NYCC: Battlefield 1943 Price, Size, Release Details

While speaking with Battlefield 1943 producer Gordon Van Dyke at New York Comic Con, Blend Games learned what you should expect to pay for the Xbox Live Arcade/PSN/PC shooter, if it'll fit on your hard drive, and whether or not you'll be able to buy it in stores.

Read Full Story >>
The story is too old to be commented.
360 PIMP3565d ago

its gonna be suck anyway

EvilCackle3565d ago

I dunno, footage looked pretty good.

Montrealien3565d ago

Welcome to N4G 360 pimp, just curious, how many accounts have you created here? And why...just why?

/on topic

1943 looks like the sh*t, I still play 1942 and all it`s mods now and then, it`s a great multiplayer sandbox shooter.

TheIneffableBob3565d ago

1943 is probably going to suck because of 24 players, regenerating health, unlimited ammo, and no Medic class.

TheBand1t3565d ago (Edited 3565d ago )

I mean, really? Maybe It's just me, but I'd rather have 64 player battles with infantry classes that DON'T have regenerating health and DON'T have infinite ammo, and I sure as hell don't like the fact every infantry class has some form of anti-vehicle weapon.

Battlefield 2, for all it's quirks, is the last true Battlefield in my opinion. At least it had mod support. Infantry shouldn't be allowed to attack tanks if their CLASS wasn't supposed to be equipped as such.

Point of Existence 2, Forgotten Hope 2, Project Reality, and AIX mods for BF2 make a good game even better, and I doubt this POS is gonna have mod support.

EvilCackle3565d ago

People are getting too hung on on the 24 player thing. That seems pretty decent for an XBLA/PSN game that's only gonna be a fraction of the price of a normal retail game.

Uncommon Calibur3565d ago

I dunno, i loved BF 1942 and BF2, but I have to say that the titan battles in 2142 were really epic. That game was a ton of fun.