Here is Gamespots review of Splinter Cell Double Agent for the PS3 which for some reason Gamespot decided to give it a lower score than the 360 version.
Before PS3 FANBOYS start attacking my comment section I am just posting a review and I did not make this review so if you have any hate or need to cry go to Gamespots website and wine to them.
I suggest this for a description " Splinter Cell makes a solid debut on the PlayStation 3 by delivering more of its signature stealth action gameplay along with its unique multiplayer modes. The Good: Stealth action gameplay remains tense and exciting; rich multiplayer suite improves on the spies-versus-mercenaries gameplay; campaign's trust system makes you think your actions through. The Bad: Missing some of the graphical features seen in the Xbox 360 version; some frame rate issues and long load times." That has all the flamebait you need DK
The title clearly says "PS3" yet all these Xbots flood in here talking about US flaming. Go back to waiting for Halo and stop flaming.
Its not sonys fault that the developers cant do the same game twice right. Maybe Ubisoft needs to get some outside help to developing ps3 game4s like thoes people making killzone.
that makes no sense...ubi is hands down one of my favorite companies, when they do stuff, they do it right and when they have to do it again, they do it better and still include all the great stuff from before graw and graw 2 perfect example rainbow 6 another good one i only wish ea could be as good. my point is, this is in no way a fault of ubi, they do a bang up job every time, don't even start putting blame on them.
Dark, if I were you I wouldn't lose sleep over that. Unless the news you post are not praising the PS3, Sony fanboys will start the flame. Just post the news as you get them. They will never be happy unless it's what they want to hear. @Sony fanboys, if it makes you feel better. The developers who made this game suck and made this game suck at purpose. Heck, gamespot sucks to for making this review and are bias Microsoft fanboys. [excuse my sarcasm].
ubisoft sucks, they are MS fanboys, they did it deliberatly, they needed more time, they are lazy programmers, you just wait till MGS and kill zone are out, gears sucks. that should save the fanboys some posts.
Not the PS3s fault?, you made beer come though my nose.lol
There is more technology in one SIXAXIS controller than there is throughout your entire console. Get over it...
Splinter Cell's why too advanced!.
its been proven plenty of time the ps3 has alot of potential its the developers fault if teamn ninja can run a game at 1080p at 60fps and selfshading its not the Ps3's fault its ubisofts
You guys weren't MS fanboys yourselfs,anyways,Bethesda is king of multiplatformers! Go Oblivion! :)
i would have said this even if the title were the other way around "Splinter Cell Gets 8.5 For PS3 While 360 Gets 8.0". I am sure most of the readers, including both sides of fanboys agreed on the following two statements: 1. PS3 and Xbox360 are about equally strong but they have very different architectures (this is GENERAL statement, ps3 processor stronger, xbox GPU stronger, whatever, u know the old arguments, but stay with me though, don't flame yet). 2. Splincter's Cell did NOT push the boundaries of either machine. (as compare say Gears of wars/Bioshock or Hevenly Sword/RachetClank footage we have see so far (I guess the most update to date stuff i can use to cmpare on the 360), which ever game you are comparing to side by side) Now if those above two points are true, in essence, both machine should be able to Re-create the Splincter Cell's world in equality in theory, if NOT better on the PS3 due to its extra development time (you can agrue that programmers are not as familia with Cell processor). Now if you believe 1 and 2 to be true, why argue about this score? Is it the problem with PS3 hardware in way that it is inadequate to output the same qaulity? think Oblivion, many ppl think the PS3 version is probably the 'better' version, those guys really did try to max out as far as they can at the amount of time they had. I think if you have stay through my reasoning thus far and put down all your flame shields and think through everything quite calmly you will see that the only difference here that can affect this above-average game that pushed no boundaries are due to the difference in programming and architecture, and not in the difference in the power of the machine. So this is a lazy port, like many other. There is no need for PS3 players to defend this any further, and of course, Xbox players are not gona grow more meat for winning the argument either right? So play nice, and good night guys..(i have a feeling after i press submit i will get flame up the ass, but I have an opinion just like the rest of you; so, flame shield is up; embrace!!)
Very good comment, here comes the..err...bubblegun!
I didn't know Gamestop did reviews.
which for some reason Gamestop decided to give it a lower score than the 360 version. After the comparison pics...I wonder why welcome to the no-shyt train.
More excuses Sony fanboys? More excuses? For how long? And you have one multiplatform game, Oblivion, to prove your case? A game that came a full year after the 360 version? If the 360 version had that extra time and launched simultanously I bet ya the 360 version would look better then the PS3 version. All the other games look best on the 360. And you're still making excuses. Yeah it's the game producers, they don't know how to program. They don't know the Cell. It's the game reviewer, they don't know how to review. They're paid by MS. Oh wait, it's the weather! It's because my girlfriend has her period! It's because Barbie Ken doesn't wear his pink skirt and did his Sony dance today! It's because... THIS IS WAITING I have no idea how much longer Sony fanboys can't wait without switching over to the 360. If they don't, they're just braindead and swallow anything even having N64 graphics on their brand new PS if you ask me, these kind of posts on articles prove it. EDIT To the posts replying mine So all of you made clear I speak the truth. When you start calling names, and start posting posts that say nothing at all it's clear. You can't give facts, you can't give a normal reaction on what is just happening right now to ya. Sony sold you a BluRay player that can do some games on top. But the lesser versions. I know it's sad to admit that. Plus, probably you are scared for Halo or something like that? The game is nice, but it's not the nr. 1 I am waiting for. Forza 2, Bioshock, Mass Effect, GTA4, Assassins Creed, Stranglehold I think I'll be playing those even more often
We're not going to touch your Xbroke360. We've made our choice, live with it. You have fun being Micro$oft's puppet. Enjoy your "Shiny" next gen graphics. They are soo realistic. I never knew light reflected off of people's skin...
