990°
Submitted by DSco4 1774d ago | screenshot

Modern Warfare 2: PS3 vs. 360 HD comparison

Here's a batch of Modern Warfare 2 comparison screens that were taken with Full RGB and Superwhite settings on the PS3, thus offering better comparability than the former comparisons. All the shots were taken with a professional grabbing system in 720p.

Can you tell the difference? (Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, PS3, Xbox 360)

Alternative Sources
« 1 2 3 4 »
loslonelyman  +   1774d ago
LOL
The PS3 looks better. I really thought they would be identical,but lighting is much better on the Ps3 side.
gaffyh  +   1774d ago
These screens are near identical, some look better on 360 and some look better on PS3. Well done to Infinity Ward!
THE MAX SPEED 21  +   1774d ago
why are the pictures so pale though? all the screens they show comparison with are always pale.
Darkeyes  +   1774d ago
Looks like all the hanging out with ND paid out... The lighting actually looks better in the PS3 in a few screen shots lol...

Turning on the RGB and Super white affects the performance most of the times. It's a shame that most comparers don't turn on the feature before comparing..
#1.3 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(12) | Disagree(10) | Report | Reply
ABizzel1  +   1774d ago
There are differences, but both version look very similar in this comparison (the last comparison guy should be ashamed of himself).

The PS3 version has better lighting and textures, but the 360 version has more effects like bloom, and cast more shadows.
StanLee  +   1774d ago
Anyone who says they can tell the difference from those comparisons are flat out lying.
_vx  +   1774d ago
both look the same graphic looks like crap
ThanatosDMC  +   1774d ago
MW2 isnt HD, right?
presto717  +   1774d ago
wasnt the 360 the lead platform for this?
cuz the ps3 version looks better.

Just wondering.
Xgamerzus  +   1774d ago
Same on both consoles!! obivously get it on PC, then sell it
Same on both consoles!! obivously get it on PC,get a "no disc crack" , then sell it!!
The old engine is amazing ONLY ON PC!!!
but for consoles it is Meh=0...compared to our new Next Gen PS3 FPS engines!!
Sorry but recylying old PC FPS engines and charging $65.00 is not my idea of a fair deal.
NeoCloud  +   1774d ago
I really doesn't matter which version looks better cause in the end The X360 version's gonna sell a Sh.....Load.
Bubbles_Kitty_Cat  +   1774d ago
Probably because the PS3's last-gen controller is so gimped.

Call of Duty games are best played with a 360 controller.
It's just one of life's simple truths. lol
Sarcasm  +   1774d ago
Wow... those of you saying one looks better than the other need to realize that some of them aren't in the same exact location. Otherwise, ZERO DIFFERENCES to my eyes.

"Call of Duty games are best played with a 360 controller.
It's just one of life's simple truths. lol "

Right... Even though the PS3's analog sticks has a better deadzone, a better d-pad, and contact sensitive face buttons. The good thing about the 360 controller is the triggers, concaved analog sticks, and perhaps ergonomics.

It's a preference, so stop acting like it's a fact.
#1.12 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(22) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
SL1M DADDY  +   1774d ago
Yet another reason to apreciate Infinity Ward
They made both versions look identical. Kudos to yet another multiplat game by them that looks the same. Now if only more and more devs of the third party kind could do the same.
Bubbles_Kitty_Cat  +   1774d ago
"It's a preference, so stop acting like it's a fact."

I know, and most people prefer the 360's. ;)
Highwayman  +   1774d ago
While it does appear that the PS3 version has a slight edge in lighting, just remember that the 360 has some tricks akin to the PS3's full RGB and superwhite. Though I don't remember what they are exactly. I haven't been in my settings in a long time.

