These screens were taken from a Head-To-Head video feature. As surprising as it might be for many, it doesn't take an eagle eye to notice the differences between both versions.
I think we all know by now these comparisons will always come out in favour of the 360 at this moment in time. Its still a decent game and shouldn`t deter PS3 owners from giving it a whirl.
Antan...they havent all come out with the 360 on top. A FUD bubble seems to be looming over all of us. I forward you to Eurogamer for their comparison and you will see that in most cases they are very close, or there is a win on both sides. The PS3 is not behind on these "ports" by anyones standards. Hell the 360 wins on a few, but by negligible margins, as admitted by most journalists that have played both side by side...the only broken link in the chain is Gamespot. http://www.n4g.com/News-317... I agree about this one however. Sorry Antan...changed the comment for you :) Just wish people would refrain from saying ALL, and actually read around. I know many don't have the motivation to do so, but I have and I'm sure as Antan has done, you will see that the ps3 does not fail on ports as much as you think and it is really a jab at the devs to say that they do.
Of course i was speaking about the majority of ports but there are as you rightly say some that swing in the PS3`s favour. Naturally i can only comment on the games ive seen on both, for example-: Ridge Racer 7 is quite a bit better looking than R6, especially in terms of HDR which looks superb on the PS3 but is not available in R6, and the new tracks look fantastic and don`t suffer from the usual portitus as they of course have been built from scratch. Oblivion is of course well documented to have a visual edge on the PS3, though i only have the PC version. I have FNR3 on the 360 but aint seen the PS3 version and yes the majority of reviews point in favour of the PS3, but not by much. SC:DA going by these screenies "appears" to lack the edge of the 360 version, which i do have. I knew months ago this conversion was lacking against the 360 but this is just a bonus of working in the industry. I think i should of said sometimes rather than always of course. As time goes on, and ive said this before, i fully expect the PS3 to show more muscle when 3rd party developers get the knack so to speak, proof of this appears to be showing, like Spiderman 3 for example. Theres more chance of the PS3 having better versions IF code is written directly and not "ported", again its nice knowing plenty of peeps in the industry. "Sorry to burst the FUD bubble that has been looming over you". I always respect your comments Deep and of course hope you get your PS3 in June, but this comment was a bit off tbh, im not sure how you thought/think im somehow affected by this FUD lark? Ant...........
How many times are you going to post that BULLSHIT link those games do not look like that on the 360. lol MAN/DUDE! My brother has a PS3 and a 360 those pics are BS we rented a ton of games and we spent a hole weekend compareing the two consoles. PS3 is alittle too bright in alot of games thus the washed out opinion of many. Adjusting the TV to make the PS3 look normal will fuc the 360 by defualt if a preson was to match the settings.lol
Do us a favour die please? You spent a whole weekend renting out games and comparing them *clap clap* i wonder when this guy is gonna get laid? ye we know the answer. If you look at these first glance there is no difference, but if your a fanboy looking for differences you will see them. I piss on this article. also funny how people are comparing these when they are not the same pictures ha ha.
POG. I know I know...but Ive also found that on many sites they do not say that the ps3 version is washed out. Ive also spoken to many owners and they completely agree. That is not to say that the ps3 versions are not lighter...but they are not as light as some have shown. Now the screenshots shown on Eurogamer, if you do not feel are accurate, they are not what the actual article refers to if you read it. They refer to a number of graphical features and not how bright either are. Eurogamer is not the only site that agrees. In fact Ive done quite a bit of scouting on this and there are some standouts. FNR3...now it is agreed that the crowds on the ps3 are subpar the 360, but it is also universally agreed that the fighter models are much better, with even better lighting on the ps3. Ridge Racer has been said to superior to the 360 version. Now now now, none of this as we have realised over these past months has anything to do with the capabilities of either console. But I really think it is belittling of the devs to say "they havent got the hang of the ps3. Because most ports (apart from Fear and perhaps this) are very good, and in some respects are superior to their xbox siblings. Please I dont do this to flame. I have done my research. I really feel it is time to end the xbox has the better multi-platform games. Each win some, each lose. I hope thats understandable POG...you must realise that a lot of it is bull right? (amusing little fact for you...gamespot said Spiderman3 is more colourful on the ps3...funny I know :)...also Criterion said that 1080p was only possible on the ps3 and that the ps3 would have better physics and AI...I say this only to show. Wins and losses on both sides...there's no need for superiority complexs.
