300°
Submitted by Kaliumhest 1878d ago | review

GameReactor: Prototype Review

GameReactor writes:

"After having spent nearly 20 hours with Infamous, it is directly physically hard to switch to Prototype. For while the sucker Punch game offered a sharp structure, cruel story, beautiful presentation and above all a fantastic game control - is Radical dilatory competitor rather than a lap concoction of rotten ingridienser. Prototype is ugly, stiff, boring and often quite irritating. Game control is poor, enemies unimaginative design and graphics extremely mediocre. In comparison with Crackdown and above Infamous, this is a joke." (PC, Prototype, PS3, Xbox 360) 5/10

« 1 2 »
s8anicslayer  +   1878d ago
I guess activision didn't send them any money! lol, I can't believe this one
Genesis5  +   1878d ago
Well now we know why there is no demo.
sonarus  +   1878d ago
This is lame. It seems that reviewers are turning this into a Infamous vs prototype thing. Like you can't enjoy both games. You have to hate one and love the other
MegaMohsi  +   1878d ago
@1.2
This reminds me of the whole Gears 2 vs Resistance 2 last November, one was a TPS and the other an FPS yet Resistance 2 was constantly knocked for not being more like Gears 2 which made no sense to me
HighDefinition  +   1878d ago
@sonarus
Even if, I don`t see a problem w/ one being better than the other to some people or in general for that matter. Infamous did alot of things very right, I knew it was gonna be harder for Prototype to follow. First off, Suckerpunch makes some of the best/smoothest control schemes out there and for this type of game that instantly will make it (again) harder for Prototype to follow.

"Prototype is ugly, stiff, boring and often quite irritating."

This for example, would NEVER be said about Infamous.
#1.4 (Edited 1878d ago ) | Agree(20) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
irish-leprecaun  +   1878d ago
at least ps3 owners have the choice
its like mlb the show and mlb 2k on ps3
while xbox only gets mlb 2k...

you get what u pay for!!
Syronicus  +   1878d ago
"This is lame. It seems that reviewers are turning this into a Infamous vs prototype thing."
Interesting quote considering that nearly every third person shooter released in the last 4 years has been compared to Gears in nearly every review... Every FPS has been compared to Halo in nearly every review... At one time, nearly every open world sandbox game was compared to GTA4 but now, inFAMOUS is the bar that has been set and sadly enough, many reviewers don't feel that Prototype reaches that bar.
arika  +   1878d ago
@sonarus
infamous and prototype should be pitted againts each other, because they are of the same genre. both have superhero powers in an open world game, but thats the only thing that is similar the rest like gameplay, graphics and storyline infamous is entirely on a different level.
i think from here on out we can really see the difference of ps3 exclusive games compared to multiplat or other exclusives from other consoles.
#1.7 (Edited 1878d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
PrimordialSoupBase  +   1878d ago
"Lawl, other websites bribed, Lawl"

For the next two pages.
#1.8 (Edited 1878d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(8) | Report | Reply
morganfell  +   1878d ago
Reviewers are not turning this into an inFamous versus Prototype. It was already an inFamous versus Prototype. Fans saw to that months ago.

I have been having a blast with inFamous and picked up Prototype today. I'll know in a few hours whether there is a competition or a runaway.

It shouldn't be a case of one game against another. But even if you look at a title by itself with no comparision, a great game still wows you and a not so great game still sticks to your shoe and smells up the place.

If Prototype is a remarkable title that would be great - I just dropped $59 on it so I hope it is. But if it isn't then claiming an unjustified comparison is to blame for lack of a perception of quality is a diversion, but doesn't alter the facts.
#1.9 (Edited 1878d ago ) | Agree(15) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
JokesOnYou  +   1878d ago
Wow,
Everybody's got a right to their opinion but thats a horrible review, imo the game is at least an 8/10. So much fun, can't wait until I get home from work.

JOY
#1.10 (Edited 1878d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
Raul_7  +   1878d ago
i just tried it..
and i am not impressed at all .. it feels like i am playing a spiderman game. :|

still havent played infamous yet, but it has much better reviews so...

*goes to buy infamous*
morganfell  +   1878d ago
Raul - You won't regret buying inFamous.

As for Prototype, I'll know in about 3-4 hours when I get some time.
chaosatom  +   1878d ago
I only got time and money for Infamous.
Maybe rent prototype later on. Not having a demo did hurt the game tho.
SaberEdge  +   1878d ago
This is lame. Not necessarily the review, since he is entitled to his opinion no matter how biased it might be. What's lame is the reaction PS3 fanboys are having again.

