Speaking to VideoGamer.com, vice president of entertainment and miscellaneous at BioWare, and vice president of Electronic Arts, Greg Zeschuk, said that the team's found developing on the PS3 "exciting", and even has its advantages.
Once exclusive developers are jumping ship and loving the PS3 poor bots
Even Valve are looking for PS3 programmers. ;o Just wait. The MDF will be on here within an hour saying "B-B-B-B-But you still don't have Mass Effect!!1"
Google to launch operating system By Maggie Shiels Technology reporter, BBC News, Silicon Valley Chrome logo Google is developing an operating system (OS) for personal computers, in a direct challenge to market leader Microsoft and its Windows system. Google Chrome OS will be aimed initially at small, low-cost netbooks, but will eventually be used on PCs as well. Google said netbooks with Chrome OS could be on sale by the middle of 2010. "Speed, simplicity and security are the key aspects of Google Chrome OS," the firm said in its official blog. The operating system, which will run on an open source license, was a "natural extension" of its Chrome browser, the firm said. For Microsoft the news comes just months before it launches the latest version of its operating system, called Windows 7. 'Back to basics' "We're designing the OS to be fast and lightweight, to start up and get you onto the web in a few seconds," said the blog post written by Sundar Pichai, vice president of product management, and Google's engineering director Linus Upson. Both men said that "the operating systems that browsers run on were designed in an era where there was no web" and that this OS is "our attempt to re-think what operating systems should be". To that end, the search giant said the new OS would go back to basics. "We are completely redesigning the underlying security architecture of the OS so that users don't have to deal with viruses, malware and security updates. "It should just work," said Google. Google already has an operating system for mobile phones called Android which can also be used to run on netbooks. Google Chrome OS will be aimed not just at laptops but also at desktops for those who spend a lot of time on the web. "Truly competitive" The announcement could dramatically change the market for operating systems, especially for Microsoft, the biggest player with around 90% share. "This announcement is huge," said Rob Enderle, industry watcher and president of the Enderle Group. "This is the first time we have had a truly competitive OS on the market in years. This is potentially disruptive and is the first real attempt by anyone to go after Microsoft. "Google is coming at this fresh and, because it is based on a set of services that reside on the web, it is the first really post web operating system, designed from the ground up, and reconceived for a web world," Mr Enderle told the BBC. Last year Google launched the Chrome browser, which it said was designed for "people who live on the web - searching for information, checking email, catching up on the news, shopping or just staying in touch with friends." Stephen Shankland at CNET said the move had widespread implications. "One is that it shows just how serious Google is about making the web into a foundation not just for static pages but for active applications, notably its own such as Google Docs and G-mail. "Another: it opens new competition with Microsoft and, potentially, a new reason for anti-trust regulators to pay close attention to Google's moves." Some commentators said Google's motivation in all this was pretty clear. "One of Google's major goals is to take Microsoft out, to systematically destroy their hold on the market," said Mr Enderle. "Google wants to eliminate Microsoft and it's a unique battle. The strategy is good. The big question is, will it work?" At the popular blog, TechCrunch, MG Siegler said "Let's be clear on what this really is. This is Google dropping the mother of all bombs on its rival, Microsoft." Microsoft releases Windows 7 later this year to replace Windows Vista and Windows XP which is eight years old. The Redmond based company claims that 96% of netbooks run Windows to date. Out of beta In a separate announcement Google also revealed that many of its most popular applications had finally moved out of trial, or beta, phase. Gmail, for example, has worn the beta tag for five years. "We realise this situation puzzles some people, particularly those who subscribe to the traditional definition of beta software as being not yet ready for prime time," wrote Matthew Glotzbach, the director of product management in the official Google blog. The decision to ditch the beta tag was taken because the apps had finally reached the "high bar" mark, he wrote. More than 1.75 million companies use Google apps, according to the firm.
You've yet to receive one of their games while we're already enjoying them and you're bragging? LOL
I was right! =D "Just wait. The MDF will be on here within an hour saying "B-B-B-B-But you still don't have Mass Effect!!1"" Then 5 minutes later... "You've yet to receive one of their games while we're already enjoying them and you're bragging? LOL" I must be psychic or something. ;o
What I said had nothing to do with what you said. Why do you have a bad game as your avatar?
Murderdolls pooped his panties.
murderdolls why do you have a bad developer as your avatar?