The screens look great. The 360 seems to have more accurate colors, whereas the PS3 colors look as though it is on wide gamut. Visuals do look really good on both platforms, I think. Can't wait to try out the multiplayer and unlock my Bushy.
Alcon Caper  +   1774d ago
They should take a picture of screen tearing. ;)
Poopface the 2nd  +   1774d ago
wow 360 is much better
like usual the 360 is looking much better.
loslonelyman  +   1774d ago
It is not SPECTACULARLY better...but
definitely better. I guess having a true HD console with tons of settings to tweak may be the difference?Even the devs said if your PS3 settings are "wonky" it will not look like the 360.My TV has custom presets as well as 50 different picture sliders (Toshiba 46LX177) so i usually spend a half hour messing with the settings till i can see a mosquito fart at 20 feet away from the screen.
Domenikos  +   1774d ago
¬¬
PS3 version looks better in terms of colours and textures.

360 has more shiny, gloss effects.

Ill get it on PS3 later this year, see you in PSN.
#1.19 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
novcze  +   1774d ago
I see lot of confusion in what Full RGB and Super White does. There are some facts
- Super White is only effective when Y Pb/Cb Pr/Cr output is ON, thus not when you play games.
- Full RGB ON = PC video levels = 256 shades of grey (0 = black, 255 = white)
- Full RGB Limited = standard video levels for CE (same as on DVD/BD) = 226 shades of grey (15 = black, 240 = white)

It`s obvious that you will get better on-screen contrast ratio and more colors with Full RGB ON, question is if your TV can support PC video levels over HDMI. One can easily figure out if TV can support Full RGB with some monitor test images ( http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-tes... ).
ultimolu  +   1774d ago
If I do get this game, it won't be because of the graphics.

It looks the same.
WenisWagon  +   1774d ago
360 version still superior
http://www.cynamite.de/_mis...

Look at how fake the brown smoke looks at the top right in the ps3 version compared to the Xbox 360 version.
beans  +   1774d ago
I gotta give the upper hand to 360 for many effects like smoke, haze, dust, and lighting on many objects not even seen on the ps3 version. Really all they did was recreate each ps3 level minus all the simple touches to make it feel more realistic. Anybody with a pair of two eyes can look at these pics and see that once again the ps3 version is struggling to keep up. Both versions look great but the 360 version clearly takes this one.
gintoki777  +   1774d ago
the color actually looks better on the ps3 version its just slightly sharper but other than that no difference.. lights in the 360 version look like they blur out more idk like in the 1st picture the guys helmet
Statix  +   1774d ago
@Bubbles_Kitty_Cat
Actually, I've personally felt for a long time that the PS3 controller was the superior controller for shooters; this is speaking as veteran FPS gamer on both consoles and PC.

While I do somewhat prefer the 360's analog stick layout (the left stick being higher than the right stick), I much prefer the PS3's smoother, more precise analog sticks. It's the simple truth that the PS3's analog sticks are smoother, feature a LARGER range of motion, and a less prominent feeling of analog deadzone--all of which contribute greatly to precision aiming in shooters. I've seen another website report on the analog stick quality of the two systems, arriving to similar conclusions.

I simply feel the level of precision afforded by the PS3's analog sticks make it my preferred controller for shooters, although I do agree that the 360's analog stick LAYOUT, as well as the feel of the triggers, is better.
rockleex  +   1774d ago
The differences...
Are actually noticeable. Unlike the minimal differences between a DVD and Bluray.

/sarcasm
RememberThe357  +   1774d ago
They look the same to me.
@Bubbles_Kitty_Cat: All the disagrees seem to prove you wrong.

However, I do think the fact the the 360 controller is bigger. If I could get a Duelshock 3 that is a bit bigger, has better triggers and the indents of the 360 sticks, I'd have the perfect controller for me. Overall though, the Deulshock 3 is a better controller than the 360 controller.
BrianC6234  +   1774d ago
Do the PS3 shots look better? I can't tell. They look about the same to me. The main problem is these screen shots aren't the exact same images so you really can't say which is better. Both look good and that's all that matters.
ikkokucrisis  +   1774d ago
They both look identical but
If i had to be really nitpicky, the PS3 screenshots have less contrast, but more detail than its 360 counterpart!

