Lens of Truth writes, "...we put the Xbox 360 and PS3 version in a Head2Head dog fight to see which version can claim the name "Top Gun". Jump inside to find out which version soared to the top and which version dive bombed into the dirt."
Holy crap... i remember when i watched that loL!
now hug onto mulitplatform games and force them to be exclusives in their minds. lol
Although in a detailed analysis a few differences might be discovered, when you actually play the games the difference is hardly noticeable, if at all. I play multiplatform games on both of my consoles now (PS3 and 360) and very few games have any differences that are enough to notice unless you are doing a careful analysis (which you aren't doing when you play a game). It's the same game on either console, in any case.
Are you effing kidding me with that BS? "...are you just tired of losing?" Most people buy consoles because of the exclusive games it as to offer, not because they think it makes them some kind of winner... Do these stupid comparisons really make you feel that warm and fuzzy inside? That's pretty pathetic. And don't pretend that the PS3 has no exclusives when the 360 is the console with the barren line-up this year.
hahaha PS3 always loses.
Oh man, I apologize for even attempting to talk to such a child.
Sorry, but I didn't take time to read your Sony Droid garbage. But XBox 360 did get the better version of Hawx, like it does every other game. All without a mandantory 22 minute, 5 GB install.
The problem with third-party games on the PS3 is that none of em take advantage of the PS3s hardware. You're setting your self up for disappointment if you think the best 360 games will look better than the best PS3 games. One can dream, though
I agree, its a rushed job to get it onto another platform to make extra cash. Of course it will sell, because most consumers do not realize how games are developed (main platform > secondary platform(s))and think that they are getting the exact same game. But some developers actually care about their products and make sure the conversion process is nearly identical. If only all publishers could be held to such standards. Then the war would be about exclusives and not third party games.
Doesn't matter lame excuse.
No I'm not Mexican or Asian so I don't have the Swine Flu. Sorry to disappoint but it sounds like you have it if you think the PS3 is superior to the Xbox 360. Someone must have also forgotten to tell the developers that the PS3 was better because they sure cant seem to make it happen.
The fun part of this, is that LoT mentions always "blurry textures" because the PS3 version uses ingame blur, and another thing they hid from their comparison is the FACT that the 360 version of HAWX had a short horizon, the visual field of the PS3 version is vast, but the 360 version is short, sorry if you disagree but you didn't played both versions, just tried to had faith in a page made to defend the 360.
Shouldn't you do the same!
You sound stupid. "Uncharted didn't take 4 years MGS4 didn't take 4 years GT5 Prologue didn't take 4 years Killzone took 4 years " 1. Uncharted has the worst screen tearing I've ever seen so maybe they should have taken 4 years. 2. MGS4 is not a game it's a movie so don't bring that up here. 3. GT5 Prologue is a demo not a full game. Having only 2 tracks available does not make it a full game more like a demo. And if you paid $30 for a demo you a sad panda. So again Killzone 2 could be done on the Xbox 360 with the same amount of dev time. Actually Killzone 2 on the Xbox 360 would look better. That's a fact deal with it.
Awesome!! I can't stop laughing at your last comment cause it's so true.
keep crying away, if you say this long enough you might have to stop crying your self to sleep at night, we both know that none of what you said is true... oh and btw killzone 2 cannot be done on the 360
I would of listened to what you had to say.. but then i saw "2. MGS4 is not a game it's a movie so don't bring that up here" Please, if you're going to attempt to argue - try actually knowing what you're talking about.
1. uncharted has zero screen tearing, ive played though on normal and crushing 2. 15 hours gameplay and about 4 hours of cutscenes, best of both worlds? 3. a demo kicked forzas ass up and down, good little arguement you have there 4. too human 10 years development time. need i say more?
"uncharted has zero screen tearing, ive played though on normal and crushing " Where did you get that version because mine has screen tearing all over the place.
"xboxgirl" post a picture of your username on a peice a paper next to your ps3 and you copy of uncharted or i instantly call BULLSHIT!
