The 360 has the headstart but could Sony have an advantage of better quality?
I was getting tired of these quick multi-platform comparisons of different sports titles and people waving them around like they really take advantage of a console's strengths like exclusives do.
I am sure the PofS3 can put out just as good if not better graphics then the 360 but what system would you rather have, one with no rumble in the controller? One where the online experience is crap? One that cost more? or the Xbox 360? That's what I thought, the Xbox 360 hands down!
These are the exact same people who did that comparison of mutlit-platfrom games by making fun of the graphics on Sonic on both the 360 and PS3. I will definetly be looking at there websit alot now that I know the website.
"The 360 has the headstart but could Sony have an advantage of better quality?" No it doesn't. Just look at COD3 or FNR3, the 360 wins hands down. See the graphics from the PS3 major title, Resistance, and the 360 major one, Gears of War, and Gears wins hands down. Plus that website out of the ancient time, doesn't work on either Firefox, nor the new IE. Dull website, dull article probably. @ Smitty below me. That's nonsense: COD3 watch this link, move over the pics to see the difference between the versions http://www.gamespot.com/fea... The 360 version is much, much sharper, has much, much more detail. Look at the last picture also, the house in the distance. The sharpness of the PS3 version reminded me of COD on the XBOX 1. Plus: Xbox Scores First Round Knock Out of PS3 http://www.xbox365.com/news... "Xbox is flat-out better both visually and mechanically," said H3's chief communications officer and world class gamer, Adrian "Hollywood" Walton. "When 'Fight Night' is played at its highest level with the highest possible resolution, everyone was able to see Xbox 360's superiority to PS3 as clear as can be on H3TV." Dipset and H3 superstar Juelz Santana was just as emphatic in his breakdown of the "Fight Night" face-off: "H3TV completely exposed that PS3's High Definition picture doesn't come close to Xbox, at least for "Fight Night." Everyone that had the opportunity to compete on both consoles scored Xbox higher right across the board." So I'm sorry for you but probably you need to put your glasses on! Go watch Resistance, look at the grass, close up stuff... You'll find it lacks sharpness and detail. It's like last gen on steroids. Even COD2 on the 360 kicks it ass as a launch title. It seems it's all because of the PS3 GPU that gives washed out colours and less detail then the 360 gives @ unixphreak1911 with that link of 20% usage of the PS3... You know that's marketingbullsh!t, right? Every console gets better games after some time, compared to the launch games. Epic has said with Gears of War they used 40% of the 360's power. Gears actually looks double as good as Resistance which uses 20% of the PS3 so in the end they do about the same right? Come on that's no logic sense. Don't eat all that marketingtalk and go watch how the games look, right here, right now. Links given above
FNR3 looks better on the PS3, and COD is essentially even.
TheMART said: Plus: Xbox Scores First Round Knock Out of PS3 http://www.xbox365.com/news... "Xbox is flat-out better both visually and mechanically," said H3's chief communications officer and world class gamer, Adrian "Hollywood" Walton. "When 'Fight Night' is played at its highest level with the highest possible resolution, everyone was able to see Xbox 360's superiority to PS3 as clear as can be on H3TV." Dipset and H3 superstar Juelz Santana was just as emphatic in his breakdown of the "Fight Night" face-off: "H3TV completely exposed that PS3's High Definition picture doesn't come close to Xbox, at least for "Fight Night." Everyone that had the opportunity to compete on both consoles scored Xbox higher right across the board." ----------------------------- ------------------------------- ------- EA's Glenn Entis (Vice President and Chief Visual Officer) said: http://ps3.qj.net/EA-using-... "We've got games coming out now where we feel we've hit maybe 20 per cent of the potential of PlayStation 3," he says. "It's going to take us a little bit of time to unleash it." ----------------------------- ------------------------------- ------- Hmmm... PS3 at around 20% utilization, and it's comparable to the 360??? 'Nuff said...
i actually think that COD looks better on the PS3 from the pics uve given. and when u say look at the house, you can clearly see that the house looks better on ps3. i dont understand why you posted them links if ur pro 360
Damn you really need glasses... You know the first picture is from the 360 and when you move over it, it's the PS3, right??? It's less detailed, it's less sharp, it has washed out colours, in the distance it has less things on screen, sky, house, whatever. I guess even glasses won't help. I officially declare you blind, or you are just a Sony fanboy that don't want to see the truth, looking through pink Barbie Ken glasses. For real. Anyone sees the 360 version is better. You want more proof of reviewers that are unbiased? http://www.gamespot.com/xbo... http://www.gamespot.com/ps3... Gamespot rated the PS3 version @ 8.2, the 360 version @ 8.8 Read it also please... "However, an inconsistent frame rate and fewer multiplayer options make the PlayStation 3 version slightly inferior to the Xbox 360 version." so it's not only the sharpness and details, it's also a choppy framerate on the PS3. Take it or leave it or go laser the eyes please
I like the 360 version more but when it comes down to it I wouldn't mind playing the PS3 version. I'd definitely miss the rumble though.