why should I buy a console that bricks 4 times in a mounth and I have to pay $1200 (if not more) to get a full console. and all that for what?? Halo?? god damn no....
Mart you dont play your 360 because your always on here tying to justify your purchase of the 360. YOu come across as a 12 year old kid wjo is jealous of the PS3 because muumy and daddy wont buy you one. Grow up you cUnt, also Halo 3 This is Waiting.
why cant i vote for lame for this very lame boy ? i ask myself how much money he gets from ms.
Themart,I feel sorry for you,please stop crying and stop posting lies. Have you read the previews of Heavenly swords or seen the videos of Lairs to see what the PS3 is capable of ?Or OBLIVION,MOTORSTROM,....Poor Mike,you feel so unsecure,you should seek psychiatric help because it's getting worse everyday.
well if your post did anything TheMart you got all the 1 bubble losers to use up thier only post... so umm congrats.
Yea Marty u!
The game looks crappy for the ps3,don`t buy it so next time they will learn how to better port games.
an cancel them. Think next time.
The rule(s) seem to be: 1. If its developed first on the 360 and ported to the PS3, chances are the PS3 version will be inferior. 2. If its developed first on the PS3 and ported to the 360, chances are the 360 version will be inferior. 3. Most current gen titles will be coded on the 360 and ported to the PS3. Basically, you want the best version for multi-platform games then buy the Xbox 360. If you hanging out for the handful of exclusives on a given platform then buy that platform. This continuous bashing of the other persons system is pointless and its not going to make anyone jump from one system to the other. For pure gaming Xbox provides a better solution due to its current price point. For those who disagree, fine, I don't give a sh*t as you're not going to convince me of otherwise just like my point has not done for you.
Robert22388 you are such a tool this is coming from the guy that has both a ps3 and x360. you make me want to return my ps3
bladestar your a tool MGS > Splinter Cell
What the? I never said that! Ofcourse "MGS > Splinter Cell" Hell I said it many times, I'm getting a PS3 the day MGS comes out. As of now there there aren't any games that pushes me to pay $600(Yes no more $500 sku) for the PS3. Notice: I said, "pushes me" or that offers me anything that the 360 is not already offering me. Ofcourse for some of you Motorstorm is a system seller or resistance but as a 360 owners there are plenty of games in those 2 genre for the 360 at this moment. MGS is one of my favorite games, heck I would rather have MGS than Halo (I am not a halo fan), hopefully Halo 3 will make me get in to it. Didn't buy a 360 because of halo, it was pretty much because of COD2 which was a launched title + Multiplayer(xbox live). By the way I don't even own Splinter Cell. You may think I am a M$ fanboy because I don't agree 100% on what Sony fanboys think and because I honesly like the 360 (so far), but I am not. The problem is that unlike many of you I buy a console for todays games not tomorrows. If tomorrow a game that offers me an experience that I can't find on the 360 I already own I would buy the PS3 as a default. It will not hurt me having both consoles. Right now there are 2 games on the PS3 that kick @$$ (resistance and motorstorm), but every @$$ is different; none of those games apeal me. What do you want me to do, buy the console and buy the games anyways!? Wouldn't that make me a Sony Fanboy? Also, if you already own a PS3 don't buy a 360 just to play this game(SC), eventhough the 360 is better it's not $399 better. People are forgetting that 8.0 (B) is not bad for a game.
So GameStop reviews games nowadays? The professionalism of this website continues to amaze me.
Splinter cell sucks the big one, on all consoles and pc. Total and utter suckage. ZZZZzzZZZzzzz
As usual, we have the ignorant comparing a port of a game(optimized on one system) to another(not optimized). Developers have had xbox 360 much longer than ps3 and know how to achieve the full potential of that system. It will be at least another year or two before we see the sheer power of Ps3. However, there are developers who still know enough to produce great games like Virtual Fighter, Resistance and Motorstorm. As they gain more experience with Ps3, Resistance 2, Motorstorm 2 will simply rock all. Killzone2 won't look as good as the trailer but Killzone3 will, once the system is mastered. So stop being TWITS by comparing ports unless the developers have achieved the full potential with BOTH machines, not just one. If the same game gets a different score then they obviously haven't. Fools can only be fools. You know who you are....
What's that old saying? "Never argue with idiots, they'll only bring you down to their level and then beat you with experience." I think that covers pretty much the majority of this sites userbase. This goes for all fanboys... M$, $ony, Nintendo, Sega etc etc... you're all just as bad! Grow the f*ck up and stop acting like whiney little boys! It's no wonder gen pop think gamers are loosers....