GameTrailers.com returns to Cyrodiil once again to give you a look at the difference in environments while riding horseback through the countryside.
Ps3 once again has blury frames in the background and were is the shade variation on the ground. It is bright everywhere. Poor color. But what do you expect me to say I love the 360 so I point out PS3 flaws.
but i was distracted by unending "Loading Area..." messages on 360 and few towers popping up later on the same platform.
now... i'm trying to see the landscape on 360 now.. ooops! "Loading Area..." again.
GOD DAMN THE 360 LOOKS SO MUCH MORE DETAILED.IT TOOK REALLY LONG TO PORT IT TOO.I WOULD BE MAD IF I OWNED A PS3.
The colors are darker in the 360 versions but the detail isn't better. I can see more detail on the castle in the background of the PS3. I can also see the CLOUDS better on the PS3. There's +'s and -'s for both platforms. Jesus these threads are lame and all the fanboyism is lame.
NEXT UP: WHICH CONSOLE GIVES OFF BETTER REFLECTION?
"ladies and gamers, once again we welcome you to 'which console is better' series.. this time we'll be checking which console gives off better reflection. now that both the consoles (elite and ps3) are going be black in color.. in which one will be able to see your face and comb your hair before you go out for a date? that is if you have a life."
shucks! more fodders guys!!!
Everything in the 360 version looks sharper, the colours are better my god
The PS3 version came a full year later and still has it's washed out colours. For real it must be something with the GPU, always the same problem with every game. And do go talking about the TV settings because why is that with every single game over and over again? Always the TV on the PS3 settings are wrong?
Watch the trees, watch the buildings, in the distance and up close. The 360 has the best graphics. I find it so amusing and on the same time it would worry me if I was up to buying a 600 dollar console, and one would know that in every single game in the future crossplatform you would get the lesser version
PS3 wins this one but the differences are not big.
I've seen other comparisons of the two versions and I think the Ps3 version looks crisper and cleaner. Also it had more detail for example on the King's face when they showed the dungeon scene.
Clean your eyes. PS3 had no loading and the while it's not as colorful, its far more detailed.
they got rid of the annoying loading text, it still loads on ps3.
Your as retarded as your name, I own both systems and must say I love the PS3 oblivion over the 360, and yes I have both versions. The PS3 is clearer, brighter, better detail and very crisp in graphics. Those videos you see are not that great, I suggest going out getting a PS3 and judging for yourself, stop making half minded comparisons of a system you know nothing about. When you grow up and your down sitting on Uncle Bill (gates) lap, come over to sony maybe there will be a "home" for you
I wonder themart. Did you go and look at the eurogamer comparison of most of the cross-platform games? Did you listen to what the site "360fanboys" said about the ps3 version of oblivion? Or are you just seeing what you want to see?
Why do you even ask? TheMART is not even trying to be unbias, he just wants to piss off the other side. And people see what they want to see.
I think both versions are 99% same. Differences there are so little that a different television / monitor could do more.
for you mart, Gamespot (biased xbox 360 site) said the graphics are better on Ps3, further draw distance and much shorter loading. Even gamespot said it LOOKS BETTER ON PS3. THE END
Majority of these games coming out lately are all 360 ports onto ps3..i`ll love to see how a ps3 game being ported onto the 360 looks like..
The only difference I see is that the color is more vivid in the 360 than the PS3 but the PS3 has no loading in the same areas the 360 players travel to.
After all I have heard over the last coming months I was kinda scared to watch that video to show the differences but now I have seen it I don't know what all the fuss is about! The differeces are minute and to be honest I was expecting a lot more from the PS3 and it's mighty cell. what a laugh!!
It looked like the Cell had a pretty easy time handling the game to me. How many times did you see the PS3 version turn choppy or even have to load? In terms of processing, the PS3 completely put the 360 to shame here. Graphics are arguable, but they look a bit cleaner, and much more detailed on the PS3 version to me. In this video, the colors did look more vivid on the 360 though.
We've been shown dozens of these videos, funny how every single one of them - apparently they adjusted their TV's to make the 360 look better?
Kinda sad implying that.