POG. This washed out look is something im not seeing to be perfectly honest with you, i have F1, Motorstorm, R7 and RFOM and i can say ive never once thought about the PS3 having washed out colours. I think one look at R7 (playing it not looking at screenshots) and Motorstorm should dispel such myths. And certainly the the muted look of RFOM is absolutley a creative decision.
ive played motorstorm GT-HD virtua fighter RFOM and they all look washed out and jaggy, i also played fill auto on 360 and full auto 2 on ps3 and the ps3 version is nasty in comparison, the textures coluors and special effects lighting on ps3 are not as good as 360 also i played ridge racer on ps3 and adain colour and lighting was inferior, if people cant see the ps3 has issues with colour lighting and textureing then they are blind
ports are up in the air it depends what they dev. it for. how much time they have. and how much they care. either way. look at the original halflife. the ports weren`t great. but the game was
These thing get all too ugly too post about them anymore! LOL Pick and Choose both win IMO
360 versions look better without a doubt. People who disagree are fanboys. It's simple, no comments are needed. Goodbye
Did you read or even look at the pics/story before you post that attack. lol Yah! sure; I forced myself to see less sweat, less muscle detail on the main charector and more etc etc.
The overall point of this is... why doesnt the PS3 version match hte 360 version? It should! 7 months after the 360 release they have had plenty of time to polish it up. I do not want to hear about what is the lead SKU, last gen the PS2 was the lead SKU in 99% of multi platform games and yet the Xbox version always looked a tad better. IF the PS3 is a more powerful system it would show small upgrades 7 months after the 360 release. If it is a matter of the PS3 being a pain to develop for then that is something Sony better get on soon. (Yes I know they talk about better tools all the time) Bottom line, a game like this (Which does not push either console's limits) SHOULD look at least the same. PS3 owners should be angry at this and wonder why they are getting turd ports.
true true. Now that's a nice look on it...although I'd like to add to that "SOME turd ports". That's all. :)
Very true. Last gen all games had same day releases too. Me personally I'm too hord core and picky to get the turd version. This gen Sony even get an extra 6 months and still comes up a nose short. I do not think it is that big of a deal but Sony did set up HIGH EXPECTATIONS that have yet to be delivered on. This makes me wonder how VF is going to turn out. DEEPBROWN DO YOU EVEN HAVE A PS3 YET? COME ON MAN PUT IN ON THAT $#!T IF YOU BELIVE IN IT SO MUCH. *Below* YEAH God of Gaming I feel that the PS3 is the same cost/price as most peoples rent or mortgage, but this guy flies around this site as the CAPTIN of the SDF but dose not put his money where his mouth is. In my area we call that type of $#!t what it is ((COUNTER FIT)).
To be fair... he more than likely has to pay rent or mortgage so that ususally comes before a PS3. As much as I do not care about the PS3 I would have picked one up by now if it clocked in at $400 bucks!
yes it does take money to get a ps3, and thanks to having a job, I got plenty of that. One major quip about people, and that is a major bullet point for 360 fanboys, is the lack of **must have** games, although the 360 didnt have theirs until a year after launch in the name of GeOW. People are simply waiting for the must have games, the Heavenly Sword, the Lair, the MGS4, the Killzone, the Home, the LBP, there is pretty much a must have game in all types of genres of gaming, and a lot of people are simply waiting, I couldn't wait, and had to have it immediately. But I do agree with the someone crappy ports, well some of them. And it is definately not because of the capabilities of the system, we call all see the ninja gaiden, the oblivion, and HS, Ratchet and Clank, both systems have the goods for excellent games. But you do have to look at it from a developers standpoint. A lot of them are all about money. They have created a game, for the 360, that is optimized for the 360. Now, in order to make the most money, and since the game is already created, they take the least amount of time to maximize the profits to get the game to other systems, its pretty simple. And you do have to look at the shottiness of ubisoft as a developer. I mean cmon, a new game, GRAW 2 is having a multitude of problems on the 360, due to the developers programming, cmon now. I am losing faith in ubisoft day by day
lol. funny. Dudes I've done my research and I'm going from what I have read and seen, just as much as any of these comparisons on this site do. PS3 is on its way but sadly I'm up to my neck in Uni work at the moment and can't actually buy one until I finish and move out of this hell hole. All these comparison opinions are coming from articles and screenshots as I'm sure most of you don't own both, so I'm just pointing you towards the many journalists on this thing called the world wide web, where the opinions are in line with mine in most respects.