Yeah. The screen tearing in Uncharted is almost as bad as the screen tearing in RE5 for the 360 >_> So, you're saying that Killzone 2 would run better on the 360? A game made by Sony developers? Yikes.. "First off, it seems that fitting the game onto a DVD is an issue. Executive producer Katsuhiro Harada told X360 magazine that it has been a "challenge to fit this game onto one DVD and to make sure the data is read at a fast rate." "Tekken 6’s graphics engine was developed for a high frame rate to create fluid motion rather than focusing purely on extravagant still shots," Harada said. "Using a ‘fulltime adjustable animation blur’ which adjusts to each character’s movement and speed, these games show a new level of smooth and dynamic movement. This technology has proved very difficult to realise with fighting games running at 60fps." "Even here at NBGI, the Soul Calibur Team gave up on it for Soul Calibur 4. In order to accomplish this effect, we had to write a lot of code optimized to make full use of the PS3’s SPU. Ultimately, we implement the same motion blur on the 360 so this will be a great challenge." http://www.destructoid.com/...
grid shat all over GTP
fair dues, i did enjoy GRID a hell of alot, full game of GT5 should be great thougn
Your the one that full of [email protected]#t. You probably don't even no what vertical screen tearing is. So you post a picture of your username on a piece a paper next to your ps3 and you copy of uncharted or i instantly call BULLSHIT!
stfu xboxgirl,verticle screen tears is when a single line or more of pixels is move out of sync from the rest of the image, socom confrontation has a huge problem with this but uncharted had NONE
Yea whatever helps you sleep at night super caffman.
...AKA PoG, so why even bother with him/her. You know he's full of it.
God dude you need glasses or a clue, pick one. The Screen tearing in Uncharted was so bad it actually made me vomit on my PS3, then I vomited on my ps3 controller and then on my PSP, guess where next? Yep my ps2 got some vomit as well. I finally stopped when i get to my PS1. I agree with Xbox girl.
Good job with that Google search, but really if you cant see the screen tearing in Uncharted you are simple retarded. I have no time for stupid people and you both have AIDS. so go die.
Awesome, Awesome, and Awesome.
My gosh, did I sleep with your older sister to warrant that comment? Geez POG you're nuts. You totally got me there with that comment. Boo hoo, I'm running home and sulking because prepubescent XBOXgirl used one of his/her accounts to attack me. rolls eyes/ EDIT: Keep going Artard, it's making me laugh and making you, you multi-account pube, more pyscho.
you know what f it, i dont give a flying crap what you think so why dont you just go eat sh!t and die
Wipe your ass say three Hail Marry and you and God can call it even. Also every time you speak I smell [email protected] through the internet. That's how bad you suck, so again go get the Swine flu and die.
HAHAHA life is good right now!!
Uncharted did have some screentearing, but nowhere near as bad as games like Assassin's Creed and Mass Effect. I have all three of those games (three of my favorites by the way) and there is no doubt Uncharted had the least amount of screen tearing between those three. The screen tearing was really fairly minor and only happened in certain areas. Besides that relatively minor flaw the game blows away almost every other game I have ever played in the graphics department. The only game I have seen that surpasses it in some areas is Killzone 2. That's pretty damn impressive for a game nearly going on its 2nd year.
HAHAHAH PS3 got whooped!! holy aliasing on the ps3, it was everywhere. I know which version I'm gonna rent. 21 minutes for a mandatory install is ridiculous, they should include a movie to watch while you wait. Like Top gun.
Too bad 360 has no good games you can BUY! Continue enjoying rental after rental!
But this didn't feel right. i've played Hawk on the PS3 and I dont feel like those pics are accurate. Im going to automatically sya the 360 cant look good but Im sure the PS3 version wasn't that bad at all.
did you watch the video? It's pretty hard to take out lighting effects and add aliasing to video. Just watch the video. Believe me these guys are legit. As a matter of fact I go to there site every Friday to watch them do head 2 heads live. You should check it out for your self.
double post :\
Yay, the PS3 version sucks! Let's all have a partey. Seriously, these comparison videos are getting stupid.
It's stupid but you can't help your self to look and comment. You contradict your self. I like comparisons and I feel they are necessary
ultimolu only likes them when the PS3 version comes out on top. Which happens once every 30th game or so. The truth hurts sometimes. Can't wait to play the superior version of Batman: Arkham Asylum. At least you get the Joker as a consolation prize.
The "truth"? I don't even own this game but it amuses how you guys can brag about superiority over a multiplatform game when we have yet to see any game that can surpass 1st party exclusives on the PS3. But keep disagreeing away. You're only amusing me even more. Comparison videos only creates flamewars and bragging rights. That's why they're getting stupid. I'll just "lol" at you Soda.
Comparisons are for fanboys, a true gamer plays it on any platform it's on not giving a rats ass about the graphics.
You guys are so funny. I own both consoles and the difference rarely amounts to much. Multi-platform games are generally nothing special graphically in the first place and so how big of a deal is it if one looks 5% better? Whoopty doo! I buy some of my multiplats on the 360 and some on the PS3. Just depends on the game. If the PS3 gets a particularly bad port I will avoid it in favor of the 360 game, but generally other considerations are far more important to me. I think it is strange that nobody is even mentioning that the PS3 version has a notable feature that the 360 version lacks. Namely the ability to save gameplay clips to your harddrive and upload them to the internet. I would think this feature might be a bigger determiner of which version a person might get than whether one version looks 5% better.