"murderdolls why do you have a bad developer as your avatar? " Yeah like I didn't see that coming. sorry you're too young to remember Donkey Kong, Battletoads, Perfect Dark or Goldeneye. Son.
and konami,squarenix,capcom,namco, (tekken series)ect. would like to say hello. all use to make games exclusively for the ps brand. now jumps ship. POOR DROIDS. see what i did there. ;) @TheDeadMetalhead and droids are still saying. bu bu bu but you still don't have Movie gear solid 4. then when a once exclusive game now goes mutli-plat. droids stop crying. bu bu bu bu that game/dev was never exclusive to the PS brand. LOL
lol look forward to seeing those Bioware Exclusives on PS3. The few multiplatform they decide to put on PS3 will looks better on 360, just like Dragon Age.
@ vega75 - "konami" So they bring one game to the 360 and suddenly that means they "jumped ship"? "squarenix" Oh really? Last time I checked, FFVersusXIII and FFXIV were PS3 exclusive, and FFXIII is still exclusive in Japan. Again, they brought ONE game to 360, and that means they "jumped ship"? "capcom" Please explain this one to me. Street Fighter IV, Resident Evil 5, Mega Man 9, they were all multiplat. Where exactly did Capcom change anything? They've always supported all of the current consoles, even back in the 90s (Street Fighter II on Genesis, Resident Evil on Saturn, etc.). "namco" Again, how did they "jumps ship"? Just because Tekken 6 is now multiplat? What does that change? I'm still going to be playing the game on my PS3. It's not like it went 360 exclusive. =/ @Aaron Greentard below - Your name implies that you like PS3, yet your comment bashes both the 360 and PS3. I must admit, I am thoroughly stumped. Nicely done.
I've been a Bioware fan since Kotor on PC. Never owned an xbox console. Good to know they'll be supporting the PS3 in the future. Hopefully, DA is a great game.
That's what the Ghost Busters developers said... I hope it's not just all talk though.
Unlike Terminal Reality, Bioware is a trusted developer with an extremely high development pedigree. I'm sure that if they were to make such claims, they would also have something to show for it.
I bet they would be able to generate killzone 2/uncharted 2 like graphics if they ever made an exclusive ps3 game. I can only imagine, but good to see them supporting the ps3, u can bet they will be as happy as EA with the revenue the ps3 will be bringing in for them. Imagine them putting mass effect 1 & 2 on one bluray & selling it for $99.99 I would definately buy it. :]
“It's new. Because we already had experience on 360, that kind of got ahead a little bit, but now we pretty much caught up. Actually it was very exciting. People on the team were really pumped to work on it. They were like, wow. We have a lot of people that like doing new stuff and trying new things, and they were like, wow another platform, can't wait! It's been good.” We need more dev teams like this. Excited to learn something new and step out of their comfort zone.
You can add me to he list that would pay $100 to get both Mass Effect 1 and 2 on the same disc. I actually liked Mass Effect better on the PC than on my Xbox 360, probably because most of the problems were ironed out by the time the PC came out.
BioWare to the PS3 is the biggest win PS3 will ever get for me other than exclusives. I bought a 360 just for Mass Effect and will continue to buy BioWare's games wherever I have to in order to play them. This is the only third-party developer where I can make such a statement. They have never let me down and based on what they showed at E3 it's going to be a very long time until they will. The best part about this is if BioWare can put out good PS3 games, then EA will likely take what they've learned and a few of their guys to lead other PS3 developments to ensure the same level of quality on the console. It's a win-win situation, honestly.
They didn't even take advantage of the 360 - they had a mediocre instance of the unreal engine3 on ME1. They'll never wring out ps3 power with that kind of attitude. Will be interesting to see what me2's doing in the engine.
You don't have to imagine it cause that's going to be happening next year when EA brings ME to the PS3 and it won't be $99 either but more like $79.99 for the ME1&2 edition while ME2 will be regular price - BOOK IT! XD
Cant wait to get the 360 version of Dragons Age.
How many times have we heard this from developers only to be let down time and time again. I will hold my excitement for when i see the proof, thank you.
Greg Zeschuk, said that the team's found developing on the PS3 "exciting" :)
leila, please don't mention Terminal Reality in the same sentence as Bioware, unless of course you're talking of how much better Bioware are. KotOR and Mass Effect are two of the greatest games I have played, gripping story lines and sublime gameplay, you could call me a Bioware fanboy I suppose. Anyway, to the topic in question, it's nice to see a developer with such a good attitude towards learning something new, kudos Bioware!
Come on people. Most of you are stuck on graphics more than anything else. With Bioware expect to play great games with them. Just don't expect any technological killers from them. You'll only disappoint yourselves. Bioware makes great games not tech demos. IMO they are the saving grace of rpg's this gen. This is why Star Wars: The Old Republic is going to be an mmo unlike any other.
@1.13 I enjoy Bioware games as much as the next guy. Loved KoTOR. But I still think making the next game an MMO is a bad decision. It could be the best MMO ever. But with one obvious competitor (although the Old Republic is a new MMO rather than a copy cat) I don't see it doing well. That's not to say I want it to be a failure. I want it to do well. I'm sick of chore-like MMO grindfests.