Man you should go ahead and pick up 360 as you dont have to wait and wait and wait and wait and wait and wait and...well u catch my drift..to enjoy great games. To rest of you PS3 fanbois, I along with huge numbers of 360 owners have been enjoying next gen HD gaming since Jan 06. I feel pity for you guys who have blindly believed SONY hype/lie machine, wasted 1 year of enjoyable gaming and ended up paying $200+ more on a console which has yet to deliver 3rd game (after MS and RFOM) which is actually good. 90% of the ports which you guys are getting are inferior to what 360 users have had for more than atleast 6 months. So why keep on waiting and never able to play beyond on the console in 3rd place3???? Why the blind faith in company who is renowned for lying to public when it comes to its consoles. Its not necessary that they will have success like ps1/2 evertime. Wake up and smell the cofee guys.
How about armored core 4, the 360 version does not have jaggies, has better textures and reflections, plus a better use of hdr and AA. so what do people have to say about that. the only prob i saw with the 360 version was that it was too dark, don't know why, but from some of the gameplay trailers it looked a lil' too dark. But that is not a graphical problem. Both consoles are powerful, people love sayin that it's the developers fault, actually it's not, it's the console makers fault. If they build something, then build the tools to help people extract all they can for the system. in the end the console maker looks bad, not really the developers. So i wish people would stop blaming the devs, and start pointing the fingers at those that can do something about it. And i know the sony tools sets are coming out soon, but that should have been done. They had a whole year delay because of a blueray diode, why couldn't they have had the developers of the console making all the necessary tools back then. And please don't say the console is only half a year old. it has had games in development for years now, so cut the bull. And one big statement for all those 1st gen 2nd gen crybabies, gears is a 1st gen game. it's epics 1st time on the console, 1st release for the console, and was announced for the system pre launch during e3.
who cares? Play it for the console you have, if you want to play it. If you have both consoles and care about Achievement points, play it on the 360. If you like rumble, play it on the 360. If you don't care about Achievement points or rumble, flip a coin.
Splinter Cell series are graphiclly advanced games and always have been, Port or not this much difference is telling you strenths and weaknesses of the two consoles.
The point is PS3 (should) look way better on every level. With all that supposed power and the year extra they had to make it play in (4D). Ports aside, Resistance should not even be comparable to any xbox360 game. It should have blown away all 360 games, with an extra year to prep for (sony's) next gen. Its a shame to pay so much more and wait so much longer for the same or in some cases lesser quality. PLAY B3HIND!
I just looked at the screens and the Xbox 360 version does look better, no doubt about it. The PS3 version looks too dark and in some of the screenshots theres not enough detail on the walls, it looks bland. I do like both consoles however but i think the devs could not be bothered with porting this game to the PS3, it was made to make quick money.
Fact is that if Sony hadn't kept mouthing off about how much more powerful their console was, then these kind of comparisons would not be happening. Sony decided to tell everyone that their machines graphics would blow the 360 away. So far, all they have delivered is "similar" graphics at best. Sony talk the talk, but have yet to walk the walk, which is why its so easy to rip into them about their games at the moment.
Sony tends to no know when to insert foot into mouth. making claims like "the next generation doesnt start till we say it does" "ps3 is the only TRUE HD experience" "we consider it more of a xbox 1.5" why oh why cant you just be humble sony? being the leader of the console war, you shouldnt have to smack talk about how your machine will kick the piss out of everything else. the underdogs should be the ones saying that so that they can take attention away from the console leader.
with the 360 and the PS3 having COMPLETELY different architecture, its very hard and costly for a developer to produce a port of equal or better quality without starting from scratch. Maybe when the 360 ports start to roll in (DMC4) 360 owners will see then downside of porting from PS3.
