An Australian journalist writes an article, that in no uncertain words, trolls the company with an outdated and limited point. Sony's Aussie boss immaturely bites back and the journo gets arrogant.
VGChartz's Mark Nielsen: "Upon finally finishing Devil May Cry 5 recently - after it spent several years on my “I’ll play that soon” list - I considered giving it a fittingly-named Late Look article. However, considering that this was indeed the final piece I was missing in the DMC puzzle, I decided to instead take this opportunity to take a look back at the entirety of this genre-defining series and rank the entries. What also made this a particularly tempting notion was that while most high-profile series have developed fairly evenly over time, with a few bumps on the road, the history of Devil May Cry has, at least in my eyes, been an absolute roller coaster, with everything from total disasters to action game gold."
3,1,4,5 to me, never played 2. 5 gameplay is amazing but level design was really disappointing to me, just a bunch of plain arenas, the story felt like a worse written rehash of the 3rd and the charater models looked weird ( specially the ladies ). Another problem with 5 was that there was not enough content for 3 charaters so I could never really familiarize with any of them
2.
Dmc.
4.
5.
1.
3.
God DMC2 was an awful game.
And in case this isn't obvious it goes worst to best
Order changes depending on your focus. I tend to focus on gameplay/fun factor, so...
5, 3, 1, 4, 2.
I really didn't like 4 but commend Dante's weapon diversity. The retreading of old ground was pretty unacceptable to me.
But even then... Still more enjoyable than 2 for me
Plenty of unforgettable games have completely messed up their players throughout the years, all the way back from the PS1 days to the dark recesses of the modern internet.
With so many games fighting for players' attention and interest losing out over time, time sink games are at risk of eventually losing steam.
It was worrisome to begin with.
It's a niche genre with only a handful of hits that can stand the test of time.
Only a few will catch on. You need a perfect storm to be successful in GaaS and a bit of luck on top of that. But a potential cash cow will keep them trying and some will go out of business because of it.
Helldivers 2 manages just fine…
Keep production costs low… don’t just make custscenes until the mechanics and enemies are perfected first.
Make so much content that you can drip extra content for years, and the game already feels complete without them.
Most importantly: make weapons, enemies, levels, and mechanics that will stand the test of 1000 hours. This might require more devs embracing procedurally generated leveled, which I think separates Helldivers 2 from Destiny’s repetitiveness.
At this point Gaming media is no better than the soap scum on my shower door..
They provide nothing, absolutly nothing to the gaming community... A big middle finger to your and yours if you are parts of the plague known as the gaming community..
Now go write another non gaming article, bunch of non gaming writing wankers..
Oh and I hope with the recession we see a lot of these people go away.
There's freedom of speech & opinion .... & then there's Hirai. If your president displays all the symptoms of a delusional amnesiac on banana-acid then what do you expect !
is because if somehow Sony were found to be fixing the price point in Australia, then do you know how much sh1t they would be in? A court case followed by a massive fine and to an extreme the banning of all of their items being sold in Australia. Of course he is pissed, I would be to if some nobody was accusing my company of breaking the law, thats why like he said, he will be calling his lawyers
is completely unprofessional and shouldn't have happened. The Journalist is to blame for not doing his research but the Sony rep still shouldn't response in this manner. Lawyers yes. The people should be made an example as the allegations were quite serious.