The 360 looks better hands down - but the PS3 loads quicker, which is important for this game. But I'd rather have it look that good and load on me for a second.
natural calibration requirements of Component vs. HDMI video feeds. This is actually why we see the EXACT same difference in contrast levels for every 360/PS3 comparison video of multiplatform games.
It's not like it's done on purpose to sabotage one or the other.
DJ seems to me making contribution to a lot of things here. None have what I can see nail him for being a flame baiter (for a while at least), still he has one bubble. Seems as a knowledged person too.Very frustrating.
Just had to vent it so dont put too much meaning to anything. A seemingly intelligent person gets silenced is my conclusion?
and that isnt counting having to pay for the game, another $65.00 + the HDMI cable that should come packaged with the PS3( no clue what that costs...i'm guessing $19.95 but I could be wrong), but doesn't. that ontop of a slower frame rate..witch apparently i'm the only one to point that out. Not to mention the fact that even though the ps3 doesn't say it's loading the area, it still is, and it still lags when doing so. look i've tried to talk myself into a ps3 but every time one of these videos come out all I can think about is how SONY swore that there would be an enormous difference in graphics between both of its competitors, and I am just not seeing this ENORMOUS difference. The difference is not a $300.00 dollar difference. " well ps3 has the blueray..blah blah.." thats all good, but when the ps3 goes out in two years because you have been watching all your movies through it, and are complaining about having to fix it or buy another or you wont be able to play the new exclusive to ps3 [insert some over hyped square enix game here] game, i'll be laughing all the way to my xbox 360 HD DVD player, and then when i'm done watching whatever HD movie I want be it porn or what have you ( blueray "wont support the porn industry") i'll put in Mass Effect, or Halo 3, or blue dragon, or bioshock or....get ready for this one LOL DEVIL MAY CRY 4 and enjoy my perfectly fine 360 experience beautiful xbox live and all. the day I buy a ps3 over a 360 is the day they are cheaper than the Wii until then my set up is the Wii360. ok I have to go download some HD movies now. later.
get a job
I have a job where I work 40 hours a week, and I got to college. heh..still dont mean I wanna spend $700 bucks on a console and 1 game lol.
Yes because people are buying a system just to play oblivion.
**edit** The comparisons do not show off any POWER differences between the two CONSOLES. They want them to be comparable, not have favoritism.
Both consoles can do much better graphics so this mutes this conversation.
no that is what this whole thread is about the comparison ps3 vs. 360, did you not read the headline of the link?
and will crap out in less than a year just from updating it..now that`s just awesome lol
Well the Xbox 360 version has more colour to it than the PS3 version but the PS3 version has les loading times. Great game none the less, i just gotta complete it on my Xbox 360.
Too bad the game doesn`t end. It`s like the never ending story of games.
lol that was funny "Loading Area...", but i have to admit the lighting is a bit better in the xbox360 version, dont you think?
Once again the xbox 360 looks more colorful and vibrant,the ps3 seems to be more washed out and grayed...could this be because that the gpu in the 360 is far superior,remember the rsx gpu was yesterdays tech as where the 360 gpu is the real next gen,but the ps3 has the cell cpu but its all about graphics and this is where the 360 shines folks...
I think you'd be interested in this: http://www.n4g.com/News-314...
ps3 vs 360. It's a good read.
I find it amusing that whenever there is no difference or the ps3 wins...everyone says "these comparisons are pointless" and then when they think the 360 looks better they say "the ps3 is the weaker console". Bit sad actually
Warwill - when I buy the ps3 I am not buying it for cross-platform titles. Cross platform titles will always look the same or comparable on each system. That is not the point. If i buy a system I buy it for its exclusive titles - and I'm afraid to say I am more excited about the titles coming to the ps3. Any 360 owner or fanboy who says all the games coming to the 360 are better have failed to research what is coming to the ps3 or either feel they prefer the games coming to the 360. That is fine. But just back off mate, because I want Heavenly Sword, I want Uncharted, I want MGS4, I want Lair, I also want cross-platform games - I can only afford one console, so I will get the same products. But I will enjoy the exclusives and the service I get with the console of my choice.
Ask a cross-platform developer, why would they want their product to be completely different on each platform. They would not - if they wanted this they would make an exclusive title. Now why don't you think about what you are saying before throwing that sh*t around.
