Eurogamer has release a gallery comparison between the Xbox360 and PS3 version of the game F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin.
they both look like crap compared to a certain fps coming out in February also, but 360 looks better in most of the screen shots but not by very much
1. Killzone2. 2. Uncharted 3. Gran Turismo Prologue 4. Metal Gear Solid 4 5. Little Big Planet 6. Motorstorm 2 They were useful for dual console owners to see that the PS3 version ran at 1fps though, back in 2007. But now they all run relatively the same, a simple 'oh look, Kz2 owns all' will do. for future Xbox360 vs PS3 videos.
yeah exactly, i dont even care about multiplatform game comparisons anymore cause i know what the ps3 can do over the 360, devs just know how to program a pc aka 360, and most of the time they dont even use the spus only the ppu and the rsx which is not very smart oh well back to watching killzone 2 videos and drooling over my keyboard, looking at killzone is almost more satisfying than looking at my wife, yummmmmmyyyyyyy
At least thats what it looks like. The 360 version looks darker and some of the texture look better then the PS3 version. Other then that, it looks basically the same.
.. have better support for the PS3. Screw 'em. They ain't getting my money. F.E.A.R. 2 (the demo) kinda reminds me of Quake II on the PC.
Textures look about identical - kidding yourself if you think otherwise. It's really just basic ATI vs. Nvidia rendering at this point. One is darker one is lighter. Honestly it's comparing apples to apples. I like Grannysmith. Other's enjoy Macintosh. Life goes on. -C
I wonder who would buy this game for the ps3 with Killzone 2 around the corner.
Anyone remember the Europgamer Killzone 2 comparisons? LMAO! Epic business. I told you all this game was garbage. TGSI
The 360 version has better Lighting and textures. Over all they both look good.
Who cares. Killzone 2 pwns all.
They look the same. The only difference is that the 360 version has a more contrasted look. The colors on the 360 version are darker (which looks great), while the PS3 version is more natural (which also looks great).
Besides the contrast (which is irrelevant) the big differences are no AA on the PS 3 compared to 360 and the 360 is much sharper possibly even running at higher resolution - you can clearly see that on the small text and logos - they are clearly visible and sharp on the 360 where it's just a blurry mess on the PS 3.
I'm pretty bummed the two look a lot different, atleast companies like IW and Capcom make the games look exactly the same. Hopefully they will fix the PS3 version a little before release. To be honest, I dont find it acceptable to give any console the short end of the stick and it should be their duty to get the two versions as close as they can possible. Example, 1 person may buy the game for 360, for 60 bucks, for an awesome game, but another may buy the same game for PS3 with game breaking FPS drops *cough* valve *cough*. Oh and I know valve didnt make orange box for ps3..thats why its THEIR fault. If they are making a multiplat game, they need to show support for all platforms, not be douches about it.
This one seems to show the lighting in the PS3 version a little better. http://images.eurogamer.net...
When I played the PS3 demo earlier, my only thought was "grain". Why is it grainy? I've already said my piece about the controls though.
killzone 2 will keep you busy, not this half port game. remember the PS 3 port for the first????? what a poor job from the developers! good thing now they can not blame the PS 3 "lack of capabilities" what a joke.
I loved the first FEAR's single player...MP sucked...and yeah...the PS3 port was garbage... but seriously...watch videos of FEAR 1 compared to FEAR 2...some major areas in FEAR 1 look better to me...I know its the same engine anyway...and obviously the new volumetric blood is far more impressive...but the lighting seems very similar, and very dated...and the character models are complete trash... whatever...definitely rent this...as there are great and creepy single player moments I would imagine...but I almost feel bad for all these first person shooter devs having GG standing firmly on their purses...
I guess the way to go for this game is to buy it on the 360.
Do people actually buy 360 games these days? There was me thinking that the 360 sells well because of piracy, sheesh.
save ur loot for killzone 2, well that is if u have a ps3,if not buy a ps3 cause kz2 is the shiatz
and definitely will be picking up Killzone 2 but im sick of the hype around it. Game just looks good, 90% of these people havent even touched the game yet they some how know its godly. I mean can we just wait and wtf...why does Killzone 2 pop up for every FPS.
because its something that 4 years ago was determined by the media as IMPOSSIBLE Now we are witnesses of LeBron James and the mighty PS3
are you really asking 'why does killzone 2 pop up with every fps?'... think about that for a second...I don't know...this is a discussion about a graphics comparison on a shooter coming out next month...so its already related to graphics...and killzone 2 kind of looks like a PS4 game compared to this... killzone 2 is the peace maker of this genre...where normally threads like this would involve non stop 'teh 360 wins AGAIIINNNNN haha;ljds'...now killzone 2 just quiets anyone getting a little over zealous about graphical fidelity of some multiplatform game...