Looking forward to playing it tomorrow!
morganfell  +   1774d ago
PS3 took this one easily. Some people may think the 360 shows better particle effects and light bloom but they would be incorrect. In some instances it appears so, such as the building explosion on page 2 but that is because the 360 shot shows the building in the midst of the explosion and the PS3 version is at the beginning of the explosion. They are not from the same time sequence and are thus deceptive.

A little common sense will prevent an incorrect observation, even for those unwilling to admit the time of the PS3 has arrived.
Elaine Benes  +   1774d ago
no real difference.
but while you kids spend your time disagreeing, i'll spend my time enjoying it on 360.
Saaking  +   1774d ago
Identical.
Bubbles_Kitty_Cat  +   1774d ago
@RememberThe357

Of course what I said got tons of disagrees.
N4G is a massive PS3-circlejerk, where the PS3 is always in first place and the power of the Cell is mightier than God Himself. lol

Out in the real world, most people prefer the 360's controller.
#1.33 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
Saaking  +   1774d ago
If you don't like N4G, no one is stopping you from leaving. There's an equal amount of Ps3 "fanboys" and 360 "fanboys" whether you like it or not. In certain articles, Ps3 fanboys will get tons of disagrees and in others it'll be the 360 fans. Just stop complaining.
Bubbles_Kitty_Cat  +   1774d ago
Not complaining, just pointing out the truth: this place is crawling with bitter PS3 fans.

It's well known across the interwebs. :D
darkride66  +   1774d ago
Is that so?
Bubbles_Kitty_Cat said above "Out in the real world, most people prefer the 360's controller."

Then how come since the 360 has had any competition it's been outsold? If "in the real world" everyone prefers the 360 controller, why hasn't this translated into sales?

Clearly consumers have spoken. Since they've had a choice they've picked either the PS3 or Wii in greater numbers. Of course, this is probably due to a number of reasons beside controller preference.

I guess that makes me ask, where did you get the idea that people prefer the 360's controller? Having used both extensively, personally the broken D-Pad and the 360 controller is a huge source of frustration for me in any game that uses it regularly.
#1.36 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
Sarcasm  +   1774d ago
"I simply feel the level of precision afforded by the PS3's analog sticks make it my preferred controller for shooters, although I do agree that the 360's analog stick LAYOUT, as well as the feel of the triggers, is better."

Bubbles to Statix! That's exactly how I feel. There are things I like about the 360 controller and things I don't like about the PS controller. But at the end of the day, my control style is very sensitive and I need the dead zones to be as small as possible so I can be as accurate as possible. So the PS controller fits the bill there FOR ME.

And to Bubbles_kitty_cat please provide some factual evidence besides that people prefer the 360 controller to the PS3 most of the times.

To me the 360 controller is like a big GT car where it has great pedal feel (triggers), comfortable bucket seats (concaved analogs), and rides extremely comfortable (Size), but is a bit sluggish with the steering inputs (dead zone) and the gearbox isn't snappy or accurate (D-Pad).

While the PS controller is more like an EVO FQ-520 where it has an incredible steering ratio (dead zone), Super AYC (contact sensitive face buttons), a precise gearbox (D-pad), but the ride is a little rougher (size), the pedals are mushy (triggers), and the seats aren't as fitting (analog sticks).

So some might prefer the GT car, and others might want the EVO. And seeing as how a majority of 360 players only own a 360 will obviously prefer the 360 controller, and vice versa for PS3 owners. The argument is moot.

:)
jadenkorri  +   1774d ago
anyone who says they can tell a difference
is a blind 360 fanboy, they look identical, if were gonna get nit picky at things, the picture top right 5th one, ps3 has light illuminating the dust, were as the 360 does not, just more dust. But he 360 has different vents on the bottom fist one were as the ps3 does not. But otherwise, graphically both match, and thats exactly what IW was going to do. I personally would like to see a company take advantage of each system and develop the same game for that system. It might stop the flamwars or fuel it.
Amp  +   1774d ago
Get those glasses checked WW
look at the tower in the center of screen with the writing on it, look at the detail on the rooftop itself, look at the writing on the gun itself!
Nitrowolf2  +   1774d ago
"Clap"
wow they actually got the settings right, and guess what they look nearly identical. You can say for either one that they have the upper edge over the other but to me they look the same.

there are 2 shots that look better on the PS3
http://www.cynamite.de/_mis...
and
http://www.cynamite.de/_mis...

