EAs The Saboteur is a game with a very unique art style - but which console delivers the better graphics? Decide for yourself in this screenshot comparison from The Saboteur.
LOL LIKE:- Final Fantasy XIII and Dragon Age: Origins
how are the textures better on the ps3? because one site says so and of course ps3 babies only believe what they want.
jagfest galore in the 360, horrible! ps3 as always has the smooth textures and better lighting. ps3 wins once again. let's move on to the next title.
the female soldier looks sexier in the ps3 whereas in the 360, it look loke a plastic doll.
'dragon age origins? how are the textures better on the ps3? because one site says so and of course ps3 babies only believe what they want.' cry more xbot
Most of the games looking better on 360? Why? Are the programmers too bad or is the ps3 too bad?
360 main builds of multiplatform titles aren't suitable for multiplatform translation. But because they're easier, the 360 was out first, devs do them anyway.
The 360 is nothing but old PC parts. Developers are already accustomed to working with the hardware, because the technology is just so old. As for it looking better in most games, you should stop believing everything you read on the internet. The procedure used to capture screenshots in these comparisons are no where reflective of the final product, and the PS3 still manages to beat out the 360 very often. And really, look at the exclusives, the 360 can't compete with launch titles on the PS3.
Have you guys even looked at the photos? First of all they aren't side by side for comparison and second of all they look pretty much teh same to me. Seems the media new way of hating on Sony is to smear the Ps3 versions of games, since they don't have anything else hate with. Bullets are all running out. And people still believe this crap. Seriously who really thinks about these things when actually playing a game? Unless one version is absolutely unplayable it don't matter one bit. These sites that do this are a bunch of fantards. How about give us some real info on the game instead of a poorly done and useless comparison. Also "seemingly". They don't even have any conviction in what they say and won't 100% back it up. Spineless hit seeking cowards.
It honestly doesn't matter that there's only minor differences between them, the media just runs with, "inferior PS3 version." Just look at the thing with Netflix. Where every game site was reporting how much a game changer having it on XBL, the number of users, there has yet to be one actual article about it on the PS3 even though everywhere you turn someone's either ordering the disc or even canceling XBL accounts. Edit: Yeah, just looked at them, and there is no notable difference.
The main reason why multi plat games look better on 360 is because the 360 has superior and more accesable hardware for devopers. The difference in power between the 2 consoles isnt even that big. Matter of fact I think the 360 may be slightly higher from what I saw with Resi5 and GoW2
There's virtually no difference. just the usual ps3 looking slightly lighter and slightly more blurry which is something that you don't notice in game anyway.
It is clear that both versions are identical. The PS3 screen shots look like someone smeared them out with a blur effect in photoshop. I looks the same as the 360 but tampered with. It is fuzzy to the point it is hard to look at cause everything is out of focus. So thank you again for proving that the only way to make people think games look better on the 360 is to dish out this blatant tampered photos.
6/10 game. WHO CARESSSSSSSSSSSS.
People who need the PS3 to be inferior. Regardless that it has better regarded exclusives.
Are you Fvcking guys blind? The PS3 has the Superior version!
Foilage says...is on crack!
Woah... I was prepared to admit the shots look virtually identical. But if you look at the colors in that one dude's facial hair, you can really tell a difference. I'm calling it for Xbox on THAT particular shot, but the rest look indistinguishable, especially in motion.
"360 main builds of multiplatform titles aren't suitable for multiplatform translation. But because they're easier, the 360 was out first, devs do them anyway" This is very true but then again it's Sonys fault for making it tough on developers to program for it. The media is on PS3 because Sony claimed it would have visuals 4 times better than 360 and here we have amazing looking multiplats (brink and rage) on the way and now exclusives (Alan Wake and Rage)I hope on par with anything PS3. All the doom stuff about ps3 is retarded and hopefully as gamers we one day stop talking it down.
I'm honestly cant see in what way the xbox version in superior? Can you point out where the superiority is? From what I can see in those low res screenshots, game is pretty much the same if anything it's bit smoother and blurrier on the PS3. Nothing to brag about. This game could be a very late purchase when it hits the bargain bin.
Come on guys take it easy. This is a gaming site where we share opinions in a mature manner. I once new a kid with no legs that had been raped by his father all of his life and one day decided to kill 30 people before jumping off a cliff. Sad stuff and here you are name calling.
Worse hardware, less memory, inferior graphics card. Lead platform has never mattered, most games are better on 360 despite the lead platform. #1.1 is Full of it.
The multiplatform argument is dead. It goes both ways, it has since 2008 with games like Burnout Paradise and Dead Space.
Oh yeah, the amazing future games again like Lost Planet 2, that are always suppose to compare(best they can hope for) to PS3 exclusives. Then when they are released end up being very underwhelming and no one compares them to PS3 exclusives again! Please 360 fanboys, stop using your PC footage to get yourselves owned upon release. It makes us kind of sad to own you again and again!
