GamePire writes: "This Shooter is to redefine PS3-Games, but can it justify the Hype?" Note: Score is only for singleplayer-mode. They weren't able to test the multiplayer part as of now.
GG are hiting F5 for numbers!! So where are they?
do they just review the single player when its only half of the game. if they did the whole game it would be a 178/100.
you think they will add two scores for SP and MP to a score final score over 100%. thats ridiclious. I think they will give it an average-score of singleplayer and multiplayer when they had the chance to play the multiplayer online. when the multiplayer is as good or even better than die singleplayer, than the score will definitely be around the 90%, maybe a bit higher maybe a bit lower...
i was just being silly for the sake of it.
maybe if they review the multiplayer and give it a 99, they will add the score of the singleplayer review and the multiplayer review then get the average of those 2 scores. example: 99+89=188, 188/2= 94. so the final review score of the game is 94. but i'm not sure how they do it.
And sTewgart knows this because clearly he has been playing it for months online. Man, talk about Blind Faith. I got an advance copy and I can`t even take it online yet but I can tell you for sure that the single player is a great experience, but nothing revolutionay, besides the amazing graphics ofcourse. Really wish I could take it online...stupid 4002 error code.
you don't need to have played it to know that the score will go up after the multiplayer, its not like they are gonna take points off of it...
I hate when people don't review the full game. When you pay 60 bucks for this game, you're getting a single-player game AND a multi-player game. Most people are going to put the majority of their time with this game into the multi-player. Therefore it's unfair to judge it based solely on the single-player. It's not reflective of the value of the actual product that people will be spending their money on. We need some STANDARDS for the reviewing process for God's sake!
if u can't review the complete game then what's the point of doing it? FPS are not well known for big story-telling. you have to take note that and wait until you get all the features the game comes with and then u can give your opinion. Well i really don't care about reviews at this point, i know the game is the best freaking first person shooter i will ever play and im glad i just bought a 1080p sony bravia. cheers PS: does anyone know where i can buy the PSN Cards in Canada?
Well the embargo's were set up in such a way that technically everyone was reviewing half the game because of the multiplayer experience.
I'm already picking this shiiit up at midnight. I was gonna pick up Street Fighter today then I thought I am going to spent so much time playing killzone2 online with friends I wont have time for any other game hehe
I am sick of reviewers giving this masterpiece below 9
have you played it?
YES, and masterpiece is a MASSIVE understatement!
89/100 for the singleplayer campaign is real good actually. Many games doesnt even get that with fully reviews. Good score imo.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.