Can't you guys see how absurd you look? Any good review that comes around is ignored and every low or medium review score is held up as the truth that Prototype is not as good as inFamous.

The fact is, Prototype is still at a 91 on metacritic and inFamous is at 85. So, right now, Prototype is the higher rated game. Could that change? Of course. But the fact PS3 fans are ready to slagg off Prototype just to make their precious inFamous look better really shows you the mentality of these guys.

How about they can both be good games guys?
aldesko  +   1878d ago
@SaberEdge
And 360 fanboys focus on the higher reviews while ignoring the lower ones to show that they don't need infamous. Nothing new here.

And prototype has an 82 on metacritic.

http://www.metacritic.com/g...
#1.15 (Edited 1878d ago ) | Agree(11) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
el zorro  +   1878d ago
I've played both and Prototype craps all over Infamous. The amount of chaos and destruction going on at one time in Prototype make Inafamous look like childs play, the movement through the world is faster and more fluid and there isn't the problem with so much pop in like in Infamous and the game runs smoother and looks better. I'm sorry...Infamous is a good game, but Prototype is better for my tastes.
cmrbe  +   1878d ago
I agree with Sornuas
and why i always hated every games being compared to Gears for the last 3 years.

Reviews should really only focus on why a game is good or bad, on its own merits.
morganfell  +   1878d ago
I just spent my first 45 minutes with Prototype. Where do I start. GameReactor may have come off like an ass but there are very valid criticisms in their article.

First impression? If I had to buy it over again, knowing what I do now I wouldn't buy it. I wouldn't rent it. The controls are all over the map. One of the worst schemes ever and it is a huge blow to the game.

Graphically the game looks nice...at first... and then you realize the lack of detailed textures. Buildings are smooth surfaces.

The combat has no precision and comes off more as the Hulk smasher button masher ...the sequel. I don't think I will be playing much more of this. Have an IQ bigger than your shoe size? Run away, run away! There is mindless fun and then there is "Wow, I just wasted 45 minutes of my life and didn't even enjoy myself."

The story is lackluster...when it even bothers to stick it's head in the game and say hi. I really love the first objective in the game.

Kill the military.

You do not need to know why, just kill them. After all they are evil, right? It's like having a Nazi as the bad guy. Clichéd, poorly thought out, and simple. Until you consume the leader - he doesn't have a name, he is...the leader...it is spawn central. If you want you can hang around and destroy more tanks and Apaches than there are in the entire US military and people just keep running into the street and dying.

All in all it is obvious why there was no demo. Sometimes demos do not occur because the team was working to finish the game. Well, this game is finished alright. In fact it is done for. And it isn't that the game need more dev time. The problem is in the design choices. I personally think they used a dart board. The choices seem more intentional than if they drew the ideas out of folded paper in a hat.

Do you want me to even make the inFamous comparison? inFamous is a measured story that forces you to wrestle with the moral implications of your actions. It makes you aware of the weight that falls on the shoulders of a hero when they have been lifted above other mortal beings. The controls are tight and exacting. The combat unique, the reward remarkable. Cole is a haunted man wondering how and if he is being used, constantly made aware of the fact that even just decisions have their price and even a single life taken wrongly has consequence.

Alex is a mindless being that slaughters and cares for no one but his self. Personally I think he deserves to die. People are just fodder and he senses no worry for anyone...but himself. People in Prototype are just pieces of scenery. Without consequence for a path chosen then there is no sense of payment for the actions you take in a game.

Verdict? With or without the comparison inFamous is a must buy game. Prototype is one of those games that you avoid like the plague.
Syronicus  +   1877d ago
@ morganfell
Thanks for the review Morgan. I always prefer a gamers review over any of the publications because you are not advertising anything and not trying to sell me something. It always makes for more believable reviews. Thanks again.

Bubbles
mebob  +   1877d ago
"I've played both and Prototype craps all over Infamous. The amount of chaos and destruction going on at one time in Prototype make Inafamous look like childs play, the movement through the world is faster and more fluid and there isn't the problem with so much pop in like in Infamous and the game runs smoother and looks better. I'm sorry...Infamous is a good game, but Prototype is better for my tastes."

This coming from a guy who said....

