Try our new beta! Click here
Submitted by Gameswire 2250d ago | screenshot

Brütal Legend - PS3 vs 360 comparison

Gameswire has added a 23-image 720p comparison gallery of Brutal Legend, showing that despite being practically identical, there are minute differences in favour of the 360 version. (Brutal Legend, PS3, Xbox 360)

« 1 2 3 »
gameangel  +   2250d ago
I'd guess that once again, the 360 was the lead development platform then?
Vicodin  +   2250d ago
Another multiplatform title that looks best on the PS3.

You have to wonder why Microsoft made the Xbox 360 so hard to program that the PS3 version of multiplats always looks the best.

Not that it really matters. The game sucks.
#1.1 (Edited 2250d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(59) | Report | Reply
I did not murder him  +   2250d ago
I disagreed because it doesn't matter if the 360 is the lead platform or not.
edwineverready  +   2250d ago
the game does not suck
Did you play it. it's really fun and fresh. @vicodin
josuttis  +   2250d ago
Yep, the PS3 version looks significantly better.

Too many other amazing PS3 exclusives to care about this novelty game. Something to pick up a few years from now from the bargin bin. Maybe.
LONEWOLF231  +   2250d ago
Are you guys blind??
The 360 version looks better than the PS3 version!
The PS3s jacket textures look washed out......which is kinda weird actually.......seeing as most of the past games both version look just about the same.
#1.5 (Edited 2250d ago ) | Agree(17) | Disagree(30) | Report | Reply
Christopher  +   2250d ago
Time to argue over some more screenshots!

Honestly, I'll wait for the Lens of Truth comparison. Those guys at least take the time and have a modicum of understanding to determine which are better. Regardless, it's unlikely that either will really be that much different from another during gameplay. Unless, of course, you really want to find things to b*tch about.
josuttis  +   2250d ago
The PS3 version looks significantly sharper and more detailed. Something definitely went wrong with the 360 version. You have to wonder why the 360 is having trouble with such a graphically mediocre title.

Maybe they will come out with a patch for the 360 version to fix the graphics up to the PS3 version's level?
Perjoss  +   2250d ago
does not matter which platform is lead (ghostbusters looks better on 360, ps3 was lead platform), Gabe Newell was right, the ps3 is too hard to develop for, thats why when you spend equal time developing a game on each platform it always comes out better looking on 360. The list is endless but most notable was gta4 with its lower resolution and jaggies on the ps3 version.

(bring on the disagrees and ignores, it only confirms that my comment carries significant weight)

edit: and dont forget to remove bubbles, i never asked for them in the first place.
#1.8 (Edited 2250d ago ) | Agree(14) | Disagree(22) | Report | Reply
Real Gambler  +   2250d ago
Yikes, not sure why you're arguing about...
Both are very close... And amazinly enough, the article say that the PS3 may be at a lower resolution... So I took picture 23 where you can clearly see and count the jaggies on both version and they come almost identical! (Though vertically, the PS3 may be a bit short...). No matter what though, both have huge jaggies (even if the article give the edge to the 360), so much that I think it's pictures from the same console, one with meteor and one without (so they had to take another shot), then they either made a huge mistake or they are toying with you.

As far as I am concerned (keep in mind I only looked at picture number 23, mostly under heavy zoom), both are pretty much the same and both are pretty bad.
Microsoft Xbox 360  +   2250d ago
I'll let you guys dish this one out. Looks pretty useless as this game sucks anyway. The high end multiplats run better on the PS3 anyway. Simple fact right there.
SupaPlaya  +   2250d ago
I looked very hard
but I can't tell any big difference at all. On top of that, once the game get going, you probably won't be able to tell.

Interestingly enough, all the comments above me have more disagrees than agrees, even though some are for 360, some are for PS3. This is interesting.
#1.11 (Edited 2250d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
AKNAA  +   2250d ago
Nothing to fight about! move along!
Okay, first off, the differences are so minor that this should not even be a debate of wether or not one version looks better than the other..

secondly, This game Rocks! I was kinda sad that the demo suddenly ended when I was really getting into it!.... Unfortunately though, this game falls on the same release date as uncharted 2, so maybe a few months from now I'll buy it....
sunil  +   2250d ago
looks at the screenshots - says to himself "Wow both look exactly the same"

comes to comment - now confused !
ThatCanadianGuy  +   2250d ago

I love how in every single thread "I did not murder him" is in, anyone that said anything slightly anti-360 has 7+ disagrees.