Deepbrown, you can honestly say that you would have no buyers remorse after buying a ps3 when you get the same stuff on the 360?
ps3 got 360 games ,360 got ps3 games thats the way it goes.although 360 has gotten alot of ps3 games so what ps3 still has more killer exclusives than 360.i would feel regret if i baught a 360 thinking on how ms is spending all their money trying to get ps3 exclusives while their console s hardware could barely survive a year.and their first party killers lag faaaaar brhind sony n nintendo
but anyway the 360 looks dark, and the PS3 looks lighter thats all
no need to cry over it women.
that there is almost no difference between the two - except that in the PS3 version they disabled the annoying 'Area loading' text.
If you want the true Oblivion experience - get it for the PC!! It is MUCH better on the PC. Not to mention the awesome mods for it. Consoles are great, but the PC always offers a better experience.
I am really tired of these posts.....the bottom line is play your console and have fun with the game...those minor differences in the game doesn't have anything to do with the actual game play.....
I think gametrailers likes making these trailers to improve traffic on there site.
The pop up loads are annoying on the 360 but the 360 has better colors and the grass and the ground have better detail while the PS3 looks kind of washed out and almost looks as if it's struggling to push the same detail that the 360 is pushing! Still both games look so identical that the experience will be exactly!
game developers now days are depending alot on shimmering graphics for an excuse for good graphics. while both versions do have their fair share of shimmer graphics, i think the 360 has a little bit more of that shimmering/smearing graphics. the ps3 one is just sharper. the 360 is alot like Gears of war graphics with the contrast and shimmer/smear. along with the loading times, i say the ps3 version has the edge. but the difference in graphics is really so small its hardly worth debating over.
I think both look damn near the same and my hats off to Bethesda for making a really good game. Also..the reason you see loading area.. on the 360 and not the PS3 is because the game puts 4+gigs on the PS3 HDD. It really helps with the loading.
Like every other comparison like this, they look nearly identical. The PS3 version does look slightly better, and while it is more significant than most other multiplatform games- it still isn't a big deal. What IS a big deal, though, is the superior performance of the PS3 version. Not only did the 360 have to load up areas that the PS3 was capable of handling without doing so, it also experienced some nasty hitches. I think this has a lot more to do with the PS3's hardware compared to the 360's than the graphics change does.
So with an extra year in development, the devs managed slightly better load times balanced with worse colors and shading?
Nice. Really shows the power of the PS3.
That makes me wanna go out and spend $200 more for a POS ps3. I mean if I spend an extra $200 dollars own something it better look as different as the wii and xbox 360.
The 360 version seems to have more detailed textures and better shading, but it's kind of hard to make a detailed comparison at this resolution...
boring, just play the game.
I'd really be excited to see the suttle differences become more pronounced on the Xbox 360 after the patch.
The xbox 360 version is slightly better now, but will it be even greater after?
I've never seen oblivion in motion before and I must say that the game is really beautiful. I can see why they wanted to remake it.
Oh but I must say that the PS3 version looks rather blurred when compared to the 360 version.
I'm a wii gamer so that was unbiased.
The colors look much richer on the 360.
Colors look over saturated on the 360 giving it a more cartoony look. Rocks and stones are not suppose to be that colorful. Also, some of the finner details are lost in the dark constrast. Someone once stated that it's the 360's graphics card that is making natural colors appear more vivid. Well in some cases, this isn't always a good thing.
Don't fool around with the tiny video version, that's not even a real comparison, watch the HD version: http://www.gametrailers.com...
I am an avid PC gamer and own what you would call 'next gen' GFX cards from both manufacturers (an ATI 700 and an Nvidia 7900). The difference you see between the two machines is also noticeable on the latest gfx cards, i.e ATI cards run with a higher contrast... I was a little alarmed when I played CS:Source with my new 7900: - the colours looked more vibrant with the ATI card... This 'problem' however is nothing that can't be sorted with a little tinkering of your TV/Monitor settings (brightness, gamma, contrast, colour etc..).
I personally feel that in the video the xbox's (ATI) shadows had too hard a drop off, losing detail on the clothes and on the horse (again just my opinion).
