Killzone 2 review from Planet PlayStation (Ger) Pros Best Graphics ever Incomparable "film" Feeling Fast Paced Multiplayer mode Negatives No Coop mode Secondary weapon not freely selectable
Great no game is perfect these scores are just right
Who lowered my grade hey no everyone is gonna give 10s as much as i want them too
is crushing planets. lol @ negatives....those are so acceptable....GO KILLZOWN GO! Can't wait to see the SuperBowl commercial (hopefully)
IF HL3 won`t have co-op, it won`t be a masterpiece too? Anyway, good score, but this game is not just GREAT, it`s a MASTERPIECE. =)
I agree! co-op is like a must for gamers nowadays but when HL2 didn't have co-op I didn't hear people bragging about it! I knew that reviewers will drag score from KZ2 just for that very reason but still, it was not a problem for HL2 and even CoD4! these reviewers need to be consistent or their opinions will only be seen as biased!
AAA baby,damn it feels good not to own a _ _ _ _ box
oh MY GOD WHATS With co-op >>>>???? does it have to be planted every fps game comon this game does not need co-op, will be cool if it did but really doesnt need it ..callduty 4 doesnt have co-op so why this game should either
ME too man i've never enjoyed playing a single player campaign with half a screen, but however an online coop would be nice. i dont get why reviewers are complaing about coop like... it can easily be patched :S "Secondary weapon not freely selectable" well no S*** that adds more realism to the game unlike the first resistance when u could carry 12 weapons at a time made the game really easy :S
It's being con'd for lack of co-op? How is it being rated on something that it doesn't have, how does that make sense exactly? lol. Anyway, Co-op is being added later anyhow so I'm not really worried about nit-picking.
Confirmed by guerrilla games.
This is exactly what I am thinking of. It should be more focus in what the game DO have and wether it fails to deliver on that front or not. Not by giving a game lower score just because it doesn't have it. This is like rating GT5:P lower, for not having damage. It's BS. Anyways 9.1 is a awesome score even though we all know this game deserves better,
no co-op realy? REALY??????
If not tacking on co-op will lose you points, then I expect to see NO game ever get perfect 10's, unless the core game mechanics are centered around co-op. I still say nobody wants to give it a 10, so they blow up any small thing they can find, even things that don't work in the game's favor.
I'm going to downrate GT5 when it comes out because it doesn't have kit cars.
Everytime someone says no Co-op, they should say bot support right after it.
Yeah true. Since all these scared reviewers are trembling and finding something to nit-pick about KZ2 "no co-op" then expect them to never give a game a perfect score for not having co-op implemented. If another fps ever gets ignored for not having co-op then i'll officially go to each site and blast them for their double standards. This is ridiculous seriously. Fear2 better have co-op or else i don't expext it to get anywhere near a 8.5
bots make a game much, much, more fun
Even though KZ2 deserve more than that, i still happy.
I don't remember Bioshock ever losing points for not having co op.
Double standards ftw. And people don't even bring that Bioshock was built for single only because KZ2 campaign is built for single only.
KILLZONE 2 IS COVERING THE FPS ARENA. Just like the snow is covering the UK><
BIOSHOCK had no co-op and it got game of the year want to explain
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.