Meanwhile, he's showered with agrees while he's surrounded by people that hate him.

Edit: Cue the disagrees ! LOL!
You're too predictable POG ;)
#1.14 (Edited 2250d ago ) | Agree(19) | Disagree(14) | Report | Reply
jack_burt0n  +   2250d ago

Lost Planet 2 better on PS3
Gran Turismo 5 Prologue much better than Forza 3
Brutal Legend a little bit better on 360

just stating their facts.
aaron5829  +   2250d ago
I'll see Lens Of Truth's comparison..
I dont know, Gameswire does not get my trust.. ever since they labeled gt5 pics as forza 3...

So... yeah.
IaMs12  +   2250d ago
Lol the only way you are going to notice the difference is sitting here actually looking for it! When you play the game you wont notice any difference at all. I still find it humourous though that since the 360 version was declared "Winner" the PS3 fannies to give a Rats A** about this game and going back to play there "Next Gen when WE say its Next gen games"... GTFU
likedamaster  +   2250d ago
The PS3 version is disgusting. Jaggies are much more noticeable on the PS3 version. And textures are blatantly better on 360. I bet the fanboys won't say so. Oops, looks like I spoke too soon.
SIdepocket  +   2250d ago
How can anyone think the PS3 version actually looks better? It has no antialiasing and somehow the 360 version still has sharper textures. Judging by the comments, methinks josuttis and Vicodin are the same person. LOL at the leet trolling.
#1.19 (Edited 2250d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
The XBOT  +   2250d ago
But the Cell?
Face it PS3, the xbox will always have a better gpu, and games that do not overstretch the consoles will aways look better on XBOX at most times. Games that do stretch the consoles will look better on the console that has the resources. The PS3 has its strenths and weaknesses and so does the xbox. See I can be objective right?
slayorofgods  +   2250d ago
The PS3 and 360 versions look the same
Good job developers of this game, you know how to make multi-platform games right.
#1.21 (Edited 2250d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
mastiffchild  +   2250d ago
Meh. Neither look amazing and it isn't what Shafer's games are ever really about in any case. The 360 and PS3 both have some issues and I couldn't pick a winner if I sat there all day-nothing to see here. Declaring either the better looking veersion is entirely down to which particular issue bothers you more and seeing how even then any differences are minute AND both consoles can do better anyway is there really any point to comparisons like this one.

If there's something glaring and one version is a lot worse meaning it's gamers get short changed then fair enough but when you really have to stretch just to see any kind of "better" looking version is it really worth the effort?

Pointless, imo.
Zydake  +   2249d ago
I'm pro PS3 but 360 looks better and lol @ so much hate toward jack black, the game, and I did not murder him ROFL. Some people won't like this game cause it's about metal if you guys didn't notice. People in our time are all about rap techno country and Spanish music, and basically this game is for the gamer metal fans. One last thing. OZZY FTW
nycredude  +   2249d ago
Isn't this game releasing the same day as UNcharted 2? If so what retards!

ALso I looked real hard and it looks pretty much the same to me. The only thing I can take out of this that is definitive is that it looks not so great on both consoles.
#1.24 (Edited 2249d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Myth  +   2249d ago
I'm a huge 360 fanboy i hate the PS3
But i have to admit the PS3 version is way better looking than the 360 version. May have to break down and go get a PS3.
Marceles  +   2249d ago
Gotta be honest, the 360 version looks better. The staircasing is more noticeable on the PS3 version. Look at his hair and face on the PS3 version and then look at the 360 version.
#1.26 (Edited 2249d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
leeger  +   2249d ago
i honestly couldn't tell the difference, whats up with all the fighting again?
house  +   2249d ago
they basically look the same guys but it can go ether way
Elaine Benes  +   2249d ago
Why'd you quit? Foreman is an @$$.
edwineverready  +   2250d ago
Want this game.
I am a ps3 fanboy, but 360 has the edge. Still going to enjoy this game on my ps3.
Tewi-Inaba  +   2250d ago
edwineverready  +   2250d ago
No problem.
I am a ps3 fanboy but i am not blind. Textures and aa are better on 360. maybe final game will be different.
#2.2 (Edited 2250d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
Tewi-Inaba  +   2250d ago
I was just kidding D:
I was poking fun at the random disagrees people just put out O_o
_vx  +   2250d ago
im a die hard Xbox fan and i can say the PS3 has way better textures (see its really easy) anyway this game is an average at max predict 6-7/10 for it, pass for me
madpuppy  +   2250d ago
Jack Black is a retard, and the thought of seeing his dumb face and hearing his stupid, un-funny voice through the
whole game makes me want to puke. the guy really is into himself.