"Way to go Sony Defence Force! You guys really mobilized on this one and won it!....um, I don't know what you won, but gauging by the way you are acting I am sure you won something. Give yourselves a pat on the back, you deserve it. All your loyal service will one day be rewarded in Sony heaven. Spread that gospel, boys! Don't let anybody tell you games other than Sony games are any good, they are only trying to deceive you. Keep the faith. Sony, your god who is in heaven, is watching over you and guiding you...keeping you safe from the truth."

In another article......my fanboy alarm is ringing.
Kain81  +   1878d ago
Mixed Reviews from 4 - 9,5 /10
i dont know what to sy this.
And there is no Demo announced for this Game, so i see i must rent it to Build my own opinion
irish-leprecaun  +   1878d ago
yeah well the "great reviews" that come out 1st
were obviously bribed!!
mastiffchild  +   1878d ago
It's odd after the great previews that it seemed to get, almost universally, that it's turning out to be a bit of a Marmite game.

The range from 4/10 to 9.5/10 is amazing to me but if someone can give it 9.5 there's got to be something great in there yet 4/10 suggests nearly everything is poor-IDK-guess it's a rent to make up my mind on this one. Really don't get why this has happened after all the great pre-release press at all.
hdesroses   1878d ago | Spam
ptotoy  +   1878d ago
where are those xbots now
it was only yesterday that those xbots were oh-so happy that protojunk was getting 9.8's.. they did not realize that activision had an embargo for reviews with less than favorable reveiws.. now you see the complete picture -- prototype maybe a good game but it is a POS next to inFAMOUS, king of superhero sandbox games..
talltony  +   1878d ago
hahaha lmao
I told you stupid bots. I told you this will not be better than infamous and I could tell that from the straight boring gameplay!! Just like i thought, its nothing more than a hulk game with a few new powers and a different charachter!
-MoOkS-  +   1878d ago
hahaha
It's one review.

It's not like Prototype is a 360 exclusive, maybe if it was then you could claim "ownage".

And whats worse is that it's unplayable on the ps3, atleast I could play it on the 360 "IF" I wanted to. LOL

Infamous is still rated lower
talltony  +   1878d ago
mooks are you serious?
This game is getting lower and lower reviews every second. it looks like crap it has always looked like crap to me and these kinds of reviews just prove it and in the end when all the reviews are out you know infamous will be rated higher.
And whats worse is that i could play it if I wanted too, cause I do own a 360 and all. but the ps3 version is not unplayable anyways, they will fix the problem via patch.
-MoOkS-  +   1878d ago
.
Read what im saying before you reply.

Right now, Prototype has a higher review average than inFAMOUS.

The ps3 version IS currently unplayable.

Concentrate on the now
jahcure  +   1878d ago
Prototype is rated
82 for xbox 360 and 91 for ps3 on metacritic. Either way it seems that the PS3 is the way to go. Higher rated prototype and inFamous. Xbox has lower rated protype (even lower than inFamous at 85)

Hmm..tough decision
#4.5 (Edited 1878d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
GiantEnemyCrab  +   1878d ago
And the intentions become clear. This isn't about the games this is a peepee contest with inFAMOUS and PS3 fans are going to protect it and associate Prototype with the 360.

Ah, the worst in gaming.. Give yourselves a round of applause.
jahcure  +   1878d ago
@Giantenemycrab
I am sure you were here when xbox fans were crying down inFamous because it wasn't on thier console of choice and began hailing prototype as a better game for obvious reasons. Now time has come where it's proven that inFamous is better and not only that but the ps3 has the better version of prototype (according to metacritic).but then what's worse is that inFamous is rated higher than prototype on the 360.

Don't tell me u conveniently forgot what led to this day
-MoOkS-  +   1878d ago
LOLOL
PS3 has the better version???? no

Look at the reviewers of both games. They don't review both versions. PS3 reviewers are notorious for over scoring games aswell

For example, If IGN rate the ps3 version 9.0 and the 360 version 8, or gamespot rate the ps3 version 8 and the 360 version 7, then you could say it's better on ps3.

The ps3 only reviewers obviously have less taste than the 360 reviewers.
jahcure  +   1878d ago
@ Mooks
so are you invalidating the scoring on metacritic? You're admitting that it's not a proper barometer for rating games since there are inconsistencies?

I ask because YOU are the one who stated that inFamous was rated lower. I was simply informing YOU that YOU were incorrect.

So which is it? Or did the scoring only count when the score was higher than inFamous'

"MoOkS- - 44 minutes ago

PM
Track
Ignore1.2 - hahaha
It's one review.

It's not like Prototype is a 360 exclusive, maybe if it was then you could claim "ownage".