Bioware is not known for graphics... they are known for the gameplay. So, to me, graphics arent important... even on multiplats, i can live with the usual "washed out" or "blur" graphics, just as long as it performs smoothly. I cant stand frame rate drops.
Bioware FTW. I'm definitely going to get Dragon Age: Origins. =D
First Valve now BioWare, it could be a sign that some of their franchises will come to the PS brand especially the PS3, L4D & ME anyone?... Anyway it's good to see this kind of support from 3rd party companies & with the PS3's capabilities which makes it the most powerful console this gen are enough motivations to work on the system.
Bioware is starting to embrace the ps3 while Kojima has embraced the 360 as have Square Enix. There seems to be a trend away from exclusivity and toward multiplats. In my opinion, it would be terrific if all developers dropped the 'exclusive' loyalty. That way, we'd all get the best games, on every console, with only the multiplat quality to separate them. If this were the case, developers would gain economies of scale and probably make overall higher profits. Everybody wins. In this scenario, I would even be happy to see developers lead development on ps3, then the ps3 would likely shine as brightly as the 360 multiplats. Like what happened in Ghostbusters, for example. ;)
Incorrect. Konami has embraced the 360, not Kojima. Same thing with SE, Wada has embraced the 360, and that's it. You know that Kojima is not happy about putting an MGS game on the 360, which is why he stated the true sequel to MGS4 will be on the PSP. And SE developers like Kitase and Nomura are known Playstation fans.
I can't disagree with your sentiment or opinion, but I do disagree with the removal of exclusivity as a whole. On both platforms exclusive titles have shown how bright games can shine and offer us incredible gameplay, graphics, and experiences that truly are unique to the system in question. Removal of exclusivity will mean less console sales as a whole since people would only buy one, and then people would eventually migrate to just one and then we'd lose the competition that we have now with the 3rd gen consoles.
Jecht I don't agree with that at all. Can you prove any of what your saying? So devs are excited to work on the PS3 but are forced to work on the 360? Yeah right! Like I said prove it with facts or it's just your skewed view of the situation.
Read interviews. It has been painfully obvious since MGS:R and MGS:PW which game Kojima is more excited about, and it's not MGS:R. As for SE, again, read interviews. You can tell in the way these devs talk about games, which they are excited about and which they are not. Sorry, but it's not the 360.
@5.4 Just because you don't do your research doesn't mean it's not true.
well as far as i can tell kojima works for konami, which has embraced the 360 wholeheartedly, so yeah, i guess by extension, Kojima quickly fell into line. Same for Kitase and Nomura at SE. It doesn't bother me either way. Bottom line, more exclusives are now multiplats. That's good imo. Saves me from spending money needlessly on multiple consoles. As far as competition goes, MS and Sony will always have first party titles to keep the exclusives lovers happy, thereby sustaining the competitive efficiency. In the meantime, i am glad third party devs are waking up to the fact that they can make more money by going multiplat and making all gamers happy. Can't wait for Godofwar4 and Uncharted3 on 360! :)
Unlike Konami and Square Enix, Sony own the studios that develope Uncharted and God of War, you'll never see them on the 360. Just saying, not trying to flame you or anything...
you do realise the two games are SONY OWNED ?? i guess they are right, you dont do research. But , i dont blame you... i dont either.. but i use common sense.
lol yeah oops... you are right they are first party titles. No matter, Sony is under extreme pressure to make money. If shareholders demand that they release their first party titles as multiplats so as to raise the profit margins, then... hmmm. Looking forward to it.
bioware is just lying. they made the best rpg this gen exclusively for microsoft's xbox 3shitty and there is no way they'll bother wasting time on that grill. mass effect is still the greatest rpg and its only for 3shitty.
Are you a PC guy cause you just bashed both 360 and PS3...
I am also confused. I really can't tell.
I am foncused...
He's being partial & sarcastic at the same time. C'mon fellas, I expected more from you all. *facepalm*
Er yeah they should be!!! ;) It's the Only TRUE Next-Gen Games Console out there!!! ;-P WELCOME TO THE FUTURE NOW, BioWare!!! ;)
Ohhhh the pwnage is burning my face LOL!!!! So, Mass Effect's coming to the PS3 next year and so is Splinter Cell... still waiting on those 360 exclusives? dont' worry, there'll be another Halo:somethingortheother after ODST & b4 Reach then again and again again. lol
Odd... I guess none of you are enjoying your PS3 the way you constantly brag about it. Would you like me to list off the exclusive 360 games that PS3 fans have constantly been saying would come to the PS3? Because from the looks of it, you guys don't really like the ones you have. Pitiful. Terrible.