It was already stated by top dev`s that it`s easier to port from ps3 to 360!
it just looks and play better on 360 dont hate
Fact is that Sony is a bunch of liars and should not be supported for it! Xbox had to take all of the ps2`s ports and the XBOX version always looked and played BETTER! So stop with all the excuses already. and deepbrown, stop posting pics of virtua Tennis 3 shots when you know damn well that the two games were developed by two different studios with the ps3 version having the better of the two which is AM2! Ps3 had Yu Suzuki san with AM2! AM2 is responsible for Virtua fighter, Shenmue and so on.
The 360 graphics look the best.
I agree. Having two completely different systems im not surprised either. They didn't build the game from the ground up for PS3 so chalk this one up as one crappy port job and another crappy news POST. Having played the X360 version i must say this game wasn't even that great to begin with. PS3 owners should skip this part of the series and wait for R6 Vegas.
What about the ones they did make for the ps3 from the ground up? They are no better quality than some 360 games. Moto storm being the 1 that may have a slight edge graphically on the average 360 game, but not much of an edge. And it lacks in most other areas.
All of the older xbox ports from ps2 always looked better on xbox. So you would think the same should apply here with the ps3.
I said it before, if you are going to buy a PS3 buy it for the games that the 360 does not have. The simple fact that 360 games have more features than the PS3 versions of the same game simply make them not worth the extra $200. (Yeah, I know the PS3 have bla bla bla.. and the 360 does not have bla bla bla... but you don't need any of that to play .... uhhh this game or any game...). If you are going to get a PS3 and already own a 360 do yourselve a favor and don't buy it to play the games that are already or going to be available for the 360. But the PS3 if you want a cheap blu-ray player or if you want to play a game that it's exclusive to the PS3. Since the PS3 is a newer and more expensive console we shouldnt be making this comparisons, it should a be a difference between day and night. The difference between the PS3 and the XBox 360 should be the same it was between the PS2 and the Original xbox which was obviously superior in terms of graphics and there was no questions about it. Games (ALWAYS) port or not looked better on the original xbox compared to the PS2. We shouldn't have to wait 2-3 years for that. The Original xbox proved to look better on than the PS2 in terms of graphics on day 1.
Good point but people will argue this till the cows come home . Its good to know that there are some sane people that post on this site
Sony has made so many claims of being so much better than the competition in every way. So the difference in the 2 systems should be like night and day. We should not have to be comparing screen shots at all. The ps3 should make me as an xbox fan say "oh crap look at those graphics and gameplay I can't get that with my system. I better find a way to get a ps3 so I can move on to the next gen". But I am thinking instead about what a good deal I got on my system. $200.00 less for better games. Hmmmmmmm.
Let's be honest PS3 fan's. I am no fanboy in any way. BUT I think all gamers - casual/hardcore/collectors & even grandmas and grandpas all expected ALOT MORE from the PS3 I expected ALOT MORE the main reason I expected alot more was because this console was released a year later, we can ALMOST say every piece of hardware on the PS3 is superior to the PS3 EXCEPT the graphics card. the second reason I expected alot more was actually because of SONY themselves, I mean they had a whole year to see what the X360 can do. Sony said things like Xbox 1.5, the PS3 will blow away the Xbox360, we all know all the stuff they have said. My point is the PS3 hasn't blown anything away, in fact I think the one year older system has actually held it's own. Those of you who think it hasn't are all fanboys. For Example. ports - some look better on PS3, some look better on X360, and all of them are comparable. exclusives - some have looked better on PS3, some have looked better on X360, some of them are comparable, some ppl (fanboys/analysts/gamers/) will say Gears of War looks better, others will say R:FOM looks better. PS3 has not delivered. X360 is holding it's own.
well i think sony just sat back on their laurels. I mean really, 360 didnt have crap until gears came out, and that was the same time ps3 launched, i bet sony just sat back and went.. wait this is what we're up against..pppfffttt.. but yeah, the high end games are coming, and its mostly from first party exclusives, I wonder if thats coincidence or not.