Look at photos 3 and 4 the 360 version has jaggies and squares all over the car... How can you say the 360 version is superior? PS3 has more darker and in depth colours too. However I really don't care these articles are stupid and pointless why are we comparing multi-platform titles unless its a fanboy thing anyway? Can N4G please BAN all comparison articles from now on?? They do nothing but spark fanboys fighting.
"The media is on PS3 because Sony claimed it would have visuals 4 times better than 360 and here we have amazing looking multiplats (brink and rage) on the way and now exclusives (Alan Wake and Rage)I hope on par with anything PS3." But as long as the 360 is the lead build for multiplatform, especially with games like Brink and Rage, the only way the PS3 will be able to grow is through exclusives. That's why I'm pissed off about FFXIII going multi. Versus will likely confirm that XIII could have been better. As for Alan Wake, the game coming out is not the one shown on a high end PC years ago. Its not even a PC game now. The 360 has constraints that are only going to negatively impact developement as the industry tries to grow.
I don't care weather such a medium game looks better on Xbox360 or not, I'm sticking with my PS3!
I think the PS3 shots look better. Don't know why nobody else does... The 360 shots are too sharp, maybe the metal body of the car look non-metallic, while the softer PS3 shot gives a much nicer, metallic look.
What game? *yawn* Who is buying this thing anyway...
In the end a halfway decent PC wins out over both console versions. Since this, like DA, is being released for the PC and look far better on the PC, I think I will just go with that version.
yap, PC's best
How come some idiot always has to bring the PC into a console comparison?
After being a PS3 owner for 2 and a half years and switching back to Xbox 360 exclusively for work reasons, I can safely say that the PS3 is definitely an extremely capable machine in the visuals and sound department. Its exclusive games prove that, and there is no denying that PS3 exclusive titles are more than enough to prove that Sony wasn't just blowing smoke up everyone's asses when they said the system was a beast. It is. While I do appreciate the overall better detail on 360 versions of multiplatform titles, I am fully aware of the PS3's ability to push visuals and sound, and I'm not going to let bad PS3 ports tell me otherwise. The proof is in the pudding, as they say.
Apart from fanboy bragging rights, most of these comparisons mean nothing to me. Sometimes the differences are so minor that changing a few settings on the TV helps out. I do agree that most multi-plats do have an edge on the 360 due to a simpler architecture, but recently most games like MW2, AC2 and all big titles look 99% identical. Besides, if I were seeking the best version, I would always buy a PC version, but sometimes games like RE5,AC2 don't release early on PC and so have to go with the console versions.... As far as PS3 and 360 is concerned, I am willing to get the best looking exclusives with 1% inferior multi-plats as opposed to the opposite. Most huge titles now a days tend to look identical and it's not going to go backwards isn't it?
The 360 pics may look better. But how do u determine the winner - on what scientific base?
umm the one that looks better... seriously wtf were you thinking when you posted that?
because i will buy it this version
Well, EA saw what Visceral has been doing on both pieces of hardware. They see what EA Canada is doing on both pieces of hardware. Worse, they see what other studios are doing.. and they closed Pandemic. Quel domage.
v little difference imo. another comparion i viewed made the ps3 version look really washed out but here it's pretty tight it seems. regardless this game doesn't look all that great
ps3 kiddies will be less than please, or just say who wants this piece of crap. THEN they will all say i wont buy this and think that since 30 of them on the site said it, it must be true in reality as well. sorry dolls, but ps3 only matters on N4G.
You should have read the comments. Nobody has said any such thing!
pretty sure if it was ps3 exclusive their would be no need for comparison. if people want to compare so much multiplats why don't we compare killzone 2 to whatever the xbox throws at the ps3. Oh but when it comes to multiplats low textures or jaggies simply will not do lol but these same people settle for okay graphics on the 360 lol admit it if you guys cared so much about the superior version you guys wouldn't settle for gears 2 being the best the 360 could do, and would demand a game with the same graphical fidelity of killzone 2 or uncharted 2. i buy them both exclusives and multiplats and if the game is good the last thing on my mind is a couple of jaggies or low textures on the ground. grow up people seriously
Yes - I - will - rush - out - and - buy - a - 360 - to - play - multiplatform - games - because - an - alleged - difference - of - a - few - pixels - means - so - much - to - me. The - obviously - superior - exclusives - on - my - PS3 - now - count - for - nothing - what - a - fool - I was.
The PS3 version cost the same as the 360 version, but we get a lower quality version. How can they justyfy delivering a lower quality version? At least they dont lower the 360 version quality, like it usually happens when a multiplat title has to accomomdate to the 360 limitiation and the PS3 version is hold to that limit.
You ask this question as if you intend on buying this crap.
I bet if the ps3 version was noticeably superior you'd be all over this game. Stop being such an ass about it.