I agree 100%. Killzone 2 will be cool. Ok, but does that mean that people should all of the sudden not care about any of the other games coming out. I'm tired of seeing "who cares cuz KILLZONE 2 OMG!!!!!!"
Sorry guys, but I couldn't give a flying F*ck about a games graphics. YES, great graphics are an added bonus, but when your deciding on what games to play, it's all about the gameplay! While everyones moaning about FEAR 2's visuals, and while everyones wanking over Killzone 2's visuals - I'll be playing the god damn game.
@ person above. Lmao, another jumps on the "Graphics dont matter" bandwagon. ever realized that that has been growing ever so greatly ever since KZ2 started being shown? lmao. And just for you buddy, those playing KZ2, will be getting the Gameplay and the Graphics.
What do you mean, 'Graphics don't matter'? I said I PERSONALLY don't care about games visuals, but they matter! Just not as much as gameplay. I will be playing Killzone 2, so according to you i'll be 'getting the gameplay and the graphics'. I'm just saying that gameplay is WAY more important.
Playe this on both the PS3 and Xbox 360, I couldn't see any real differences
http://www.the-magicbox.com... EDIT: VISIT THE SITE AND READ THE AVAILABILITY BEFORE DESAGREEING LOL!!!
I thought it would be a Rickroll.
And that site is clueless. they have the publisher and the release dates wrong...
with KZ2. How can a video game website confused these two games?
that pictures with the Helghast snipers semi-disappearing is bad ass!!! I wish they had it bigger for a background!
2nd page...2nd picture down...look at that sky...and remember, that entire thing moves with procedural wind...
You guys are incredible!!!! You dont have sense of humor!! i didnt said anything bad yet some fanboys disagree with me!! LOL! To the rest who posted...This is the game who is now unrivaled graphycally speaking. I played FEAR 2 demo and its not a bad game. Its scared the hell aout of me and its only a demo, but frankly I dont know why some sites are praising this game's graphics. They are really crap and grainy. The AI is incredible but the graphics are no match for some of the best FPS this gen...imagine this graphics in comparison to CAPCOMS MULTIPLATFORM KILLZONE 2!! SORRY GUYS I COULDN RESIST!!! LOL!! Disagree all you want fans I will kill you all in the KILLZONE 2 multiplayer game!!!! LONG LIVE TO THE HELGAST!!!!
Looks like someone forgot to calibrate the brightness on the 360 version, everything is so dark or maybe it's calibrated for the 360 and not the PS3, something is off in brightness/contrast. Not sure which version it's supposed to look like.
Exactly what I thought, why so dark?
Aside from the PS3 version being brighter, I see no other real difference. You can change the brightness or contrast on your TV though so that shouldn't be a problem.
both look like sh1t
I think this game looks really good...but the fact it's going head-to-head with Killzone 2 isn't smart. I got fired from Gamestop today. AFTER I got fired, they asked if I wanted to reserve F.E.A.R. 2. I told them to go F&#K themselves and that I'm buying KZ2.
why did you get fired
He sold a PS3 without trying to convince the buyer to buy a 360 instead?
why? and what FEAR or KZ2 has anything to do with it? but I hope you get a new job soon! back to the topic, at least 360 only owners will have something to play while PS3 owners enjoy KZ2!
yeah seriously dude...did you get some customer interested in a PS3 by accident or something?... speaking of GS...sadly I pre-ordered killzone 2 at GS for the demo recently...while I poked fun of the guy for there being like 30 used copies of Gears 2 there (I simply asked, 'why would anyone return that, you guys always tell me its the greatest game ever created'?')...when I asked to pre-order killzone 2...he said 'PS3 or 360?'...I should have walked out...but still want that demo badly...
THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE (they played the 360 version on a darker setting) look at the box imiage they are exact same
They pics range from exactly the same to the ps3 having a bright glow because of the setting.
