CGN Writes...
"But if OnLive works as well as I hope, will I get rid of my PS3, 360 and Wii? I'm not gonna lie, I thought about it. But then I thought, 'What would I do when Resistance 3 comes out? What will I do when the next Zelda comes out? What will I do when the next Gears comes out?'"
The friendly folks over at Razer recently sent us their full size Kishi Ultra mobile gaming controller, and this thing didn't disappoint.
VGChartz's Mark Nielsen: "Upon finally finishing Devil May Cry 5 recently - after it spent several years on my “I’ll play that soon” list - I considered giving it a fittingly-named Late Look article. However, considering that this was indeed the final piece I was missing in the DMC puzzle, I decided to instead take this opportunity to take a look back at the entirety of this genre-defining series and rank the entries. What also made this a particularly tempting notion was that while most high-profile series have developed fairly evenly over time, with a few bumps on the road, the history of Devil May Cry has, at least in my eyes, been an absolute roller coaster, with everything from total disasters to action game gold."
Me leaving it out should be telling of my thoughts on it. Better than 2 as a DMC game.
Still a good game though.
3,1,4,5 to me, never played 2. 5 gameplay is amazing but level design was really disappointing to me, just a bunch of plain arenas, the story felt like a worse written rehash of the 3rd and the charater models looked weird ( specially the ladies ). Another problem with 5 was that there was not enough content for 3 charaters so I could never really familiarize with any of them
2.
Dmc.
4.
5.
1.
3.
God DMC2 was an awful game.
And in case this isn't obvious it goes worst to best
Order changes depending on your focus. I tend to focus on gameplay/fun factor, so...
5, 3, 1, 4, 2.
I really didn't like 4 but commend Dante's weapon diversity. The retreading of old ground was pretty unacceptable to me.
But even then... Still more enjoyable than 2 for me
The Epic Games Store continues to dish out free games and you can add two more to your library this week.
Wait and see mode right now. If they can truly pull this one off and have it work, I will be one of the first to plunk down my cash, especially if it is a reasonable price. The idea of this makes me a happy camper, now I just wait for the results.
I am in a wait and see mode for now. I personally don't believe they will be able to pull it off as well as they say they will; however, for now, I will give them the benefit of the doubt. Anyways, it will not affect me one way or the other since I doubt I will subscribe to the service. I like my consoles and the benefits each has.
How many gamers will be able to play on one server with 1080p graphics and how much bandwidth would it take. Service may look good as a demo with the servers a few feet away from the set top box, but how will it perform with millions of users and miles of cable? This is not ready to happen yet. The United States doesn't have the high speed internet capability quite yet. There are download caps in other countries. This service has many obstacles to overcome before it works in the real world. Including making people feel ok about giving away their money for a license to play, not a copy of the game. Money gone, no trade in value.
is really live require internet connection to play it ? and its all about streaming ??
if it is then its sucks
no internet = no games?
....