EDITED: actually took another look after seeing those 2 i posted i went back, look at the 360 version and notice in most background its more of a mist/fog effect.

TBH i really don't care for Muliplat advantage because we know PS3 could produce better.
#2 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(14) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
zoks310  +   1774d ago
That mist and fog is a trick used by devs to cover up jagged edges.
darkride66  +   1774d ago
That and to reduce draw distance.
It's less taxing on the hardware.
qqjohn  +   1774d ago
The look the same if you take off your fanboy glasses
JeffGUNZ  +   1774d ago
hahah bubbles for you sir. Exactly. They are identical. Good job IW.
Consoldtobots  +   1774d ago
weren't you the same people in last weeks thread laughing up a storm because the PS3 versions looked "washed out". That my little amigos = NO CREDIBILITY on your part.

PS3 version looks better fwiw.
JeffGUNZ  +   1774d ago
Nope.
I could care less how a game looks on PS3, since I only own a 360. The only reason I looked at this article is cause it's MW2 and they look identical.
drummerx2709  +   1774d ago
I really see little to no difference here
hay  +   1774d ago
Agreed. As usuall I fail to spot any difference.
glennc  +   1774d ago
that's because you are unbiased. when i fanboy speaks his oppinions are influenced by his emotions, or more to the point his hatred for the other console.
Bumpmapping  +   1774d ago
PS3 version looks more natural.
4point7BillionLoss  +   1774d ago
Jaggies
4.7 billion jaggies
Kamikaze135  +   1774d ago
@4point7BillionLoss
Lol, yeah I noticed that on the 360 version, too. Weird =O
DonCorneo  +   1774d ago
everything is shiny on the 3fixme version
even the jaggies are shiny
buying1999   1774d ago | Spam
xcox  +   1774d ago
lol, 4point7Billion tears
confirmed:

killzone 2 is the best looking FPS this gen.

moving on
#5.5 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Nitrowolf2  +   1774d ago
They look nearly identical, but notice those 2 pics i posted in Gamerzone and you'll see the PS3 has the upper edge, cause the 360 version has that fog going on through all the pics. But really during gameplay it all looks the same.
talltony  +   1774d ago
They look so similar but how could anyone...
deny that the ps3 version def has the upper hand in this comparison. I was a little surprised when I saw this shot..
http://www.cynamite.de/_mis...
#6.1 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
tawak  +   1774d ago
agreed looks like they starting to get hang of making ps3 version everything is identical now plus last two pic the ps3 has a little little slightly edge over the 360 version,this must be a mistake.
#6.2 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
she00win99  +   1774d ago
now i'm confuse, which should i buy uncharted 2 or mw2? i really love fps but U2 is the best game right now according from the reviews..
#7 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Bumpmapping  +   1774d ago
Uncharted 2 for sure.
Nitrowolf2  +   1774d ago
U2 but thats me.
#7.2 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
itsralf  +   1774d ago
Ratchet and Clank Future: A Crack in Time.
(i know that wasn't an option, but that game is lasting forever.
I'm about twelve hours in, and there's still so much to do.
So if you want something worth your money, it's a steal.)
she00win99  +   1774d ago
if i'm going to buy r&c, i will to buy tools of destruction because it's alot cheaper..
tawak  +   1774d ago
always buy exclusive 1st then buy a used mw2
buying1999   1774d ago | Spam
xcox  +   1774d ago
dude!
uncharted 2 easy

MW2 might be a good FPS but after KZ2 it's gonna be yet another FPS and it won't even look as good.

uncharted 2 is the game of a decade bro, you don't wanna miss this
kraze07  +   1774d ago
The look nearly identical on all the pics.
slave2Dcontroller  +   1774d ago
Shocker
PS3 version looks slightly better and is "slightly" more rich in color while the 360 version is slightly more faint(usually the case for PS3 ports). At any rate they are nearly identical.

