Why Bethesda Picking up Rage is a Good Thing

Slashgamer Writes: "I'm sure some might be quick to point out that not having EA control the marketing behind Rage, could potentially hurt the sales of the game. Obviously, this stems from the perception that the company has an unlimited pocket for promoting a title; however, I would disagree with this simple theory."

Read Full Story >>
The story is too old to be commented.
Cajun Chicken3204d ago

Well, quite simply. Sequels of Rage.

GWAVE3204d ago

People worship Bethesda, which is sad. Yes, they make sprawling, interesting games, but their bugtesting is horrible.

Hellsvacancy3204d ago (Edited 3204d ago )

I loved Fallout 3, i had it 4 the PS3 aswell and experienced VERY minor glitches whilst playin it (over 100 gameplay hours) and im WELL lookin 4-ward 2-gettin my hands on Rage, i thought Borderlands was borin as hell Rage looks like its goin 2-fulfill my ultra-violent needs


RememberThe3573204d ago

Fallout 3 was filled with bugs, how is it that EA not publishing the game is better? The advertising? Really? That's all you've got? I'm sorry if I'm off but Bathesda doesn't seem like any better of a publisher. They almost seem worse.

ian723204d ago (Edited 3204d ago )

Rogue Warrior anyone?
That and WET were pretty poor games. I did like Fallout 3 and Oblivion though.

Show all comments (8)