It's the exact same jpg files shown for both consoles. Enough said. XBOX360: http://image.com.com/gamesp... PS3: http://image.com.com/gamesp...
Its funny to me to see mart in a room that is for PS3 announcements, and its even funnier that he is the 3rd post. It looks to me like theMART is having buyers remorse about his 360 and is trying to find ways of justifying jumping on the XBOX bandwagon. By the way MART, the word is COLORS not COLOURS, it would serve you right to do a spell check before posting for the world to see. On to the meat of your post, consider that most of the games you cited are PORTS, and bad ones at that, if you are not familiar with what that is its a game that was made for one system and released on another machine with little to no optimization for the sole purpose of making money, in other words MARK the PS3 did not get a fair shake because the games were not optimized for the system. Gears of War looks better than than Resistance? Perhaps but how much better? Resistance is a first generation Sony game, Gears of War is a 360 2nd generation. That is similar to having a sales man that has been with the company for 10 years closing 10 accounts this year and having a kid straight out of college and having him close 8 counts that year, it goes without saying that the guy who has been there for 10 year would be very worried because of the potential the college kid has shown for how well he can do in the future. And just for your consideration MARK, think about how many PS2s were sold this holiday season. The user base Sony has has only grown so eventually most of those people who purchased a PS2 will want a PS3. The long run for the 360 is looking very interesting, I don't think Microsoft will go out of business but I believe your lack of analytical analysis and also your blind following of Microsoft is really hurting you in this post. Time will tell more than anything and you are selling Sony short even before the race has started, but I can't blame you because if I were you or MS I would be worried to. In closing MARK, you need to become MS's PR person because that is some grade A ass kissing you are engaging in my friend, make sure they send you your W-2, because taxes are coming due. What you need to do MARK is STFU, play your GOW and watch your porn on you separate HD-DVD player and leave the analysis and comment on the state of the video game industry to people with more than a grade school education. Happy gaming!
.....we only spell color that way with American english.. He might be from Canada or the UK or something thus he spells it colour and we say colour. Amercan English and British English have a lot of little differences like that. I bet he drinks a lot of tea or something too. j/k
i disagree with you, and im branded as blind? wheres the logic in that? and btw your insults are so immature and stupid, you lose all credibility to what you're saying. the colours on the ps3 look brighter as a whole, the 360s are a bit dark for my likeing. but thats my preference, my opinion, not yours. so why cant you accept that? oh bcoz i dont agree with you im a sony fan? do you actually know me? so dont jump to conclusions for gods sake. true some of the pics looks better on the 360 on the games they show - fight night etc. but i personally think that some of the ps3 pics looks a tad better than 360's. anyways, my rant has ended
C'mon people how many more times does the 360 have to prove that its the better gaming console in terms of graphics. You only need to look at the GPU for both consoles and you'll see which console has the better graphical power it doesnt take a genius to work it out. In one corner you have a nextgen GPU with unified architecture and embedded ram and in the the other we have an out dated 7800GTX you do the math... P.S why do we still not know the specs of the RSX c'mon sony what are you afraid of!!!!
is basically a freelance journalist. He's just a script reader, he has NO education in videogaming whatsoever. He appears in ads ranging from washing up powder to alchoholic beverages. I wouldn't take him seriously. for there even to be a debate, "which is better?" is bad news for the PS3. with all the so-called power it has, theoreticly, the PS3 SHOULD have blown the 360 out the water AGES ago?
Than why the hell did you give this story your approval rating??? Sorry to say this but "FANBOY" confirmed for "DC RID3R"
"Than why the hell did you give this story your approval rating??? Than why the hell did you give this story your approval rating??? Sorry to say this but "FANBOY" confirmed for "DC RID3R" " first of all shorty, if you want a D*ck to jump on, catch a cab to your local g*y-bar, my python is for WOMEN only. I gave this story approval because this is a "heart warming" news article for PS3/sony fans. Just because I prefer teh 360 (best online games, gamers, gaming network), that doesn't mean I'm not interested in other game related news! Third, your writing style is VERY similar to achira a.k.a G-string hooker. I PITY TEH FOOL! psst psst (spit)
No I'm not "achira" and I do not like "achira" myself.
^^ If they can't get their website to work properly on Firefox I sure can trust them to know something about hardware specific.
Who the hell doesn't support Firefox these days? Not worth looking at now...
i dont care about the graphic. i care about the games. Sony has the best games since PS1. I care about Bluray movies too.
You're absolutely right Sony really knew what they were doing when they first came to the market. And for those who love blu-ray this is a dream come true, but gamers want evolution and Sony isn't proving that they can do that just yet. They probably just need time like MS did with Gears, R6 vegas etc, but as of right now games wise Sony isn't bringing much to the table when they could be romping the market.
NO they dont, but just wait until all the fans boys that think the PS3 graphics looks better show up.BUT..... I know what there gonna say JUST GIVE THE PS3 A YEAR THEN WE'LL SEE!!
