GT writes, "Can the consoles come close to the quality of the computer?"
Not hard to spot which one has the vaseline filter.
Attached to your Ass
I see that's the first thing that popped in your head. It says a lot about you really.
You could say the same about both of them, Murderdolls. But of course, you only concentrate on Nelson M's fanboyism, seeing as how you are just as big a 360 fanboy as Popinsky
Great Comeback MurderGoth
Thanks where's yours NelsonGoth!!11!!one1!!1? @1.3 - Soda made a joke about the PS3 version bring "blurry" hence the vaseline joke. NelsonGoth!!11!one!!111! made a joke about having sex with a man. In the butt. Reading is fun.
You could say the same about both of them, thereapersson. But of course, you only concentrate on Murderdolls fanboyism, seeing as how you are just as big a PS3 fanboy as Nelson M.
Lmao, Nelson every time I look in the Open Zone you're there, making me laugh my ass off bubbles dude.
How pointless. They all look great.
The only difference one would notice is if you were to apply the different art shaders on the PC version.
Definetly. I failed to see the difference during the fights, and that's what's important. Pixel counters could see some differences, but why bother.
we all know the 360 beats the ps3 in visuals on most multi plats and this is unlikely to change the rest of the current console cycle.the 360s more straight forward archeitecture was a great decision by MSOFT and a blunder by sony that has cost dearly to the ps3
YOU must be stupid to think Sony is stupid.
i own the 360 AND ps3 versions dude..they look the same.. cut the crap out!..seriously. Edit:@prabx. cut THAT crap out! no need for name calling...especially when he aint even talkin about you. just makes you look like a fanboy.
Sorry you are wrong! This article clearly shows the 360 version of SF IV is better: http://www.lensoftruth.com/... Because you don't see it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Albeit, I must admit most people probably won't notice it. Just like you, I didn't notice it. SF IV lead version was the PC and the PC is considerably closer to the 360 than the PS3. Furthermore the load time of the PS3 version is considerably slower without the installation.
That doesn't make sense since the game sold more on the ps3? Want to be a fanboy about it huh? The games are basically the same, if you care about 1 little pixel and a stupid game comparison website have fun pretending to play a fighting game that you will most likely lose 20:-1 matches in.
With a name that has HD in it, I'm suprised to hear you say that. As I said, I couldn't tell much of a difference myself, but it is there for people that care. I think this issue is very similar to the DVD vs. Blu-Ray. Quality wise it is better, but not substantial in my opinion.
this game looks but ass ugly on what ever system. The chracter models look like homeless people, I wish they would have done them with an anime flare. I can dream, and yes I do own the game. Retarded story and all, if it wasnt fun to play it would be "gutter trash"
You're surprised to hear me say that a multiplatform by capcom is basically the same and that 1 pixel and a biased game comparison website is supposed to matter to me? No that's not what a gamer cares about.
Sorry, but claiming it is 1 pixel difference is a ridiculously understatement. Furthermore calling lens for truth biased shows me that you either did not research them properly and read their articles, or is just a fanboy with a personal agenda. It is clear that they show evidence of differences and arrive at a sound conclusion. Furthermore they have given PS3 the nod many times and in one example gave PS3 the win on what I consider a very subjective reason. The fact that the game was blurrier thus fit into the art style better on Prince of Persia on the PS3 gave it the win although everything else is equal. If you are a true gamer, you should care about how publishers/developers treat gamers differently on different platforms. Things like the recent Ghostbuster game is atrocious and a disservice to all PS3 owners.
True gamers only care about gameplay not the bullshit that these websites offer with game comparisons. All it is just a scam to entice flame wars, traffic and fuel the console war.
the 3 are the same just in ps3 looks a little more color.
I thought the PC version would look better ... doesn't seem to be the case. Even when zooming on Crimson viper's face, we see no differences. This game looks great on all platforms. Good job capcom !!
Yeah, Capcom did a great job on all three versions, wish all companies would do this good of a job for every game on all machines.
It's a 360 port. They didn't really upgrade the textures or anything, they just added some new shaders and optimized the hell out of the game. The game runs at 60 FPS on a slow laptop. At the lowest settings, but it still runs.
this cell shaded graphics, almost looks same on every platform , so comparing a cell shaded game is a WASTE and btw not every 1 owns every platform, the one he posses , he will enjoy on that, so these comparison videos are mindless
360 barely edged out the ps3 in eurogamer and the PC has the capability of 1080p native with 16xAF and 8xAA so yeah lol the PC owns this one. That video is a joke of compression and low resolution.
PC can do 2560 x 1600
http://www.gamezine.co.uk/n... http://www.eurogamer.net/ar... "So bearing in mind the RSX/7900GS connection, how come it's the 360 game that is closer, and indeed technically superior to the arcade version? After all, RSX runs faster than the 7900GS, and has more of those all-important pixel and vertex shader units. It all comes down to bandwidth - the amount of data that can stream in and out of the graphics chip at any given point. RSX can handle 22GB/s of data, but the 7900GS trumps it with double that. This all suggests that Capcom maximised the strengths of the 7900GS and the lack of bandwidth hurts the PS3 conversion. Transparent textures in particular require a ton of bandwidth. On Xbox 360, this isn't really an issue, most likely due to the 10MB of RAM directly connected to the Xenos graphics chip, which as an effective speed of a staggering 256GB/s." Xbox 360 = 720p, 2x AA PS3 = 720p/630p, No AA, Downgraded Textures/Lighting/Reflections
Your really pathetic eh?
I saw both 360 and PS3 versions at the shop. As usual, there is no difference you can see with your eyes. The difference is you actually have a working D-PAD on PS3. That must explain SF4 sold more on PS3. But feel free to continue masturbating on gametrailers videos, while we play PS3 exclusives and enhanced versions of former 360 exclusives.
JUST MY OPINION 1.PC 2.PS3 3.360
Its not even worth discussing the feed speaks for itself
this is ridiculous. unless they are all shown in 1080p or higher you can't tell the difference. i recently picked up the PC version, maxed out all the settings put it to 1920x1080 and HUGE HUGE difference. this video doesnt prove anything
bought the ps3 one and downloaded the pc (*torrentz)..the pc ownz graphically, but I still only play the ps3 cuz my friends are all online
This game is really easy to run, but it looks good. I maxed everything out at 1920 x 1080 on my old 8800 GTS 512 rig with a solid 60+ fps.
1680x1050 pixels with 16xAA runing at full speed. You dont get that on consoles, and it DOES look way better on PC. Even the original jamma game is Power PC based. And sadly the character models do look bad in the first place :/
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.