See how the Xbox 360 and PS3 versions of Treyarch's WWII FPS compare.
A lot of people are quick to say the wii is winning this generation, yet I don't see many wii vs PS3 or wii vs. 360 posts...why is that?
Fanboy wars. We don't see PC VS PS3 and X360. We all know PC blows them away graphic wise.
The 360 version does look a bit sharper and I bought the PS3 version. Kudos to Infinity Ward for making Call of Duty 4 a perfectly identical game across both platforms. I dont give a sh!t about Treyarch.
This is just LAME.... Is it just me or are people not tired of this videos every time a new game comes out :/
360 looks sharp.. but it's a bad sharp... not the one i wanna look at.. this video comparison is stupid.. i'm running COD WAW on my ps3 at 1080p... so.. fuk what you think
Looks the same across both platforms... Nothing to see here...just the world in constant rotation.
I see this trend of multiplatform games looking equal or slightly better on the PS3 to continue throughout next year and beyond. But, you can only play next generation games on the PS3...
"360 looks sharp.. but it's a bad sharp... not the one i wanna look at.. this video comparison is stupid.. i'm running COD WAW on my ps3 at 1080p... so.. fuk what you think" Dude, are you crying or something? How is being sharp bad? There's oversharpening your TV but you know, that's a TV setting. There's no such thing as "Bad sharp" in a game. It has AA, it has cleaner textures, and that's bad? OK. I love how all of you are brushing aside this comparison for the PS3 over 360 Fallout 3 comparison. It's not lame when the PS3 is winning but it is when the 360 is winning? OK. Disagrees are everywhere, looks like everyone here is crying. :'( On another note, anyone notice the achievement on the 360 version when the Japanese soldier on fire jumps on Pvt. Ryan? This quite obvious to people who have the 360 version but it's Saving Private Ryan 10G. :D
but not from this site, the video just says BUFFERING, BUFFERING, BUFFERING,BUFFERING, BUFFERING, BUFFERING, then plays a little, then BUFFERING, BUFFERING, BUFFERING,BUFFERING, BUFFERING, BUFFERING, then plays a little, then BUFFERING, BUFFERING, BUFFERING,BUFFERING, BUFFERING, BUFFERING, then plays a little, then BUFFERING, BUFFERING, BUFFERING,BUFFERING, BUFFERING, BUFFERING, then plays a little The worst site I have ever seen to watch a video on, anyone else have this buffering problem? I have a 10 MB connection!
Both games look identical to me......and plays identical...and thats what matter that no-one on either side is getting shafted...
OMG are people not sick of these videos already do people HAVE to compare every multiplatform release??? its a god damn joke!
You can also get a trophy in PS3 for saving Private Ryan from the flaming Jap
It's just kinda messed up when any multiplatform isn't on the same level for the systems they come out on, the 360 version looks sharper with better tones , and effects by a bit. When he cut the guys neck the amount blood that went on the wall is more & looks better compared to ps3. Reveiws lik this are good because gamers can catch the companies in their act bfore buying the game, instead of buying the game and seeing if they get skrewed over or not. P.S. Nobody is tired of these vidoes if yu are why are yu here dip sh!ts.
Both versions look bad. My bad, all of them do especially the last gen including Wii lmao! TGSI
The 360 version looks slightly sharper on this comparison video. Which is good since you have to pay more to enjoy the game on the 360!!
but the 360 version is less gimped, probably because the hardware is much simpler to work with. Cutscene animations are good.
People seem to forget that no matter what system a game is developed on the goal of the developer is to make them look and play the same. Only when a developer totally fails with one system does it really matter. When you have to split hairs as to which is better than the other, then you are taking it too far. Perhaps if the goal with multiplat games was to optimize it completely for each system independently, then there would be reason to compare like this. I am getting Fallout 3 for 360 because of the DLC not the graphics. I've seen it and it looks just fine. I'm getting this for PS3, because the people I want to play this with are on my PSN friends list. Graphic differences like this are a non issue.
I'm gonna agree with most people that the 360 version is just a tiny micron of a pixel hair sharper. But if there wasn't this side by side comparison, I wouldn't be able to tell a difference.
at the beginning, when the guy is gettin beaten you can see a guy standing in the background. On 360 that guy has a backpack and other crap on, in the ps3 it is just a flat texture on the guy. mabe they ran outa time and didnt put that in. Other than that they are pretty similar.
Casually looking: Identical Looking hard: Gun textures and rock textures on the 360 are sharper, seems like AA on the 360 version. Neither version looks that great anyways.
Actually.. the PC has that potential, but not ALL PC's can run these games better than the next generation consoles.
CODs always had low requirements compared to other PC games.
I play CoD 4 with 3 year old tech with highest settings at 1920 x 1200 and average 85 fps (using Fraps). Only desktops still running Pentium 2's would have a hard time running the game.
Hard to believe that ^^^^^ Intel Core 2 Duo t5250 1.5Ghz nVidia GeForce 8600m GS 256MB 2 GB DDR2-667 PC2-5300 Windows Vista Home Premium 32bit SP1 i get 20-60FPS when i use 1024x768 and settings at default averaging about 30FPS and this is a laptop about 1.5 years old
except in some areas where the ps3 is a bit sharper ;)
Call of Duty:World at War(xBox 360) Vs KillZone 2 = KillZone 2 WINS!!! Gears of Wa*k 2:So Macho(xBox 360) Vs KillZone 2 = KillZone 2 WINS!!! Halo 3(xBox 360) Vs KillZone 2 = KillZone 2 WINS!!! So the... .____....____....____ |.......|...|................ .| |____|...|____....____| |...................|........ .| |............____|...____| WINS!!! ;) + Oh Dear, POOR Micro$oft's cheaper xBox 360 still can't beat the more expensive Wii in the U.S.of.A!!!(2 Months in a row now!!!) ;-D ;-D ;-D WTF are they going to do now???
