Exclusive: Quantum Of Solace - PS3 VS Xbox 360 video

Eurogamer Portugal published an exclusive video comparing the two versions. Enjoy!

[HighDefinition]

If you cover sh!t w/ syrup, it doesn`t make them pancakes.

[BBCnewsrocks]

is better than your crap

[Panthers]

I heard this game was really fun.

[Danja]

The movie was great , the game uhh...not really..

The PS3 has better textures....

[SL1M DADDY]

No, not even syrup can help. It goes along with the age old saying, "you can't polish a turd".

[jack who]

but teh cell

[PirateThom]

http://i35.tinypic.com/25hz...

Bu bu bu t3h xenon... :(

[theEnemy]

lol owned.

[Magic_The_Celt]

OUCH after an owning like that your butt must be pretty sore huh jack?

[dj_funky]

the textures on the ps3 is def better.. just look at the moutians.

[InMyOpinion]

That's because the PS3 version lacks depth of field. The PS3 version has more v-sync issues and jaggies(also clearly visible at the beginning and at 0:31).

At 1:03 you'll notice that the 360 displays particle effects when helicopter fire hits the wall, the PS3 doesn't.

At 1:35 you don't need eagle vision to see that the lighting and weather effects look much better on the 360. The PS3 version is more or less pitch black.

[gambare]

I played both versions Jenzo, and both versions got different graphical issues and the game itself is awful.

[thewhoopimen]

Jenzo you call that depth of field? Where does your supposed depth of field shift focus from foreground to background or vice versa? Lets see... never. Look at the video of the enemy falling on the last video... i don't see a depth of field shift when he hits the ground... do you? I don't! The ground is still blurry! I call that background... vaseline effect and its prevalent throughout the video. It is a blur not a depth of field.

[PirateThom]

It's kind of a mess on both consoles.

Actually.

Even though this was lead on 360, PS3 wins by a mile.

http://i35.tinypic.com/25hz...

Seriously, what the hell Treyarch?

[theEnemy]

Err now that was just plain BS by Treyarch.

The 360 part is like been blurred to death.

[ChileanBoy]

yea when i looked at that last part ps3 wins, but overall they look almost exactly the same.

ps3 will eventually win on all of them. once the companies get more used to the newer technology

[Xi]

what "newer" technology?

It doesn't even have unified shader technology.

[LeonSKennedy4Life]

"unified shader technology"

You're aware that "unified shader technology" is a made-up phrase, correct?

[Panthers]

I love when clueless people try to sound like they know what they are talking about.

[heroicjanitor]

The 360 actually has it but nvidia themelves have said it is pretty poor and most people don't want to use it for certain calculations and end up using the cpu instead... He only mentioned it because as the saying goes "if you can't blind them with brilliance confuse them with jargon" or something along those lines..

[LeonSKennedy4Life]

It is fake. Anti-aliasing would be a good term to replace it though.

The PS3 is more than capable of shading properly. If you've seen Killzone 2 in action, you'll know what I mean. The Cell is able to calculate anything you can throw at it. Why rely on RAM when you have processing power not seen by any PC retailing for under four-thousand dollars?

[thewhoopimen]

haha... unified shader technology. When has it been ever been an educated move to throw out marketing fudge jargon as real "tech". Check out my iAutoSync podcal superfrump texturizers!~ It Pwns all cuz of it's cool name.

[gaminoz]

I think the outdoors at the beginning and the indoors at the end show PS3 looking better, but the rooftops bit looks better on 360.

[achira]

better on the ps3. but the graphics in this game are not the best. i am a bit disappointed.

[LeonSKennedy4Life]

Who cares? The game sucks anyway.

[pain777pas]

There are more particle effects in the 360 so you know that they have different systems for that so they did not port to the PS3. However the textures seem to be better on the PS3 than the 360. For the record I may not even rent this game though. The movie was enough thanks.

[FernandoMartinez]

PS3 wins this one, the 360 has a weird blur to it, seen very nice in the last fight scene of the video.

[mynd]

360= Depth of field effect
PS3= None

It's overused on the 360, but from a technical point of view, the 360 version is superior, from an artistic point of view, I wish they wouldn't depth blur so much. There is no need for it on that fight scene at the end. Overused special effect.

[chanto23]

to me depth of field means "lack of detail"...

PS3 looks wayyyy better...

[mynd]

I'm not sure about "way better" , but it looks sharper in some situations. It's being abused basically, just because they can blur it, doesn't mean they should. The opening scene with the mountains in the background, it looks appropriate, but that final fight scene?, what a joke.

[DiabloRising]

Anyone else think blur and depth of field are being ABUSED instead of used to improve visuals this generation?

[mynd]

Yip

[Magic_The_Celt]

PS3 looks far better, jesus lol.

[eastcoast]

maybe its me, but on the museum level on ps3....well did someone turn out the lights? i also think that the blurring on xbox is more in keeping with the filmic effect. when it needs to show detail it looks better on 360

[rockbottom3076]

edges it out on the game on the average, BUT PS3 does seem to do some things better and the blurry mess towards the end of the video makes me glad I got the PS3 version. Ps its not a bad game just very short!