And whats worse is that it's unplayable on the ps3, atleast I could play it on the 360 "IF" I wanted to. LOL

Infamous is still rated lower "
#4.9 (Edited 1878d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
SaberEdge  +   1878d ago
It's silly to compare the two versions that way. The PS3 version and 360 version don't have the same number of reviews posted, so you can't conclude anything that way.

The only way we will know which version is better is when groups like Digital Foundry do an actual technical analysis of both games.

In any case, if you average the 360 and PS3 versions' scores Prototype has a 86.5 on Metacritic, while inFamous has an 85. So it is absolutely absurd to be proclaiming inFamous the better game.

I think they are both going to be good games and which one is better is going to come down to personal opinion.
jahcure  +   1878d ago
You can't be serious
"if you average the ps3 and 360 scores"...are you a special breed of idiot? You do realize you will be counting some scores two times ...don't u. How is that an average? Please enlighten me with your special "planet na nu na nu math"

I think my original point stands best that metacritic is not a good barometer for game score averages. To suggest that you count ign's score 2 times to make your special math work, is really stupid.

Think before u respond at least
Bordel_1900  +   1878d ago
This is a no buy for me.
chidori666  +   1878d ago
"Prototype is ugly, stiff, boring and often quite irritating."
well... here go again...

flop flop flop.
#6 (Edited 1878d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
WildArmed  +   1878d ago
its a quite harsh review.
I played it and i'd give it atleast a 7.
I think inFAMOUS set the bar 2 high
OmarJA  +   1878d ago
Like -MoOkS-'s ass.
cgoodno  +   1878d ago
This is the problem now
How can we tell what is a quality review and what isn't anymore? Even if there is no bias in a review, there's the issue that people will see bias wherever they want to see it if it doesn't fit their preconception of how good or bad a game is.

Will reviews be used from now on to support one bias over another? Should we not include every single random blog in these review summaries or are the major gaming news sites also biased?

I guess we'll never really know.
Gue1  +   1878d ago
Will reviews be used from now on to support one bias over another?
That's the question of the year! And I say YES!

But when you read a review of a game by a real gaming site you'll see that there's some consistency between them but try to read a review of a movie by a movie site(not IGN)... Your head will spin like crazy!

You can easily find a magazine or site that rated your favorite movie with a 1 out of 10. I mean, 1 out of 10 sounds crazy! That must be a movie made by a blind 5 years old kid! But that's how things are on that industry.

Go, find some movie reviews on metacritic. There you'll find what inconsistency really means.

You can never trust in any reviews of the movie industry but you can still trust in most reviews of the video game industry.
#7.1 (Edited 1878d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Tidus11  +   1878d ago
simple... you pick one site/source that you trust and seems to follow your tastes and you rely on them for reviews. I only use reveiws for games that don't have demos.... the lack of a demo really hurt this games sales
khrisnifer  +   1878d ago
There's only one answer - try it for yourself
Got it yesterday and it's blowing my mind.
It's a gamer's game for sure.
Cajun Chicken  +   1878d ago
These reviews aren't putting me off at all, I've seen enough and read enough for this game to appeal to me. Just got an email saying that Play.com have shipped my copy.
benny o klaatt  +   1878d ago
after seeing your comment chicken
I just looked and i've got my order shipped too from play.com Can't wait, please allow 3-5 days for delivery??? best be one day, lol
Cajun Chicken  +   1878d ago
Yeah, I hope it arrives on Friday. If not, I'm still playing through Infamous and Red Faction during that extra day or so.
Bordel_1900  +   1878d ago
Scores from GR.

Fuel Multi Racing 5/10
Virtua Tennis 2009 Multi Sport 6/10
Infamous PS3 Action 8/10
Star Ocean: TLH Xbox 360 Rollspel 7/10
Resident Evil 5 PS3/Xbox 360 Action 8/10
Halo Wars Xbox 360 Strategi 9/10
Street Fighter IV Multi Fighting 10/10
Killzone 2 PS3 Action 10/10
Resistance 2 PS3 Action 8/10
Gears of War 2 Xbox 360 Action 9/10
Milky  +   1878d ago
seems like a pretty reliable site to me, based off there previous reviews.
BYE  +   1878d ago
Looks like a good site to check out reviews, bookmarked.
#9.2 (Edited 1878d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
irish-leprecaun  +   1878d ago
yeah i agree except
resistance 2 multi is better than gears multi.......
and thats all that most of us care about
SaberEdge  +   1878d ago
I don't think anybody was claiming the site had a bias for a particular console. Usually what happens is that a particular reviewer is biased towards a particular franchise. For example a certain reviewer might be a Splinter Cell fan and thus might not be fair about the way they judge a game like Metal Gear Solid, expecting it to work the way they are used to in Splinter Cell. Get what I mean?

