CheapyD from CheapAssGamers.com tells Capcom and other devs how it is when it comes to ripping off consumers with DLC packs so close to launch.
The Street Fighter series has a long history, but which are the seven best games the franchise has yet offered to gamers?
After Street Fighter II released in in 1991, it caused a fighting game explosion, both in arcades and in home consoles. But, as the decade ended, and arcades were failing, so too were 2D Fighting games. This is how Street Fighter IV completely revitalized the genre.
I'd say Blazblue helped too. Didn't care for Street Fighter 4, but Blazblue was amazing during that time. Sad that the series kind of went downhill after the first 2 or 3 games though.
BlazBlue was the much better, more technical game..and a real 2D Fighting Game after all. But yes, since it was a big name..the characters were still popular and the game itself was good, SFIV indeed helped a lot. However, I am pretty sure the much better-selling Mortal Kombat 9 would have been done without SFIV as well..and that one truly helped to make the fighting game genre in general more popular again.
eyyy max xD
one of the very few streamers i can actually watch without it being cringe and awful ha.
The content of IV was severely lacking when it launched. It got better over time.
In the same interview at EGX 2019 recently, Capcom and Street Fighter producer Yoshinori Ono responded to a fan question asking if there were any plans to bring the fourth or fifth entries in the series to the Nintendo Switch.
they botched SFV so bad, just start over, make a new version with proper single player mode and fully fleshed out with support for all of the consoles this time.
Did you see how Ultra and the Collection sold? We don't need to convince Nintendo of anything. Just put it on the console.PHYSICALLY.
You’re not seeing Street Fighter V come to other platforms besides PC because Sony helped co-fund the game so it’s staying only on PS4 & PC
That doesn't makes sense. Is Nintendo saying that Capcom can't publish the game on the system because it's users don't want the game? if so, that's really stupid of them, because why should they care?
Nintendo isn't saying such things of course.
Capcom shouldn't pass the buck. If they don't want to make more SF games on the Switch, then just say so, and say why.
If they want Nintendo to fund the project, then they are the ones that need to convince Nintendo to give them money.
He has every right to have his opinion and complain, but I have to say, what a cry baby! If you don't like it, either ignore it or vote with your wallet and don't buy any DLC.
It's Capcom's business if they want to charge or not. If he were the one who could earn an extra $1 million by putting some more work in designing bonus costumes, I doubt you'd hear any $0.02 complaints.
A few years ago these costumes would have been unlockables. Now they are DLC with a price tag. It's a scam and it really sucks that companies are doing this because they are no longer selling a complete game, they are taking pieces out and charging you for them to make more money in the long run. Another perfect example - Prince of Persia. When I beat it, I just had a feeling this couldn't be the end. Can it? Now there is new DLC, so apparently it was not.
In a funny way it seems like we've sacrificed unlockable items and cheat codes for trophies and achievements.
In the defense of Street Fighter there is the outfits you unlock for use in HOME which is a pretty creative advertising idea.
xbots LOVE to pay for DLC for their new games from you, while later down the line PS3 owners get all that DLC ALREADY in the game. Same exact thing happened with Lost Planet. 360 owners had to pay for a couple map packs as DLC and when the ps3 version hit shelves later, it came with all those packs. God Blademask is such a f!cking retard.
LOL love the title of this thread. Although i agree i sadley will be giving into Capcom and will only be buying the female costume pack when it arrives.