Beauty is only skin deep - so let's tear off the skin and check out the guts.
We PS360 guys will enjoy this lovely HD experience, sorry Wii =(
They're negligible, not warranting a 200 comment thread.
This game looks brutal. The comparisons need to stop already. I thought they had stop a couple months ago but i guess no multiplats came out or something. It's as if the comparison started all over again as soon as SFIV came out.
But don't not expect it go get that high. :)
http://img21.imageshack.us/... Why are they DIFFERENT COLORS if its the SAME VERSION?! They are color changing these things on purpose. If they are from the same capture, there would be absolutely no difference in colors. Why is either 360 version saturated/desaturated. GT gets owned again.
Has major screen tearing and 360 has none. Check these out 0:47-0:49, 0:55, 2:01... and notice screen tearing on the PS3 version. Other than that they both look exactly same visually.
wrong tab lol.. :)
LOL gametrailers FAIL! look at 0:47 when his hanging of the helicopter PS3 side has the 360s A button.. lametrailers
hahah.. nice spot
First Grid now this. Hahaha Gametrailers. BTW pause at 0:52 and tell me what you see. Apart from the fact that one has AA and the other doesn't, they're both the same.
They humiliate them selves over and over. What are they trying to prove with this type of vids? Very fanboyish if you ask me(i have not seen vid so i don't know which version looks better, actually i never watch those since GRID fiasco). So now it seems they did it again? Will they stop? NO, very stubborn fanboys. How they expect anyone to believe that PS3 or 360 video is actually PS3 or 360 video/material? It could be just well edited. Lametrailers ftw
I don't know how GT actually have credability within the industry.
Epic fail indeed.
IGN has been doing this 2 btw
noooo.... in that same shot it says "press [X] or [*triangle] to pull yourself up.
to just come out and say your all wrong but if you go to the site and watch it in HD you can see that its actually and X button but just looks like the A button in this whorse quality.
They got busted and changed it. You can see sscreengrabs/comments on GT as well pointing it out.
looks like gametrailer found their little mistake, pulled the video and fixed it too late gametrailers
OMG... 0:47...X360 vs X360? :D
PS3 version looks better
but once it gets to the part where he's fighting the big monster it definitely looks better on the PS3. Not saying that 360 has had it better more than once, but this time the PS3 has a slight edge. Really nothing that would take away from either experience you choose.
there was a part were the 360 version was loading the textures. anyway, who cares, this is a game based on a movie, which would probably play like S**t
Well the whole argument for this game is capoot when both versions are either both Xbox 360 versions or doctored. See above comments.
I better not :D either way I have to wait a week until I can download the demo...damn you microsoft!!
lol unreal engine lookin better on ps3 gotta hurt
The whole video is only the 360 version lol
do you live Shadow Man? I got the demo already but haven't played it.
WTF! this looks cool.
Apparently one of the better GoW clones (especially liked the helicopter head chop scene). However it's time we moved on from these comparisons. (Both versions looks good enough for their respective console owners).
Thats beautiful.they really worked on this
we all know the game boy advance version is gonna have the best graphics, don't get carried away
omfg i got a disagree when i was being sarcastic...i hate you all
They both look the same for the most part but the PS3 version is a lil sharper with better details
less wang too :o
the 360 version looks much better.
haters who talk trash about hawk well now look ps3 version looks better haha dum people
..because I have no idea what the hell you just tried to say. Try using punctuation.
Well, the PS3 has all the better stuff this time, bloom, higher texture res, I am impressed. Edit: Ha , I see they totally stuffed this up. Lame.
The only thing though the game has crappy animation and graphics but still I think it will be an ok game. The demo was pretty cool.
the rock monster did look better on the PS3 though, I never knew this game looked so good, the film spin offs look to be getting better, this and Batman look really good, hopefully they have gameplay to match.
did they get them mixed up?
This is gametrailers we are talking about. They messed it up on purpose to make the PS3 version look worse than the 360. They have even been caught editing PS3 videos/pictures to make them look worse and editing 360 ones to make them better. They did this when comparing assassins creed, look it up on youtube.
both games look very good, but the fire man and the lava monster looked just a tiny bit better on ps3 imo
im glad i dont buy multiplatform games because my gaming standards are high. why should i buy games that are inferior to majority of the ps3 exclusives. its so silly having these multiplatform games compared. its like comparing a 2009 mustang gt to a 2009 lamborghini revington by having them drive the speed limit in a 25mph driving zone. we all know the lamborghini is faster. have people seen motorstorm 2, resistance 2, gt 5 pro, uncharted, mgs 4, and killzone 2. lets compare games in the same genre. uncharted > gears 1 and 2 gt 5 pro > forza 2, lbp > banjo kaz. motorstorm 2 > pgr 4 killzone 2 > halo 3 and the whole xbox family. when it comes to fun factor, to each his own, but on a technological level, ps3 exclusives are better in their genre and just better overall than xbox games . xbox 360 has a lot of good games but none can be compared to the top ps3 exclusives ON A TECHNOLOGICAL LEVEL. ohh yeah, the xbox 360s hardware failure rate is 33%. ps. the talon stands for talented
@talon I need to agree with you here. Comparing both versions of a multiplat game, says nothing about what is the more capable hardware, when 360 pulls out a game comparable to KZ2 or Uncharted:DF, we can talk. Multiplats are doing what they are suppose to do, be the same on both platforms, so is expected that differences in visuals be minimal and dont retract in any way from the experience.