there is only one movie I enjoyed that he was in and in that movie one scene.

The Jackal,
slayorofgods  +   2250d ago
There is a pixel on the a$$ cheek of animated Jack black that isn't as sharp and clear on both versions. Clearly it is obvious which version of the game I am going to be purchasing.
jessupj  +   2250d ago
Gee, I've very suprised to see so many people hating on this game so hard. I think it looks awesome fun. A hack and slash with RPG elements, can't wait to play this one.
Voice of Reason  +   2250d ago
The differences are pretty tiny. 360 version looks a little smoother I guess, although I reckon you won't be able to see the difference when it's in motion.
iown-ipwn-ikill  +   2250d ago
i heard that is to do with whatever both consoles do when screenshotted. ps3 uses something wierd, makes it look worse than it actually is
fishd  +   2250d ago
No one didn't give a sh1t about this game(for shame).... until now

Just wait and see,150 comments, here they come!
edwineverready  +   2250d ago
I hope people buy this game because the producer also produced pychonauts for ps2 my all time favorite game, but that did not sell well. PLayed the demo for brutal legend and loved it. people do yourself a favor and play the demo it's free :)
darkpower  +   2250d ago
They actually gave a sh!t since Bobby Kotick became a douche about it and tried to prevent the game from being released after Activision passed on it.
Isaahc  +   2250d ago
although a ps3 only owner here,I admit the 360 is smoother. Anyway that won't stop me from buying as a metal head.
UncleJaysus  +   2250d ago
The difference is very small. In the jacket mostly. And the badges.
Pandamobile  +   2250d ago
The difference is very small. The 360 version has a little bit more anit-aliasing, (you can notice it around the eyes) that's about it.
I did not murder him  +   2250d ago
This site is known to try and make the two versions of games as close as possible with screenshot placement and zoom(try to make it seem like PS3 versions are close or better) You'll have to wait for EuroGamer's comparison to see the real difference.
#7.1 (Edited 2250d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(24) | Report | Reply
TheBand1t  +   2250d ago
Funny, you were praising their GT5P VS Forza 3 article when it favored Forza, but now it's not a reliable source?

I did not murder him  +   2250d ago
I figured it was about time you would put on the TheBand1t mask. Whatever you said I'm sure it was some shady smart ass comment that makes you feel good because you have some nut-case vendetta against me I did not initiate
Baka-akaB  +   2250d ago
Fanboy or not , no one is that dense or delusional .

It's pretty obvious imo now that he's doing it on purpose and having some massive fun .
Hell i wouldnt be surprised if he was one of the worst ps3 fanboy as well .
iown-ipwn-ikill  +   2250d ago
@ i did not murder him

yeah, euro gamer can be trusted... idiot
TheBand1t  +   2250d ago
I'm pointing out that you were singing praises about thise site when Forza 3 and GT5P were compared and Forza came out on top, but now that they say both versions of a multiplat look more or less the same, it's unreliable.

You're the last person who should be accusing someone else of smart ass and snide remarks, btw.
ZombieNinjaPanda  +   2250d ago
@ I did not murder him

Don't act innocent, everyone knows your a troll. What I want to know is how you went from 1 bubble back to 5 though.

On Topic:

I legit cannot see any differences. Good game they made.
BlackTar187  +   2250d ago
Im going to add about his bubbles
On a another thread as soon as i wrote something about him i had 4 disagress Right away with in a minute and the person below me as well and then i posted again and its the same 4 disagrees with in seconds. Its obv. he makes account to fill his bubbles unlike me who try and be fair and cant seem to get any.