To be honest, I'm one of the very lucky European people who has both a PS3 and an Xbox 360. I play both on a 40" Sony Bravia KDLW2000 LCD TV. PS3 is through HDMI and the Xbox is still through the inferior Component cable. To be honest... I was suprised, the Xbox version (Even through it's component cable) had slightly more detail to the images than it's PS3 counterpart on COD3. But upon examination I noticed that the lighting on the xbox360 was GLARING and often produced paradoxial results (For instance light shining through walls, overused lighting in dark areas) It was basically....just horrible. Annoyed at this I did some research and found out that the PS3 infact has 128bit HDR, which is far higher than the Xbox 360 thus causing the xbox 360 to Bloom it's lighting. I certainly do not think the Xbox 360 is capable of producing better graphics with it's yesterdays technology, but I do think that developers should exploit the Cell and RSX to get more out of it. This brings me to the conclusion that when I play games on the PS3 I'm seeing them as the developers wanted me to see them, when you play games on the 360 you see them in a distored sense.
great comment there. i supported sony all the way.
Wow "HandShandy" I think you got your system's mixed up there, but hey it just might be my opinion along with GameSpot.com opinion too. Link- http://www.gamespot.com/fea...
but specs are ONLY specs :( Fact is that yes, the ps3 is very powerfull, and isn't showing it's full capabilities atm (2008/9) :( Fact is that in order to produce that power for optimized ps3 games costs enormous GUAP!!! Way too much money for most dev's :( Fact is that with the ps3 installation base where it is at the moment(1,360,351- nexgenwars.com), it doesn't make sense to release these titles until the amount of ps3 sku's in homes has risen dramatically (I estimate around the 9-10 million mark)and becomes financially viable :( Fact is most ps owners play iso backups/pirated games(if your heart just jumped, I mean YOU)), hence the dreadfull software sales that befall the ps2+psp (110 million ps2's sold, how many software titles have eclipsed the 10 million mark?) :( Fact is MOST ps3 owners will wait for modchips and hacks to appear on the PS3 for the EXACT same purpose, again halting software sales, and therefore "making truly OPTIMIZED games for the ps3" seem EVEN less financially viable :( Fact is teh Xbox 360 has the best online games, the best online gamers, the best online network, and 10,426,648 owners :] FACT
"I certainly do not think the Xbox 360 is capable of producing better graphics with it's yesterdays technology, but I do think that developers should exploit the Cell and RSX to get more out of it." Oh please. How much bull can you bring? Yesterdays technology. A triple core 3.2 Ghz CPU isn't certainly yesterdays technology. The GPU of the 360 is more advanced then the PS3 one. That GPU is yesterdays PC technology, because Sony thought the Cell could do the GPU tasks also. Late in their development process they found out they needed a GPU, ran to Nvidia with a bag of money and asked what they could get for it. Nvidia then took a standard GPU of the shelves and said here you are. The Cell and GPU are not optimal together as the 360 CPU and GPU are special build. John Carmack says that, other say it. The Cell might be a new form of CPU build, but also stated it's not optimal for gaming, it is for videodecoding, that's why in combination with the BluRay player makes it a videoplayer first and have some games on top. But not the best, and certainly not the best gaming experience with the lack of a PREMIUM online service. Just simple as that. Plus, you talk about lightning... Well why is it then that night levels on the 360 in COD3 look like they should and the PS3 is washed out no night, but a sun coming up somewhere where it doesn't belong? Why is it that all the lighting in other games, including FNR3 isn't good? Why is it that shadows and lightning in for example football games are so wrong on PS3?
You do know the Xbox 360 uses a proto ATI RS600 GPU chip that you can't even buy yet. Most cross platform games should look better because they have had more time to work on the games. How does HDR lighting look worst then non-HDR lighting? If their are problems with the lighting its not the technology its a mistake by the devs. Whats next?, I FOUND A GLITCH IN TDU itz becuz of Xbot 360 has inferer technolgy. I've been following these two consoles long enough to know the difference between them and one lousy video isn't going to change that.
same with cross platform games. What developer is really going to spend the money or time to makes games look better for one systme or another. Graphics on exclusive titles, though difficult to compare, is the only way comparisions can be made between the two systems graphical capacities.
Just compare GOD OF WAR on ps2 to it's original titles - now that's almost a generation leap and it runs perfectly well on my 5year old ps2. All games will improve in graphics, and that means the xbox360 as well. As far as I know we're not even threading games yet, so the xbox has those other two cores to play with. But then the ps3 has a lot to play with, and the improvements will come. As the thing says, when you're working to the strengths of a certain machine then the graphics will be much better - of course ports dont look as good, because they were working to the strengths of the 360. Of course it's about time...when have 1st generation games ever looked good?
About God of War "the first game had some of the best graphics ever achieved on a PlayStation 2, so no one will be disappointed. Some of my fellow editors even commented that the game's in-game graphics looked almost like CG." I rest my case - if ps2 games can look this good, then the future looks good.