Pennywise, like most people who can think for themselves, don't need to count pixels to determine playability. The saboteur has been reviewed and consensus is that it is an average game at best. Don't hide behind fanboyism just because you don't like what someone said
Stewgart... Wow. What an unprovoked attack over a mediocre game. No, this game was never even a blip on my radar. I knew this game would be a 6/10 before the reviews even came out. If you are a dev who worked on this game, sorry if I offended you. Next time, try harder and I promise I won't be offensive. If you are just someone trying to attack me... Here's a tissue. Join the club.
why do the trees looks so different in both versions when compared? the trees in the ps3 version looks better imo
people over-react on these stupid comparisons. 360 fanboys pretend that the 1 blurry pixel on the ps3 renders the game obsolete and ps3 fanboys cry on about exclusives. The truth is when you're playing the game these differences are totally unnoticeable. Only if one version has a obvious inferior framerate then we should talk about it, but these screenshots are completely pointless.
I agree with your point, except one. The reviews and quality of this game rendered it obsolete.
Both versions look MEH. Like all the PS3 version has is a bit more bloom, so it is funny watching 360 owners make a big deal out of it when most games on 360 overuse it. But in all seriousness, what it is up with the bad focus? Both systems have like SUPER blurry background, looks like the XMB XD.
i honestly cannot see even the slightest of difference. why is everyone hating on this game also? looks pretty good imo
All these Xbox 360 kids claiming that 360 is better when I haven't seen one 360 game that looks better than Uncharted 1!
Hardly anything in it. Either way, hardly bragging rights for either "side", it's average visuals at best.
They look pretty much the same
And dont even start with saying killzone 2 and uncharted 2 coudnt be done on the 360. Gears 2 is proof that it could uncharted looks like a cartoon not to mention half the game is a video. Killzone on the other hand is a great game short game but looks great but still gears of war is rite up there with them guys but uncharted 2 is praised way to much for its story but nobody on here mentions thats its mainly a video
WTF are you talking about?!!? You're complaining about 90 min. of cutscenes in a 12hr game. If you don't like them, just skip them. It only takes two button presses.
Are you on crack? Uncharted 2 is a masterpiece; it's how an action / adventure story should be presented in a game. It's the pinnacle of voice / motion capture acting, right up there with Metal Gear Solid.
Try playing U2 and Killzone 2 before saying Gears is right up there, instead of assuming some nonsense and hoping you're right.
Don't listen to 360 fanboys, view the photos for yourself. Click the original source on both the PS3 and 360 shots and tab back and forth. If you do so, you will notice that the game is mostly identical. The developers have done a great job. The only difference that I am noticing is that the 360 shots seem to have that vaseline effect making the PS3 shots sharper and clearer. Take a look at the first shot. Which system shows the hair on the back of the guys hair clearer? PS3. Furthermore, the 360 version has more jagges. Take a look at the 2nd pair of shots on the 2nd page. Look at the jagges on the guys ears in the 360 shots, the PS3 shots don't have jagges, their edges are smooth. It also looks like the PS3 version has better shadows in that same picture. I honestly think the PS3 wins this battle.
IMO the PS3 looks better, i've seen comparisons of games in which the 360 version does look slightly better than PS3, but not on this game. Great job EA...and the game is not that bad, IMO 7.5/10, i haven't played that much yet though, maybe once you unlock more perks, it gets better
I don't care if the PS3 version looks better, I'm not clicking that $hit! I don't even like the comparisons where PS3 wins and I especially hate the ones where PS3 wins but the site proclaims 360 the winner for whatever little fake reason or for complete blindness!
though the ps3 does look more realistic and polished in all the screens, just a little though,and a few of the 360 screens look cartoony in comparison to the ps3 screens,
people look at the colours in the pictures actually the 360 is the worse in this one ps3 version has darker and richer colours where i noticed the 360 looks to have a grey white look to it. i like the the bloom on ps3 so im not complaining it hides more of the jaggiez where the 360 suffers alot from in most of their games. sharper graphics doesnt mean better graphics lol. bloom is so much better in this one 360 got bad colour depth and again i say it looks way to white
Yet the washed out colours thing never comes up when it's The 360 version. "Teh colours on 360 are brighter and more vibrant".
bubble +1 I was recently bought a 360. and some games look nice etc, but shadows look bad in some games, although some do look nice, i don't think the 360 will ever trump the ps3 in the visual or sound dept. The reason most 360 fans think the 360 is better is simply because of early piss poor ports and lack of aa of anykind. Don't get me wrong, the 360 can produce nice visuals, and i expect some newer game engines to acheive that. I still like the look of FORZA3 even if imo it does not look as good as GT5P.
only the fandroids with their eye cancer think that this game looks better on the PS3, loL! Also its a fact that dragon age looks a little bit better as the 360 version but EVERY magazine gave the 360 the better score caus ethe PS3 version von Dragon Age runs with 20-25 FPS, while the 360 version runs with 30 FPS. Just get it droids! The only games you can play are your flop exclusives the rest of the games (around 120 games each year) are multiplattform and run and look better on the 360. So keep waiting for ya crap exclusives while we play the best games.