I don't think its a good idea to blame this on devs they have to work with what they've got ya know splinter cell came out on xb360 in october last year and they have had ps3 dev kits since the summer before that so they've been working on this port for a while now theres no excuse for this. If the Ps3 version would've came out and been awesome i would have expected it bc all of the time they've had
ubisoft is crap, check out the problems that graw2 is having on the 360, and its not because of the 360, its the programming. ubisoft is cutting corners left and right, its not a good thing ahahahah.. disagree all you want, doesnt mean its not true http://www.n4g.com/xbox360/... read it and weep, fanboys just don't understand
LAZINESS plain and simple
You should be lucky, if devs stopped making ports/Multi platform games for PS3 altogether then you'd be left with 4 games to look forward to. So stfu about blaming devs as those guys are doing their best to bring games to your, already in hot water console. BTW look at the pic of US flag on guys shirt, the one ps3 looks like ps2 texture. I guess they even had to dumb down that small a texture for ps3.
This pictures are BS,check others sources and they all say it looks great on the ps3
Compared to what? Does is look greater than (better than) the 360 version? Equal to? Greater than the PS2? Next-gen graphics in general look great.
Everyone thinks its laziness from the developers. I think it is I believe the ps3 memory limitations and inferior gpu might be holding it back. The developers don't want to release inferior games like this they want to make it as polished as possible Xbox is more powerful even games made on the ps3 then ported to the Xbox look better on it. Armed core 4 is one of them.
Whhaaattt? Their is not even a remote comparison the ps3 shots almost look like just a black screen, wow that's horrible I guess they said F the PS3 version since the next version is a 360 exclusive and therefore wont have to worry about the ps3
And they said that the next generation start with PS3.
And they said that the next generation start with PS3,please, not impressed. Sorry double post.
in my eyes. AM tired of these washed out halfed-As$ ports they keep putting out there. Pretty soon am just gonna give up of the company and not buy any of their games.
I suggest starting a petition to boycott Ubisoft's games. This way you wont have to worry about CAPCOM and Ubisoft screwing your beloved PS3. You can even add EA while you're at it.
Ubisoft may have it's problems, but don't you think you should cast some of that blame on inefficient dev tools, poor architecture, and poor support from an extremely arrogant company? "4 letters S-O-N-Y" - Jack Tretton I myself am getting quite upset with sony in general, from rootkits to trojan machines that force people into a poor HD format. Thanks for the Blu-Ray player that I don't use Sony. Oh, Talledega Nights is only worth $4 in trade-in at GameStop... :(
Its a well known fact ps3 can do wat 360 does but better..its devlopers being lazy
Its a well known myth. Many of yall actually believed that the ps3 was going to be great for games. Yall bought into what Sony was claiming. But you should have known at launch "a year late" that it was all hype and no substance. Sony stated a long time ago that ps3 games would blow 360 games out the water at launch. And some of yall really believed that. And now you take it too personal when you find out it was all a lie. Get over it. I did. I just use my ps3 for movies right now. I have hopes of a great game to come at some point though. But I absolutely enjoy my 360 when it comes to Next Gen games. WOW
fact. ps3s best looking game is, not as good looking as 360 best!
So you're saying its everyone's fault but your beloved Sonys?
