The story is too old to be commented.
2899d ago Replies(15)
badkolo2899d ago

agreed, if they do this, suck it activitision.

ia_studio2899d ago (Edited 2899d ago )

Killzone2 32 players + online dedicated servers, psn(free)

Edit: resistance 2, Mag have dedicated servers+more players, but I preffer killzone2

solidt122899d ago

Activision Execs need to STFU

vhero2899d ago

charging more for the game wasn't enough they wanna charge a monthly fee to play it now?? They got a good thing going right now why are they trying to commit business suicide? Would never happen anyways as users would just play the free games instead forcing them to go free.

mastiffchild2899d ago

We've jumped through so many hoops for these greedy tosspots who wouldn't even put in dedicated servers? And now this? So glad I don't buy anything Acti make anymore.

MagicAccent2898d ago



PS3istheshit22898d ago (Edited 2898d ago )

one of the best games ive ever played next to COD4
but ill probably pay for a couple months then when its february, the cold will start to go away and everyones gonna be outside so...
what im trying to say is that if they start charging then MW2 is just gonna be those games that you play for a little while but then it goes to the dusty pile of games
me and my friends come home after school and play about 4 or 5 games of COD4
lol its kinda tradition
if it wasnt for COD then id be playing resistance 2 and killzone 2
but if the fees start coming then im only playing Playstation FPS

... theres GT5 god of war 1 2 and 3 ratchet and clank and so many other exclusives on PS3 which makes me not wanna play COD even more if i have to pay for it
funny comment up there "they do learn well from microsoft"

krouse932898d ago

This is a stupid F'ing idea there rolling in money and If they do this I will ignore all other activision games that come out from here on in.

cyberwaffles2898d ago

"According to the Activision CFO, there is a demand from its core fanbase to pay for additional services."

what a load of horse ****. theres no demand to pay for additional services, they just want to play the damn game online for free like most games have been since the advent of online PC gaming. just when i was starting to give MW2 a second chance because of its TPS mode, Activision finds a way to take a million steps backward.

rockleex2898d ago

We will gladly pay for free services.


+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 2898d ago
alphakennybody2899d ago

Do it kotick ,I triple dare you and you'll soon know how hitler lost!!

komp2899d ago

In a bunker with a pistol and some cyanide for the wife?

rawrockkillz2899d ago

No he got a machine gun in the face from Eli Roth!

Elven62899d ago

Even if they do it you know the hardcore Call of Duty players will jump on it, they would essentially want to turn it into the Battle.Net of COD only difference being every game required a few for entry instead of one.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2899d ago
n4gn4gn4gn4g2899d ago

That's just silly.

//Dylai safonwyr sugno fy pidyn

TheMART2899d ago

"Saaking - 2 minutes ago
1.1 -
It wouldn't surprise me if it. PS3 owners wouldn't be affected but it'd just be unfair. Imagine paying XBL TO PLAY ONLINE and then having to pay to play online...AGAIN. So basically you'd get charged to access the FULL game (SP and MP) twice?! WTF! "

Why wouldn't PS3 owners be affected if they had to pay for playing Call of Duty also?

I don't get your unlogical thinking at all. They didn't have to pay before and in the new situation they should. Sounds like being affected to me mate.

ZombieAutopsy2899d ago (Edited 2899d ago )

You obviously didnt get what he was saying so ill try to break it down for you.

Xbox users already pay to play games online and if they started to charge a fee to play Call of Duty games online Xbox users would have 2 pay twice. (yea they could work it out so you dont have to have live but lets face it no one buys just CoD games to play online)

Ps3 users dont pay to play online so they would only have to pay the fee to play Call of Duty games.

Saaaking was kidna wrong though in saying Ps3 users wouldnt be affected but they wouldnt be affected as bad is what i think he was getting at. Me personally though i would never pay to play CoD online unless it was something like 10$ a year and it had dedicated servers/free map packs/and clan game servers with good leaderboards.

The Iron Sheik2899d ago

Actually 360 owners would have to pay 3 times. Once to their ISP once for Live and once again for MW2. IMO if people weren't so complacent paying $50 a year for something that should be free. Activision would never have the nerve to even think about a monthly fee.

Pirateogta2899d ago

And PS3 owners would have to pay 2 times. Once to their ISP and once for MW2. And they'd still get a worse experience than 360 owners who are paying for LIVE.

ZombieAutopsy2899d ago (Edited 2899d ago )

Pirate i owned CoD4 on both Ps3 and X360 and their is really no difference in the online play (or any p2p online game), the only real difference was in the xbox version you could join peoples games and now you can do that on Mw2 on the ps3, you're just a fanboy thats why you THINK its a better service...I dont mind paying for live because 50$ a year isnt much to me but i know when it comes to online play for multiplatform games its the same experience and if there are any problems in either version they are usually fixed within a month of release and usually sooner than that.

The Iron Sheik2899d ago

If by a worse online experience you mean not being called [email protected] or the n word by 12 year olds you would be correct.

There are no dedicated servers for MW2 on live and the party chat was disabled, so how is it better?

BYE2899d ago


How is free wifi and online play, with most of the exclusives having dedicated server support, a worse experience?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2899d ago