http://www.cynamite.de/_mis...

http://www.cynamite.de/_mis...
#9 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(12) | Disagree(8) | Report | Reply
food86  +   1774d ago
buy uncharted the sp for mw2 is only 6 to 7 hours while the uncharted is 9 and up and the multiplayer for uncharted is beast but If I were you I would just go and buy both
she00win99  +   1774d ago
i can't afford to buy both, the games are too expensive in my country. i think i'll buy uncharted 2 first then buy mw2 later when the price go down..
marcindpol  +   1774d ago
you remember that comparison stating that ps3 version is washed out?

those screenshots clearly looks like xbox version is more washed out than ps3!

lol
komp  +   1774d ago
BRAVO, I am glad they actually correctly set up the PS3. Even if it looked worse with the correct settings it would be valid.
LoLZoRz  +   1774d ago
hoooly sh1t its better on

its the same -.-
gamingisnotacrime  +   1774d ago
they might look the same to the naked eye, but
take out the equipment and magnify 20x, then you will see the Definitive Version!

nothing to do with the gaming experience, but since they are comparing it, why not take out the magnifying glass (like they always do, and nobody cares)
BigBen  +   1774d ago
Both versions look great. Good work IW. Def buying this game. :)
Dutch Boogie  +   1774d ago
The ps3 version looks much more natural. This is the outcome when you turn on full rgb and super white. They increase the colors significantly and displays sharper images.
LoLZoRz  +   1774d ago
if u turn rgb on then it will b too dark so thats not the best idea it looks fine now
Consoldtobots  +   1774d ago
just about EVERY display hitting the market now supports extended colorspace. Unless you're buying a WHOTHEHELLMADETHIS 5000Q, i hear thosee are real cheap but don't support 24bit RGB.
Cheboury  +   1774d ago
GREAT PORT!!!!
Great port...

Nevertheless Xbox 360 seems to have a slight edge here!

http://www.cynamite.de/_mis...

Sunspot visible on the wall...

http://www.cynamite.de/_mis...

watch the back part of the car. Ps3 is missing reflection.

Drawing any other conclusion is purely diatribing and indulging in your fanboy rage!
MGOelite  +   1774d ago
wtf you talking about port? each console had a seperate dev team
Krimmson  +   1774d ago
You do realize that the reflection may not be on the PS3 version because he's standing in a different spot and in a different angle, right?
The Meerkat  +   1774d ago
In pic 3 there are trees in the background on the 360 which are not there on the PS3.
Erotic Sheep  +   1774d ago
... So the PS3 can't render trees? Is that what we're getting at? >.>
jmmurillo86  +   1774d ago
Nearly identical. Surprisingly, PS3 slightly better.
They are nearly identical. Only in detail close-ups PS3 is slightly better. For example, look at the shadow map in protagonist's hands:

http://www.cynamite.de/_mis...
BigBen  +   1774d ago
I noticed one thing, most of the 360 scan's looked like there was dust particles added and slightly brighter. Whereas, the PS3 version looked a bit sharper with more attention to detail on objects and background.
JeffGUNZ  +   1774d ago
@ jmmurillo86 ...Stop
just stop. If you actually look at the picture, you will see the vehicle with the PS3 is further ahead and more under the shadow compared to the 360. If you look, you see the shadow creeping on his hand. These pictures on not the EXACT same pictures. A few feet away will change the way the picture looks. Stop being a fanboy. They look THE SAME!
jmmurillo86  +   1774d ago
More details:

Depth Of Field better on X360. For example, look at the up-right tree in:

http://www.cynamite.de/_mis...

Also X360 screenshot is too bright so you lose the details of the wall.
NFGC  +   1774d ago
@ 3.3
Dude what are you smoking? The two screenshots were taken at a different time and position. Just look at the antenna of the first hummer, PS3 pic is clearly much closer to the building and of course the DOF will be different.