There are many factors in how good a game looks. 1. What type of tv you are using. 2. What resolution you are playing it on. 3. What type of connection are you using. HDMI, componant, ect.... Those are just a few factors that play a "HUGE" role in how the game looks when you play it. I'm so tired of fanboys blaming it on the developers. They do the best job they can and they are artists. They want to show off their best work on each system. They want PS3 owners to say "Man this is the best game ever" when they play the game they have developed. Some fall short of that but its not because they didn't try. The fact of the matter is....Microsoft has superior developement tools over Sony. Many developers have clearly stated that the 360 is much easier and better for game developement. MS and ATI implimeneted some brilliant decisions in the hardware design that is just "NOW" being implimented in PC video cards. Micorosoft thought ahead in regards to the GPU and the 3 PPU stucture. Sure sony was attempting to be innovative whith the Cell. A one PPU processor with SPE's running off of it. And sure it pushes an amazing amount of "numbers"....But we are talking about games. And we all know why Sony added the blu ray player to the ps3. So with both decisions in Blu ray and the Cell....it was not a good decision for developers or games. Sure you can argue about if and when developers learn how to take advantage of Cell's power....But that's a big "IF" and "When". And in the meanwhile it costs 1/3rd more to develope for a system that isn't matching what the 360 is doing. Gamers are seeing it. Developers are seeing it. And many gamers have said "forget 600 for a system that isn't living up to the hype"...and many developers are saying..."why spend more money to make and inferior game and with a much smaller base of fans"....its going to be tuff for Sony this time around. Thats a fact. Now in regards to the comparissons....I have played both systems, every game, and on the "SAME" tv. 1080p DLP 61 inch. There hasn't been "ONE" game that looks better on the ps3 yet. I'm sorry if that offends some die hard fanboys. But thats the complete truth. I will say this though. Even though Oblvion looks better on the 360 with the update. The ps3 version does benefit from faster load times. But thats it from what I have seen and compared. But the ps3 version has way more pop ins and the texture detail, lighting, and shadowing looks better on the 360 version. And Splinter Cell is not even close folks. The 360 version looks notibly better. But thats right on par with many other games. The 360 version looks anywhere from a tad better to much better. But not once have a seen a game where the ps3 version looks better on my TV with my set up. Its not the developers. Put the blame where the developers put the blame. With Sony's choices in hardware this time around. All so they can attempt to be innovative and different. Gamers loose in the end with an over priced inferior system. But at least I can watch my extensive blu ray collection on it. So its cool with me. My 360 is for the best next gen gaming experience and my ps3 is for my blu ray collection. Oh, I use my 360 for my media center extension as well. Pretty neat stuff there.
all you have to look at is ninja gaiden sigma... you said it yourself.. its EASIER to develop for on the 360, that has nothing to do with the hardware thats involved. Granted, the tools could have been given out to make it easier to develop for, and thats all sony's fault. But don't worry the games are coming, better tools are being developed for, HS, Ninja Gaiden, R&C, LAIR, again, Gears came out one year after launch, in november, lets see what games PS3 has in november, I think we'll all be pleasantly surprised.
I'm giving my honest not biased opinion... I really don't know [email protected]#t about this, but i'm giving my point of view anyway.. I think that the default visuals for the PS3 when they are working on a port are going to look like that always.. The developers are going to do what they can to make it look good, believe it or not, because they are gonna look bad as a company.. The thing is devs are not going to make too many changes to try and make it beautiful when they have the game already made.. The 360 has that advantage, that games are going to look good and colorful by default thanks to ATI.. The PS3 is different and does not have that advantage.. for the PS3 to have a good colorful beautiful game, the devs have to work it hard.. For anybody that haven't seen a PS3 in action believe me games on it look amazing and colorful, but most of them are not going to look as colorful as other multiplatforms on the 360..
Looks like another win for the 360. The 360 keeps on winning the comparison battle. Bottom line is that the ps3 was supposed to be kicking the 360s ass from day 1. Isn't that what Sony said? "Next gen doesn't start until we say so!" And the ps3 hasn't done nothing to take over the 360s next gen throne. Only the fanboys are buying the ps3. Splinter Cell is a AAA franchise and the 360 gets the better version again. No more excuses! I cant wait for GTA4 to come out and hear the excuses of "Rockstar sucks anyway!" when the 360 gets the better version! ;)
Sony: Here is the most powerful game console ever made, it will blow the xbox 1.5 out of the water. Next Gen starts when we say so. Gamer: WOW! I can't wait! [1 1/2 years later] Sony: Here we give you the PS3! With blu-ray and .... you want it! and it's only $600. Gamer: WOW! Yes I want one. Wow, blu-ray movies look great!... Ok, let me play the games. $h!t no game invites!? Not all games have online features! (including those ports that have online for the 360). Wait a minute, Gears look better than any games ever made for the PS3. All these games comparison... games look the same or even better in some case on the 360. HOw can this be? No rumble? ohh let me try the new motion censitive ... oh wait... it's varely supported. Sony: It's better but you are going to have to wait 2-3 years before developers can learn how to program... yeah cause we made it hard at purpose so games look better on the 360 at least for 2-3 years. It's better damn it. It's the CELL. If you can see it your are an idiot. Gamer: Crap, sony is losing all exclusives. They only have 2 I really want (Final Fantasy, Metal Gear).