Now we come to FPS drop and load stuttering. I beleave from what i've seen and what the developers have said that the PS3 cpu handles the games loading a lot better and this has aloud for more detail to be added. I have to say from experience of building my own PCs that a better CPU makes more difference than any other component. Paring a lower end budget card with a fast CPU will still give you some really good frame rates.
I see the PS3 showing some real improvements in the future, Sony again like the last console they brought to us have made their machine difficult for developers to code. This isn't such a bad thing as it adds some longevity to the console (people will still be going wow years to come, think GOW).
Lastly: Who wants a one console world anyway?
GOOD LUCK TO BOTH MICROSOFT and SONY
lets see a fierce price war, not to mention GREAT games
great comment, respect! i think exactly the same, nothing that couldnt be solved with calibrating the PS3/TV...
I don't understand the fuzz about "RICH" colors, i personally like how the PS3 looks in this case and in some more, cause it looks more real in the colors perspective..
I don't like having too many strong colors on a game it takes the reality away from it from my point of view.. If the game takes place on TimeSquare, in the city of Japan or in the Willy Wonka Chocolate Factory then give me LIVE and RICHER colors, but is not..
I like it that way cause it looks more real, if i wanted rich colors i'll buy crayons.. I sincerely like that about the PS3..
Don't care if is a GPU problem, it looks more real, like i said: FROM MY POINT OF VIEW.
PARDON MY ENGLISH
I am an xbox owner and I do love it but I kinda like the PS3 subdued colors it looks more lifelike to me. Really though I can see the "mine is better than yours" arguements tapering off recently. The two consoles are doing te same thing giving us great games and killer graphics. It really is just a matter of taste with regard to the controllers and exclusives and noone can tell someone else they are wrong in what they enjoy.
If the 360 is so great then why do they keep milking Halo for every penny. After Halo 3 they knew they would bomb so they created Halo Wars. Gimme a break MS. When the PS3 1st party titles start to drop that will slow the sell of the 360 greatly. Thats why Bill is throwing money at as many companies as possible. Videogames are getting like politics and it's really sad.
A trilogy and a prequel made by ensemble. Why stop making one of the best selling franchises in gaming?????
Why did Square Enix make 13+ final fantasies?
And how did you get on this subject anyhow? Jealous???
xbox was much more of a single game console 360 though has a fare amount of decent games.but still spending money trying to get ps3 titles while your hardware still hass a lifespan of a green fly.there just using up all their resources while sce devoloping resources double theirs lemme see ms get those games
Look at how crisper the PS3 version looks. Also notice the more details on the dry cracked ground.
On that comparison the PS3 looks beautiful and it runs very smoothly..
You gotta give it to the PS3 on the fight scene too..
Much more comparative than this other trailer - and that's from the same GTV company! *LOL* talk about trying make a medial twist both ways. One better than XBOX and one worse (trying to) than XBOX. Hmm is that journalism in a nutshell or what?
THe ps3 version looks better this time....
I Cant stand the colors in the PS3 version. Yea the PS3 version is better in some things. Maybe a extra year.But please fix that color problem. The grass and trees on the 360 have it hands down.
Its close but the 360 has it for me.
Besides the color differences and loading times where that there was dynamic looking clouds on the PS3, but really when your in a oblivion gate fighting the daedra our you really going to care about a little sharper picture or are you going to worrie about bashing in that daedras skull. Think about that for a little bit
the sky is way better on ps3, but the colors look really nice on 360.
the best difference has to be no loading screens on ps3 though.
I think exclusives r going to have to be the best comparisons...because everything else will be made the same. if they make it better on one system, then that is bad reltions with the other system.
Anywho, did Bethesda leave the duplication glitch in the PS3 version?
say somthing or tick the disagree box without a reasonable explanaton
How can you tell on this crap video? im mean get real the pixels are as big as my thumb on this feed. show me a Hidef feed and then we shall compar
When did Zelda Twilight Princess get ported to the PS3 and 360???
On a serious note, they look damn-near identical to me, with the exception of a slightly greener tint on the 360, while it appears as if the PS3 version had the contrast cranked up a few notches.
One thing is certain: both the PS3 and 360 versions look considerably sharper and more detailed than the Wii version.
...(I couldn't resist!)
load times or not the 360s version looks better ,another game you Sony cats see with your own eyes thats just looks better on an 400$ system lol crazy !!