Exactly. In the PS3 version you can record videos and upload them to Youtube while in the 360 version you cannot. Would you rather have an extra gameplay feature or near unnocitably better graphics?
I would of bought the PS3 version, but i found the 360 version for £15 less. Now i feel better, knowing the 360 version looks slightly better :|
for their infamous vs uncharted 2 comparison! haha
That'll be a war there, lol.
Infamous vs Alien Wake. PS3 will get spanked again. You have one good game on the PS3 Killzone 2. And that started being developed back when you mom was pretty. So you sound ridicules.
Killzone 2 Little Big Planet Uncharted Warhawk Heavenly Sword Ninja Gaiden Sigma Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots Gran Turismo 5 Prologue Rachet and Clank ...You were saying XBox Girl? One good game? I don't know where you came from but you have a very serious problem... C'mon, don't disagree. Prove me wrong.
"Alien Wake"? Is that the next Gears game? =P
my comment was meant as a joke.. take it easy lol no need for weak insults haha btw saying "you sound ridicules" sounds ridiculous
please dont down the "list as many PS3 exclusives as you can think of" route. I thought you were better than that
Lens of subjective truth, why can't you compare exclusives lol.
If they compared exclusives, it becomes even more subjective. There is no doubt in my mind that the PS3 has the better looking exclusives. It's just that in the grand scheme of a gaming library those are a small number. If you own both systems it is a simple choice. Buy exclusives for both systems and all multi-platform games for the Xbox 360. That's the only way you will be guaranteed to play the games as the developer intended.
Very good point! I like you.
I agree to a point. I own both consoles, but I buy some multiplatform games on my PS3. I thought Dead Space looked slightly better on the PS3 and more importantly I like the way it controlled better on the PS3, so that is the console I got it for. My point is, a small graphical difference is only one of many consideration as to which version of a multiplatform game you decide to purchase. Right now I don't have Xbox Live because my subscription ran out and money is tight. To me both services offer basically the same experience and so a person like me might choose to get a multiplatform game on the PS3 simply because they know they will be able to play the game online no matter what. It really just depends on what you value.
oooo 360 looks slightly better.....Compare uncharted to gears 1 and 2....I make my case. Anyway we all know the ps3 dominates the 360 in graphics and sound so why argue. plus...this game got lackluster reviews so why do we even care?
I love the way these guys define the "best HAWX experience on a console" by graphics alone! Forget the added features (like Youtube uploading), graphics are all that matters. EDIT - @ jaidek: I never said they didn't mention it, but they clearly imply that extra features are meaningless in face of improved graphics and I just don't see it that way. @ Xboxgirl: You trying to break the record of most ignored user on N4G or something?
They did mention that in their article. I do think that it is a very slick feature, but more of a novelty than anything. But that is something that we won't be seeing on the Xbox 360 any time soon. Not until MS decides to loosen their protective grip on Xbox Live.
LOL still at the PS3 2.5 years after its launch it can't win. "Xbox 360 wins with flying colors, soaring in with sharper textures, more lighting effects and less aliasing. On a positive note the PS3 and Xbox 360 color palette where very close. " "Xbox 360 owns the sky in this latest Head2Head. While the PS3 version did perform on par with the Xbox 360 version, missing lighting effects, inferior textures and a 21 minute mandatory install makes the Xbox 360 this Head2Head Top Gun. " Meh meh meh the PS3rd this gen.
Finally someone with brains!
Then why do you own one? See, I can do the same thing too. MEH, MEH, MEH, THE XBOX 360 CAN'T EVEN BEAT TEH WII. Grow up Mart.
Why do you care Juuken? MEH MEH MEH YOU SEEM OVEROBSESSED BY ME I've said this so many times but it seems it can't be getting through. I just bought the PS3 actually for one game to play. LBP. Just because I wanted to play that game. The hardware itself still stinks in my eyes, wrong decisions from Sony. Can you please store it in that brains of yours for once?
You're such a stinking fanboy, theMart. I have both consoles and they both have their pluses and minuses. The 360 tends to perform somewhat better on multiplatform games and PS3 exclusives are overall the best looking games I have seen. So they both excel in certain areas. We all know why the PS3 sometimes gets inferior multiplatform games and it has nothing to do with the PS3 hardware "stinking". If you want to use a term like "stinks" I think it would better apply to the 360 hardware (at least in terms of reliability). I mean, I have had my 360 die on me 3 times and I think that is pretty ridiculous.