Main differences in those screens are the guys on the patio and the color contrast.
mythamp  +   1774d ago
The Glove
For me the shadow on the glove proves the difference, nice find jmmurillo86. A smoking gun, just like it was with OJ, sadly he got away with it.
Stationfan  +   1774d ago
As much as I hate the fact that infinity ward didn't strive to push the hardware, I have to give them credit for not slouching on the ps3 version, in 2007 they were one of the first 3rd party developers that gave the ps3 a real built from the ground up game. While in that time the norm was making lazy mediocre ps3 ports. Kudos to you guys for showing us equal opportunity developing in that respect.
Moto13  +   1774d ago
PS3 I am impressed
Not to say that COD4 was that far off, but the PS3 version was definitely a very tiny bit inferior to the 360 version, but this time, for the first time in the period of owning a PS3 (which was since Jan/2007) I can say that the PS3 version looks slightly better in some pictures. Finally a multiplat game that looks on par with the 360 version or better. I am still getting the game on the 360 though because I love the controller for FPS games. Good job IW.
lordkemp007  +   1774d ago
Unrelated info for UK.

ASDA 24hrs midnight 32.00 offer ends Fri 13th November.

Sainsbury's out tomorrow 26 pounds offer ends 15th November. Store opens 8.
kingboy  +   1774d ago
Do they offer delivery outside the UK?
pyramid  +   1774d ago
hard to tell
Its hard to tell the difference,but i bet the 360 version runs at a more stable 60fps
commodore64  +   1774d ago
It's really amazing that they made the ps3 version look near identical, as most often there exists some obvious deficit on ps3 multiplats, like in the recent Bayonetta and Badlands, for example.

Kudos to the developer.

We'll have to wait until the detailed apples-to-apples comparisons to call judgement on this one, that's for sure.

Going by the poor quality screenshots, it's hard to tell, so far.
What is evident, however, is that the 360 version seems to have additional fog effects in places that the ps3 doesn't have and better quality bloom overall.
#21.1 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
ReviewsArePolitics  +   1774d ago
lol look at how commodore64 is convinced of his own lies
hahaha you're so delusional it's too funny
commodore64  +   1774d ago
I am not lying.

Here's the evidence, which shows ps3 multiplats are inferior in some ways 80-90% of the time:

http://misterslimm.wordpres...

Certainly with regard to Bayonetta, the difference was so obvious that Famitsu deducted 2 points - even without a direct comparison!
No argument there, right?

Here's more evidence:
http://forum.beyond3d.com/s...
The above link shows the resolutions and AA levels of nearly ALL the multiplats. A lot of the time, the ps3 is lagging - and that's not even counting framerate problems, frametear and reduced textures evident on the ps3.
Check through it yourself. You will find I am right.

Even Tekken6, lauded to have been designed and developed for arcade on ps3 hardware, was forced to run a 576p on ps3, while the 360 managed 768p.
Again, this is a fact. Check it out for yourself.

I am not sure how you can justify calling me a liar, as the facts and evidence are clearly in my favour, dude.

With regard to MW2, all I am saying is there is ample evidence of historical precedent in favour of my argument. Incidentally, other users in this thread have noticed the additional fog on the 360 too.

No need to get nasty.
I am just pointing out the facts.
#21.3 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
cmacdonald  +   1774d ago
This is a direct quote from neogaf by a IW developer.

"re: PS3 vs 360 shots.

I took many comparison shots and videos during development to make sure both platforms were identical. In my findings there is some (extremely) slight differences in color temp (I guess due to how the systems output video), but as long as you've got your console set up properly for your display it should look the same. If the PS3 version is looking washed out then you've got something set up wonkily. Make sure to follow the brightness adjustment guide in the options menu.

And yes, on a lower end setup Full RGB _will_ crush blacks. It is not a foolproof "fix", as is the reference level adjustments on the 360.

