel: Is Yo-Kai Watch coming to take Pokemon's throne? Check this out and judge for yourself! | 3DS

Exile's End Review [MonsterVine]

18m ago - MonsterVine: "East and West have combined to create a action platformer clinging to the golden ye... | PC

HotLiked - What the Internet is talking about right now

Now - Kill some time at You will regret it... | Promoted post

Visual Novel Honey Rose Shows Off Its Schoolgirl Wrestling Action In First Trailer

31m ago - Honey Rose, the visual novel and wrestling hybrid game, got its first trailer. | PC

Hear About Final Fantasy XIV's Korean Service from Producer Naoki Yoshida

31m ago - Naoki Yoshida talks about Final Fantasy XIV in Korea and more. | PC

Memorable Metal Gear Moments: The River of Death

31m ago - One of Metal Gear Solid 3's most memorable moments brings Snake face to face with all the enemies... | PS2