In that screenshot comparison Videogameszone checked the graphics between the PS3 and Xbox 360 version of Borderlands.
If I had all the money in the world, the first thing I'd do is buy all PS3 owners a pair of glasses. Both versions are the same, except with a few online bugs on PS3 which are fixed. PC version looks best.
horrible comparison, some of the screen shot are at different angles and distances
I'll just wait for Digital Foundry's face off comparison.
Yes I would wait for Eurogamer this site doing these comparisons is known to try to make the PS3 version of games seem on par. Thats the first thing I noticed was the camera angle aimed closer to the ground etc on the 360 version in these pics trying to expose the imperfections of the textures, they aimed the camera in the PS3 version further away making the textures more crisp and natural looking even though it made little difference they still tried. The only thing I see different in this BS comparison is the PS3 version is missing textures on the ground etc.
"to try to make the PS3 version of games seem on par"... not the expected result, huh ?
It's just Why Dis, ignore him. Congratulations 360 fans....you've got your own Nasim. :/
lol @ singling out ONE fanboy on n4g the community is build of fanboys gets disgusting on both sides.
Watch the GT comparison. The PS3 version is definitely a little better. http://www.gametrailers.com...
And less rabid insecure fanboys that need to spin everything to feel some type of comfort.
That's why, despite using identical assets (textures, geometry, etc...) the PS3 version appears sharper and has a greater sense of depth. This could be due to a number of reasons such as capture errors, intentional tampering (like IGN, Gametrailers, etc...), or simply the fact that they are taking advantage of the PS3's HDR rendering capability. Whatever the reason, it's best to wait till we get an official breakdown from Digital Foundry.
The game looks great on both consoles but the PS3 just looks sharper and has deeper colors.
No need to compare cel-shaded visuals.
AMEN TO THAT BROTHA! Cell-shaded games tend to the look the exact same, even with lowered texture rezes, when compared to even the PC version. Also, this review was complaining about the AA being equally bad on both systems. I have AAx24 forced on through my HD5870 running at 1680*1050 and the game STILL HAS HORRIBLE JAGGIES!
"I have AAx24 forced on through my HD5870 running at 1680*1050 and the game STILL HAS HORRIBLE JAGGIES!" That...is effed up...
Victory for the PS3. But who cares? Uncharted 2 is the best looking game of the year.
Seriously. These screenshot comparisons are just getting stupid.
its not getting stupid because some people have both systems, and we want to know which one is better. so anyone posting visual comparisons or frame rate videos are welcome here. if you don't like it... don't read it and move on.
you are without doubt one of the worst most pathetic fanboys ever to grace the net. get a life idiot. i've got uncharted2 and it may have fabulous graphics, but it aint nowhere near this industry destroying juggernaught you and all the other turd fanboys are making out to be. now i've finished it, i'll be trading it saturday....for forza3. ouch, sorry turds! and by the way, these comparisons are made especially for the idiotic fanturds just like you.
Well what console game has better visuals, gameplay & scores than Uncharted2? Enjoy Forza3, its a great game.
typical example of the hypcytcal sony fanboys that stricken this site. so now scores matter because uncharted2 scored well? and gameplay? i could probably name a dozen games that i thought were better than uncharted2. and now forza3 is a great game???? after you trolled every forza3 thread for months? are you for real?? lol
screw a screenshot comparison. i want a patch for this glitchy game! then i'll worry about whether i got it for the right console or not lol videos confirm that PS3 loads textures faster though. can anyone confirm if this still holds true when the game is saved to HDD on the 360???
I have it installed on my 360 and I noticed a pretty big difference. It goes for most games that use UE. Same thing with Mass Effect and Gears of War 2. The textures load a lot faster. Can't say if it's faster than the PS3 though.
Soda, fella, there's just nothing ion it at all. Onve it's installed on a 360 it pretty much negates any of this issue and ends up totally on a par with the PS3 version, imo. I've got the PS3 bversion and was playing the 360 version, installed, at a mates and we were looking as we'd been told there was a difference and neither of us could find anything-and not on;y on this front eiother-we couldn't split the two versions over anything visually. I'm not shocked, mind, as it doesn't even look great on a PC and just isn't that demending a game for either console-prolly the cel shaded GFX I guess. Honestly, though, can we just have comparisons done when there's something trong with one of the versions? 99% of the time they just find nothing, next to nothing and stuff you can't even see with the guman eye. DF use testing programs FFS! Who thinks that there's enough of a difference between two versions any time you need a computer to see the damned inequalities? I've already seen a GT article saying the PS version is better and another elsewhere saying they're identical-next we'll have one with the 360 on top-because there's no real difference and people HAVE to write something but these things are getting SOOO dull and pointless.
That was misinformation trying to give PS3 a victory. The loading difference when installed on the 360 HDD is greater than even GTA4.
PS3 the superior version.
Who cares about graphics comparisons really? Obviously one is going to be better than the other otherwise it would all be the same.....
cell shaded graphics! Lets compare them!
the art style is actually really cool and a nice change from the drab greys and browns of todays 'next gen' games. talking of which the next gen filter in uncharted 2 made me laugh
but who cares anyways? Whats the point of comparing these games? Its stupid! Just let it go. Sometimes one version is better then another. Just deal with it and move on.
These type of articles just arent newsworthy anymore. It's a fact by now, Xbox 360 runs multiplats better than the PS3.
what can I say.....I'm into hot girls with tight bodies. But you go boy with your big black man for your avatar ... Yeah for gay!
I have it on the PS3 nephew has it on the Xbox Here is what I noticed Xbox Colors are a little brighter Bloom effetcs are a little brighter PS3 Seems to be sharper Some diff textures on the ground in some spots Loads textures much faster and loads the game faster over all Thats my experience, eithier way its so close eithier system is fine, and the game rocks by the way
This game is great. I love the crazy fights where they mobs keep coming endlessly and I go down more times than an "adult film" actress. Dead! Second wind! Dead! Second wind! This kind of fun works on both consoles.
Who cares, play the game and have some fun. Stop caring about which version has better looking rocks then the other. I would understand if it was a huge difference. But if you need a magnifying glass to see which version is better, well then you're a freaking "Fanboy" that misses the whole point of playing GAMES. On that note, who's up for a game of Borderlands "PS3" version? PM me...
Not everyone who compares is a fan boy; however there are those who own both systems and are curious which one to purchase and sometimes there are large differences in games so its worth noting and comparing, I certainly like to know if one version is gimped
im okay with the ps3 graphics of this game,they could be alot worse lol. i dont think the loading of textures faster is really that big of deal.
ps3 looks better
i got it for the pc. graphics are beautiful, definitely notice texture load-in. wonder how it compares to 360.
Nothing to see here. Move on!
2 points 1)cell shaded...there will be very little difference but more importantly 2)IT DOESNT MATTER! for non cell shaded games....the ps3 came out 1 year later and cost 200+ more....it had *$%@*! better look superior. this is just getting stupid.
1. PS3 fanboys don`t play multi-plats, so this is pointless 2. 360 version is obviously better 3. PS3 version has broken online
Still,there really is nothing in it whatsoever,this kind of thing isn't exactly game breaking.
I've been playing this as much as possible on my PS3 (I'm only a level 25 siren, if that indicates how little free time I have). This game is awesome. I'm really enjoying it. Get it regardless of your console.
All i noticed was that the shadows on the ps3 version appeared darker. It could just be a greater range in shadows but its doesnt makes the game really look better, just different. Apart from that though the games both seem to look identical. im sure pixel counters will say otherwise but on an HDtv they'll look the same.
PS3 wins this one... fanboys get a life.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.