more exclusives that I want.
disagree or not ... I can't think of any recent Ubisoft games that have been decent on a Sony machine compared to a MS machine. This includes the PS2 and PSP. Why is that Bethsada or Ninja Theory come up with amazing ports/remakes and this company makes utter crap. Have you seen any of the Wii games by Ubisoft? TopGamer, as much as I respect your opinion mate, there is too much inconsistency to NOT put blame on development. I'm not sure if Ubi had any of the latest DEV Tools like EDGE during development. If they are trying to push this game out to capture sales from 3+ million PS3 gamers, they better put something worthy out. Otherwise, it just doesn't make sense to put out crap. If its crap, people will hold out. I'm going to reserve my opinion on Ubi ports after Rainbow Six: Vegas and GRAW 2 for the PS3. If they turn up like crap ... there is a trend going on here and I'll treat Ubi just like I treat EA ... with very little respect.
The Wii version looks WAY better and costs $10 less =) Seriously tho, both look very good and just cuz console A's version looks better than console B's doesn't necessarily mean console A is more powerful. I doubt that the developers of this game (or any game for that matter) have the exact same level of familiarization with each console's hardware. Even if they did, the dev tools are gonna be different for each. I think it's funny how some ppl are being so nitpicky about the smallest detail just so they can justify their purchase of a particular console.
The 360 version looks ALOT! better. It shouldn't surprise thought. Splinter Cell has always been an XBOX thing. Wasn't it this franchise that served up the first killer app of XBOX? They (XBOX) must pay Ubi lots of money.
these comparison shots are a joke. they had the same comparisons for armored core4 ( which i love ) and ALL the screen shots do no justice for the game. the ps3 version had all the effects, even the heat waves. Also the second i started the game it took me to a setup menu and even had a brightness control. Only fan boys care any more because real gamers know you cant trust no ones opinon about a game, you have to try it for your self....p.s. this game sux anyways
I agree there have been some muliplatform games that looked better on the PS3(FN3). However, in this case , the 360 looks way better to me. The PS3 look flat. All in all, I think both systems will do well. I am very impressed with that R&C game for the PS3. I do not have a PS3 but my friend upstairs from me does and he likes it a lot. I guess that is all that matters. Play the system you like and have fun. Every one precieves things differently so we will never see eye to eye when comparing these systems. I prefer the 360 but like what the Ps3 has to offer.
Explain to me why you need to own both fricking consoles to have an opinion on it? It seems like any negative comment regarding the PS3, that is justified with the evidence of these and other screenshots, that people dismiss you and claim you dont own the system to make a judgement on it..?? Well thanks to the gaming community, you dont need to own the damn console to have a damn opinion on it..why on Earth do you think I come here..to LEARN about games and consoles and I will have my damn opinion on anything based on what I know. PS3 versions of games already out on the 360 seem to be lacking in many factors generally speaking. It's a fact and we see it daily with evidence such as this.. I'm personally tired of people claiming it "tv resolution" "adjust your TV" "bias editors" and all the rest of that cheesy waste that can't be digested down those blatant fanboy stomachs. Oh and for this lazy developer issue.. It's irrelevant. At the end of the day, there are games on that shelve that arent up to scratch and they are representing the PS3. It's up to the developers to fix that, but they're not bothered..so when will they ever be bothered to work hard in order to utilise the PS3's power...why should they even when they can focus on the 360 and get more money for their work? It doesn't make sense. Another game on the PS3 that looks like utter utter crap. It's becoming a joke!