Ohh well. I murder him totally avoided me in the other forum when i call him out so don't expect anything different here.

Cool its this close but at full speed like 99% of these the differences are not worth the time is put into these things but hey everyone has a job and they must do it. theres a demand for these comparison so i don't fault the website for doing them

Game looks fun.
Baka-akaB  +   2250d ago
lol it's funny , look at how everyone get disagree in spades , when some of us are usually quite ignored or left alone ...

He even use his accounts to agree with himself and disagree with others , how very cute
YogiBear  +   2250d ago
@ I did not murder him
I pity you.
likedamaster  +   2250d ago
Bu bu but teh Cell... Bu bu but teh Bluray?

LOL. I'm messing. I don't see but a minor difference. I'm sure game will play great on both consoles.

Btw, check out my exaggerated first post above. Relax and have fun, isn't that what games are for?
#7.11 (Edited 2250d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
poeo  +   2250d ago
i only tried the PS3 version, but it had some pretty bad framerate issues, and accessing in-game XMB during the demo made the game freeze every time for like 10-20 seconds (not kidding)... unacceptable. i hope that's not an issue in the full game.

i liked the game though, felt fresh and was genuinely funny at times (and humor is VERY hard to do well in games).
#8 (Edited 2250d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
madkrazygames  +   2250d ago
it's in the xbox version too
jesuisankit  +   2250d ago
Its gonna be an amazing game.
Sangria  +   2250d ago
I regret having played the demo, now i know it's f-ing awesome and i'll have to wait two long weeks to play it. Painful waiting.

However, i noticed the french voices were not really good, they used cartoon-ish voice actors, including the dubber of Cartman in South Park for Eddie's voice (hopefully we can set up the original voices, my beloved Jack Black :3 ).
#10 (Edited 2250d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
Shaka2K6  +   2250d ago
LMAO it is always the crap games that i never heard off the ones that look ''best on xbox 360'' according to Xbug websites.
Saaking  +   2250d ago
I'm very interested in this game; however, I agree that the bots are very lame. They brag about mutliplats yet PS3 exclusives such as KZ2 and UC2 are unmatched by ANYTHING on the 360. It's really pathetic.
NecrumSlavery  +   2250d ago
Played both demos. PS3 version looks better but I am so fvcking tired of devs mapping the PS3 and 360 equally in controls. 360 using triggers on bottom. PS3 gamers use R1, L1 for primary triggers but since devs always map the controls to 360, we are stuck shooting an driving with the damn R2, L2. Please map the 360 trigger controls to R1,L1.
It's uncomfortable to use the bottom triggers to play this game.
Sir Ken_Kutaragi  +   2249d ago
And the WINNER is...

+ The Demo was Funny i thought. Silly and Funny + lots of Blood. It was ok.
(Brütal Legend Demo i mean)
#11.3 (Edited 2249d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
buying1999   2249d ago | Spam
Belasco  +   2249d ago
am what you guys call a bot, and I have no intention of even downloading the demo for this piece of crap.
trancefreak  +   2249d ago
@ Necrum i feel the same and thats 1 reason I hated fear 2 controls felt way to unbalanced. I like battlefields layout/ and killzone 2 on alt 2 the best.
AngryTypingGuy  +   2249d ago
Necrum, that's one of the reason's why I like the 360 controller much better. Sony copied MS's analog trigger buttons...but if they primarily use the R1 and L1 buttons for triggers, why did they make the L2 and R2 buttons analog?

And oh yeah...360 wins...again. :-)
#11.7 (Edited 2249d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
swiftshot93  +   2250d ago
The fact is there are no differences between good multiplatform games these days. The only way to tell the difference is to have them side by side, and even then its hard to make the differences out. And isnt that defeating the purpose? No one WANTS differences.
#12 (Edited 2250d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
Baka-akaB  +   2250d ago
Imo every multiplatform should use the advantage of each platforms it's on while overcoming their weaknesses .

IF i got more space on my ps3discs then throw me some extra bones ... if my 360 got more ram or anti aliasing effect , then give me some visuals extras .

I find the whole attitude of current multi platform devs very unhealthy and hypocrite .