Arnon, come at me with a game that tells a story like MGS4, or is as creative as LBP and then we'll talk. You should start listing too, because most those games you have are outdated.
“story like MGS4” well how about Mass effect and “creativity like LBP” none... no game is as creative as LBP. It (looks like) a great game that I wish I had. Unfortinatly I prefer my Halo to to your LBP. Also Halo has a Forge mode so it lets me express myself :)
and im "really pumped" to see what amazing things they can come up with whilst working on the PS3 :D
And Activision is about to leave the system and take Modern Warfare, GHWT etc etc with them... Don't know dudes. The PS3 is allmost 3 years on the market and hasn't seen a Valve nor Bioware game, plus others like Activision and Koei are on the edge of jumping the sinking POS3 ship like rats getting of it. Seems like the 360 will get the 3rd party exclusive threatment like the PS2 got last gen. They go and support one system, so it'll be propelled in larger hardware sales and they can focus on the one version that will be sold the most, while the competing platform POS3 will slow down in sales (which did already itself with the high price and recession in place).
You don't ACTUALLY believe that Activision will drop Sony, do you? They make like 40% of their income off of PS3 consoles. They need Sony a lot more than they need them. Besides, even if Activision did go through with it (HA!), Modern Warfare 2 would still likely go to PS3. Infinity Ward would just find another publisher. Not impressed. Please try again. @ Natsu X FairyTail - Only the 360 version was published by Microsoft. The PC version was published by EA, as well as both versions of Mass Effect 2. @ Murderdolls above - You basically said the exact thing I quoted. Just replace "Mass Effect" with "Bioware games" and presto; a perfect match. @Mart below - Unless the 360 magically sold 30 million units tomorrow (doubling total sales, mind you), then Activision won't do it. They would lose money. (3 bubbles. >.<)
Well think about it... ATM they might make a certain part of their income on the PS3. BUT they'd rather make 90% of the sales on one platform that grows to an installed base of 80 to 100 mln. units out, then on two platforms that both can get to 40 to 50 mln. each untill next gen is here. Thus: if Activision and some other devs put their big guns only on 360, it gives a kickstart in hardware sales, which makes the software sales on that one supported platform higher and they don't need the platform with the minor installed base anymore. SOmething like the PS2 got 3rd party exclusive support and we saw what that did. The PS2 got boosted in sales up to where it is now, over 120 mln. sales, while the XBOX 1 missed out on some games/support and stayed around 25 mln. units sold. Still the devs didn't mind about sales on that 25 mln. for certain 3rd party devs because they focussed on the main platform, also cutting costs to program for a 2nd console.
Marty doesn't run a business so he clearly doesn't know. If Activision dropped Sony, Harmonix would eat up all of their profits from those lost Guitar Hero fans, Call of Duty fans would jump ship to Killzone 2 / Resistance 2 / other FPS, and Tony Hawk would be pissed off at Activision. Get real, guy.
@Mart - As Sony could just drop support for ther Guitar hero, no Sony Artists would hit activision in the wallet. Activision is all talk, trying to push Sony into making a PS3 price cut. PS3 Price cut will happen when Sony is ready to do it, not before.
Bla Bla Bla ...
I'm surprised people reply back to Mart, most of what he says is pretty much non-sense in his own la-la-land.
it's the most powerful console .. of course they're pumped!
The most powerful platform is one they are already familiar with. And it's not the ps3 I know you said console. But they don't limit themselves to JUST consoles. This is why I say platform
idontcare I feel sorry for you if you actually believe your statement. Great system no doubt BUT more powerful HIGHLY doubtful.
EDIT @ Samus above Really? forget about my comment.
ME IZ DA CRAP! da game is empty and BTW u can download it for free an play it on ur PC ..add the nude patch to hahahha EDIT: LOL da Bots are scared chaining yr comment rofl :D:D:D
I see that you are REALLY HAPPY about that Nude patch eh? you probably beat your meat to that virtual alien woman eh? FREAK + FA99OT!
da game iz crap and boring az hell da only way i could play it for more than 5hr iz by downloading da nude patch :) played it for 1 more hr an delete the whole whole game, da game iz not worth all da crying my PS3 frindz
God... your grammar is terrible to see. Stop, talking.
U will do me a huge favor, cuz when i c pps like ya i try to make my grammar even worse dan it iz thx 2u and ur kind whoz only argument iz about grammar
Even though this is only about Dragon Age, it seems that dreams are already forming
"BioWare 'really pumped' to work on PS3" If that doesn't say "a lot of PS3 support in the future", then what exactly does? Honestly, the only way they could make it clearer would be to say "Hey, dumbasses! We're making g