In doing blind side by side tests at the office the ONLY person capable of picking the right version was the programmer responsible for a lot of the rendering code :P"

edit: you can't disagree with me, I didn't write that.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum...
#22 (Edited 1774d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
novcze  +   1774d ago
sure they are same, if he say so . . . but as long as your TV support Full RGB, is Full RGB ON the right setting. One can easily figure out if TV can support Full RGB (= 8bit per color component = 256 shades of grey) with some monitor test images ( http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-tes... ).
bjornbear  +   1774d ago
its the same! =O
Isn't this like...a blow to 360 fangirls? because this is how it's going to be in the very near future:

Multiplats won't have a difference.

Get used to it, I already have.
The Meerkat  +   1774d ago
If you say the games look the same.

Then i'll take the version with the best online, controller and frame rate.

(and comments like Fangirls belong over there -------------->)
Jdoki  +   1774d ago
@ Meerkat...

...So, PS3 version, yeah??
JeffGUNZ  +   1774d ago
@ Jdoki
No, he said best.

I kid I Kid, but you see what I did there? No need to fanboy it up people. The game is going to be outstanding on both consoles. Lets all enjoy it.
ReviewsArePolitics  +   1774d ago
Well, he did say best online, so he probably meant PSN as it's free and you get all the bells and whistles of any other online service, if not more.

He said best controller, and I've been playing with the PlayStation controller since 1995 up to its current evolution, the DS3. It's definitely the best, otherwise you'd see drastic changes.

And about frame-rate, well I think it's funny he talks about frame-rate when he doesn't have either version, much less both.

lol @ him acting like he has a PS3 too
divideby0  +   1774d ago
nit...PS3 looks a tad better, but you will never know when playing the game...and some shots the 360 looks better
Bathyj  +   1774d ago
I dont care about these comparisons, because I only have it on PS3 and am just about to start playing.

Thats right. Thanks EB for the midnight launch, see you guys tommorrow.
hkseo100  +   1774d ago
hm
on the screenxhot where it says "Curb Stomper" on the vehicle, you can see on the right bottom corner that the textures of the fliers are sharper on the ps3.

it seems like 360 has bloom on hte minigun on the first level (Bloom isnt anything special, HDR is where its at)

on the last COD4, Shadows were a lot better on ps3 because of the nvidia chipset. u can see the differnece ur self if u run BF2 on ur PC with a ATI card vs an nVidia card, the shadows will render a lot smoother on the nVidia card. but textures, 360 was bette.r

im just impressed that ps3 has overall better quality, lets hope it can maintain the 60fps mark for both consoles.
crazydrummerlad1  +   1774d ago
hmmm im a victor
the battle is inconclusive. well done
MGOelite  +   1774d ago
FINALLY a fair comparison
snaileri  +   1774d ago
720p is console gamer's HD,
1080p is PC gamer's HD.
ZeroX9876  +   1774d ago
Nice to see a great work again!
Thanks to infinity ward, the two versions are equal!The only thing missing is V.S. on cross-platform!!!!
« 1 2 3 4 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

Bayonetta (Wii U) Review | Nintendo Feed

8m ago - "Bayonetta is a great game that all Wii U owners should snap up. The story is immersive, the comb... | Wii U
10°

Valkyria Chronicles’ Selvaria and Alicia join Dengeki Bunko Fighting Climax

12m ago - "Valkyria Chronicles‘ Selvaria Bles will be a playable character in the upcoming console version... | PS3
30°

The Legend of Zelda's strangest spin-offs

12m ago - Hyrule Warriors is a successful Zelda spin-off, but not all of the series' outside ventures have... | Culture
10°

The Next Penelope: An F-Zero-Inspired Space Odyssey | Hardcore Gamer

12m ago - The Next Penelope is a title that will likely catch many gamers off guard when it launches on PC... | PC
Ad

Destiny The Game

Now - Explore Mars, Rediscover Venus, Reclaim the moon, Protect Earth. Become Legend. The wait is over! Destiny is now available to play, Pick up your... | Promoted post
40°

eGamer Podcast 98: Double Crunch Of Destiny

2h ago - Recorded 16 September 2014, this is episode 98 of the eGamer podcast. Topics discussed this week... | PC
Related content from friends