This industry didnt build itself by having Megadrive's aladdin team holding themselves back for the inferior Snes version . And vice versa for a few games that couldnt handled super 7 mode .
Saaking  +   2250d ago
Ps3 version for me.
borgome  +   2249d ago
Look at all those jaggies on the PS3 side, what a shame indeed.
AliTheBrit  +   2250d ago
Whats new?

Multiplatform games almost always turn out better on the 360.
Saaking  +   2250d ago
@ali the bot

Yep, and PS3 exclusives look miles ahead of anything on the 360 so what's your point?
AliTheBrit  +   2249d ago
^ Were you dropped on your head as a child?

My point is MultiPlatforms turn out better on the 360

and when like 95% of all games are MultiPlatform, it matters.

The fact of the matter is, each console only as a small handful of worthwhile exclusives in a year, Multi-Plats make up the bulk of games.

And since when where graphics everything? or are you one of these tards who call themselves gamers but then make out as if amazing visuals = amazing game

Try harder.
buying1999   2249d ago | Spam
CernaML  +   2249d ago
There you go again with that best version on the 360 bullsh*t again... Excuse me while I go back to my PC game that renders in NATIVE 1080p with 16x AA for a HUGE sum of $200 for upgrading a 2 year old PC! Boy PC gaming is sooo expensive.

@Ali: When it takes complex technical equipment to notice those differences (Digital Foundry), then no, it DOESN'T matter if the 360 version gets 2 better looking pixels than the PS3. Most multiplatform games look completely identical. Wasn't the PS2 the weakest console of last gen with not-as-good-looking-as-Xbox games? Well what happened there? Also, graphics DO matter in this generation apparently. What's with all of these graphics comparisons for EVERY multiplatform game ever released? I never noticed them last gen. If graphics didn't matter then why did you say that it mattered if the 360 gets them better 95% of the time? Nice contradiction. Maybe YOU should try harder.
#14.4 (Edited 2249d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
buying1999   2249d ago | Spam
TooTall19  +   2249d ago
Now bull$hitt1999 is complaining about the cost
CernaML has nothing but valid points. The PC version of a game will almost always be better than the console version of a game. Cost is not related.
CernaML  +   2249d ago
Seriously buying1999? Are you that retarded? I had onboard graphics last time. I had a GOOD reason to upgrade. I didn't do it just for the hell of it. My new GTX 260 should last me for quite some time. I mean... if it can already surpass what the consoles can offer by miles, then why should I worry about upgrading every two years? If you want to talk about costs, then how about the fact that you pay more for console games? You pay for DLC while PC gamers usually get them for free. We get free (and superior) online play. We get free mods while you get nothing. We have cheaper and higher quality (external) HDDs, bluetooth, headsets and wifi adapters. You have nothing but proprietary and overpriced pieces of junk. Amost anything can work on PCs. Now... if your paperweight can get the same performance as my PC for $300, then you have something to brag about. But it doesn't. And sometimes the performance I see on 360s and PS3s are God awful. So kindly stop talking out of your a*s. I pay a little more, I get a bigger bang for my buck. Same applies for the people that want the most out of a console by getting a 60" Plasma/LCD with 7.1 surround sound speakers. Now excuse me while I go play the BEST VERSIONS OF MULTIPLATFORM GAMES. lolololol
#14.7 (Edited 2249d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
buying1999   2249d ago | Spam
CernaML  +   2249d ago
You're STILL commenting? Do you not know how to read? I said I won't need to upgrade this PC for years to come. It already outperforms your precious 360 by miles so why bother spending more? Excuse me for having a job and being able to afford my own godd*mn things.

Cernbutthead and Piss Cee. How cute. Did you lose a few braincells thinking that up? Because they are hardly even worth being called puns. Maybe you should finish High School before trying to act like the right one. You're not.

The reason why I mentioned costs was because you were the jacka*s that brought it up the very first time I replied to one of your idiotic comments. I KNEW that you were going to bring it up again so what I did was mock you. I can't give you the cost of the machine because it was 2 f!cking years ago and I was gradually changing parts here and there. Now I finally have something I like and it only cost $200 this whole year. I didn't spend thousands on it, so you have no point to backup.