LOL This is funny. Why the disagree? Some fan out there is playing a 360 game comparable with KZ2 (graphically)? Or someone thinks multiplats are rising the bar graphically? Im really curious about it.
You are the purest definition of Sony fanboy I have ever read from. Automatically, as if a rat smelling garbage, you crawled out of your slime-infested, self-righteous hole to run your mouth about trifles irrelevant to this article. Sure, no one gives a crap about this movie game, but no one actually gives a crap about the overtime PR you are doing for Sony. But of course, I see your supporters will be here to fight the good fight with you. What you need to understand is that no matter how loudly you shout about how great Sony exclusives are better than MS exclusives, it won't make them sell more copies. On a technical level, the 360 has a better gpu than the ps3, but you don't hear me running my mouth off about irrelevant things, because it doesn't matter how good it looks, just like The Phantom Menace. Just get out of here Tylantacrap, while I take some Tylenol for these headaches you cause. P.S. the talon stands for your mother is a whore.
KILLZONE 2 WINS!!! ;-P AGAIN!!!;)
I just played the Demo and 'Uncharted 1' Graphics F-IN Kills it!!! ;-D It(X-Men Origins:Wolverine)looks horrible :-/ Unreal engine looks SOOOOO OUTDATED. The gameplay was ok tho. It was ok, if you like those sort of games;) Oh my 1st Comment i was wrong...KILLZONE 2 DESTROYS IT BIG-TIME!!! ;-P
Gives the 360 owners self confidence in their so called system.Another botched comparison.
Are we watching the same video? Both look nearly identical.. the ps3 actually looks a tiny bit better in a few shots.
Can't believe peopel are still doing these stupid comparisons. If the game looks good then it'll look good on both machines. All that interests me is if a particular version is left unlplayable due to frame rate issues or some other technical nightmare. And unless the PS3 version suffers from those faults I'll buy the PS3 version every time from here on in. Simple reasons for this are that I prefer the trophy system and if there is an online portion to the game then I prefer to play online for free. Speaking of free, Gold emberships for everyone this weekend. In the UK at least so I'll maybe play some Gears 2 on there woohoo.
better when you look at the background details.
Go up close to a wall or zoom in on the ground in virtually any game (MGS4 & Killzone 2 included), & the environmental textures are garbage.
I dont know about you, but i dont spend my time zooming in on the ground with a sniper to look at textures -_-
You all know it's true, but don't want to admit it. You can always tell it's the truth when you get another ignore on your profile. Went from 6 to 11 in 3 days. That's what you do when you can't refute. Ignore or attack bubbles.
Yeah, people on PS3 are missing out.. http://farm4.static.flickr.... http://farm4.static.flickr.... http://farm4.static.flickr.... People ignore you because you're a troll. Uncharted's environmental textures are "garbage"? Do you honestly think if you zoom into a texture on any 360 shooter it won't look bad?
Uncharted's environmental textures are basically a frikkin cartoon. I would hope they look good. It's bright, shiny, & colorful. It's not a realistic graphic presentation. Yes there are 360 games with crappy @ss textures too. & if you don't care so much, why do we see PS fans talking sh*t in every article relating to graphics? Weren't too many of you last go around when Gamecube had better specs.
i'd say the ps3 version looks a tad better (not that it really matters)I still can't believe Gt are still doing these comparisons though and screwing them up with the while wrongly labeled screens lmao For me, if i have to decide between multi-plat games it's generally trophies/achievements... i prefer trohpies, friends (if multi)... more mates on psn but in terms of graphics, theres really not a big enough difference to make someone choose 1 system over the other imo. My only concern in this regard is performance, if i find out 1 version has bad framerates, or lots more bugs, then that's what really defines which version should be purchased, not which has the pretties graphics when put side by side.
Agree with you 100% peep If the dev makes a good looking game it'll look good on both machines but if there are performance issues then that is a big factor.
Does it really?? Considering it's all 360 footage and the video is now pulled. This just goes to show how much of this is in peoples heads and they will see what they want to see.
The video's pulled? Que? And there are some minor differences between the two.. mainly texture pop-in times.
I love the fact that most people here aren't even going to play this game yet they care.
Maybe they won't, but I'm going to play the hell out of it.
"Maybe they won't, but I'm going to play the hell out of it." Same. I heard a lot of good things about that game...and the movie was FIRE.
Here is a movie based game that may not suck. Amirite?
you people make me sick all I ever hear about is how multi look better on x360 and thats a big deal...but when its PS3 turn its only a "little bit better" and "who cares no ones going to play it anyway" or "does it matter?" I don't get why people cant just let the ps3 have what they fairly earned. Check out joe75's post before disagree...or not.
EDIT: opppsie doosie wrong reply I wouldn't want to talk to you anyways
When playing the actual game, the only difference you would notice is probably the 360's pop-in. But most 360 owners should be used to that now.
That's really all that I noticed with the guy sitting on the ledge on the battlements. Pop-in has usually been the only issue with Xb