I can somewhat confirm this. I'm playing the demo right now and it absolutely looks nothing like those PS3 screenshots.
well most places confirmed that they do not use any of the HDMI 1.3x profile stuff the PS3 is capable of...as the 360 is HDMI 1.2, and does not support x.v.color or 'super white/black'...this made a giant crap fest over at GT, when the confirmed they didn't even use HDMI for the PS3 'as not all 360's have HDMI'...so everything was in component...which is wrong on so many levels...its not the PS3's fault that MS made a big mistake not including HDMI initially...one would think any credible comparison would involve having both systems display images to the very best of their ability...right? not sure if Eurogamer does this or not...and it doesn't really matter over all...as not all HDTV's support all those 1.3 additions...hell, its still hard to find a display that supports x.v.color for under $2k in a 'normal' size... but obviously...anyone with a good HDTV knows...if you have super white on...and 'HDMI Full' under the color settings selected...the contrast is completely different than what ALL of these comparisons always show...I have been playing this demo since last week...and it looks nothing like that washed out comparison...but have played the same demo on the 360 on the same TV, and it looks very similar to that comparison... 1 thing is for sure...the two are nearly identical no matter what anyone says...even in this comparison...the PS3 version is just 'whiter', as usual...its good that the PS3 didn't get another port like it did for FEAR 1..as that was nearly unplayable, and arguably the single lamest port the PS3 ever received...
He didn't put RGB on full-.- moron.
I don't get how they manage to avoid putting RGB on full:S I mean, check the difference! It's huge!
Just wanted to point out that RGB Full can crush your black levels. It can become a little too dark if you don't adjust your brightness level. RGB Limitied can make the image further 'washed' out but you can adjust contrast and brightness
Can you change the RGB, while in a game, with the XMB? Or, do you have to leave the game to do so?
It has to be set through the XMB (HDMI only)
They know the RGB is on limited, this is old mistakes, anyone remembers assassins creed???? why do they insist on playing on RGB limited, when the difference is so huge????
so.. do you guys have it on "full" or "limited"
not all tv's support RGB full...which is a color profile associated with HDMI 1.3... some websites confirmed that they do not do that for comparisons...as its 'unfair to the 360'...since the 360 only has HDMI 1.2 (if at all)... that never made sense to me...as GT confirmed exactly this last year...I would think that these sites would want to make each console display the game to the best of their ability...what was I thinking?... either way...anyone that owns a PS3 and sees these comparisons knows that the setting are not adjusted properly...some places argue that they don't use RGB Full because its 'not default'...of course its not, because a lot of HDTV's don't even support it...and if it doesn't support it...no image is displayed...HDMI isn't the default output either...so that logic is broken... but it overall makes little difference...it just makes the contrast more in line with the 360s...it can make the image overly dark if your television isn't set up for it properly...but it also makes whites much brighter...it just increases the contrast difference between white and black...and is a great feature if you have a display that supports it...
Strangely, having played the PS3 demo, i can clearly say the game doesn't looks so "clear". It's just a matter of brightness which can be set in the game's options. The grain is quite disturbing and i don't see any reason for using it, and the game doesn't seem having much technically evolved since the first F.E.A.R, i'm a bit disappointed, so for me it will be a non-buy.
PS3 version looks to be running at an lower resolution and with less detail and is way too washed out. The textures on the 360 version are better.
It looks washed out like every game does with the RGB setting on limited. Play the game with RGB on full and it will look alot better.
The 360 has an RGB feature as well is it turned on or off? lol Anyways thats not going to boost resolution and add testures ;)
Dunno, but I know for sure that Gametrailers for a whole year talked down on PS3 graphics, saying they looked "washed out". It all turned out to be that they hadn't put RGB on full. Then they didn't want to do it either, they wanted to review games on the consoles with standard settings. Which is where gametrailers made themselves look like idiots, since the 360 doesn't have HD as standard setting. -.-
why dis thinks a 360 game is better then a ps3 game thats a shocker i never wouldve seen that coming lol. i couldn't care less as long as its fun edit: apparently gaming is not about fun anymore its about stupid fanboy arguments and ridiculous fud :)
Its funny that he can somehow cont the resolution, from alow resolution video. Its like a photocopy of a photocopy, what do you expect to learn from it moron?
Ok the PS3 version looks better are you happy?
i dont care witch one looks better its subjective play games and be mary :)
The textures are the same on both, I've played both. The resolution is the same on both. the only difference is in the way the two systems do anti-aliasing (xbox 360 version looking slightly sharper )but the lighting looks more realistic on the PS3, softer looking and less shiny than the Xbox 360 version. Both have film grain but its more prominent on the PS3, probably has to do with the difference in lighting, but I think the PS3 version looks better overall. To be completely honest the differences are so minimal that if you like the game you should be happy with either of the console versions.
Deciding if I want to get this for PC or ps3, will check the demo for ps3 and see what I think, leaning towards PC though.
I played the PC demo, that will definitely be what I'm playing this on