You said that you will be able to enjoy the best multiplatform ports which is FALSE. That was my point.

Now you say that you'll be able to enjoy the best console ports? Whoop dee f*cking doo. Like I said before, when it takes complex technical equipment to find these differences between both consoles, then I don't see why it matters whether or not one console looks slightly better than the other. You don't have anything to brag about. Both are identical to the human eye. bragging about one texture being sharper than the other or one being brighter than the other only makes you look like a fool. One has 2x AA and the other doesn't. Whatever. There is hardly a difference whatsoever.

"A fool and his money are soon parted."

This is MUCH more suited for you. When Microsoft constantly makes you pay for an online system (which isn't worth it) and a full priced expansion pack then you are the actual fool. Not me.

I have a question for you, so you paid $300 for your console. How much did you pay for your TV? Or all your games that cost more than PC games? How long have you been using Live? Did you buy any other overpriced accessories such as a bigger HDD, extra controller, wifi adapter? Or are you just a cheapskate with a 15" CRT and have a 40 foot Ethernet cable running from your neighbor's house? I'm just assuming since you like to be very insecure about what *I* use *MY* money for.
thefirstmann  +   2246d ago
Geese Cern. We get it. You're a guy that can buy whatever he wants and play it on PC. Good for you. You didn't have to write a novel. I read the comments on this reply and YOU were the one that brought up cost first. Buying was simply talking about console vs console. That's what this post was about and he's right the 360 version does perform and look better than the ps3 version. I'm sure that the PC version with your brand spanking new video card will look the best. But Personal Computers aren't mentioned in this face-off.
I could see your argument if he had mentioned PC in his first comment but I read it all and I just didn't see that. Move on.
TheBand1t  +   2250d ago
Anyway....I played the demo and the only thing that irked me was some of the sound effects. They felt off.
Panthers  +   2250d ago

They look the same to me. Its not like this game is trying to push either platform.
Magnus  +   2250d ago
The chick is hot but to mee both screens look the same
LinuxGuru  +   2250d ago
After about 15 minutes of flipping back and forth, the verdict is this:

+ PS3 has higher-quality HDR lighting, as it always does
+ PS3 has better and more self-shadowing
- PS3 uses Quincunx anti-aliasing, making overall image appear softer

- Xbox 360 has lesser-quality HDR lighting
- Xbox 360 has worse and less self-shadowing
+ Xbox 360 uses MSAA, making overall image appear slightly sharper

I would personally choose the PS3 version.
_vx  +   2250d ago
even though i totally agree with you i wouldn't recommend anyone to pick this title YET!, unless reliable reviews says otherwise
DevastationEve  +   2250d ago
So the PS3 version sucks...that's all you needed to say bub.
LinuxGuru  +   2250d ago
@ Apocalypse
Actually, both versions suck graphically. This is not a visually appealing game, per se.

Oh and pull the Micro-$tick outta your ass, because anyone with a pair of eyes can see what I pointed out is true.
Elvfam511  +   2250d ago
You Got Owned
DevastationEve  +   2250d ago
Oh I know it, huh...jeez wow! I got so owned! Guru there totally opened a can or two on me...gosh. Wow. Man. Gee. Who woulda knew...unfunkingbelievable.

Umlaut's are evil anyway, we all know that.
Thoreau  +   2250d ago
i am not getting this game anyway. just thought i'd peek at the screen shots. looks ok.
kaaos666  +   2250d ago
good music cool idea but i just got done with the demo and this game sucks.
snake-OO  +   2250d ago
personally i think this game has rubbish graphics on both consoles
B00M  +   2250d ago
To be honest both look like sh!t XD
-GametimeUK-  +   2250d ago
I shouldnt even bother saying anything...

What do you expect? The 360 just has better looking games at the end of the day
LinuxGuru  +   2250d ago
"The 360 sometimes has better looking multi-platform games at the end of the day"

Figboy  +   2250d ago


say hello, to name only a few.

wake me up when the 360 has ANYTHING that can come close to competing.

until then, enjoy your stale Unreal Engine 3 Gears of War wannabes.

i'll take games designed from the ground up for a console any day.

back in 2007, your argument would have had some weight. now, it's lighter than a feather.
likedamaster  +   2250d ago
@Figboy(and Linux please mind yours)

1st pic... So they've finally decided to match the ps2 version with a bright color palette. Other wise, look at Ratchet's tail... 2D at its finest. And game is still boring and monotonous.