This guy definitely seemed like a big inFamous fan and it seemed he let that color his judgment of Prototype. Who knows though...he is entitled to his opinion, even though it is far outside the bounds of the general consensus. The game is still at a 91 on Metacritic, for example.
antt3  +   1877d ago
"The game is still at a 91 on Metacritic, for example. "
I know you wrote that a while ago, but the score has since changed. It's now down to an 86 on metacritic.

And strangely enough, it has an 82 on metacritic for the 360 version.

Maybe I'm ignorant, but don't multiplats usually get the same score, or at least comparable? I've never actually taken notice before.
tiamat5  +   1878d ago
Ouch indeed. First a 7.5, then 5 then a 2. Prototype is not heading in a good direction. Maybe they should have come out before Infamous after all. It is a pretty hard act to follow.
kevnb  +   1878d ago
I dont know what you mean by not heading in a good direction?
the game is available in stores now is it not? Most reviews are very high, but who cares about reviews? 5 reviewers gave the dark knight 5/10, do you think that movie headed in a poor direction lol?
knowledge4lfe  +   1878d ago
just got it today
i just picked it up about 2hours ago. the game is pretty cool, but the controls absolutely suck. i give it a 7.5/10 and i will not compare it too infamous. i am enjoying it. its very fun to rip people in half and just destroy everything. but the controls suck, the story so far has gone every which way, dont know what the heck is going on. but it is FUN. not great but pretty good. definitely a rent for every hardcore gamer.
benny o klaatt  +   1878d ago
Whats up with the controls? I thought predator concrete jungle, back in the day had bad controls but i manned it, and was worth it
SupaPlaya  +   1878d ago
^^^^ knowledge4lfe
you are the reason I continue to read comments on here regarding games. An honest opinion without bias. We need more people like you to just tell it like how it is, an opinion from a gamer that I can trust.

Common now people bubble a fellow gamer up. I did my part.
#11.2 (Edited 1878d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
raztad  +   1878d ago
+Bubble from me too dude.

Dispersion on Prototype's review scores is going crazy, from absolute crap to masterpiece :D. Something is rotten here. A open world game w/o no good story, no exploration (this sucks hard), sucky controls, crappy graphics but fun mindless destruction doesnt sound like my coup of tea, but could be a good option when it reaches the bargain bin.
kevnb  +   1878d ago
oh well the reviewer didnt like it
does it really matter? If anything it shows that not everybody loves this game.
GiantEnemyCrab  +   1878d ago
This is the one that matters.. Or actually was there one that scored it lower? Just take whatever site gave it the lowest rating and that will be the site that isn't "paid off" and is giving the honest opinion.
ico92  +   1878d ago
the majority of people that are botherd by the scores are 360 owners because the were expecting it to score higher than inFamous even tho prototype is multiplat and not a 360 exclusive oh well i think i'll rent prototype and buy inFamous
kevnb  +   1878d ago
I hate to see people bothered with scores
most people dont care about some review website, I know the review websites do a good job of making themselves seem important to the obsessed but still.
-x.Red.x-  +   1878d ago
damn
I expected a 7 maybe a 8 but 5
damn...
demoneyeslaharl  +   1878d ago
Um... I don't hate Prototype, and at initial glance, I'd take inFamous over this game at any day (a bit biased, I know), but... what the heck is up with those words?

"Dilatory competitor rather than a lap concoction of rotten ingridienser."?

Anyways, in all seriousness... what's with the range of scores?
ultimolu  +   1878d ago
Ouch.

Thankfully I'll rent it.
HighDefinition  +   1878d ago
I like the new avatar.........
:)
ultimolu  +   1878d ago
n_n Thanks.
Rifle-Man  +   1878d ago
Looks like Sony did the right thing when they decided to bump up the release date of Infamous – I'm sure the scores would be different if the reviewers hadn't played it first.
SupaPlaya  +   1878d ago
Interesting observation,
perhaps playing Infamous right before Prototype did hurt the score a bit. It's almost like playing COD4 right before playing COD3.
SupaPlaya  +   1878d ago
^^^^^
Wrong post
Eiffel  +   1878d ago
My question is who really goes by reviews anymore? Thats like going by your best friends opinion. Its an opinion.

