SCEA's Kaz Hirai breaks PlayStation 3 software price silence

Those wondering how much they'll be shelling out for PlayStation 3 software were given a morsel of information today, as an interview conducted with Sony Computer Entertainment America boss Kaz Hirai broached the company's line on the potentially thorny subject.
In an interview with US magazine PSM, Hirai explained, "...generally speaking, over the past twelve years or so, there has been a consumer expectation that disc-based games are maybe $59 on the high end to $39 on the low end. So, what I can say now is, I think it would be a bit of a stretch to think that we could suddenly turn around and say "PS3 Games now $99.99."" outlined Hirai.

"I don't think consumers expect software pricing to suddenly double," he continued. "So, the quick answer is that we want to make it as affordable as possible, knowing that there is a set consumer expectation for what software has cost for the past twelve years. That's kind of the best answer I can give you. So, if it becomes a bit higher than $59, don't ding me, but, again, I don't expect it to be $100."

Read Full Story >>
news.spong.com
Jak4ever6504d ago

Im a Loyal Playstation consumer (although i do have a 360 now, cant pay $600 dollars for a console) but.. il be dammed if im going to pay an average of 69 to 89 dollars a game!!!! Sony better be smart on this one!

God I hope the game prices are at least reasonable!!!

andy capps6504d ago

He said $39-$59, so it sounds like the same as the Xbox 360. It's about what I expected, except that I don't expect any to be $39.99 unless they're party type games like Singstar, DDR, Eye of Judgment, etc. Most, if not all games, will probably be $59.99.

greenlynxx6504d ago

You are incorrect. When he was discussing the 39.99 to 59.99 prices he was refering to customer expectations. When he was speaking in reference to what the actual price of the PS3 games will be he said, "So, if it becomes a bit higher than $59, don't ding me, but, again, I don't expect it to be $100." So your conclusions are based on an incorrect reading of the article.

ACE6504d ago

sony are greedy wanker$ ...

i have woke up from there trance thank god for that .... this is old ne way the price is ment to be around $60....$75 so later to sony lol with there beta ray disc with mpeg2 what a joke

greenlynxx6504d ago (Edited 6504d ago )

That sounds alot like he is preparing us for games priced slightly higher than the $59.99 pricing structure available for their competition. I'm guessing $64.99 to $69.99.

Schmitty076504d ago

If they are going to be regular price as the 360's (59,49) why wouldn't he just tell us? Because they aren't. Maybe not by much like you said, 64.99 and 69.99.

tatical6504d ago

I read somewhere that all games will be on Blu-Ray disc. If so, I'd expect to pay at least $70 (most 360 games are $60 DVDs). If you're willing to pay for a PS3, then the higher priced games shouldn't be a problem.

TheMART6504d ago

I think slightly higher will be 79 dollars for sure.

That will get a hell of an expensive console then. Damn. A console + 2 games + 1 extra controller:

830 Euro's or so

OMG

That's a 360 premium, with 1 extra controller with at least 6 games, even maybe 7

greenlynxx6504d ago

I hope they don't price games at $79.99. It is hard to imagine how they will be able convince the average joe to shell out that kind of cash for a game that they can get on the competition's machine for $20 bucks less.

BOOSTIN6504d ago

i dont trust this KAZ punk. why wont they be honest and just hit us with prices. ohhh thats right, the last time they gave us a price it scared off half their customers. PWNED!

NitrogenB6504d ago

did you just pull that figure out of your butt?? that is pure speculation, $89? where exactly did you get that from...."..that prob means 89.99 PER GAME!" Dude, shut up...go home, and slam your face into a WALL.

beaucauchemar6504d ago (Edited 6504d ago )

And the PS3 was originally expected to be $399. I would be surprised if any PS3 games turned out to be less than $80 out of the gate. Tell me (based on Sony pricing so far) that I'm wrong...

The 360 vs. PS3 is turning out to be like a V8 Vantage vs. DB9 debate. Sure the Vantage is $50,000 less but are you really losing anything? :)
-Beau

Show all comments (140)
90°

10 Weirdest Video Games of All Time

Plenty of unforgettable games have completely messed up their players throughout the years, all the way back from the PS1 days to the dark recesses of the modern internet.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
JonTheGod8h ago

Why are the Katamari games not on the list??

130°

70 percent of devs unsure of live-service games sustainability

With so many games fighting for players' attention and interest losing out over time, time sink games are at risk of eventually losing steam.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
thorstein1d 4h ago

It was worrisome to begin with.

It's a niche genre with only a handful of hits that can stand the test of time.

Cacabunga7h ago

I like the sound of that!! I will for sure never support these gaas games.
Sony must be shocked at gamer's reaction, making them cancel a few of these and hopefully go back to the good heavy hitters they had us used to..
now bring on that PSPro reveal and show us some SP 1st party awesomeness.

CrimsonWing691d 3h ago

What’s to be unsure of!? Look at the ratio of success to failure!

DarXyde10h ago

It's pretty ridiculous.

Imagine having a breadth of data at your disposal to see the statistically low success rate of these games, only to be laser focused on the exceptional case studies.

shinoff21831d 2h ago

Yes. Stop all the live service bs.

jznrpg1d 2h ago

Only a few will catch on. You need a perfect storm to be successful in GaaS and a bit of luck on top of that. But a potential cash cow will keep them trying and some will go out of business because of it.

MIDGETonSTILTS171d 1h ago

Helldivers 2 manages just fine…

Keep production costs low… don’t just make custscenes until the mechanics and enemies are perfected first.

Make so much content that you can drip extra content for years, and the game already feels complete without them.

Most importantly: make weapons, enemies, levels, and mechanics that will stand the test of 1000 hours. This might require more devs embracing procedurally generated leveled, which I think separates Helldivers 2 from Destiny’s repetitiveness.

Show all comments (15)
60°

The Battle Pass Is The Worst Thing To Happen To Modern Gaming

Nameer from eXputer: "Some exceptions aside, I don't think the battle pass is a net positive for gaming with how they're implemented in most live service titles."

got_dam1d 6h ago

Battle passes AND meta gaming both.

DivineHand1251d 4h ago (Edited 1d 4h ago )

I like the way Helldivers 2 does battle passes. It allows you to make purchases on each level of the battle pass and gives you the option of choosing which item to unlock first. The more purchases you make using medals the further you progress. There is no timer and you can earn medals towards purchasing stuff via personal orders and Major orders.

I haven't played much live service games that have battle passes but I remember some games that have battle passes where you progress through it linearly using an exp system. What makes it really bad is that the battle pass will have like 50 or more levels with the cooler stuff being closer to the end. They also have an in-game shop that sells exp boosters so you can reach the end of the pass before it refreshes. Everyone ilse will have to grind their way through.

lucian2291d 3h ago

battle pass in fortnite is perfect; buy one and it buys the rest for every other season as it gives you more money than the first cost. so 8.50 and season ends with you getting 13.00, it pays for the next and you have some pocket change to save up for cash shop. All of which is optional