Gamer 2.0: Tomb Raider: Underworld Review

There is no multiplayer found in Underground and with a campaign that ends abruptly and only lasts about 6-7 hours, some fans might get a little peeved that more was not offered. While Underground was a solid addition to the Tomb Raider franchise, a more polished combat and stretched out story mode would have been welcome. Fans of the series will no doubt enjoy what Underground brings to the table, and if newcomers can look past the fast-moving story and clunky fighting and enjoy the adventure elements for what they are, then they surely will have a good time as well.

Gameplay: 7
Visuals: 9
Audio: 8
Value: 6
Quality: 8

The story is too old to be commented.
Nicknasty3634d ago

Dumb, what in the world would you need multiplayer for? Its Tomb Raider you douche! Great game i think and its all about the single player experience. Too many people think every game has to have multiplayer. I dont even play much multiplayer because its kinda boring to me and to repetitive. Its not a 6 to 7 hr game either, thats false. It lasts alot longer than that. This guy must be cheating or something.

Baba19063634d ago

i agree. i liked it too. and it took me more than 6-7 hours. it didnt feel too short and the ending was pretty clear it was coming. i mean didnt he notice that lara had all the pieces to open the underworld?

sure it has some problems. but it isnt that bad.