Go by what you've learned and researched about the game. I did and I made a wise purchase because of it.
#19 (Edited 1878d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
MegaMohsi  +   1878d ago
Difference is reviewers are professionals who get paid for their opinion because they have knowledge of whatever they're reviewing and have played hundreds more games than your next door neighbor or best friend.
Baka-akaB  +   1878d ago
As usual reviews are useless , especially when results are so disparate and different for the same game . The only ones that cares much about it are folks deeply involved in a war against the ps3 , the wii or the 360 ...
#20 (Edited 1878d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
mastiffchild  +   1878d ago
Not com pletely useless, esp in this case. BECAUSE of the range of scores it's likely that you might find something to really dislike, just as likely that you'll find something great too but the chance is that if theres a mixed opinion you're best off renting or having a play on someone's copy before buying. It's what renting's for in my book.

If you're wise but still like an opinion before buying then find a site/mag/reviewer that seems to rate the same games that you do-it's all about what suits you really and if you haven't the time to invest in really researching your buys then the approved/matched reviewer to your tastes is about the best method.IMO, obviously-ane't there reviewers who tend to agree with your opinion more often than not?
Sir Ken_Kutaragi  +   1878d ago
'ProtoFlop'
;-D
SupaPlaya  +   1878d ago
One thing I need to let off my chest is,
that I agree that review score is pretty such useless when you look at a combined average of all sites. Few problems with sites like Meta and Gamerankings:

1) The site dictates which review sites are included, not us gamers
2) Criteria for grading a game varied a great deal from site to site
3) blogs being used as a review source
4) Different gaming tastes. I'll trust an RPG review from RPGFans.com than a site like FPSFans.com.
5) Some obviously biased site

But instead of saying review score is irrelevant, it's much more important to READ THE REVIEW and over time you'll see some reviewer have similar taste for gaming as you, and their score will more likely reflect how you perceive the game.

With that said, I'm going to have to put it on record that MetaCritic is just fanboys' flamebait tool. Nothing more.
Rock Bottom  +   1878d ago
Couldn't agree more.
DevilDante  +   1878d ago
OK 7, 7.5 but 5 is ridiculous
BubbleSystemSuck  +   1878d ago
i think now people gonna buy infamous and rent Prototype...

Lets see sales records...
Got2bemad2behere  +   1878d ago
Wrong score
on the site it is 4/10 (If somebody commented this then I'm sry)
Ju  +   1878d ago
The 4/10 seams to be the second opinion. 5/10 on the main page.
MetalGearBear  +   1878d ago
@mooks
wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
u mad!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
stop complain about everything!!!!!!!
why protoflop has no demo?
what up with that!?
#26 (Edited 1878d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
spunnups  +   1878d ago
Ouch.
cmrbe  +   1878d ago
Damit
why did they have to compare it to Infamous?.

A game should be judge on its merits alone.
dogmeat eater  +   1878d ago
what a lame game
Theres still no gametrailers review or gamespot review. Activison is probably trying to toss some money at gamespot to hold there review off for a few more days.Then they can get a little more sales for this piece of sh!t. I have a feeling gametrailers is going to rip this game apart.
#29 (Edited 1878d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
II Necroplasm II  +   1878d ago
They should have it up this week. I'm not buying til I see their review, they go over games good.
dogmeat eater  +   1878d ago
this game makes sh!t look good
it sure does
« 1 2 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

The 25 best PS4 games

14m ago - The PS4 is one hell of a system, that much is certain. But, seeing as we haven't even reached the... | PS4
30°

Lack Of Fallout 4 News Is Making People Crazy

14m ago - Skyrim Fansite writes: "Misleading articles regarding Fallout 4 news are circulating on the Web.... | PC
10°

Q*Bert Rebooted:L SteamFirst Interview

14m ago - SteamFirst: Following last week’s Review of Q*Bert Rebooted I was given an opportunity to intervi... | PC
30°

10 Unbelievably Creepy Video Game Easter Eggs

14m ago - Throughout video game history there have been many Easter Eggs hidden for gamers to find. Some we... | PC
Ad

Start Making Games for the PS4

Now - Want to design the next generation of video games? Start learning game design today. Click for more info on how to get started. | Promoted post
20°

The Best Batman Gadgets Of The Arkham Franchise

14m ago - Batman has always brought an iconic assortment of gadgets and tools to fight crime with and save... | PC
Related content from friends