2nd pic... A lot of smoke & mirros is what I see. Oh and its really blurry. Textures in that game are noticeably terrible. And characters look like gray blobs compared to Gears, etc.

3rd pic... Looks like a ps2 God of War game with higher resolution. Also, seriously, bigger bosses don't equal better graphics.

4th pic... You got me there. But even in this game I can easily point out MAJOR graphical and gameplay flaws. But for the sake of real gamers and love of the series I won't go there. Game on.
#23.3 (Edited 2250d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
mandeep1803  +   2250d ago
Exactly the same.

end of topic.

Figboy  +   2250d ago
this is getting f*cking ridiculous now.

outside of the fact that there is practically NO difference between the two, shouldn't we be past this sh*t by now?

Uncharted 2, Ratchet 2, Killzone 2, MGS4, even inFAMOUS embarrasses the competition, and the multi-plats of the day are NOWHERE near the insults that the multi-plats of 2007 were.

seriously, i have excellent eyesight, and i just don't see the differences. we all know the PS3 and 360 have different graphics cards (i think the PS3's is NVIDIA, and the 360's is ATI? please correct me if i'm wrong, i'd like to know), but this pixel counting has got to stop.

this isn't like Ninja Gaiden 2 vs Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2, where the differences were quite astounding.

you people need to grow up and let this sh*t go already. if you have to tape together two screens to point out that a few pixels may be missing on one version compared to the other, then something is wrong with you, and the difference is negligible.
B00M  +   2250d ago
GametimeUK - Jeez i thought there werent still people like you around. Evryone knows the PS3 has better graphics.
JonnyBigBoss  +   2250d ago
Batman AA was the same, but on release the PS3 version looked better.
likedamaster  +   2250d ago
I disagree. Demos looked identical on both consoles. The Batman version that was obviously superior was the PC version, in every way.
harpua  +   2250d ago
This game looks like sheet.
creeping judas  +   2250d ago
Look it doesnt matter in the end

PS3 fanboy says "looks better on the PS3"
360 fanboy says "looks better on the 360"

None of these articles will ever sway a fanboy into thinking otherwise.

I loved the demo for the humor and will probably pick it up!!!
Baka-akaB  +   2250d ago
I find very funny that people fight over who got the better looking version of a game that isnt even really good looking .

That's how comparative have become worse and dumber .

The game is nothing to inspire awe in the 3d and graphic details departement ... it's obvious that it shines elsewhere , in the metal themed design and presentation , it's awesome concept , the awesome music and a pretty decent gameplay .

It doesnt need to be crysis to be great , so making the part that matter the least here , a piece of importance is silly at best .
MeatAbstract  +   2250d ago
No need really.
PS3 or Xbox 360, either way you're getting the same game

I'll be getting this on the Xbox 360 as I need more games for it and I just downloaded the demo on XBL and loved it. Well done Tim Schafer
_vx  +   2250d ago
careful of over using your Xbox or the RROD will be waiting for you, i would say use it for HALO and the upcoming-next year-360 only games.
« 1 2 3 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Westwood Studios to Receive Industry Icon Award at The Game Awards 2015

17h ago - Host Geoff Keighley just announced that the defunct Westwood Studios will receive the “Industry I... | Retro

Yokai Watch Dance Gets Two New Japanese Commercials

17h ago - Level-5 has released two new commercials showing off the game’s colorful and adorable gameplay. | Wii U

HotLiked - What the Internet is talking about right now

Now - Kill some time at You will regret it... | Promoted post

Next North American Splatfest Aims for Your Stomach

18h ago - Nintendo has announced that Splatoon’s next Splatfest will make players choose between two Americ... | Wii U

Mega Marble World Brings Top Down Marble Puzzle Action to Sega Genesis

20h ago - Carl Williams writes, "The Sega Genesis is getting quite a bit of retro love here lately (thanks... | Retro

Fated: The Silent Oath Character Details Revealed

20h ago - Frima Studios recently revealed the host platforms for their forthcoming virtual reality (VR) vid... | PC