With your track record of denial, I don't even need to watch it to know the 360 won.
It's obvious the 360 version looks better. PS3 fanboy denial notwithstanding.
Everyone look at these time frames. 00:24-00:27 Look at the Prisoner of War's head. Which look blurrier?
there are silly things like the backpack is missing from the PS3 version on the guy outside giving someone a beating for some reason Big deal darkequitus:PSN/XBL
Watch the lighting on the ceiling at the beginning. It's better on the 360. Also, there are more particle effects in the 360 version (like when the soldier gets his throat slit and the blood sprays on the wall). It also looks sharper than the PS3 version and has less jaggies. Other than that they are identical.
I looked at the same scenes and thought that the ps3 version looked better. Go figure... This game is near identical, move along people, nothing to see here.
Dont panic. I have figured this all out. To see the difference you first need to set your monitor to "fanboy", should all be clear then.
Cheers mate, Bubbles for you. That was clever and very funny.
Well unless me and Jenzo need to get our eyes fixed, I think he is right in saying their is a slight slight edge to the 360, the blood on the wall was more evident, there seems to be less blur on the 360, they look very similar but that's what I see. Wanna give me 6 disagrees now?
I'll give you another one for shts and giggles.
Early morning here and I'm already laughing! Thanks mate!
I tried it and it works! Great comment, still laughing! Cheers.
yup, bubbles Fishy, hahahaha
Chuckles...you got me fishy ~ bubbles
I agree with Jenzo on this one. But I think not a significant difference to make a decision which to buy (for people who need that). PS3 is still good, though, but 360 is sharper.
@Jenzo The blood squirting is due to COD4's dynamic character engine. It's going to be different again and again and again. Look at the character models of the older soldiers that get's stabbed by the U.S. marines. They are different from the 360 version to the PS3 version. But in actuality, they will be different again when you reload the same level. Just like COD4, people used to compare "why is the soldier's hand in the helicopter different?" This is no different. But by all means if your happy about the 360 version being "superior" then you need to re-think the next 30-40 years of your life.
Awesome Fishy. xD They look the same to me.
What's the point of comparing turds?
agreed the game doesn't really have a good look to it, not sure if it is the environments or what but things just don't look right
My turd has a higher sweetcorn content than yours. There's virtually no difference, and who's going to play them side by side to notice the differences anyway?
Videogamer are quick with their comparisons these days, used to always be GT first, guess they want the hits. Regarding the video, yeah, both are COD-WaW.
That's all right. I want to see how the games compare. Videogamer doesn't judge. They just put the videos up. No need to flame, that's just for the people on N4G. Others might be able to just watch the video and make up their own mind for what ever reason.
what the Jap commander used to burn this guy's face? Was it his face, his eyes or his ears?
He burns the soldier's eye with a cigar.
for no real reason it seems. At least some of the disagreers could make an effort to say what they saw and why they disagree with you.
I think the game is crap compared to COD: 4. That's the last time I buy a game from Treyarch. IW is the only one I trust now for the COD franchise.
I thought Treyarch did a better job. Oh well what ever people just like to be difficult I guess. You dont buy games for me and I dont buy games for you, thank god.
What's with the hate for Treyarch, man? COD3 was the worst COD so far, but it was far from terrible and they did throw it together in well under a year thanks to pressure from their publisher. Other than that they seem like a solid enough dev house. Their Spiderman games were about as good as movie license games can get and their new COD game is a huge improvement over COD3. In Treyarch I see a dev house with a bad rep because of some bad luck they had with licensing issues and publisher woes, trying to redeem themselves in the eyes of gamers and become a legitimate dev house. Give them a chance. It is Call of Duty after all. They could have put out any old piece of crap and made millions, but they actually put in a good effort.
The thing is, it's virtually CoD4 with new skins, and there taking the credit. I can see why IW are angry to be honest.
IW is pissed at Activision, over a comment made by one of the publisher's employees about both games, not at Treyarch.
Xbox 360 version is sharper but textures look pretty much the same resolution.
The 360 vesion is much sharper and clearer, and for that reason detail is more apparent. Anyone who tries to deny that is either blind or they are just denying it because they are fans of the PS3 and can't stomach the truth.
here we go again.. hold on lemme watch ¬_¬
Do not forget to put on your bifocal glasses please.
i only watched a minute or two since i dont wanna ruin it (dont have it yet) but they both looked identical
The 360 is sharper than the competition...
^ sigh no it isnt man you know it isnt they look the same
If you think that looked the same, you're blind.
to be honest unless you're doing a comparison like this there is no way you would pick up on these monor differences (and that only if u look hard). the main thing is that the game runs well which it does on both but i guess if people wish to debate which is better then fair enough cus its always gonna be like this lol
Game looks ok across both platforms. Nothing mind-boggling.
By the way, that is one spiffy avatar! LOL
Screw the comparison crap they both look close enough. What got me about this video was the sheer violence and in some ways disrespect to true fallen soliders. I don't want my kids ever seeing anything like this in a game even though I'm sure they will one way or another.Looks good though but a little to realistic and disturbing. I wonder whats going to happen when somebody makes a game about a serial killer sicko, or a molester. Games might not be able to scare us yet but soon I fear some stories that will mess up some people.
serial killer stuff has already been done though.
Not sure who but I could imagine one day developers making very realistic stories about real life sick people. Eerie times are ahead of us and it's only natural for somebody to take it there.